期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medicine
Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure
Bo-Christer Björk1  Mikael Laakso1 
[1]Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland
关键词: scientific publishing;    Open access;   
Others  :  857328
DOI  :  10.1186/1741-7015-10-124
 received in 2012-07-27, accepted in 2012-09-28,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Open access (OA) is a revolutionary way of providing access to the scholarly journal literature made possible by the Internet. The primary aim of this study was to measure the volume of scientific articles published in full immediate OA journals from 2000 to 2011, while observing longitudinal internal shifts in the structure of OA publishing concerning revenue models, publisher types and relative distribution among scientific disciplines. The secondary aim was to measure the share of OA articles of all journal articles, including articles made OA by publishers with a delay and individual author-paid OA articles in subscription journals (hybrid OA), as these subsets of OA publishing have mostly been ignored in previous studies.

Methods

Stratified random sampling of journals in the Directory of Open Access Journals (n = 787) was performed. The annual publication volumes spanning 2000 to 2011 were retrieved from major publication indexes and through manual data collection.

Results

An estimated 340,000 articles were published by 6,713 full immediate OA journals during 2011. OA journals requiring article-processing charges have become increasingly common, publishing 166,700 articles in 2011 (49% of all OA articles). This growth is related to the growth of commercial publishers, who, despite only a marginal presence a decade ago, have grown to become key actors on the OA scene, responsible for 120,000 of the articles published in 2011. Publication volume has grown within all major scientific disciplines, however, biomedicine has seen a particularly rapid 16-fold growth between 2000 (7,400 articles) and 2011 (120,900 articles). Over the past decade, OA journal publishing has steadily increased its relative share of all scholarly journal articles by about 1% annually. Approximately 17% of the 1.66 million articles published during 2011 and indexed in the most comprehensive article-level index of scholarly articles (Scopus) are available OA through journal publishers, most articles immediately (12%) but some within 12 months of publication (5%).

Conclusions

OA journal publishing is disrupting the dominant subscription-based model of scientific publishing, having rapidly grown in relative annual share of published journal articles during the last decade.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Laakso and Björk; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140723075141959.pdf 907KB PDF download
24KB Image download
22KB Image download
21KB Image download
41KB Image download
51KB Image download
【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Suber P: Open Access. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2012.
  • [2]Willinsky J: The Access Principle - the Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2005.
  • [3]Solomon DJ, Björk B-C: A study of open access journals using article processing charges. J Am Soc Info Sci Technol 2012, 63:1485-1495.
  • [4]Knight LV, Steinbach TA: Selecting an appropriate publication outlet: a comprehensive model of journal selection criteria for researchers in a broad range of academic disciplines. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 2008, 3:59-79.
  • [5]RCUK Announces New Open Access Policy, press release [http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/media/news/2012news/Pages/120716.asp] webcite 2012.
  • [6]Finch J: Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications. [http://www.researchinfonet.org/publish/finch/] webciteReport of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings. Research Information Network 2012.
  • [7]Sciencewatch - Top Ten Most-Cited Journals (All Fields), 1999-2009 [http://sciencewatch.com/dr/sci/09/aug2-09_2/] webcite
  • [8]Björk B-C: The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: a failed experiment? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2012, 63:1496-1504.
  • [9]Björk B-C, Solomon DJ: Open access versus subscription journals - a comparison of scientific impact. BMC Med 2012, 10:73. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [10]Davis PM, Walters WH: The impact of free access to the scientific literature: a review of recent research. J Med Libr Assoc 2011, 99:208-217.
  • [11]Wagner A: Open access citation advantage: an annotated bibliography. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 2010., 60doi.10.5062/F4Q81B0W [http://www.istl.org/10-winter/article2.html webcite]
  • [12]Craig ID, Plume AM, McVeigh ME, Pringle J, Amin M: Do open access articles have greater citation impact? a critical review of the literature. Journal of Infometrics 2007, 1:239-248.
  • [13]Laakso M, Welling P, Bukvova H, Nyman L, Björk B-C, Hedlund T: The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS One 2011, 6:e20961.
  • [14]Björk B-C, Roos A, Lauri M: Scientific journal publishing: yearly volume and open access availability. Information Research 2009, 14:e391.
  • [15]Crawford W: Free electronic refereed journals: getting past the arc of enthusiasm. Learned Publishing 2002, 15:117-123.
  • [16]Gargouri Y, Larivière V, Gingras Y, Carr L, Harnad S: Green and gold open access percentages and growth, by discipline. [http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3664] webcite
  • [17]Matsubayashi M, Kurata K, Sakai Y, Morioka T, Kato S, Mine S, Ueda S: Status of open access in the biomedical field in 2005. J Med Libr Assoc 2009, 97:4-11.
  • [18]McVeigh M: Open Access Journals in the ISI Citation Databases: Analysis of Impact Factors and Citation Patterns. [http://science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/openaccesscitations2.pdf] webcite 2004.
  • [19]UlrichsWeb Serials Solutions [http://ulrichsweb.serialssolutions.com/] webcite
  • [20]DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals [http://www.doaj.org] webcite
  • [21]Björk B-C, Welling P, Laakso M, Majlender P, Hedlund T, Guðnason G: Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009. PLoS One 2010, 5:e11273.
  • [22]Dallmeier-Tiessen S, Goerner B, Darby R, Hyppoelae J, Igo-Kemenes P, Kahn D, Lambert S, Lengenfelder A, Leonard C, Mele S, Polydoratou P, Ross D, Ruiz-Perez S, Schimmer R, Swaisland M, van der Stelt : Open access publishing - models and attributes. [http://edoc.mpg.de/478647] webciteMax Planck Digital Library/Informationsversorgung 2010.
  • [23]SCImago - SCImago Journal & Country Rank [http://www.scimagojr.com] webcite
  • [24]Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge [http://apps.webofknowledge.com] webcite
  • [25]Scopus [http://www.scopus.com] webcite
  • [26]SciELO [http://www.scielo.org/] webcite
  • [27]Redalyc [http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/] webcite
  • [28]J-Stage [http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/] webcite
  • [29]Rogers E: Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press; 1995.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:51次 浏览次数:50次