期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Utilisation of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners within maternity care provision: results from a nationally representative cohort study of 1,835 pregnant women
Jane Frawley2  Cindy Gallois1  Alex Broom1  David Sibbritt2  Jon Adams2  Amie Steel2 
[1] School of Social Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia;Faculty of Health, UTS, Level 7, Building 10, 235-253 Jones Street, Ultimo, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
关键词: Integrative medicine;    Interprofessional;    Health services;    Complementary medicine;    Pregnancy;   
Others  :  1151536
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2393-12-146
 received in 2012-09-23, accepted in 2012-12-04,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

There is little known about women’s concurrent use of conventional and complementary health care during pregnancy, particularly consultation patterns with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). This study examines health service utilisation among pregnant women including consultations with obstetricians, midwives, general practitioners (GPs) and CAM practitioners.

Methods

A sub-study of pregnant women (n=2445) was undertaken from the nationally-representative Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (ALSWH). Women’s consultations with conventional practitioners (obstetricians, GPs and midwives) and CAM practitioners for pregnancy-related health conditions were analysed. The analysis included Pearson chi-square tests to compare categorical variables.

Results

The survey was completed by 1835 women (response rate = 79.2%). A substantial number (49.4%) of respondents consulted with a CAM practitioner for pregnancy-related health conditions. Many participants consulted only with a CAM practitioner for assistance with certain conditions such as neck pain (74.6%) and sciatica (40.4%). Meanwhile, women consulted both CAM practitioners and conventional maternity health professionals (obstetricians, midwives and GPs) for back pain (61.8%) and gestational diabetes (22.2%). Women visiting a general practitioner (GP) 3–4 times for pregnancy care were more likely to consult with acupuncturists compared with those consulting a GP less often (p=<0.001, x2=20.5). Women who had more frequent visits to a midwife were more likely to have consulted with an acupuncturist (p=<0.001, x2=18.9) or a doula (p=<0.001, x2=23.2) than those visiting midwives less frequently for their pregnancy care.

Conclusions

The results emphasise the necessity for a considered and collaborative approach to interactions between pregnant women, conventional maternity health providers and CAM practitioners to accommodate appropriate information transferral and co-ordinated maternity care. The absence of sufficient clinical evidence regarding many commonly used CAM practices during pregnancy also requires urgent attention.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Steel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150406084433149.pdf 198KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Zollmann C, Vickers A: What is complementary medicine? Br Med J 1999, 319:693.
  • [2]Adams J, Sibbritt D, Easthope G: Examining the relationship between women’s health and the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Complement Ther Med 2003, 11(3):156-158.
  • [3]Andrews G, Adams J, Segrott J: Alternative medicine in the concept of care. In The Companion to Health and Medical Geography. Edited by Brown T, McLafferty S, Moon G. Blackwell, London; 2009.
  • [4]Adams J, Sibbritt D, Easthope G, Young A: The profile of women who consult alternative health practitioners in Australia. Med J Aust 2003, 179:297-300.
  • [5]Adams J, Lui C-W, Sibbritt D, Broom A, Wardle J, Homer C, Beck S: Women’s use of complementary and alternative medicine during pregnancy: a critical review of the literature. Birth 2009, 36(3):237-245.
  • [6]Lantz PM, Low LK, Varkey S, Watson RL: Doulas as childbirth paraprofessionals: results from a national survey. Womens Health Issues 2005, 15(3):109-116.
  • [7]Adams J, Sibbritt D, Lui C-W: The use of complementary and alternative medicine during pregnancy: a longitudinal study of australian women. Birth 2011, 38(3):200-206.
  • [8]Steinsbekk A, Adams J, Sibbritt D, Jacobsen G, Johnsen R: The profile of adults who consult alternative health practitioners and/or general practitioners. Scand J Prim Health Care 2007, 25(2):86-92.
  • [9]Pledger MJ, Cumming J, Burnette M: Health service use amongst users of complementary and alternative medicine. N Z Med J. vol. 123 2010. http://journal.nzma.org.nz/journal/123-1312/4059/ webcite
  • [10]Tiran D: Viewpoint - midwives’ enthusiasm for complementary therapies: a cause for concern? Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery 2004, 10:77-79.
  • [11]Tovey P, Adams J: Nostalgic and nostophobic referencing and the authentication of nurses’ use of complementary therapies. Soc Sci Med 2003, 56:1466-1480.
  • [12]Bishop FL, Northstone K, Green JR, Thompson EA: The use of complementary and alternative medicine in pregnancy: data from the avon longitudinal study of parents and children. Complement Ther Med 2011, 19:303-310.
  • [13]Tiran D: Complementary therapies in pregnancy: midwives’ and obstetricians’ appreciation of risk. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2006, 12:126-131.
  • [14]Wardle J, Steel A: Fertility, preconception care and pregnancy. In Clinical naturopathy: an evidence-based guide to practice. Edited by Sarris J, Wardle J. Elsevier, Chatswood; 2010:622-652.
  • [15]Eisenberg D, Kessler R, Rompay M, Kaptchuk T, Wilkey S, Appel S, Davis R: Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey. Ann Intern Med 2001, 135(5):344-351.
  • [16]Adams J, Lui C-W, Sibbritt D, Broom A, Wardle J, Homer C: Attitudes and referral practices of maternity care professionals with regard to complementary and alternative medicine: an integrative review. J Adv Nursing 2011. In Press
  • [17]Ernst E, Watson L: Midwives’ use of complementary/alternative treatments. Midwifery 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.08.013 webcite
  • [18]Stuber KJ, Smith DL: Chiropractic treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain: a systematic review of the evidence. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008, 31:447-454.
  • [19]Santilli V, Beghi E, Finucci S: Chiropractic manipulation in the treatment of acute back pain and sciatica with disc protrusion: a randomized double-blind clinical trial of active and simulated spinal manipulations. Spine J 2006, 6(2):131-137.
  • [20]Helmreich RJ, Shiao S-YPK, Dune LS: Meta-analysis of acustimulation effects on nausea and vomiting in pregnant women. Explore (NY) 2006, 2(5):412-421.
  • [21]Ensiyeh J, Sakineh M-AC: Comparing ginger and vitamin B6 for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Midwifery 2009, 25(3):649-653.
  • [22]Ee CC, Manheimer E, Pirotta M, White A: Acupuncture for pelvic and back pain in pregnancy: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008, 198(3):254-259.
  • [23]Steel A, Adams J: The role of naturopathy in pregancy, labour and postnatal care: broadening the evidence base. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2011, 17:189-192.
  • [24]Adams J: Growing popularity of complementary and alternative medicine during pregnancy and implications for healthcare providers. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol 2011, 6(4):365-366.
  • [25]Keppel G: Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs; 1991.
  • [26]Adams J: General practitioners, complementary therapies and evidence-based medicine: the defence of clinical autonomy. Complement Ther Med 2000, 8:248-252.
  • [27]Maha N, Shaw A: Academic doctors’ views of complementary and alternative medicine and its role within the NHS: an exploratory qualitative study. BMC Complement Altern Med. vol. 7 2007. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/7/17 webcite
  • [28]Poynton L, Dowell A, Dew K, Egan T: General practitioners’ attitudes toward (and use of) complementary and alternative medicine: a New Zealand nationwide survey. N Z Med J 2011, 119(1247):35-44.
  • [29]Joos S, Musselmann B, Szecsney J: Integration of complementary and alternative medicine into family practices in germany: results of a national survey. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011, 2011:1-8.
  • [30]Ben-Arye E, Scharf M, Frenkel M: How should complementary practitioners and physicians communicate? a cross-sectional study from israel. J Am Board Fam Med 2007, 20(6):565-571.
  • [31]Adams J: An exploratory study of complementary and alternative medicine in hospital midwifery: Models of care and professional struggle. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2006, 12(1):40-47.
  • [32]Honda K, Jacobson J: Use of complementary and alternative medicine among United States adults: the influences of personality, coping strategies, and social support. Prevent Med 2005, 40:46-53.
  • [33]Bryant HE, Visser N, Love EJ: Records, recall loss, and recall bias in pregnancy: a comparison of interview and medical records data of pregnant and postnatal women. Am J Public Health 1989, 79(1):78-80.
  • [34]Tomeo CA, Rich-Edwards JW, Michels KB, Berkey CS, Hunter DJ, Frazier AL, Willett WC, Buka SL: Reproducibility and validity of maternal recall of pregnancy-related events. Epidemiol 1999, 10(6):774-777.
  • [35]Adams J, Tovey P (Eds): Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Nursing and Midwifery: Towards a Critical Social Science. Routledge, London; 2008.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:4次 浏览次数:9次