Psychosocial workload and stress in the workers’ representative

BMC Public Health

Matthias Nübling¹  Salvatore Giacomuzzi²  Martin Rabe² 

[1]FFAS – Freiburg Research Centre of Occupational and Social Medicine, Freiburg, Germany

[2]Institute for Public Health, UMIT, The Health and Life Sciences University Hall, Tyrol, Austria

关键词: Works councils;    Trade union;    Human resources;    Industrial relations;    Psychosocial workload;   

Others  :  1162926
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-909

 received in 2012-03-01, accepted in 2012-10-04,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Using a data set of works councils of trade union IG Metal, this paper investigates psychosocial stress and strain on this specific group in comparison to employees working in administration in general (leadership and non-leadership-role) and a national reference value.

Methods

For assessing psychosocial work factors on works councils within the sector represented by the trade union IG Metal in Germany, a research by using the German standard version of COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire) was performed. The instrument includes 87 single items forming 25 aspects of strain and stress. Results from the study group of works councils were compared to those from employees working in administration and to the general population mean (COPSOQ database). Statistical analysis included t-tests, analysis of variance and multiple comparisons of means. To be significant in terms of statistics, p<0.05 (two-tailed) and a minimum deviation of 5 or more points between groups′ mean values identify the relevant values.

Results

All in all, 309 works councils from a national survey of the German chemical and metalworking industries took part in the study. 113 were full-time works council members (exempted from the duty to perform their regular work), 196 were voluntary members (acting as employee representatives on an honorary basis alongside their normal duties). Comparison between works councils and employees working in administration (leadership roles (N=1810) and non-leadership roles (N=2970)) and for employees in general (N=35.000) showed unfavourable values for works councils for most scales. Significantly higher values indicating higher strain and stress were found for the scales: emotional demands, work-privacy conflict, role conflicts, mobbing, cognitive stress symptoms and burnout. Unfavourable results were obtained for the aspects: quality of leadership, social support, sense of community and general health. Favourable findings were found on the scales: influence at work, quantity of social relations and the partly positive values for quantitative demands and commitment to the workplace.

Conclusion

Compared to the reference groups, works council members perceive the psychosocial demands of working life as more exhausting for the majority of aspects. This allows several conclusions. One reason may be the extended tasks employee representatives face, an other may be that the education of most works council members does not seem appropriate to the high demands of their managerial and executive tasks.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Rabe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Busck O, Jørgensen TH, Knudsen H, Lind J: The Transformation of Participation. Employee participation, influence and the working environment. Aalborg University, Denmark; 2008.
• [2]Burgoon B, Raess D: Globalization and Working Time: Working Hours and Flexibility in Germany. Politics Society 2009, 37(4):554-575.
• [3]Tietel E: Konfrontation - Kooperation – Solidarität. Betriebsräte in der sozialen und emotionalen Zwickmühle. Ed. Sigma, Berlin; 2006.
• [4]Minssen H, Ries C: Der Co-Manager und seine Arbeitsweise. Die interne Arbeitsorganisation von Betriebsräten im Öffentlichen Personennahverkehr. Indust Bezieh 2005, 12:367-393.
• [5]Haipter T: Works councils as actors in collective bargaining: Derogations and the development of codetermination in the German chemical and metalworking industries. Econ Ind Democr 2011, 32(4):679-695.
• [6]Rogers J, Streeck W: Works Councils:consultation, representation, and cooperation in industrial relations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago; 2004.
• [7]Doi Y: An epidemiologic review on occupational sleep research among Japanese workers. Ind Health 2005, 43:3-10.
• [8]Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Nachreiner F, Schaufeli WB: The job demands-resources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol 2001, 86:499-512.
• [9]Salanova M, Agut S, Peiro′ JM: Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: the mediation of climate. J Appl Psychol 2005, 90:1217-1227.
• [10]Fairris D, Askenazy P: Works Councils and Firm Productivity in France. J Lab Res 2010, 31:209-229.
• [11]Fakhfahk F, Pérotin V, Robinson A: Workplace Change and Productivity: Does Employee Voice Make a Difference? In The Role of Collective Bargaining in the Global Economy: Negotiating for Social Justice. Edited by Hayter S. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham; 2011.
• [12]Jones M, Jones R, Latreille P, Sloane P: Training, Job Satisfaction and Workplace Performance in Britain: Evidence from WERS 2004. IZA DP 2008., 3677
• [13]Korunkaa C, Kubiceka B, Schaufeli WB, Hoonakkerc P: Work engagement and burnout: testing the robustness of the Job Demands-Resources model. J Posit Psychol 2009, 4(3):243-255.
• [14]Rabe M, Giacomuzzi S: Training courses as a means of coping with occupational stress. ABSRC Journal 3(1):25-36.
• [15]Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Høgh A, Borg V: The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. A tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005, 31:438-489.
• [16]Rugulies R, Aust B, Pejtersen JH: Do psychosocial work environment factors measured with scales from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Quastionnaire predict register-based sickness absence of 3 weeks or more in Denmark? Scand J Public Health 2010, 38:42-50.
• [17]Bakker A, Demerouti E: The Job Demands-Resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol 2006, 22(3):309-328.
• [18]Karasek R, Theorell T: Healthy work. Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books, New York; 1990.
• [19]Karasek R, Clays E, Leynen F, De Bacquer D, Kornitzer M, Kittel F, De Backer G: High Job Strain and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Middle-Aged Men and Women From the Belgian Job Stress Study. J Occup Environ Med 2007, 49(4):360-367.
• [20]Karasek R: Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job design. Adm Sci Q 1979, 24:285-308.
• [21]De Jonge J, Kompier MAJ: A critical examination of the Demand-Control-Support Model from a work psychological perspective. Int J Stress Manag 1997, 4:235-258.
• [22]Siegrist J, Siegrist K, Weber I: Sociological concepts in the etiology of chronic disease: the case of ischemic heart disease. Soc Sci Med 1986, 22:247-253.
• [23]Siegrist J, Siegrist K, Matschinger H, Dittmann K: Typ A as a Coping Career – Towards a Conceptual and Methodological Redefinition. In Biological and Psychological Factors in Cardiovascular Disease. Edited by Schmidt TH, Dembrowski TM, Blümchen G. Springer, Heidelberg; 1986:104-126.
• [24]Walster E, Walster GW, Berscheid E: Equity: Theory and research. Allyn and Bacon, Boston; 1978.
• [25]Van Vegchel N, de Jonge J, Bosma H, Schaufeli WB: Reviewing the effort-reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies. Soc Sci Med 2005, 60:1117-1131.
• [26]De Jonge J, Bosma H, Peter R, Siegrist J: Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and employee well being: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Soc Sci Med 2000, 50:1317-1327.
• [27]Theorell T, Hasselhorn HM: On cross-sectional questionnaire studies of relationships between psychosocial conditions at work and health - are they reliable? Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2005, 78:517-522.
• [28]Johnson JV, Hall EM: “Job strain work place social support and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population”. Am J Public Health 1988, 78:1336-1342.
• [29]Meijman TF, Mulder G: Psychological aspects of workload. In Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2nd edition. Edited by Drenth PJ, Thierry H, Wolff CJ. Psychology Press, Hove; 1998:5-33.
• [30]Kristensen TS, Borg V: AMI’s spørgeskema om psykisk arbejdsmiljø. National Institute of Occupational Health, Copenhagen; 2000.
• [31]Nuebling M, Stößel U, Hasselhorn HM, Michaelis M, Hofmann F: Methoden zur Erfassung psychischer Belastungen – Erprobung eines Messinstrumentes (COPSOQ). In Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Fb 1058. Wirtschaftsverlag NW, Bremerhaven; 2005.
• [32]Nuebling M, Stößel U, Hasselhorn HM, Michaelis M, Hofmann F: Measuring psychological stress and strain at work: evaluation of the COPSOQ Questionnaire in Germany. GMS Psychosoc Med 2006, 3(5):1-14.
• [33]Nuebling M, Vomstein M, Schmidt S, Gregersen S, Dulon M, Nienhaus A: Psychosocial work load and stress in the geriatric care. BMC Publ Health 2010, 10:428. BioMed Central Full Text
• [34]Kompier M, Taris T: Understanding the causal relations between psychosocial factors at work and health – a circular process. Scand J Work Environ Health 2011, 37(4):259-261.
• [35]Kompier M: Assessing the psychosocial work environment - “subjective” versus “objective” measurement. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005, 31(6):405-408.