Is ‘mainstreaming AYUSH’ the right policy for Meghalaya, northeast India?

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

John Porter²  Sandra Albert¹ 

[1]Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India

[2]London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

关键词: Traditional medicine;    Medical pluralism;    Indigenous medicine;    Health systems;    Health policy;   

Others  :  1222528
DOI  :  10.1186/s12906-015-0818-x

 received in 2015-01-24, accepted in 2015-08-11,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

National policy on medical pluralism in India encourages the mainstreaming of AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy) systems and the revitalization of local health traditions (LHT). In Meghalaya state in the northeast, the main LHT is its indigenous tribal traditional medicine. This paper presents the perceptions of tribal medicine and of AYUSH systems among various policy actors and locates the tribal medicine of Meghalaya within the policy on medical pluralism currently being implemented in the state, a region that is ethnically and culturally different and predominantly inhabited by indigenous peoples.

Methods

A stakeholder mapping exercise identified appropriate policy actors and 46 in-depth interviews were conducted with policy makers, doctors, academics, members of healer associations and elders of the community. A further 44 interviews were conducted with 24 Khasi and 20 Garo traditional healers. Interview data were supplemented with document analysis and observations. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis that incorporated elements of grounded theory.

Results

In Meghalaya there is high awareness and utilization of tribal medicine, but no visible efforts by the public sector to support or engage with healers. The AYUSH systems in contrast had little local acceptance but promotion of these systems has led to a substantial increase in AYUSH doctors, particularly homeopaths, in rural areas. Policy actors outside the health department saw an important role for tribal medicine due to its popularity, local belief in its efficacy and its cultural resonance. The need to engage with healers to enhance referral, training, documentation and research of tribal medicine was made.

Conclusions

The wide acceptance of tribal medicine suggests that tribal medicine needs to be supported. The results of the study question the process of the implementation of the ‘mainstreaming AYUSH’ policy for Meghalaya and highlight the importance of contextualizing health policy within the local culture. A potential role for Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) at sub-national levels is also highlighted.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Albert and Porter.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Berman PA. Rethinking health care systems: Private health care provision in India. World Dev. 1998; 26(8):1463-1479.
• [2]Shankar D. Indigenous Health Services-The State of the Art. In: State of India' s Health. Mukhopadhyay A, editor. Voluntary Health Association, India; 1992: p.129-162.
• [3]Sujatha V, Abraham L. Medicine, state and society. Econ Polit Wkly. 2009; xliv(16):35-43.
• [4]GoI. National Rural Health Mission (2005–2012), Mission Document. http://www. nird.org.in/brgf/doc/Rural%20HealthMission_Document.pdf webcite
• [5]Priya R, Shweta AS. Status and role of AYUSH and Local Health Traditions under the National Rural Health Mission. National Health Systems Resource Centre, New Delhi; 2010.
• [6]Last M. The Professionalization of Indigenous Traditional Healers. In: Medical Anthropology: Contemporary Theory and Method. Sargent CF, Johnson TM, editors. Praeger Publishers, London; 1996: p.374-395.
• [7]Panikkar KN. Culture, Ideology, Hegemoney: Intellectuals and Social Consciousness in Colonial India. Anthem Press, London; 1995.
• [8]Lambert H. Medical pluralism and medical marginality: Bone doctors and the selective legitimation of therapeutic expertise in India. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 74(7):1029-1036.
• [9]Hardiman D. Indian medical indigeneity: from nationalist assertion to the global market. Soc Hist. 2009; 34(3):263-283.
• [10]Payyappallimana U, Hariramamurthi G. Local Health Practitioners in India - Resilience, Revitalisation and Regintegration. In: Medical Pluralism in Contemporary India. Sujatha V, Abraham L, editors. Orient Black Swan, India; 2012: p.279-304.
• [11]Attewell G. The end of the line? The fracturing of authoritative tibbi knowledge in twentieth-century India. Asian Med. 2005; 1(2):387-419.
• [12]GoI. National Policy on Indian Systems of Medicine & Homoeopathy-2002. http://indianmedicine. nic.in/writereaddata/linkimages/7870046089-Ayush%20%20n%20policy%20ISM%20and%20H%20Homeopathy.pdf webcite
• [13]Albert S, Nongrum M, Webb EL, Porter JD, Kharkongor GC. Medical pluralism among indigenous peoples in northeast India‐implications for health policy. Trop Med Int Health. 2015; 20(7):952-960.
• [14]North Eastern Region Vision 2020: General Strategies For The Region. Peace, Progress and Prosperity in the North Eastern Region. North East Council, Ministry of DONER, India; 2008.
• [15]NCST. National Commission for Scheduled Tribes. http://ncst. nic.in/index.asp?langid=1 webcite
• [16]Ministry of Tribal Affairs. Demographic Status of Scheduled Tribe Population of India. http://www. tribal.gov.in/WriteReadData/CMS/Documents/201306110208002203443DemographicStatusofScheduledTribePopulationofIndia.pdf webcite
• [17]GoI. Census of India 2011. http://censusindia. gov.in/ webcite
• [18]Meghalaya Human Development Report 2008. Planning Department. Government of Meghalaya, India; 2009.
• [19]Meghalaya State Development Report 2008–2009. Planning Department. Government of Meghalaya, India; 2009.
• [20]Rao R. Ethnobotany of Meghalaya: medicinal plants used by Khasi and Garo tribes. Econ Bot. 1981; 35(1):4-9.
• [21]Tynsong H, Tiwari B. Plant Diversity in the Homegardens and their Significance in the Livelihoods of War KhasiCommunity of Meghalaya, North-east India. J Biodiversity. 2010; 1(1):1-11.
• [22]Roy B, Swargiary A, Syiem D, Tandon V. Potentilla fulgens (Family Rosaceae), a medicinal plant of north-east India: a natural anthelmintic? J Parasitic Dis. 2010; 34(2):83-88.
• [23]Syiem D, Syngai G, Khup PZ, Khongwir BS, Kharbuli B, Kayang H. Hypoglycemic effects of Potentilla fulgens L. in normal and alloxan-induced diabetic mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002; 83(1–2):55-61.
• [24]United Nations. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 2008. http://www. un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf webcite
• [25]Gilson L, Hanson K, Sheikh K, Agyepong IA, Ssengooba F, Bennett S. Building the field of health policy and systems research: social science matters. Plos Med. 2011; 8(8): Article ID e1001079
• [26]Tantivess S, Walt G. The role of state and non-state actors in the policy process: The contribution of policy networks to the scale-up of antiretroviral therapy in Thailand. Health Policy Plann. 2008; 23(5):328-338.
• [27]Health Statistical Handbook 2011–2012. Meghalaya. Health Management Information Systems (HMIS) Division, NRHM, India; 2012.
• [28]Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy Plann. 2000; 15(3):239-246.
• [29]Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, London; 2009.
• [30]Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis: Pine Forge Press; 2006.
• [31]NEIAH. The North Eastern Institute of Ayurveda & Homoeopathy (NEIAH), Shillong, Meghalaya. http://neiah. nic.in/ webcite
• [32]Bewley S. Clothing naked quackery and legitimising pseudoscience. British Medical Journal. 2011.
• [33]Effectiveness of Homeopathy for Clinical Conditions. Evaluation of the Evidence: NHMRC draft Information Paper. National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia; 2013.
• [34]GoI. National Rural Health Mission State Health Action Plan 2008–2009, Government of Meghalaya. nhsrcindia. org/index.php?option.com_docman&task webcite
• [35]KHADC. The Khasi Hills Autonomous District Protection And Promotion of Khasi Traditional Medicine Act, 2011. http://khadc. nic.in/acts_rules_regulations%20_n%20_bills/Acts%20n%20Rules-arranged/UKJHills%20Traditional%20Medicine%20Act,%202011.pdf webcite
• [36]GoI. Mainstreaming AYUSH under NRHM. http://203. 193.146.66/hfw/PDF/ayus.pdf webcite
• [37]NRHM. Mainstreaming of AYUSH. http://www. nrhm.gujarat.gov.in/mainstreaming-ayush.htm webcite
• [38]Halstead SB, Walsh JA, Warren KS. Good health at low cost. Rockefeller Foundation, New York; 1985.
• [39]Palafox B. Further insights from China, Costa Rica, Kerala and Srilanka 25 years later. Good Health at Low Cost 25 Years On What makes a successful health system?. Balabanova D, McKee M, Mills A, editors. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London; 2011.
• [40]Blaauw D, Gilson L, Penn-Kekana L, Schneider H. Organisational relationships and the ‘software’of health sector reform. Centre for Health Policy. School of Public Health. University of Witwatersrand, South Africa; 2003.
• [41]Mechanic D. The functions and limitations of trust in the provision of medical care. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1998; 23(4):661-686.
• [42]Ergler CR, Sakdapolrak P, Bohle H-G, Kearns RA. Entitlements to health care: Why is there a preference for private facilities among poorer residents of Chennai, India? Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72(3):327-337.
• [43]Gilson L. Trust and the development of health care as a social institution. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 56(7):1453-1468.
• [44]Buse K, Mays N, Walt G. Making Health Policy. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill International, London; 2012.
• [45]Walt G, Gilson L. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy Plann. 1994; 9(4):353-370.
• [46]Bosch-Capblanch X, Lavis JN, Lewin S, Atun R, Røttingen J-A, Dröschel D, Beck L, Abalos E, El-Jardali F, Gilson L. Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: rationale for and challenges of guidance development. Plos Med. 2012; 9(3):e1001185.
• [47]Remme JH, Adam T, Becerra-Posada F, D'Arcangues C, Devlin M, Gardner C, Ghaffar A, Hombach J, Kengeya JF, Mbewu A. Defining research to improve health systems. Plos Med. 2010; 7(11):e1001000.
• [48]Sheehan HE. Medical pluralism in India: patient choice or no other options. Indian J Med Ethics. 2009; 6(3):138-141.
• [49]Sen G, Iyer A, George A. Systematic hierarchies and systemic failures: Gender and health inequities in Koppal District. Econ Polit Wkly. 2007; 42:682-690.
• [50]Syiem E. People's Linguistic Survey of India. The Languages of Meghalaya. Orient Blackswan Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi; 2014.
• [51]Karlsson BG. Unruly Hills, Nature and Nation in India's Northeast. Orient Blackswan and Social Science Press, New Delhi; 2011.
• [52]Dalai Lama enamoured by culture of M’laya, NE. Shillong Times. Meghalaya, India: Shillong Times, Shillong; 2014.
• [53]Balasubramanian A. Is There an Indian Way of Doing Science? Traditional knowledge systems of India and Sri Lanka. Balasubramanian A, Devi TN, editors. Centre for Indian knowledge systems (CIKS), Chennai, India; 2006.
• [54]Andrade-Neto V, Brandão M, Stehmann J, Oliveira L, Krettli A. Antimalarial activity of Cinchona like plants used to treat fever and malaria in Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003; 87(2):253-256.
• [55]Stephens C, Porter J, Nettleton C, Willis R. Disappearing, displaced, and undervalued: a call to action for Indigenous health worldwide. Lancet. 2006; 367(9527):2019-2028.
• [56]Hafeel A, Suma T, Unnikrishnan P, Shankar D. Reviving Local Health Traditions in Ancient Roots New Shoots London: Zed Books. 2003.
• [57]Alves RR, Rosa IM. Biodiversity, traditional medicine and public health: where do they meet? J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007; 3(1):14. BioMed Central Full Text
• [58]Nair M. Tribal healers script a success story. 2004. The Hindu. Retrieved 10.10.2013. http://www. hindu.com/2004/08/02/stories/2004080201470500.htm webcite
• [59]Nair M. Tapping the riches of tribal medicine. The Hindu. Retrieved 2.10.2013,. http://www. hindu.com/2008/07/24/stories/2008072457031000.htm webcite
• [60]Pandey V. Short of doctors, Nagaland turns to traditional healers. DNA. DNA, India; 2012.
• [61]Gopichandran V, Satish Kumar C. Mainstreaming AYUSH: an ethical analysis. Indian J Med Ethics. 2012; 9(4):270-277.
• [62]Jayasundar R. Healthcare the Ayurvedic way. Indian J Med Ethics. 2012; 9(3):177-179.
• [63]Patwardhan B. Ayurveda: Finding place in own house. J Ayurveda Integrative Med. 2012; 3(3):109-110.
• [64]Valiathan MS. An Ayurvedic view of life. Curr Sci. 2009; 96(9):1186-1192.
• [65]Jayasundar R. Ayurveda: a distinctive approach to health and disease. Curr Sci. 2010; 98(7):908-914.
• [66]Jayasundar R. Contrasting Approaches to Health and Disease: Ayurveda and Biomedicine. Orient Black Swan, India; 2012.
• [67]Balasubramaniam A. Building a Bridge Between Local Health Cultures and Codified Traditions. In: Challenging the Indian Medical Heritage. Shankar D, Unnikrishnan P, editors. Foundation Books, New Delhi, India; 2004: p.63-75.
• [68]Gupta M, Shaw B. Uses of medicinal plants in Panchakarma Ayurvedic therapy. Indian J Traditional Knowledge. 2009; 8:372-378.
• [69]Rawal M, Chudasma KM, Vyas RV, Parmar BP. Effect of Vasantic Vaman and other Panchakarma procedures on disorders of various systems. Ayu. 2010; 31(3):319-324.
• [70]Shang A, Huwiler-Müntener K, Nartey L, Jüni P, Dörig S, Sterne JAC, Pewsner D, Egger M. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. Lancet. 2005; 366(9487):726-732.
• [71]Finniss DG, Kaptchuk TJ, Miller F, Benedetti F. Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects. Lancet. 2010; 375(9715):686-695.
• [72]Turner JA, Deyo RA, Loeser JD, Von Korff M, Fordyce WE. The importance of placebo effects in pain treatment and research. Jama. 1994; 271(20):1609-1614.
• [73]Patwardhan B. Health for India: Search for appropriate models. J Ayurveda Integrative Med. 2012; 3(4):173-174.
• [74]Twelfth Five Year Plan 2012–17. Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi; 2013.
• [75]Rao KD, Sundararaman T, Bhatnagar A, Gupta G, Kokho P, Jain K. Which doctor for primary health care? Quality of care and non-physician clinicians in India. Soc Sci Med. 2013; 84:30-34.
• [76]Asthana S, Dasgupta R. Rao et al.'s “which doctor for primary health care? Quality of care and non-physician clinicians in India 84 (2013) 30–34”. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 102(0):201-202.
• [77]Rao KD, Sundararaman T. Medical pluralism and cross practice in India. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 102:203-204.
• [78]NHSRC. Rural Health Practitioners: Augmenting Sub-Center Service Delivery in Assam. nhsrcindia. org/index.php?option.com_dropfiles&task=frontfile.download&id=11066 webcite
• [79]Rao M, Rao KD, Kumar A, Chatterjee M, Sundararaman T. Human resources for health in India. Lancet. 2011; 377(9765):587-598.
• [80]7th Common Review Mission Meghalaya. NRHM, MoH&FW, New Delhi; 2013.
• [81]Everybody's business-strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO's framework for action. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2007.
• [82]World Health Report 2013: Research for Universal Health Coverage. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2013.
• [83]Sheikh K, Gilson L, Agyepong IA, Hanson K, Ssengooba F, Bennett S. Building the field of health policy and systems research: framing the questions. Plos Med. 2011; 8(8): Article ID e1001073
• [84]Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM. On the need for evidence-based medicine. Journal of Public Health. 1995; 17(3):330-334.
• [85]Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray J, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. Br Med J. 1996; 312(7023):71.
• [86]Thomas T, Paul J. Posing the Research Question: not so simple. Can J Anesth. 2009; 56(1):71-79.
• [87]Systems Thinking: for Health Systems Strengthening. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2009.