期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medicine
Development and evaluation of the feasibility and effects on staff, patients, and families of a new tool, the Psychosocial Assessment and Communication Evaluation (PACE), to improve communication and palliative care in intensive care and during clinical uncertainty
Cathy Shipman2  Myfanwy Morgan1  Sue Hall2  William Bernal3  Odette Dampier3  Jo Noble3  Caroline Rumble2  Sara Leonard3  Rachel Burman2  Wendy Prentice2  Philip Hopkins3  Jonathan Koffman2  Irene J Higginson2 
[1] Division of Health and Social Care Research, King’s College London, London, UK;Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s College London, School of Medicine, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9PJ, UK;Intensive Care Unit, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
关键词: Psychosocial;    Intensive care unit;    End-of-life care;    Intensive therapy unit;    Critical care unit;    Uncertainty;    Communication;    Palliative care;   
Others  :  855676
DOI  :  10.1186/1741-7015-11-213
 received in 2013-08-03, accepted in 2013-08-30,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

There are widespread concerns about communication and support for patients and families, especially when they face clinical uncertainty, a situation most marked in intensive care units (ICUs). Therefore, we aimed to develop and evaluate an interventional tool to improve communication and palliative care, using the ICU as an example of where this is difficult.

Methods

Our design was a phase I-II study following the Medical Research Council Guidance for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions and the (Methods of Researching End-of-life Care (MORECare) statement. In two ICUs, with over 1900 admissions annually, phase I modeled a new intervention comprising implementation training and an assessment tool. We conducted a literature review, qualitative interviews, and focus groups with 40 staff and 13 family members. This resulted in the new tool, the Psychosocial Assessment and Communication Evaluation (PACE). Phase II evaluated the feasibility and effects of PACE, using observation, record audit, and surveys of staff and family members. Qualitative data were analyzed using the framework approach. The statistical tests used on quantitative data were t-tests (for normally distributed characteristics), the χ2 or Fisher’s exact test (for non-normally distributed characteristics) and the Mann–Whitney U-test (for experience assessments) to compare the characteristics and experience for cases with and without PACE recorded.

Results

PACE provides individualized assessments of all patients entering the ICU. It is completed within 24 to 48 hours of admission, and covers five aspects (key relationships, social details and needs, patient preferences, communication and information status, and other concerns), followed by recording of an ongoing communication evaluation. Implementation is supported by a training program with specialist palliative care. A post-implementation survey of 95 ICU staff found that 89% rated PACE assessment as very or generally useful. Of 213 family members, 165 (78%) responded to their survey, and two-thirds had PACE completed. Those for whom PACE was completed reported significantly higher satisfaction with symptom control, and the honesty and consistency of information from staff (Mann–Whitney U-test ranged from 616 to 1247, P-values ranged from 0.041 to 0.010) compared with those who did not.

Conclusions

PACE is a feasible interventional tool that has the potential to improve communication, information consistency, and family perceptions of symptom control.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Higginson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140722055323855.pdf 593KB PDF download
117KB Image download
80KB Image download
84KB Image download
【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Azoulay E, Timsit JF, Sprung CL, Soares M, Rusinovj K, Lafabrie A, Abizanda R, Svantesson M, Rubulotta F, Ricou B, Benoit D, Heyland D, Joynt G, Francxais A, Azeivedo-Maia P, Owczuk R, Benbenishty J, De Vita M, Valentin A, Ksomos A, Cohen S, Kompan L, Ho K, Abroug F, Kaarlola A, Gerlach H, Kyprianou T, Michalsen A, Chevret S, Schlemmer B: Prevalence and factors of intensive care unit conflicts: the conflicus study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009, 180:853-860.
  • [2]Sprung CL, Woodcock T, Sjokvist P, Ricou B, Bulow HH, Lippert A, Maia P, Cohen S, Baras M, Hovilehto S, Ledoux D, Phelan D, Wennberg E, Schobersberger W: Reasons, considerations, difficulties and documentation of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units: the ETHICUS Study. Intensive Care Med 2008, 34:271-277.
  • [3]Smith D: Development of an end-of-life care pathway for patients with advanced heart failure in a community setting. Int J Palliat Nurs 2012, 18:295-300.
  • [4]Parker MJ: We need an alternative to the Liverpool care pathway for patients who might recover. BMJ 2013, 346:f3702.
  • [5]Morgan J: End-of-life care in UK critical care units–a literature review. Nurs Crit Care 2008, 13:152-161.
  • [6]Truog RD, Campbell ML, Curtis JR, Haas CE, Luce JM, Rubenfeld GD, Rushton CH, Kaufman DC: Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a consensus statement by the American College [corrected] of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 2008, 36:953-963.
  • [7]Browning AM: Empowering family members in end-of-life care decision making in the intensive care unit. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2009, 28:18-23.
  • [8]Mularski RA, Puntillo K, Varkey B, Erstad BL, Grap MJ, Gilbert HC, Li D, Medina J, Pasero C, Sessler CN: Pain management within the palliative and end-of-life care experience in the ICU. Chest 2009, 135:1360-1369.
  • [9]Savory EA, Marco CA: End-of-life issues in the acute and critically ill patient. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:21. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [10]Curtis JR, Vincent JL: Ethics and end-of-life care for adults in the intensive care unit. Lancet 2010, 376:1347-1353.
  • [11]Levin TT, Moreno B, Silvester W, Kissane DW: End-of-life communication in the intensive care unit. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2010, 32:433-442.
  • [12]Luce JM: A history of resolving conflicts over end-of-life care in intensive care units in the United States. Crit Care Med 2010, 38:1623-1629.
  • [13]Luce JM: End-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010, 182:6-11.
  • [14]Aslakson R, Pronovost PJ: Health care quality in end-of-life care: promoting palliative care in the intensive care unit. Anesthesiol Clin 2011, 29:111-122.
  • [15]Morgan L, Howe L, Whitcomb J, Smith K: Improving communication and cost-effectiveness in the intensive care unit through palliative care: a review of literature. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2011, 30:133-138.
  • [16]Tyrie LS, Mosenthal AC: Care of the family in the surgical intensive care unit. Anesthesiol Clin 2012, 30:37-46.
  • [17]Curtis JR: Communicating about end-of-life care with patients and families in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin 2004, 20:363-380.
  • [18]Mosenthal AC, Weissman DE, Curtis JR, Hays RM, Lustbader DR, Mulkerin C, Puntillo KA, Ray DE, Bassett R, Boss RD, Brasel KJ, Campbell M, Nelson JE: Integrating palliative care in the surgical and trauma intensive care unit: a report from the Improving Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit (IPAL-ICU) Project Advisory Board and the Center to Advance Palliative Care. Crit Care Med 2012, 40:1199-1206.
  • [19]Mularski RA, Heine CE, Osborne ML, Ganzini L, Curtis JR: Quality of dying in the ICU: Ratings by family members. Chest 2005, 128:280-287.
  • [20]SIAARTI: End-of-life care and the intensivist: SIAARTI recommendations on the management of the dying patient. Minerva Anestesiol 2006, 72:927-963.
  • [21]Boyle DK, Miller PA, Forbes-Thompson SA: Communication and end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: Patient, family, and clinician outcomes. Crit Care Nurs Q 2005, 28:302-316.
  • [22]Halcomb E, Daly J, Jackson D, Davidson P: An insight into Australian nurses’ experience of withdrawal/withholding of treatment in the ICU. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2004, 20:214-222.
  • [23]Barnato AE, Chang CCH, Saynina O, Garber AM: Influence of race on inpatient treatment intensity at the end of life. J Gen Intern Med 2007, 22:338-345.
  • [24]Yaguchi A, Truog RD, Curtis JR, Luce JM, Levy MM, Mélot C, Vincent JL: International differences in end-of-life attitudes in the intensive care unit: Results of a survey. Arch Intern Med 2005, 165:1970-1975.
  • [25]Seymour JE: Negotiating natural death in intensive care. Soc Sci Med 2000, 51:1241-1252.
  • [26]Nelson JE, Bassett R, Boss RD, Brasel KJ, Campbell ML, Cortez TB, Curtis JR, Lustbader DR, Mulkerin C, Puntillo KA, Ray DE, Weissman DE: Models for structuring a clinical initiative to enhance palliative care in the intensive care unit: a report from the IPAL-ICU Project (Improving Palliative Care in the ICU). Crit Care Med 2010, 38:1765-1772.
  • [27]Nelson JE, Cortez TB, Curtis JR, Lustbader DR, Mosenthal AC, Mulkerin C, Ray DE, Bassett R, Boss RD, Brasel KJ, Campbell ML, Weissman DE, Puntillo KA: Integrating Palliative Care in the ICU: The Nurse in a Leading Role. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2011, 13:89-94.
  • [28]Cheung W, Aggarwal G, Fugaccia E, Thanakrishnan G, Milliss D, Anderson R, Stock D, Bird H, Tan J, Fryc AC: Palliative care teams in the intensive care unit: a randomised, controlled, feasibility study. Crit Care Resusc 2010, 12:28-35.
  • [29]Mosenthal AC, Murphy PA, Barker LK, Lavery R, Retano A, Livingston DH: Changing the culture around end-of-life care in the trauma intensive care unit. J Trauma 2008, 64:1587-1593.
  • [30]Chapman L: Adapting the Liverpool Care Pathway for intensive care units. Eur J Palliative Care 2009, 16:116-118.
  • [31]Investigators SUPPORT: A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. JAMA 1995, 274:1591-1598.
  • [32]Fridh I, Forsberg A, Bergbom I: Family presence and environmental factors at the time of a patient’s death in an ICU. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007, 51:395-401.
  • [33]Abbott KH, Sago JG, Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Tulsky JA: Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support. Crit Care Med 2001, 29:197-201.
  • [34]Ahrens T, Yancey V, Kollef M: Improving family communications at the end of life: implications for length of stay in the intensive care unit and resource use. Am J Crit Care 2003, 12:317-324.
  • [35]Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, Shannon SE, Treece PD, Rubenfeld GD: Missed opportunities during family conferences about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005, 171:844-849.
  • [36]Hsieh HF, Shannon SE, Curtis JR: Contradictions and communication strategies during end-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care 2006, 21:294-304.
  • [37]Puntillo KA, McAdam JL: Communication between physicians and nurses as a target for improving end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: challenges and opportunities for moving forward. Crit Care Med 2006, 34:S332-S340.
  • [38]Vincent JL, Berré J, Creteur J: Withholding and withdrawing life prolonging treatment in the intensive care unit: a current European perspective. Chron Respir Dis 2004, 1:115-120.
  • [39]West HF, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, Curtis JR: Expressions of nonabandonment during the intensive care unit family conference. J Palliat Med 2005, 8:797-807.
  • [40]Palda VA, Bowman KW, McLean RF, Chapman MG: “Futile” care: Do we provide it? Why? A semistructured, Canada-wide survey of intensive care unit doctors and nurses. J Crit Care 2005, 20:207-213.
  • [41]Fassier T, Lautrette A, Ciroldi M, Azoulay E: Care at the end of life in critically ill patients: the European perspective. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005, 11:616-623.
  • [42]Kirchhoff KT, Walker L, Hutton A, Spuhler V, Cole BV, Clemmer T: The vortex: families’ experiences with death in the intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care 2002, 11:200-209.
  • [43]Kopelman AE: Understanding, avoiding, and resolving end-of-life conflicts in the NICU. Mt Sinai J Med 2006, 73:580-586.
  • [44]Lautrette A, Ciroldi M, Ksibi H, Azoulay E: End-of-life family conferences: rooted in the evidence. Crit Care Med 2006, 34:S364-S372.
  • [45]Chaitin E, Stiller R, Jacobs S, Hershl J, Grogen T, Weinberg J: Physician-patient relationship in the intensive care unit: erosion of the sacred trust? Crit Care Med 2003, 31:S367-S372.
  • [46]White DB, Curtis JR: Care near the end-of-life in critically ill patients: A North American perspective. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005, 11:610-615.
  • [47]Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008, 337:a1655.
  • [48]Higginson IJ, Evans CJ, Grande G, Preston N, Morgan M, McCrone P, Lewis P, Fayers P, Harding R, Hotopf M, Murray SA, Benalia H, Gysels M, Farquhar M, Todd C: Evaluating complex interventions in end of life care: the MORECare statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews. BMC Med 2013, 11:111. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [49](ICNARC) ICNARC: Electronic Data Analysis Report. London: Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC); 2012.
  • [50]Lewis-Newby M, Curtis JR, Martin DP, Engelberg RA: Measuring family satisfaction with care and quality of dying in the intensive care unit: does patient age matter? J Palliat Med 2011, 14:1284-1290.
  • [51]Ritchie J, Spencer L, O’Connor W: Carrying out qualitative analysis. In Qualitative Research Practice. Edited by Ritchie J, Lewis J. New York: Sage; 2003.
  • [52]Clarke EB, Curtis JR, Luce JM, Levy M, Danis M, Nelson J, Solomon MZ: Quality indicators for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2003, 31:2255-2262.
  • [53]Cook D, Rocker G, Heyland D: Dying in the ICU: strategies that may improve end-of-life care. Can J Anaesth 2004, 51:266-272.
  • [54]Giannini A, Pessina A, Tacchi EM: End-of-life decisions in intensive care units: attitudes of physicians in an Italian urban setting. Intensive Care Med 2003, 29:1902-1910.
  • [55]Gysels M, Higginson IJ: Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer: Research Evidence. London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence; 2004.
  • [56]Bailey FA, Burgio KL, Woodby LL, Williams BR, Redden DT, Kovac SH, Durham RM, Goode PS: Improving processes of hospital care during the last hours of life. Arch Intern Med 2005, 165:1722-1727.
  • [57]Bookbinder M, Blank AE, Arney E, Wollner D, Lesage P, McHugh M, Indelicato RA, Harding S, Barenboim A, Mirozyev T, Portenoy RK: Improving end-of-life care: development and pilot-test of a clinical pathway. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005, 29:529-543.
  • [58]Luhrs CA, Meghani S, Homel P, Drayton M, O’Toole E, Paccione M, Daratsos L, Wollner D, Bookbinder M: Pilot of a pathway to improve the care of imminently dying oncology inpatients in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005, 29:544-551.
  • [59]Di Leo S, Beccaro M, Finelli S, Borreani C, Costantini M: Expectations about and impact of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient in an Italian hospital. Palliat Med 2011, 25:293-303.
  • [60]Veerbeek L, van der Heide A, de Vogel-Voogt E, de Bakker R, van der Rijt CC, Swart SJ, van der Maas PJ, van Zuylen L: Using the LCP: bereaved relatives’ assessments of communication and bereavement. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2008, 25:207-214.
  • [61]Veerbeek L, van Zuylen L, Swart SJ, van der Maas PJ, de Vogel-Voogt E, van der Rijt CC, van der Heide A: The effect of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying: a multi-centre study. Palliat Med 2008, 22:145-151.
  • [62]Mularski RA, White-Chu F, Overbay D, Miller L, Asch SM, Ganzini L: Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management. J Gen Intern Med 2006, 21:607-612.
  • [63]Boyd K, Murray S: Using end of life care pathways for the last hours or days of life. BMJ 2012, 345:e7718.
  • [64]Department of Health: More care, less pathway: a review of the Liverpool Care Pathway. Report on the use and experience of the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP). London: Department of Health; 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-liverpool-care-pathway-for-dying-patients webcite (accessed 26 July 2013)
  • [65]Lowson E, Hanratty B, Holmes L, Addington-Hall J, Grande G, Payne S, Seymour J: From ‘conductor’ to ‘second fiddle’: Older adult care recipients’ perspectives on transitions in family caring at hospital admission. Int J Nurs Stud 2013, 50:1197-1205.
  • [66]Curtis JR, Ciechanowski PS, Downey L, Gold J, Nielsen EL, Shannon SE, Treece PD, Young JP, Engelberg RA: Development and evaluation of an interprofessional communication intervention to improve family outcomes in the ICU. Contemp Clin Trials 2012, 33:1245-1254.
  • [67]McCorkle R, Ercolano E, Lazenby M, Schulman-Green D, Schilling LS, Lorig K, Wagner EH: Self-management: enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness. CA Cancer J Clin 2011, 61:50-62.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:45次 浏览次数:18次