Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of web-based treatment for phobic outpatients on a waiting list for psychotherapy: protocol of a randomised controlled trial

BMC Psychiatry

Pim Cuijpers³  Manja de Neef²  Judith Bosmans⁴  Aartjan Beekman¹  Annemieke van Straten³  Robin N Kok³ 

[1] Department of Psychiatry and the EMGO institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;Dutch Association of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Utrecht, The Netherlands;Department of Clinical Psychology and the EMGO institute for Health and Care Research, Faculty of Psychology and Education, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;Department of Health Sciences and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

关键词: Outpatients;    Cost-effectiveness;    Randomised controlled trial;    Internet therapy;    Web-based intervention;    Phobic disorders;    Phobias;   

Others  :  1124300
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-244X-12-131

 received in 2012-05-23, accepted in 2012-08-22,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Phobic disorders are highly prevalent and constitute a considerable burden for patients and society. As patients wait for face-to-face psychotherapy for phobic disorders in outpatient clinics, this time can be used for guided self-help interventions. The aim of this study is to investigate a five week internet-based guided self-help programme of exposure therapy in terms of clinical effectiveness and impact on speed of recovery in psychiatric outpatients, as well as the cost-effectiveness of this pre-treatment waiting list intervention.

Methods/design

A randomised controlled trial will be conducted among 244 Dutch adult patients recruited from waiting lists of outpatient clinics for face-to-face psychotherapy for phobic disorders. Patients suffering from at least one DSM-IV classified phobic disorder (social phobia, agoraphobia or specific phobia) are randomly allocated (at a 1:1 ratio) to either a five-week internet-based guided self-help program followed by face-to-face psychotherapy, or a control group followed by face-to-face psychotherapy. Waiting list status and duration are unchanged and actual need for further treatment is evaluated prior to face-to-face psychotherapy. Clinical and economic self-assessment measurements take place at baseline, post-test (five weeks after baseline) and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after baseline.

Discussion

Offering pre-treatment internet-based guided self-help efficiently uses time otherwise lost on a waiting list and may increase patient satisfaction. Patients are expected to need fewer face-to-face sessions, reducing total treatment cost and increasing speed of recovery. Internet-delivered treatment for phobias may be a valuable addition to psychotherapy as demand for outpatient treatment increases while budgets decrease.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register NTR2233

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Kok et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Bijl RV, Ravelli A, van Zessen G: Prevalence of psychiatric disorder in the general population: results of The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Soc Psychiatr Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998, 33:587-595.
• [2]Konnopka A, Leichsenring F, Leibing E, König H-H: Cost-of-illness studies and cost-effectiveness analyses in anxiety disorders: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 2009, 114:14-31.
• [3]Mendlowicz MV, Stein MB: Quality of life in individuals with anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2000, 157:669-682.
• [4]Dingemans A, van Vliet I, Couvée J, Westenberg H: Characteristics of patients with social phobia and their treatment in specialized clinics for anxiety disorders in the Netherlands. J Affect Disord 2001, 65:123-129.
• [5]Hirai M, Clum GA: A meta-analytic study of self-help interventions for anxiety problems. Behav Ther 2006, 37:99-111.
• [6]Cuijpers P, Donker T, van Straten A, Li J, Andersson G: Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Psychol Med 2010, 40:1943-1957.
• [7]Griffiths KM, Farrer L, Christensen H: The efficacy of internet interventions for depression and anxiety disorders: a review of randomised controlled trials. Med J Aust 2010, 192:S4-S11.
• [8]Cuijpers P, Marks IM, van Straten A, Cavanagh K, Gega L, Andersson G: Computer-aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: a meta-analytic review. Cogn Behav Ther 2009, 38:66-82.
• [9]Hedman E, Andersson G, Ljótsson B, Andersson E, Rück C, Mörtberg E, Lindefors N: Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy vs. cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. PLoS One 2011, 6:e18001.
• [10]Paxling B, Almlöv J, Dahlin M, Carlbring P, Breitholtz E, Eriksson T, Andersson G: Guided internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Cogn Behav Ther 2011, 40:159-173.
• [11]Hedman E, Andersson G, Andersson E, Ljótsson B, Rück C, Asmundson GJG, Lindefors N: Internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for severe health anxiety: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2011, 198:230-236.
• [12]Andrews G, Cuijpers P, Craske MG, McEvoy P, Titov N: Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2010, 5:e13196.
• [13]Bergström J, Andersson G, Karlsson A, Andréewitch S, Rück C, Carlbring P, Lindefors N: An open study of the effectiveness of Internet treatment for panic disorder delivered in a psychiatric setting. Nord J Psychiatry 2009, 63:44-50.
• [14]Spence SH, Donovan CL, March S, Gamble A, Anderson RE, Prosser S, Kenardy J: A randomized controlled trial of online versus clinic-based CBT for adolescent anxiety. J Consult Clin Psychol 2011, 79:629-642.
• [15]Issakidis C, Andrews G: Pretreatment attrition and dropout in an outpatient clinic for anxiety disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2004, 109:426-433.
• [16]World Health Organization: Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Geneva: World Health Organization; 1990.
• [17]de Neef M, Cuijpers P: Fobieën. Amsterdam: Boom Uitgeverij; 2007.
• [18]van Oppen P, van Balkom AJLM, Smit JH, Schuurmans J, van Dyck R, Emmelkamp PMG: Does the therapy manual or the therapist matter most in treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder? A randomized controlled trial of exposure with response or ritual prevention in 118 patients. J Clin Psychiatry 2010, 71:1158-1167.
• [19]Almlöv J, Carlbring P, Källqvist K, Paxling B, Cuijpers P, Andersson G: Therapist Effects in Guided Internet-Delivered CBT for Anxiety Disorders. Behav Cogn Psychother 2011, 71:311-322.
• [20]Marks IM, Mathews AM: Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients. Behav Res Ther 1979, 17:263-267.
• [21]Mavissakalian M: The Fear Questionnaire: a validity study. Behav Res Ther 1986, 24:83-85.
• [22]Cox BJ, Swinson RP, Shaw BF: Value of the Fear Questionnaire in differentiating agoraphobia and social phobia. Br J Psychiatry 1991, 159:842-845.
• [23]Van Zuuren FJ: The fear questionnaire. Some data on validity, reliability and layout. Br J Psychiatry 1988, 153:659-662.
• [24]Beck AT, Steer RA: Beck Anxiety Inventory Manual. San Antonio, TXL: Psychological Corperation; 1993.
• [25]de Beurs E, Wilson Ka, Chambless DL, Goldstein a J, Feske U: Convergent and divergent validity of the Beck Anxiety Inventory for patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia. Depress Anxiety 1997, 6:140-146.
• [26]Leyfer OT, Ruberg JL, Woodruff-Borden J: Examination of the utility of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and its factors as a screener for anxiety disorders. J Anxiety Disord 2006, 20:444-458.
• [27]Radloff LS: The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977, 1:385-401.
• [28]Donker T, van Straten A, Marks IM, Cuijpers P: Brief self-rated screening for depression on the Internet. J Affect Disord 2010, 122:253-259.
• [29]van Agt HM, Essink-Bot ML, Krabbe PF, Bonsel GJ: Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. Soc Sci Med 1994, 39:1537-1544.
• [30]Brooks R: EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996, 37:53-72.
• [31]Lamers LM, Stalmeier PF, McDonnell J, Krabbe PF, van Busschbach JJ: [Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005, 149:1574-1578.
• [32]Nguyen TD, Attkisson CC, Stegner BL: Assessment of patient satisfaction: development and refinement of a service evaluation questionnaire. Eval Program Plann 1983, 6:299-313.
• [33]De Brey H: A cross-national validation of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire: The Dutch experience. Eval Program Plann 1983, 6:395-400.
• [34]Mayfield D, McLeod G, Hall P: The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. Am J Psychiatry 1974, 131:1121-1123.
• [35]Bradley KA, Bush KR, McDonell MB, Malone T, Fihn SD: Screening for problem drinking: Comparison of CAGE and AUDIT. J Gen Intern Med 1998, 13:379-388.
• [36]Kushner MG, Abrams K, Borchardt C: The relationship between anxiety disorders and alcohol use disorders: a review of major perspectives and findings. Clin Psychol Rev 2000, 20:149-171.
• [37]Hakkaart-van Roijen L: Trimbos/iMTA questionnaire for Costs associated with Psychiatric Illness (TiC-P). 2002. [Technology]
• [38]Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Tan S, Bouwmans CAM: Handleiding voor kostenonderzoek: Methoden en standaard kostprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg. Geactualiseerde versie 2010. Diemen: [Dutch manual for costing in economic evaluations]; 2011.
• [39]Blankers M, Koeter MWJ, Schippers GM: Missing data approaches in eHealth research: simulation study and a tutorial for nonmathematically inclined researchers. J Med Internet Res 2010, 12:e54.
• [40]Fenwick E, O’Brien BJ, Briggs A: Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves–facts, fallacies and frequently asked questions. Health Econ 2004, 13:405-415.
• [41]Melville KM, Casey LM, Kavanagh DJ: Dropout from Internet-based treatment for psychological disorders. Br J Clin Psychol 2010, 49:455-471.
• [42]Wierzbicki M, Pekarik G: A meta-analysis of psychotherapy dropout. Prof Psychol Res Pract 1993, 24:190-195.
• [43]Eysenbach G: The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res 2005, 7:e11.
• [44]Eskildsen A, Hougaard E, Rosenberg NK: Pre-treatment patient variables as predictors of drop-out and treatment outcome in cognitive behavioural therapy for social phobia: A systematic review. Nord J Psychiatry 2010, 64:94-105.