Validation of the foot length measure as an alternative tool to identify low birth weight and preterm babies in a low-resource setting like Nepal: a cross-sectional study

BMC Pediatrics

Mats Målqvist⁴  Surabhi Aryal³  Ravi Vitrakoti¹  Viktoria Nelin⁴  Ashish KC² 

[1] Foundation for Maternal and Child Health Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal;United Nation’s Children’s Fund, Nepal Country Office, UN House, Pulchowk, Nepal;College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur, Nepal;International Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, University Hospital, Uppsala SE-751 85, Sweden

关键词: Nepal;    Screening tool;    Foot length;    Low birth weight;    Preterm;   

Others  :  1181768
DOI  :  10.1186/s12887-015-0361-4

 received in 2014-12-23, accepted in 2015-04-13,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

The majority of infants who die in the neonatal period are born with a low birth weight (LBW, <2500 grams), or prematurely (before 37 weeks). Most deaths among these infants could be prevented with simple, low-cost interventions like kangaroo mother care (KMC) or prevention and early identification of infection. It is difficult, however, to determine birth weight and gestational age in community settings, and therefore necessary to find an appropriate alternative screening tool that can identify LBW and preterm infants.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Nepal to compare the validity of using three different foot length measurement methods (plastic ruler, measuring tape, and paper footprint) as screening tools for identifying babies with birth weights <2000 grams or infants born preterm (<37 weeks). LBW was defined as less than 2000 grams because of the implication for use of KMC for these infants. Non-parametric receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was completed to determine which measurement method best predicted LBW and preterm birth. For the method that was the best predictor for each outcome (i.e. highest area under the curve), further analyses were completed to determine sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values of an operational screening cutoff to predict LBW or preterm birth in this setting.

Results

Of the 811 infants included in this study, 30 infants had LBW and 54 were born preterm. The plastic ruler was the measurement method with the highest area under the curve, and thus predictive score for estimating both outcomes, so operational cutoffs were identified based on this method. An operational cutoff of 7.2 cm was identified to screen for infants weighing <2000 grams at birth (sensitivity: 75.9%, specificity: 90.3%), and 7.8 cm was determined as the operational cutoff to identify preterm infants (sensitivity: 76.9%, specificity: 53.9%).

Conclusions

In Nepal, at least in community settings, foot length measurement with a hard ruler may be a valid proxy to identify at-risk infants when birth weight or gestational age is unavailable. Further studies and piloting should be conducted to identify exact cutoffs that can be used within community settings.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 KC et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R et al.. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012; 379(9832):2162-72.
• [2]Lawn JE, Davidge R, Paul VK, von Xylander S, de Graft Johnson J, Costello A et al.. Born too soon: care for the preterm baby. Reprod Health. 2013; 10 Suppl 1:S5. BioMed Central Full Text
• [3]Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee AC, Waiswa P et al.. Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014; 384(9938):189-205.
• [4]Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA. Beyond newborn survival: the world you are born into determines your risk of disability-free survival. Pediatr Res. 2013; 74 Suppl 1:1-3.
• [5]Blencowe H, Lee AC, Cousens S, Bahalim A, Narwal R, Zhong N et al.. Preterm birth-associated neurodevelopmental impairment estimates at regional and global levels for 2010. Pediatr Res. 2013; 74 Suppl 1:17-34.
• [6]Blencowe H, Vos T, Lee AC, Philips R, Lozano R, Alvarado MR et al.. Estimates of neonatal morbidities and disabilities at regional and global levels for 2010: introduction, methods overview, and relevant findings from the global burden of disease study. Pediatr Res. 2013; 74 Suppl 1:4-16.
• [7]Katz J, Lee AC, Kozuki N, Lawn JE, Cousens S, Blencowe H et al.. Mortality risk in preterm and small-for-gestational-age infants in low-income and middle-income countries: a pooled country analysis. Lancet. 2013; 382(9890):417-25.
• [8]Conde-Agudelo A, Diaz-Rossello JL. Kangaroo mother care to reduce morbidity and mortality in low birthweight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 4:CD002771.
• [9]Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, Lawn JE, Salam RA, Paul VK et al.. Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet. 2014; 384(9940):347-70.
• [10]Lawn JE, Kinney MV, Belizan JM, Mason EM, McDougall L, Larson J et al.. Born too soon: accelerating actions for prevention and care of 15 million newborns born too soon. Reprod Health. 2013; 10 Suppl 1:S6. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Lee AC, Lawn JE, Cousens S, Kumar V, Osrin D, Bhutta ZA et al.. Linking families and facilities for care at birth: what works to avert intrapartum-related deaths? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009; 107 Suppl 1:S65-85.
• [12]Lawn JE, Kerber K, Enweronu-Laryea C, Massee BO. Newborn survival in low resource settings–are we delivering? BJOG. 2009; 116 Suppl 1:49-59.
• [13]Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005; 365(9462):891-900.
• [14]Bhargava SK, Ramji S, Kumar A, Mohan M, Marwah J, Sachdev HP. Mid-arm and chest circumferences at birth as predictors of low birth weight and neonatal mortality in the community. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985; 291(6509):1617-9.
• [15]Sreeramareddy CT, Chuni N, Patil R, Singh D, Shakya B. Anthropometric surrogates to identify low birth weight Nepalese newborns: a hospital-based study. BMC Pediatr. 2008; 8:16. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Raymond EG, Tafari N, Troendle JF, Clemens JD. Development of a practical screening tool to identify preterm, low-birthweight neonates in Ethiopia. Lancet. 1994; 344(8921):524-7.
• [17]Mullany LC, Darmstadt GL, Khatry SK, Leclerq SC, Tielsch JM. Relationship between the surrogate anthropometric measures, foot length and chest circumference and birth weight among newborns of Sarlahi. Nepal Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007; 61(1):40-6.
• [18]Marchant T, Jaribu J, Penfold S, Tanner M, Armstrong SJ. Measuring newborn foot length to identify small babies in need of extra care: a cross sectional hospital based study with community follow-up in Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10:624. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Nabiwemba E, Marchant T, Namazzi G, Kadobera D, Waiswa P. Identifying high-risk babies born in the community using foot length measurement at birth in Uganda. Child Care Health Dev. 2013; 39(1):20-6.
• [20]Mukherjee S, Roy P, Mitra S, Samanta M, Chatterjee S. Measuring new born foot length to identify small babies in need of extra care: a cross-sectional hospital based study. Iran J Pediatr. 2013; 23(5):508-12.
• [21]Nepal demographic and health survey 2011. New Era, Kathmandu, Nepal; 2011.
• [22]“Smarika” Annual Report 2012-13. Paropakar Maternity and Women’s Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal; 2013.
• [23]Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM et al.. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem. 2003; 49(1):7-18.
• [24]Ashish KC, Malqvist M, Wrammert J, Verma S, Aryal DR, Clark R et al.. Implementing a simplified neonatal resuscitation protocol-helping babies breathe at birth (HBB) - at a tertiary level hospital in Nepal for an increased perinatal survival. BMC Pediatr. 2012; 12:159. BioMed Central Full Text