期刊论文详细信息
BMC Health Services Research
Implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field
Elizabeth H Bradley4  Negalign Berhanu3  Ruth Lawson5  Leulseged Ageze1  Erika Linnander4  Dawit Tatek4  Abraham Mengistu2  Jennifer W Thompson4  Zahirah McNatt4 
[1] Abt Associates, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia;Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia;Jimma University College of Public Health and Medical Sciences, Jimma, Ethiopia;Yale University School of Public Health, 60 College Street, P.O. Box 208034, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8034, USA;Department for International Development, Abuja, Nigeria
关键词: Healthcare reform;    Ethiopia;    Decentralization;    Governance;   
Others  :  1132713
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-178
 received in 2013-04-03, accepted in 2014-04-08,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Decentralization through the establishment of hospital governing boards has been touted as an effective way to improve the quality and efficiency of hospitals in low-income countries. Although several studies have examined the process of decentralization, few have quantitatively assessed the implementation of hospital governing boards and their impact on hospital performance. Therefore, we sought to describe the functioning of governing boards and to determine the association between governing board functioning and hospital performance.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study with governing board chairpersons to assess board (1) structure, (2) roles and responsibilities and (3) training and orientation practices. Using bivariate analysis and multivariable regression, we examined the association between governing board functioning and hospital performance. Hospital performance indicators: 1) percent of hospital management standards met, measured with the Ethiopian Hospital Reform Implementation Guidelines and 2) patient experience, measured with the Inpatient and Outpatient Assessment of Healthcare surveys.

Results

A total of 92 boards responded to the survey (96% response rate). The average percentage of EHRIG standards met was 58.1% (standard deviation (SD) 21.7 percentage points), and the mean overall patient experience score was 7.2 (SD 2.2). Hospitals with greater hospital management standards met had governing boards that paid members, reviewed performance in several domains quarterly or more frequently, developed new revenue sources, determined services to be outsourced, reviewed patient complaints, and had members with knowledge in business and financial management (all P-values < 0.05). Hospitals with more positive patient experience had governing boards that developed new revenue sources, determined services to be outsourced, and reviewed patient complaints (all P-values < 0.05).

Conclusions

These cross-sectional data suggest that strengthening governing boards to perform essential responsibilities may result in improved hospital performance.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 McNatt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150304055712237.pdf 219KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Bossert TJ: Decentralization and governance in health. USAID Health 2020 Policy Brief. 2008. http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/resource/detail/1974 webcite
  • [2]Partners for Health Reformplus: Insights for Implementers: decentralization and health system reform, Issue in brief. Bethesda, Maryland: Abt Associates; 2002.
  • [3]Ramesh M, Wu X, He AJ: Health governance and healthcare reforms in China. Health Policy Plan 2013. doi:10.1093/heapol/czs109
  • [4]Bossert TJ, Beauvais JC: Decentralization of health systems in Ghana, Zambia, Uganda and the Philippines: a comparative analysis of decision space. Health Policy Plan 2002, 17(1):14-31.
  • [5]McDonagh KJ: Hospital governing boards: a study of their effectiveness in relation to organizational performance. J Healthc Manag 2006, 51(6):377-389.
  • [6]Collins D, Njeru G, Meme J, Newbrander W: Hospital autonomy: the experience of Kenyatta National Hospital. Int J Health Plann Manage 1999, 14(2):129-153.
  • [7]Eid F: Hospital governance and incentive design: the case of corporatized government hospitals in Lebanon. Policy Research Working Paper 2727. The World Bank: Washington, D.C; 2001.
  • [8]Govindaraj R, Obuobi A, Enyimayew N, Antwi P, Ofsu-Amaah S: Hospital autonomy in Ghana: the experience of Kore Bu and Komfo Anokye teaching hospitals. Data for Decision Making Project. 1996. http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/ihsg/publications/pdf/No-41.PDF webcite
  • [9]Govindaraj R, Chawla M: Recent experiences with hospital autonomy in developing countries -- what can we learn? Data for Decision Making Project. 1996. http://apin.harvard.edu/ihsg/publications/pdf/No-32-2.pdf webcite
  • [10]Sarp N: An example of health sector reforms in Turkey: hoslital decentralization (health enterprises). J Anakara Med Sch 2002, 55(1):9-18.
  • [11]Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Ministry of Health: Ethiopian Hospital Management Initiative: Ethiopian Hospital Reform Implementation Guidelines. 2012, 1:2012.
  • [12]Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Ministry of Health: Ethiopian Hospital Management Initiative: Ethiopian Hospital Reform Implementation Guidelines. 2010., 2
  • [13]Webster TR, Mantopoulos J, Jackson E, Cole-Lewis H, Kidane L, Kebede S, Abebe Y, Lawson R, Bradley EH: A brief questionnaire for assessing patient healthcare experiences in low-income settings. Int J Qual Health Care 2011, 23(3):258-268.
  • [14]Krause N: A comprehensive strategy for developing closed-ended survey items for use in studies of older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2002, 57(5):S263-274.
  • [15]Alexander JA, Lee SY, Wang V, Margolin FS: Changes in the monitoring and oversight practices of not-for-profit hospital governing boards 1989–2005: evidence from three national surveys. Med Care Res Rev 2009, 66(2):181-196.
  • [16]Alexander JA, Ye Y, Lee SY, Weiner BJ: The effects of governing board configuration on profound organizational change in hospitals. J Health Soc Behav 2006, 47(3):291-308.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:12次 浏览次数:6次