Online discussion for block teaching in postgraduate health professionals’ curriculum: the Ethiopian experience

BMC Medical Education

Bineyam Taye¹ 

[1] School of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

关键词: Ethiopia;    Block teaching;    Online discussion;   

Others  :  1135634
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6920-14-29

 received in 2013-04-06, accepted in 2014-02-10,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Online discussions as a method of instruction are a new approach in Ethiopia. There is no previous study in the Ethiopian context that has assessed students’ engagement and learning experience using this instruction method, which may offer a valuable complement to other instruction methods for intensive block teaching in a resource-limited environment. The aim of this study was to assess the value of online discussions in supporting students’ engagement and interaction with their peers and teachers in a block teaching postgraduate health professionals’ curriculum.

Methods

The research was conducted at Addis Ababa University College of Health Sciences, School of Medical Laboratory Sciences (SMLS), which has structured the curriculum around intensive block teaching. Between December 2011 and February 2012, two groups of full-time (N = 21) and part-time (N = 52) postgraduate students participated in online discussions as part of a Biostatistics and Research Methods module, in addition to other instructional methods. Every week, the course instructor initiated the online discussion by posting an assignment and articles with a few discussion questions. To evaluate the participants’ collective learning experience, the content of the email messages generated during these online discussions was analyzed qualitatively.

Result

A total of 702 emails were exchanged during the three week module, of which 250 emails (35.6%) were posted by full-time students and 452 emails (64.4%) by part-time Continuing Education Program (CEP) students. During the online discussion forum, students identified different statistical data analysis tools and their application for given data sets. In terms of message contents, 67% of full-time and 64% of part-time students’ messages were classified as learning experiences. However, a slightly higher proportion of part-time students’ posts were social messages. The majority of students in both groups reported high levels of satisfaction with their online experience.

Conclusion

Online discussion could be a valuable addition to face-to-face classroom teaching to improve students’ engagement and interaction in an intensive block teaching postgraduate curriculum where learners are engaged in a full work load with academic studies.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Taye; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Addis Ababa University: Procedures of Modularization and Block Teaching. Ethiopia: Masters program of the Addis Ababa University; 2009. Available from http://www.aau.edu.et webcite
• [2]Davies MW: Intensive teaching formats: a review. Issues Educ Res 2006, 16(1):1-20.
• [3]Daniel EL: A review of time-shortened courses across disciplines. Coll Stud J 2000, 34:298-308.
• [4]Beattie K, James R: Flexible coursework delivery to Australian postgraduates: how effective is the teaching and learning? High Educ 1997, 33(2):177-194.
• [5]Harasim L: Teaching and learning online: issues in designing computer-mediated graduate courses. Can J Educ Commun 1987, 16(2):117-135.
• [6]Cook D: Web-based learning: pros, cons and controversies. Clin Med 2007, 7:37-42.
• [7]Moberg TF, Whitcomb ME: Educational technology to facilitate medical students’ learning: background paper 2 of the medical school objectives project. Acad Med 1999, 74:1146-1150.
• [8]Anshu , Bansal P, Mennin SG, Burdick WP, Singh T: Online faculty development for medical educators: experience of South Asian program. Educ Health 2008, 21(3):175.
• [9]Knowles MS, Holton EF, Swanson RA: The Adult Learner. 5th edition. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998.
• [10]Palo Alto, CA, USA: SurveyMonkey Inc; http://www.surveymonkey.com webcite
• [11]Hara N, Bonk CJ, Angeli C: Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instr Sci 2000, 28:115-152.
• [12]Kim S, Kolko BE, Greer TH: Web-based problem-solving learning: third-year medical students’ participation in end-of-life care virtual clinic. Comput Hum Behav 2002, 18(6):761-772.
• [13]Lipponen L, Rahikainen M, Lallimo J, Hakkarainen K: Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning. Learn Instr 2003, 13:487-509.
• [14]Henri F: Computer conferencing and content analysis. In Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers. Edited by Kaye AR. New York: Springer; 1992:115-136.
• [15]Qualitative content analysis http://www.southalabama.edu/coe/bset/johnson/lectures/lec17.pdf webcite
• [16]Kim S, Farber S, Kolko BE, Kim W, Ellsbury KE, Greer T: Faculty and student participation in online discussions of palliative care scenarios. Fam Med 2006, 38(7):494-499.
• [17]Dongre AR, Chacko TV, Banu S, Bhandary S, Sahasrabudhe RA, Philip S, Deshmukh PR: On-line capacity-building program on “analysis of data” for medical educators in the South Asia Region: a qualitative exploration of our experience. Educ Health 2010, 10(online):425. Available from: http://www.educationforhealth.net webcite
• [18]Woo MA, Kimmick JV: Comparison of Internet versus lecture instructional methods for teaching nursing research. J Prof Nurs 2000, 16:132-139.
• [19]Mc Kenzie W, Murphy D: “I hope this goes somewhere”: evaluation of an online discussion group. Aust J Educ Technol 2000, 16:239-257.
• [20]Taradi SK, Taradi M: Expanding the traditional physiology class with a synchronous online discussions and collaborative projects. Adv Physiol Educ 2004, 28:73-78.
• [21]Ludlow JB, Platin E: A comparison of Web page and slide/tape for instruction in periapical and panoramic radiographic anatomy. J Dent Educ 2000, 64:269-275.
• [22]Francis B, Mauriello SM, Phillips C, Englebardt S, Grayden SK: Assessment of online continuing dental education in North Carolina. J Cont Educ Health Prof 2000, 20(2):76-84.
• [23]Moore MG, Kearsley G: Distance Education – A Systems Review. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company; 1996.