Assessing urology and nephrology research activity in Arab countries using ISI web of science bibliometric database

BMC Research Notes

Ansam F Sawalha²  Samah W Al-Jabi¹  Sa’ed H Zyoud¹  Waleed M Sweileh² 

[1] Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine;Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine

关键词: ISI Web of science;    Arab world;    Urology and nephrology;    Bibliometric;   

Others  :  1133261
DOI  :  10.1186/1756-0500-7-258

 received in 2014-02-22, accepted in 2014-04-11,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Bibliometric analysis is increasingly being used for research assessment. The main objective of this study was to assess research output in Urology and Nephrology subject from the Arab countries. Original scientific articles or reviews published from the 21 Arab countries in “Urology and Nephrology” subject were screened using the ISI Web of Science database. Research productivity was evaluated based on a methodology developed and used in other bibliometric studies by analyzing the annual productivity, names of journals, citations; top 10 active institution and authors as well as country contribution to Urology and Nephrology research.

Results

Three thousand and seventy six documents in “urology and nephrology” subject category were retrieved from 104 journals. This represents 1.4% of the global research output in “urology and nephrology”. Four hundred and two documents (12.66%) were published in Annales D Urologie Journal. The h-index of the retrieved documents was 57. The total number of citations, at the time of data analysis, was 30401 with an average citation of 9.57 per document. Egypt, with a total publication of 1284 (40.43%) ranked first among the Arab countries in “urology and nephrology” subject category. Mansoura University in Egypt was the most productive institution with a total of 561 (15.33%) documents. Arab researchers collaborated most with researchers from the United States of America (226; 7.12%) in urology and nephrology research.

Conclusion

The present data reveals a good contribution of some Arab countries to the field of “urology and nephrology”. More efforts are needed by some other Arab countries to bridge the gap in urology and nephrology research. Overall, the quality of urology/nephrology research is considered relatively high as measured by h-index. Cooperation in urology/nephrology research should be encouraged in the Arab world to bridge the gap with that from developed countries.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Sweileh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Wallin JA: Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2005, 97:261-275.
• [2]De Battisti F, Salini S: Robust analysis of bibliometric data. Stat Methods Appl 2013, 22:269-283.
• [3]Bramness JG, Henriksen B, Person O, Mann K: A bibliometric analysis of European versus USA research in the field of addiction: research on alcohol, narcotics, prescription drug abuse, tobacco and steroids 2001-2011. Eur Addict Res 2014, 20:16-22.
• [4]Hofman K, Ryce A, Prudhomme W, Kotzin S: Reporting of non-communicable disease research in low-and middle-income countries: a pilot bibliometric analysis. J Med Libr Assoc 2006, 94:415-420.
• [5]Huber JT, Gullion JS: Complementary and alternative medicine as represented in the HIV/AIDS body of knowledge: a bibliometric analysis. Med Ref Serv Q 2003, 22:23-32.
• [6]Rashidi A, Rahimi B, Delirrad M: Bibliometric analysis of parasitological research in iran and Turkey: a comparative study. Iran J Parasitol 2013, 8:313-322.
• [7]Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Awang R: Assessing the scientific research productivity of a leading toxicology journal: a case study of human & experimental toxicology from 2003 to 2012. SAGE Open Med 2014, 2:2050312114523424.
• [8]Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM: Worldwide research productivity of paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning: a bibliometric analysis (2003-2012). Hum Exp Toxicol 2014. Article in press
• [9]Al-Khader AA: Enhancing research productivity in the Arab world. Saudi Med J 2004, 25:1323-1327.
• [10]Benamer HT, Bredan A, Bakoush O: Scientific publication productivity of Libyan medical schools: a bibliometric study of papers listed in PubMed, 1988-2007. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2009, 22:310.
• [11]Bissar-Tadmouri N, Tadmouri GO: Bibliometric analyses of biomedical research outputs in Lebanon and the United Arab Emirates (1988-2007). Saudi Med J 2009, 30:130-139.
• [12]Farhat T, Abdul-Sater Z, Obeid M, Arabi M, Diab K, Masri S, Al Haless Z, Nemer G, Bitar F: Research in congenital heart disease: a comparative bibliometric analysis between developing and developed countries. Pediatr Cardiol 2013, 34:375-382.
• [13]Benamer HT, Bakoush O: Arab nations lagging behind other Middle Eastern countries in biomedical research: a comparative study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009, 9:26. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Awang R: A bibliometric analysis of toxicology research productivity in Middle Eastern Arab countries during a 10-year period (2003-2012). Health Res Policy Syst 2014, 12:4. BioMed Central Full Text
• [15]Zer M, Lindner A, Greenstein A, Leibovici D: Is the rate of medical publication from Israel similar to other countries? A comparative study of three medical specialties. Harefuah 2011, 150:558-562. 619
• [16]Abdel-Halim RE: Contributions of Ibn Al-Nafis (1210-1288 AD) to the progress of medicine and urology: a study and translations from his medical works. Saudi Med J 2008, 29:13-22.
• [17]Gordetsky J, O’Brien J: Urology and the scientific method in ancient Egypt. Urology 2009, 73:476-479.
• [18]Whiting DR, Guariguata L, Weil C, Shaw J: IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011, 94:311-321.
• [19]Afifi A, Karim MA: Renal replacement therapy in Egypt: first annual report of the Egyptian Society of Nephrology, 1996. East Mediterr Health J 1999, 5:1023-1029.
• [20]Al-Nozha MM, Ali MS, Osman AK: Arterial hypertension in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 1997, 17:170-174.
• [21]Al-Nozha MM, Abdullah M, Arafah MR, Khalil MZ, Khan NB, Al-Mazrou YY, Al-Maatouq MA, Al-Marzouki K, Al-Khadra A, Nouh MS: Hypertension in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2007, 28:77-84.
• [22]Farag YM, Kari JA, Singh AK: Chronic kidney disease in the Arab world: a call for action. Nephron Clin Pract 2012, 121:c120-c123.
• [23]Schena FP, Zoccali C: Bibliometric analysis of the scientific productivity of the Italian Society of Nephrology for a period of five consecutive years (1990-1994). Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996, 11:2359-2360.
• [24]Einollahi B: Nephrology research output in Iran in a decade. Iran J Kidney Dis 2007, 1:57-62.
• [25]Zhou X, Xing C, Xin L, Hu H, Li L, Fang J, Liu Z: Scientific publications in urology and nephrology journals from China: a 10-year analysis. Can Urol Assoc J 2012, 6:102-106.
• [26]Allison MM: Mapping the literature of nephrology nursing. J Med Libr Assoc 2006, 94:E74-E79.
• [27]Fedder J, Nielsen GL, Petersen LJ, Rasmussen C, Lauszus FF, Frost L, Hornung N, Lederballe O, Andersen JP: A substantial number of scientific publications originate from non-university hospitals. Dan Med Bull 2011, 58:A4332.
• [28]Garg AX, Iansavichus AV, Kastner M, Walters LA, Wilczynski N, McKibbon KA, Yang RC, Rehman F, Haynes RB: Lost in publication: half of all renal practice evidence is published in non-renal journals. Kidney Int 2006, 70:1995-2005.
• [29]Hari Kumar KVS, Aravinda K: Publication trends of a biomedical journal from India. Indian J Med Sci 2010, 64:253-258.
• [30]Thomas GR, Eng L, de Wolff JF, Grover SC: An evaluation of wikipedia as a resource for patient education in nephrology. Semin Dial 2013, 26:159-163.
• [31]Jabbour S, Giacaman R, Yamout R, Khawaja M, Nuwayhid I: Public health in the Arab World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
• [32]Thomson Reuters: Web of Knowledge. 2013. [cited 2013 December 11]; Available from: http://wokinfo.com/media/pdf/SSR1103443WoK5-2_web3.pdf webcite
• [33]Schreiber M: How relevant is the predictive power of the h-index? A case study of the time-dependent Hirsch index. J Informetrics 2013, 7:325-329.
• [34]Baldock C, Ma R, Orton CG: The h index is the best measure of a scientist’s research productivity. Med Phys 2009, 36:1043.
• [35]Saied H, Dupré A, Lacki W, Paley D: Pelvic and lower lumber ectopy of kidney in children - with 7 case reports. Ann Urol 1972, 6:227-233.
• [36]Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL, Elbahnasy AM, Heidorn C, McDougall EM, Clayman RV: Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 2000, 164:1153-1159.
• [37]Siffert W, Forster P, Jockel KH, Mvere DA, Brinkmann B, Naber C, Crookes R, Du PHA, Epplen JT, Fridey J, Freedman B, Müller N, Stolke D, Am S, Moutaery K, Grosse-Wilde H, Buerbaum B, Ehrlich T, Hr A, Horsthemke B, Ed Du T, Tiilikainen A, Ge J, Wang Y, Yang D, Hüsing J, Rosskopf D: Worldwide ethnic distribution of the G protein beta3 subunit 825T allele and its association with obesity in Caucasian, Chinese, and Black African individuals. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999, 10:1921-1930.
• [38]Ghoneim MA, el-Mekresh MM, el-Baz MA, el-Attar IA, Ashamallah A: Radical cystectomy for carcinoma of the bladder: critical evaluation of the results in 1,026 cases. J Urol 1997, 158:393-399.
• [39]Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN: An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 2010, 21:5-26.
• [40]Schwab SJ, Harrington JT, Singh A, Roher R, Shohaib SA, Perrone RD, Meyer K, Beasley D: Vascular access for hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1999, 55:2078-2090.
• [41]Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Shoma AM, El-Tabey NA, Shaaban A, Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim MA: Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 2003, 92:232-236.
• [42]Leissner J, Ghoneim MA, Abol-Enein H, Thuroff JW, Franzaring L, Fisch M, Schulze H, Managadze G, Allhoff EP, El-Baz MA, Kastendieck H, Buhtz P, Kropf S, Hohenfellner R, Wolf HK: Extended radical lymphadenectomy in patients with urothelial bladder cancer: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol 2004, 171:139-144.
• [43]Pedrini LA, Zereik S, Rasmy S: Causes, kinetics and clinical implications of post-hemodialysis urea rebound. Kidney Int 1988, 34:817-824.
• [44]Eknoyan G, Lameire N, Barsoum R, Eckardt KU, Levin A, Levin N, Locatelli F, MacLeod A, Vanholder R, Walker R, Wang H: The burden of kidney disease: improving global outcomes. Kidney Int 2004, 66:1310-1314.
• [45]Shalhav AL, Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Elbahnasy AM, McDougall EM, Clayman RV: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell cancer: the Washington University experience. J Urol 2000, 163:1100-1104.
• [46]de Granda-Orive JI, Alonso-Arroyo A, Roig-Vazquez F: Which data base should we use for our literature analysis? Web of science versus SCOPUS. Arch Bronconeumol 2011, 47:213.
• [47]Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G: Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 2008, 22:338-342.
• [48]Tadmouri GO, Bissar-Tadmouri N: A major pitfall in the search strategy on PubMed. Saudi Med J 2004, 25:7-10.
• [49]Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW: Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA 2009, 302:1092-1096.
• [50]Oelrich B, Peters R, Jung K: A bibliometric evaluation of publications in urological journals among European Union countries between 2000-2005. Eur Urol 2007, 52:1238-1248.
• [51]Kou J, Zhang Y, Zhang XG, Liang S, Cai GY, Chen XM: Clinical research promotes development of nephrology in China: an analysis of 20 years of scientific publications. Ren Fail 2012, 34:472-479.
• [52]Bredan A, Benamer H, Bakoush O: Visibility of Arab countries in the world biomedical literature. Libyan J Med 2011, 6:6325.
• [53]Tadmouri GO, Bissar-Tadmouri N: Biomedical publications in an unstable region: the Arab world, 1988-2002. Lancet 2003, 362:1766.
• [54]Sweileh WM, Zyoud SH, Sawalha AF, Abu-Taha A, Hussein A, Al-Jabi SW: Medical and biomedical research productivity from Palestine, 2002–2011. BMC Res Notes 2013, 6:41. BioMed Central Full Text
• [55]El-Azami-El-Idrissi M, Lakhdar-Idrissi M, Ouldim K, Bono W, Amarti-Riffi A, Hida M, Nejjari C: Improving medical research in the Arab world. Lancet 2013, 382:2066-2067.
• [56]Shaban SF, Abu-Zidan FM: A quantitative analysis of medical publications from Arab countries. Saudi Med J 2003, 24:294-296.
• [57]Al-Khader AA, Al-Jondeby MS, Shaheen FA: Impact of Nephrology publications from Saudi Arabia in the last decade. Saudi Med J 2002, 23:1177-1180.
• [58]Lee S, Bozeman B: The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Soc Stud Sci 2005, 35:673-702.
• [59]Abramo G, D’Angelo CA, Di Costa F: Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation? High Educ 2009, 57:155-171.
• [60]Bordons M, Gomez I, Fernandez MT, Zulueta MA, Mendez A: Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics 1996, 37:279-295.
• [61]Bozeman B, Corley E: Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Res Policy 2004, 33:599-616.
• [62]Wagner CS: Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics 2005, 62:3-26.
• [63]He Z-L, Geng X-S, Campbell-Hunt C: Research collaboration and research output: a longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university. Res Policy 2009, 38:306-317.
• [64]Basu A, Kumar BSV: International collaboration in Indian scientific papers. Scientometrics 2000, 48:381-402.
• [65]Nauen CE: Ten years of international scientific cooperation in fisheries, aquaculture and coastal zones: some preliminary lessons. Environ Dev Sustain 2008, 10:605-622.
• [66]Rahman M, Sakamoto J, Fukui T: Japan’s share of research output in urology and nephrology. Int J Urol 2003, 10:353-355.
• [67]Labanaris AP, Krot D, Schott GE, Helmschrott P, Zugor V: Impact factors and publication time spans in urological journals. Urologe A 2007, 46:297-300. 302
• [68]Lent V, Langenbach A: A retrospective quality analysis of 102 randomized trials in four leading urological journals from 1984-1989. Urol Res 1996, 24:119-122.
• [69]Montorsi F: Current and future trends of publications in urological journals: the increasingly leading role of Europeans. Eur Urol 2007, 52:939-942.
• [70]Aksnes DW: Characteristics of highly cited papers. Res Eval 2003, 12:159-170.
• [71]Plomp R: The highly cited papers of professors as an indicator of a research group’s scientific performance. Scientometrics 1994, 29:377-393.
• [72]Aksnes DW, Sivertsen G: The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators. Scientometrics 2004, 59:213-224.
• [73]Aksnes DW: Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2006, 57:169-185.
• [74]Fowler JH, Aksnes DW: Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics 2007, 72:427-437.
• [75]Vinkler P: Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators. J Inf Sci 2007, 33:481-491.
• [76]Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM: Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on waterpipe (narghile, shisha, hookah) tobacco smoking during the period 2003-2012. Tob Induc Dis 2014, 12:7. BioMed Central Full Text