The effects of chemical interactions and culture history on the colonization of structured habitats by competing bacterial populations

BMC Microbiology

Juan E Keymer⁴  Peter Galajda⁵  Tim Weenink³  Felix JH Hol¹  Simon van Vliet² 

[1] Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Lorentzweg 1, Delft, CJ 2628, The Netherlands;Department of Environmental Microbiology, Eawag, Überlandstrasse 133, Dübendorf 8600, Switzerland;Current address: Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK;Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad (IEB), Las Palmeras 3425 Ñuñoa, Santiago, Casilla 653, Chile;Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvari krt. 62, Szeged H-6726, Hungary

关键词: Microfluidics;    Bacterial competition;    Collective behavior;    Microbes;    Spatially structured habitats;    Habitat colonization;   

Others  :  1141094
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2180-14-116

 received in 2013-07-18, accepted in 2014-05-01,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Bacterial habitats, such as soil and the gut, are structured at the micrometer scale. Important aspects of microbial life in such spatial ecosystems are migration and colonization. Here we explore the colonization of a structured ecosystem by two neutrally labeled strains of Escherichia coli. Using time-lapse microscopy we studied the colonization of one-dimensional arrays of habitat patches linked by connectors, which were invaded by the two E. coli strains from opposite sides.

Results

The two strains colonize a habitat from opposite sides by a series of traveling waves followed by an expansion front. When population waves collide, they branch into a continuing traveling wave, a reflected wave and a stationary population. When the two strains invade the landscape from opposite sides, they remain segregated in space and often one population will displace the other from most of the habitat. However, when the strains are co-cultured before entering the habitats, they colonize the habitat together and do not separate spatially. Using physically separated, but diffusionally coupled, habitats we show that colonization waves and expansion fronts interact trough diffusible molecules, and not by direct competition for space. Furthermore, we found that colonization outcome is influenced by a culture’s history, as the culture with the longest doubling time in bulk conditions tends to take over the largest fraction of the habitat. Finally, we observed that population distributions in parallel habitats located on the same device and inoculated with cells from the same overnight culture are significantly more similar to each other than to patterns in identical habitats located on different devices inoculated with cells from different overnight cultures, even tough all cultures were started from the same −80°C frozen stock.

Conclusions

We found that the colonization of spatially structure habitats by two interacting populations can lead to the formation of complex, but reproducible, spatiotemporal patterns. Furthermore, we showed that chemical interactions between two populations cause them to remain spatially segregated while they compete for habitat space. Finally, we observed that growth properties in bulk conditions correlate with the outcome of habitat colonization. Together, our data show the crucial roles of chemical interactions between populations and a culture’s history in determining the outcome of habitat colonization.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 van Vliet et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Tagkopoulos I, Liu YC, Tavazoie S: Predictive behavior within microbial genetic networks. Science 2008, 320:1313-1317.
• [2]Adler J: Chemotaxis in bacteria. Science 1966, 153:708-716.
• [3]Adler J: Chemoreceptors in bacteria. Science 1969, 166:1588-1597.
• [4]Berg HC: Bacterial behaviour. Nature 1975, 254:389-392.
• [5]Bassler BL: Small talk. Cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Cell 2002, 109:421-424.
• [6]Adler J: Effect of amino acids and oxygen on chemotaxis in escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 1966, 92:121-129.
• [7]Budrene EO, Berg HC: Complex patterns formed by motile cells of escherichia coli. Nature 1991, 349:630-633.
• [8]Budrene EO, Berg HC: Dynamics of formation of symmetrical patterns by chemotactic bacteria. Nature 1995, 376:49-53.
• [9]Blat Y, Eisenbach M: Tar-dependent and -independent pattern formation by Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol 1995, 177:1683-1691.
• [10]Woodward DE, Tyson R, Myerscough MR, Murray JD, Budrene EO, Berg HC: Spatio-temporal patterns generated by Salmonella typhimurium. Biophysical J 1995, 68:2181-2189.
• [11]Fujikawa H, Matsushita M: Fractal growth of Bacillus subtilison agar plates. J Physical Soc Japan 1989, 58:3875-3878.
• [12]Matsushita M, Fujikawa H: Diffusion-limited growth in bacterial colony formation. Physica A 1990, 168:498-506.
• [13]Ben-Jacob E, Schochet O, Tenenbaum A, Cohen I, Czirók A, Vicsek T: Generic modelling of cooperative growth patterns in bacterial colonies. Nature 1994, 368:46-49.
• [14]Rudner R, Martsinkevich O, Leung W, Jarvis ED: Classification and genetic characterization of pattern-forming Bacilli. Mol Microbiol 1998, 27:687-703.
• [15]Matsuyama T, Matsushita M: Self-similar colony morphogenesis by gram-negative rods as the experimental model of fractal growth by a cell population. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992, 58:1227-1232.
• [16]Ben-Jacob E, Shochet O, Tenenbaum A, Cohen I, Czirók A, Vicsek T: Communication, regulation and control during complex patterning of bacterial colonies. Fractals 1994, 02:15-44.
• [17]Fujikawa H, Matsushita M: Bacterial fractal growth in the concentration field of nutrient. J Physical Soc Japan 1991, 60:88-94.
• [18]Ohgiwari M, Matsushita M, Matsuyama T: Morphological changes in growth phenomena of bacterial colony patterns. J Physical Soc Japan 1992, 61:816-822.
• [19]Ivanitskii GR, Medvinskii AB, Tsyganov MA: From the dynamics of population autowaves generated by living cells to neuroinformatics. Physics-Uspekhi 1994, 37:961-990.
• [20]Tisdall J, Oades J: Organic-matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. Eur J Soil Sci 1982, 33:141-163.
• [21]Grundmann GL: Spatial scales of soil bacterial diversity - the size of a clone. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2004, 48:119-127.
• [22]Vos M, Wolf AB, Jennings SJ, Kowalchuk GA: Micro-scale determinants of bacterial diversity in soil. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2013, 37:936-954.
• [23]Nunan N, Wu K, Young IM, Crawford JW, Ritz K: Spatial distribution of bacterial communities and their relationships with the micro-architecture of soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2003, 44:203-215.
• [24]Camp JG, Kanther M, Semova I, Rawls JF: Patterns and scales in gastrointestinal microbial ecology. Gastroenterology 2009, 136:1989-2002.
• [25]Brune A, Friedrich M: Microecology of the termite gut: structure and function on a microscale. Curr Opin Microbiol 2000, 3:263-269.
• [26]Bäckhed F, Ley RE, Sonnenburg JL, Peterson DA, Gordon JI: Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science 2005, 307:1915-1920.
• [27]Hanski IA, Gilpen ME (Eds): Metapopulation Biology. San Diego: Academic Press; 1997.
• [28]Mittal N, Budrene EO, Brenner MP, van Oudenaarden A: Motility of escherichia coli cells in clusters formed by chemotactic aggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:13259-13263.
• [29]Saragosti J, Calvez V, Bournaveas N, Buguin A, Silberzan P, Perthame B: Mathematical description of bacterial traveling pulses. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000890.
• [30]Saragosti J, Calvez V, Bournaveas N, Perthame B, Buguin A, Silberzan P: Directional persistence of chemotactic bacteria in a traveling concentration wave. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:16235-16240.
• [31]Ahmed T, Shimizu TS, Stocker R: Microfluidics for bacterial chemotaxis. Integr Biol 2010, 2:604-629.
• [32]Park S, Wolanin PM, Yuzbashyan EA, Silberzan P, Stock JB, Austin RH: Motion to form a quorum. Science 2003, 301:188.
• [33]Park S, Wolanin PM, Yuzbashyan EA, Lin H, Darnton NC, Stock JB, Silberzan P, Austin RH: Influence of topology on bacterial social interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:3910-3915.
• [34]Keymer JE, Galajda P, Muldoon C, Park S, Austin RH: Bacterial metapopulations in nanofabricated landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:17290-17295.
• [35]Hol FJH, Galajda P, Nagy K, Woolthuis RG, Dekker C, Keymer JE: Spatial structure facilitates cooperation in a social dilemma: empirical evidence from a bacterial community. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e77042.
• [36]Stocker R, Seymour JR, Samadani A, Hunt DE, Polz MF: Rapid chemotactic response enables marine bacteria to exploit ephemeral microscale nutrient patches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:4209-4214.
• [37]Seymour JR, Marcos SR: Resource patch formation and exploitation throughout the marine microbial food web. Am Nat 2009, 173:E15-29.
• [38]Aglandze K, Budriene L, Ivanitsky G, Krinsky V, Shakhbazyan V, Tsyganov M: Wave mechanisms of pattern formation in microbial populations. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1993, 253:131-135.
• [39]Medvinsky AB, Tsyganov MA, Shakhbazian VY, Kresteva IB, Ivanitsky GR: Formation of stationary demarcation zones between population autowaves propagating towards each other. Physica D 1993, 64:267-280.
• [40]Tsyganov MA, Ivanitsky GR: Solitonlike and nonsoliton modes of interaction of taxis waves (illustrated with an example of bacterial population waves). Biophysics 2006, 51:887-891.
• [41]Berg HC: E. coli in Motion. 1st edition. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2004.
• [42]Keymer JE, Galajda P, Lambert G, Liao D, Austin RH: Computation of mutual fitness by competing bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:20269-20273.
• [43]Salman H, Zilman A, Loverdo C, Jeffroy M, Libchaber A: Solitary modes of bacterial culture in a temperature gradient. Phys Rev Lett 2006, 97:118101.
• [44]Männik J, Driessen R, Galajda P, Keymer JE, Dekker C: Bacterial growth and motility in sub-micron constrictions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:14861-14866.
• [45]Ben-Jacob E, Levine H: Self-engineering capabilities of bacteria. J R Soc Interface 2006, 3:197-214.
• [46]Marrocco A, Henry H, Holland IB, Plapp M, Séror SJ, Perthame B: Models of self-organizing bacterial communities and comparisons with experimental observations. Math Model Nat Phenom 2010, 5:148-162.
• [47]Be’er A, Zhang HP, Florin EL, Payne SM, Ben-Jacob E, Swinney HL: Deadly competition between sibling bacterial colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:428-433.
• [48]Be’er A, Ariel G, Kalisman O, Helman Y, Sirota-Madi A, Zhang HP, Florin E-L, Payne SM, Ben-Jacob E, Swinney HL: Lethal protein produced in response to competition between sibling bacterial colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:6258-6263.
• [49]Gibbs KA, Urbanowski ML, Greenberg EP: Genetic determinants of self identity and social recognition in bacteria. Science 2008, 321:256-259.
• [50]Chattwood A, Thompson CRL: Non-genetic heterogeneity and cell fate choice in Dictyostelium discoideum. Dev Growth Differ 2011, 53:558-566.
• [51]Keller EF, Segel LA: Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. J Theor Biol 1970, 26:399-415.
• [52]Brenner MP, Levitov LS, Budrene EO: Physical mechanisms for chemotactic pattern formation by bacteria. Biophysical J 1998, 74:1677-1693.
• [53]Edelstein A, Amodaj N, Hoover K, Vale R, Stuurman N: Computer control of microscopes using μmanager. Current Protocols Molecular Biology 2010, 92:14.20.1-14.20.17.
• [54]Rasband W: ImageJ, U.S. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: National Institutes of Health; 1997–2012. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ webcite
• [55]R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012. http://www.R-project.org webcite
• [56]van Vliet S, Hol FJH, Weenink T, Galajda P, Keymer JE: The effects of chemical interactions and culture history on the colonization of structured habitats by competing bacterial populations. Data Set 2014. doi:10.4121/uuid:f5603abf-bf15-4732-84c0-a413ce7d12d3