期刊论文详细信息
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Evaluation of a self-management patient education program for patients with chronic heart failure undergoing inpatient cardiac rehabilitation: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial
Hermann Faller3  Ronja Westphal1  Rainer Schubmann6  Ernst Knoglinger5  Ulrich Kiwus7  Gabriele Karger2  Johannes Glatz4  Bettina Seekatz3  Gunda Musekamp3  Karin Meng3 
[1] Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Rehabilitation Hospital, Am Kurpark 1, Bad Segeberg 23795, Germany;Rehabilitation Hospital Heidelberg-Königstuhl, Kohlhof 8, Heidelberg 69117, Germany;Department of Medical Psychology, Medical Sociology, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Wuerzburg, Klinikstr. 3, Würzburg 97070, Germany;Rehabilitation Center Seehof, Lichterfelder Allee 55, Teltow/Berlin 14513, Germany;Rehabilitation Hospital Kirchberg-Klinik, Kirchberg 7-11, Bad Lauterberg 37431, Germany;Rehabilitation Hospital Möhnesee, Schnappweg 2, Möhnesee 59519, Germany;Rehabilitation Center Bad Nauheim - Rehabilitation Hospital Wetterau and Taunus, Zanderstr. 30-32, Bad Nauheim 61231, Germany
关键词: Cardiac rehabilitation;    Cluster-RCT;    Evaluation;    Self-management;    Patient education;    Chronic heart failure;   
Others  :  857544
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2261-13-60
 received in 2013-05-10, accepted in 2013-08-19,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Chronic heart failure requires a complex treatment regimen on a life-long basis. Therefore, self-care/self-management is an essential part of successful treatment and comprehensive patient education is warranted. However, specific information on program features and educational strategies enhancing treatment success is lacking. This trial aims to evaluate a patient-oriented and theory-based self-management educational group program as compared to usual care education during inpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Germany.

Methods/Design

The study is a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial in four cardiac rehabilitation clinics. Clusters are patient education groups that comprise HF patients recruited within 2 weeks after commencement of inpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Cluster randomization was chosen for pragmatic reasons, i.e. to ensure a sufficient number of eligible patients to build large-enough educational groups and to prevent contamination by interaction of patients from different treatment allocations during rehabilitation. Rehabilitants with chronic systolic heart failure (n = 540) will be consecutively recruited for the study at the beginning of inpatient rehabilitation. Data will be assessed at admission, at discharge and after 6 and 12 months using patient questionnaires. In the intervention condition, patients receive the new patient-oriented self-management educational program, whereas in the control condition, patients receive a short lecture-based educational program (usual care). The primary outcome is patients’ self-reported self-management competence. Secondary outcomes include behavioral determinants and self-management health behavior (symptom monitoring, physical activity, medication adherence), health-related quality of life, and treatment satisfaction. Treatment effects will be evaluated separately for each follow-up time point using multilevel regression analysis, and adjusting for baseline values.

Discussion

This study evaluates the effectiveness of a comprehensive self-management educational program by a cluster randomized trial within inpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Germany. Furthermore, subgroup-related treatment effects will be explored. Study results will contribute to a better understanding of both the effectiveness and mechanisms of a self-management group program as part of cardiac rehabilitation.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00004841; WHO International Clinical Trials: = DRKS00004841

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Meng et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140723082240205.pdf 236KB PDF download
59KB Image download
【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]McMurray JJV, Pfeffer MA: Heart failure. Lancet 2005, 365:1877-1889.
  • [2]Bundesärztekammer (BÄK). Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF): Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Chronische Herzinsuffizienz – Langfassung. Version 1.5. 2009-2012. 2009. http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/themen/herzinsuffizienz webcite
  • [3]Dickstein K, Cohen-Solal A, Filippatos G, McMurray JJV, Ponikoski P, Poole-Wilson PA, Strömberg A, van Veldhuisen DJ, Atar D, Hoes AW, Keren A, Mebazaa A, Nieminen M, Priori SG, Swedberg K: ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008. Eur Heart J 2008, 29:2388-2442.
  • [4]Lainscak M, Blue L, Clark AL, Dahlstrom U, Dickstein K, Ekman I, McDonagh T, McMurray JJ, Ryder M, Stewart S, Stromberg A, Jaarsma T: Self-care management of heart failure: practical recommendations from the patient care committee of the heart failure association of the European society of cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2011, 13:115-126.
  • [5]McMurray JJV, Adamopoulos A, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Böhm M, Dickstein K, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fonseca C, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Jaarsma T, Køber L, Lip GYH, Maggioni AP, Parkhomenko A, Pieske BM, Popescu BA, Rønnevik PK, Rutten FH, Schwitter J, Seferovic P, Stepinska J, Trindade PT, Voors AA, Zannad F, Zeiher A: ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012. Eur J Heart Fail 2012, 14:803-869.
  • [6]Riegel B, Moser DK, Anker SD, Appel LJ, Dunbar SB, Grady KL, Gurvitz MZ, Havranek EP, Lee CS, Lindenfeld J, Peterson PN, Pressler SJ, Schocken DD, Whellan DJ, on behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research: State of the science: promoting self-care in persons with heart failure: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation 2009, 120:1141-1163.
  • [7]Barnason S, Zimmermann L, Young L: An integrative review of interventions promoting self-care of patients with heart failure. J Clin Nurs 2011, 21:448-475.
  • [8]Boren SA, Wakefield BJ, Gunlock TL, Wakefield DS: Heart failure self-management education: a systematic review of the evidence. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2009, 7:159-168.
  • [9]Ditewig JB, Blok H, Havers J, van Veenendaal H: Effectiveness of self-management interventions on mortality, hospital readmissions, chronic heart failure hospitalization rate and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 78:297-315.
  • [10]Jovicic A, Holroyd-Leduc JM, Straus SE: Effects of self-management intervention on health outcomes of patients with heart failure: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2006, 6:43. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [11]Kozak A, Rucker-Whitaker C, Basu S, Mendes de Leon C, Calvin J, Grady K, Richardson D, Powell LH: Elements of Nonpharmacologic interventions that prevent progression of heart failure: a meta-analysis. Congest Heart Fail 2007, 13:280-287.
  • [12]Yehle KS, Plake KS: Self-efficacy and educational interventions in heart failure: a review of the literature. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2010, 25:175-188.
  • [13]Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J: Self management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns 2002, 48:177-187.
  • [14]McDonagh TA, Blue L, Clark AL, Dahlstro U, Ekman I, Lainscak M, McDonald K, Ryder M, Stroömberg A, Jaarsma T, on behalf of Heart Failure Association Committee on Patient Care: European society of cardiology heart failure association standards for delivering heart failure care. Eur J Heart Fail 2011, 13:115-126.
  • [15]Karoff M, Held K, Bjarnason-Wehrens B: Cardiac rehabilitation in Germany. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2007, 14:18-27.
  • [16]Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund: Reha-Therapiestandards Koronare Herzkrankheit – Leitlinie für die medizinische Rehabilitation der Rentenversicherung. Berlin: Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund; 2009.
  • [17]Meng K, Schubmann R, Hohoff M, Vogel H: Schulungsbedürfnis von Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz in der medizinischen Anschlussrehabilitation. Praxis Klinische Verhaltensmedizin und Rehabilitation 2009, 83:67-77.
  • [18]Muschalla B, Glatz J, Karger G: Kardiologische Rehabilitation mit strukturierter Schulung bei Herzinsuffizienz – Akzeptanz bei Patienten und Veränderungen in Krankheitswissen und Wohlbefinden (Cardiac rehabilitation with a structured education programme for patients with chronic heart failure – illness-related knowledge, mental wellbeing and acceptance in participants). Rehabilitation 2011, 50:97-104.
  • [19]Faller H, Reusch A, Ströbl V, Vogel H: Patientenschulung als Element der Patientenorientierung in der Rehabilitation (Patient education as a constituent of a patient-oriented approach in rehabilitation). Rehabilitation 2008, 47:77-83.
  • [20]Reusch A, Schug M, Küffner R, Vogel H, Faller H: Gruppenprogramme der Gesundheitsbildung, Patientenschulung und Psychoedukation in der medizinischen Rehabilitation 2010 - Eine Bestandsaufnahme (Medical rehabilitation group-programmes concerning health promotion, patient education and psychoeducation – a 2010 national survey). Rehabilitation 2013.
  • [21]Michie S, Ashford S, Sniehotta FF, Dombrowski SU, Bishop A, French DP: A refined taxomomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and health eating behaviours: the CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health 2011, 26:1479-1498.
  • [22]Williams SL, French DP: What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour – and are they the same? Health Educ Res 2011, 2:308-322.
  • [23]Faller H, Koch GF, Reusch A, Pauli P, Allgayer H: Effectiveness of education for gastric cancer patients. A controlled prospective trial comparing interactive vs. lecture-based programs. Patient Educ Couns 2009, 76:91-98.
  • [24]Karger G, Muschalla B, Glatz J: Effekte einer Patientenschulung bei Herzinsuffizienz auf krankheitsbezogenes Wissen und Wohlbefinden. DRV-Schriften 2012, 98:156-157.
  • [25]Meng K, Seekatz B, Roßband H, Worringen U, Vogel H, Faller H: Intermediate and long-term effects of a standardized back school for inpatient orthopedic rehabilitation on illness knowledge and self-management behaviors: a randomized controlled trial. Clin J Pain 2011, 27:248-257.
  • [26]Reusch A, Ströbl V, Ellgring H, Faller H: Effectiveness of small-group interactive education vs. Lecture-based information-only programs on motivation to change and lifestyle behaviours. A prospective controlled trial of rehabilitation inpatients. Patient Educ Couns 2011, 82:186-192.
  • [27]Seekatz B, Haug G, Mosler G, Schwaab B, Altstidl R, Worringen U, Faller H, Meng K: Entwicklung und kurzfristige Effektivität eines standardisierten Schulungsprogramms für die Rehabilitation bei koronarer Herzkrankheit (Development and short-term effects of a standardized patient education program for in-patient cardiologic rehabilitation). Rehabilitation 2013.
  • [28]Cameron J, Worrall-Carter L, Driscoll A, Stewart S: Measuring self-care in chronic heart failure: a review of the psychometric properties of clinical instruments. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2009, 24:E10-E22.
  • [29]Schuler M, Musekamp G, Faller H, Ehlebracht-König I, Gutenbrunner C, Kirchhof R, Bengel J, Nolte S, Osborne R, Schwarze M: Assessment of proximal outcomes of self-management programs – translation and psychometric evaluation of a German version of the health education impact questionnaire (heiQTM). Qual Life Res 2012.
  • [30]Faller H, Steinbüchel S, Schowalter M, Störk S, Angermann C: Der Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) - ein neues krankheitsspezifisches Messinstrument zur Erfassung der Lebensqualität bei chronischer Herzinsuffizienz. Psychometrische Prüfung der deutschen Version (The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) – A new disease-specific quality of life measure for patients with chronic heart failure. Psychometric evaluation of the German version). Psychother Psych Med 2005, 55:200-208.
  • [31]Schwarzer R: The Health Action Process Approach (HAPA). Assessment Tool 2007. 2007. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/health/hapa.htm webcite
  • [32]Sniehotta F, Schwarzer R, Scholz U, Schüz B: Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: theory and assessment. Eur J Soc Psychol 2005, 35:565-576.
  • [33]Horne R, Weinman J: Patients’ beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness. J Psychosom Res 1999, 47:555-567.
  • [34]Godin G, Shephard RJ: A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1985, 10:141-146.
  • [35]Mahler C, Hermann K, Horne R, Ludt S, Haefeli WE, Szecsenyi J, Jank S: Assessing reported adherence to pharmacological treatment recommendations. Translation and evaluation of the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS) in Germany. J Eval Clin Pract 2010, 16:574-579.
  • [36]Meng K, Seekatz B, Roßband H, Worringen U, Faller H, Vogel H: Entwicklung eines standardisierten Rückenschulungsprogramms für die orthopädische Rehabilitation (Development of a standardized back school for in-patient orthopaedic rehabilitation). Rehabilitation 2009, 48:335-344.
  • [37]Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW: An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ–4. Psychosomatics 2009, 50:613-662.
  • [38]Cordes A, Herrmann-Lingen C, Büchner B, Hessel A: Repräsentative Normierung des ENRICHD-Social-Support-Instrument (ESSI) - Deutsche Version. Klinische Diagnostik und Evaluation 2009, 2:16-32.
  • [39]Ukoumunne OC, Gulliford MC, Chinn S, Sterne JAC, Burney PGJ: Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 1999., 3(5)
  • [40]Heck RH, Thomas SL, Tabata LN: Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. In Quantitative methodology series. Edited by Marcoulides GA. New York: Routledge; 2010.
  • [41]Vickers AJ: Analysis of variance is easily misapplied in the analysis of randomized trials: a critique and discussion of alternative statistical approaches. Psychosom Med 2005, 67:652-655.
  • [42]Cohen J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. 2nd edition. Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:11次 浏览次数:13次