Resurrection of an ancestral 5S rRNA

BMC Evolutionary Biology

George E Fox¹  Qing Lu¹ 

[1]Department of Biology and Biochemistry, 3201 Cullen Blvd., University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5001, USA

关键词: ribosome evolution;    mutagenesis;    5S rRNA;    parsimony;    ancestral sequence resurrection;   

Others  :  1143534
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2148-11-218

 received in 2011-03-14, accepted in 2011-07-22,  发布年份 2011

【 摘 要 】

Background

In addition to providing phylogenetic relationships, tree making procedures such as parsimony and maximum likelihood can make specific predictions of actual historical sequences. Resurrection of such sequences can be used to understand early events in evolution. In the case of RNA, the nature of parsimony is such that when applied to multiple RNA sequences it typically predicts ancestral sequences that satisfy the base pairing constraints associated with secondary structure. The case for such sequences being actual ancestors is greatly improved, if they can be shown to be biologically functional.

Results

A unique common ancestral sequence of 28 Vibrio 5S ribosomal RNA sequences predicted by parsimony was resurrected and found to be functional in the context of the E. coli cellular environment. The functionality of various point variants and intermediates that were constructed as part of the resurrection were examined in detail. When separately introduced the changes at single stranded positions and individual double variants at base-paired positions were also viable. An additional double variant was examined at a different base-paired position and it was also valid.

Conclusions

The results show that at least in the case of the 5S rRNAs considered here, ancestors predicted by parsimony are likely to be realistic when the prediction is not overly influenced by single outliers. It is especially noteworthy that the phenotype of the predicted ancestors could be anticipated as a cumulative consequence of the phenotypes of the individual variants that comprised them. Thus, point mutation data is potentially useful in evaluating the reasonableness of ancestral sequences predicted by parsimony or other methods. The results also suggest that in the absence of significant tertiary structure constraints double variants that preserve pairing in stem regions will typically be accepted. Overall, the results suggest that it will be feasible to resurrect additional meaningful 5S rRNA ancestors as well as ancestral sequences of many different types of RNA.

【 授权许可】

   
2011 Lu and Fox; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Hillis DM, Bull JJ, White ME, Badgett MR, Molineux IJ: Experimental phylogenetics: generation of a known phylogeny. Science 1992, 255:589-592.
• [2]Liberles DA, (editor): Ancestral sequence reconstruction. Oxford University Press; 1997:1-239.
• [3]Jermann TM, Opitz JG, Stackhouse J, Benner SA: Reconstructing the evolutionary history of the artiodactyl ribonuclease superfamily. Nature 1995, 374:57-59.
• [4]Gullberg M, Tolf C, Jonsson N, Mulders MN, Savolainen-Kopra C, Hovi T, Van Ranst M, Lemey P, Hafenstein S, Lindberg AM: Characterization of a putative ancestor of coxsackievirus B5. J Virol 2010, 84:9695-9708.
• [5]Gaucher EA, Thomson JM, Burgan MF, Benner SA: Inferring the palaeoenvironment of ancient bacteria on the basis of resurrected proteins. Nature 2003, 425:285-288.
• [6]Gaucher EA, Govindarajan S, Ganesh OK: Paleotemperature trend for Precambrian life inferred from resurrected proteins. Nature 2008, 451:704-707.
• [7]Service RF: Molecular evolution: Resurrected proteins reveal their surprising history. Science 2007, 317:884-885.
• [8]Benner SA, Sassi SO, Gaucher EA: Molecular paleoscience: systems biology from the past. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 2007, 75:1-132. xi
• [9]Williams PD, Pollock DD, Blackburne BP, Goldstein RA: Assessing the accuracy of ancestral protein reconstruction methods. PLoS Computational Biology 2006, 2:e69.
• [10]Thomson JM, Gaucher EA, Burgan MF, De Kee DW, Li T, Aris JP, Benner SA: Resurrecting ancestral alcohol dehydrogenases from yeast. Nature Genetics 2005, 37:630-635.
• [11]Benner SA, Kim HJ, Yang Z: Setting the stage: the history, chemistry and geobiology behind RNA. Cold Spring Harb Perspect 2010, 2:a003541.
• [12]Belousoff MJ, Davidovich C, Zimmerman E, Caspi Y, Wekselman I, Rozenszajn L, Shapira T, Sade-Falk O, Taha L, Bashan A, Weiss MS, Yonath A: Ancient machinery embedded in the contemporary ribosome. Biochem Soc Trans 2010, 38:422-427.
• [13]Bokov K, Steinberg SV: A hierarchical model for evolution of 23S ribosomal RNA. Nature 2009, 457:977-980.
• [14]Fox GE: Origin and evolution of the ribosome. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010, 2:a003483.
• [15]Hsiao C, Mohan S, Kalahar BK, Williams LD: Peeling the onion: ribosomes are ancient molecular fossils. Mol Biol Evol 2009, 26:2415-2425.
• [16]Fox GE, Woese CR: The architecture of 5S rRNA and its relation to function. J Mol Evol 1975, 6:61-76.
• [17]Szymański M, Barciszewska MZ, Erdmann VA, Barciszewski J: 5S rRNA: structure and interactions. Biochem J 2003, 371:641-651.
• [18]Schuwirth BS, Borovinskaya MA, Hau CW, Zhang W, Vila-Sanjurjo A, Holton JM, Cate JH: Structures of the bacterial ribosome at 3.5 A resolution. Science 2005, 310:827-834.
• [19]Lee YH, Dsouza L, Fox GE: Equally parsimonious pathways through an RNA sequence space are not equally likely. J Mol Evol 1997, 45:278-284.
• [20]Brosius J: Toxicity of an overproduced foreign gene product in Escherichia coli and its use in plasmid vectors for the selection of transcription terminators. Gene 1984, 27:161-172.
• [21]Hedenstierna KOF, Lee YH, Yang Y, Fox GE: A prototype stable RNA identification cassette for monitoring plasmids of genetically engineered microorganisms. System Appl Microbiol 1993, 16:280-286.
• [22]Lee YH, Dsouza L, Fox GE: An experimental system for exploring an RNA structure space. Orgins Life Evol Biosphere 1993, 23:365-372.
• [23]Felsenstein J: Phylogenies from molecular sequence: inference and reliability. Annu Rev Genet 1988, 22:521-565.
• [24]MacDonell MT, Colwell RR: Phylogeny of the Vibrionaceae, and recommendation for two new genera, Listonella and Shewanella. System Appl Micobiol 1985, 6:171-182.
• [25]Wallace DM: Large- and small-scale phenol extraction. Meth Enzymol 1987, 152:33-41.
• [26]Godson GN, Sinsheimer RL: Use of Brij lysis as a general method to prepare polyribosomes from Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta 1967, 159:489-495.
• [27]Chao L, McBroom SM: Evolution of transposable elements: an IS10 insertion increases fitness in Escherichia coli. Mol Biol Evol 1985, 2:359-369.
• [28]Dykhuizen DE, Hartl DL: Selection in chemostats. Microbiol Rev 1983, 47:150-168.
• [29]Hartl DL, Dykhuizen DE, Miller RD, Green L, de Framond J: Transposable element IS50 improves growth rate of E. coli cells without transposition. Cell 1983, 35:503-510.
• [30]Lenski RE: Experimental study of pleiotropy and epistasis in Escherichia coli. I. Variation in competitive fitness among mutants resistant to virus T4. Evolution 1988, 42:425-432.
• [31]Lenski RE: Experimental study of pleiotropy and epistasis in Escherichia coli. II. Compensation for maladaptive effects associated with resistance to virus T4. Evolution 1988, 42:433-440.
• [32]Zhang Z, D'Souza LM, Lee YH, Fox GE: Common 5S rRNA variants are likely to be accepted in many sequence contexts. J Mol Evol 2003, 56:69-76.
• [33]Nayar M, Fox GE: Defining 5S rRNA structure space: Point mutation data can be used to predict the phenotype of multi-change variants. Mol Biol Evol 2011, in press.