期刊论文详细信息
BMC Oral Health
Clinical validation of robot simulation of toothbrushing - comparative plaque removal efficacy
Peter Gaengler1  Barbara Jennes2  Sebastian Staufer2  Tomas Lang2 
[1] Faculty of Health, Department of Dentistry, University of Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50, 58448 Witten, Germany;ORMED Institute for Oral Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 45, 58455 Witten, Germany
关键词: Oral hygiene;    Randomized clinical trial;    Robot simulation;    Cleaning efficacy;    Plaque control;    Toothbrushing;   
Others  :  848294
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6831-14-82
 received in 2014-01-16, accepted in 2014-06-20,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Clinical validation of laboratory toothbrushing tests has important advantages. It was, therefore, the aim to demonstrate correlation of tooth cleaning efficiency of a new robot brushing simulation technique with clinical plaque removal.

Methods

Clinical programme: 27 subjects received dental cleaning prior to 3-day-plaque-regrowth-interval. Plaque was stained, photographically documented and scored using planimetrical index. Subjects brushed teeth 33–47 with three techniques (horizontal, rotating, vertical), each for 20s buccally and for 20s orally in 3 consecutive intervals. The force was calibrated, the brushing technique was video supported. Two different brushes were randomly assigned to the subject. Robot programme: Clinical brushing programmes were transfered to a 6-axis-robot. Artificial teeth 33–47 were covered with plaque-simulating substrate. All brushing techniques were repeated 7 times, results were scored according to clinical planimetry. All data underwent statistical analysis by t-test, U-test and multivariate analysis.

Results

The individual clinical cleaning patterns are well reproduced by the robot programmes. Differences in plaque removal are statistically significant for the two brushes, reproduced in clinical and robot data. Multivariate analysis confirms the higher cleaning efficiency for anterior teeth and for the buccal sites.

Conclusions

The robot tooth brushing simulation programme showed good correlation with clinically standardized tooth brushing.

This new robot brushing simulation programme can be used for rapid, reproducible laboratory testing of tooth cleaning.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Lang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140718064430502.pdf 2249KB PDF download
Figure 5. 68KB Image download
Figure 4. 48KB Image download
Figure 3. 39KB Image download
Figure 2. 22KB Image download
Figure 1. 58KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Deacon SA, Glenny AM, Deery C, Robinson PG, Heanue M, Walmsley AD, Shaw WC: Different powered toothbrushes for plaque control and gingival health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010. Issue 12. Art. No.: CD004971. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004971.pub2
  • [2]Arnold M, Trost G: Über die Abhängigkeit des Putzeffektes von verschieden Formen des Bürstenkopfes. Dtsch Stomatol 1972, 22:46-53.
  • [3]Nygaard-Østby P, Edwardsen S, Spydevold B: Access to interproximal tooth surfaces by different bristle designs and stiffness of toothbrushes. Scan J Dent Res 1979, 87:424-430.
  • [4]Rawls HR, Smith NK, Lentz DL, Cobb GW: Interproximal penetration of commercial toothbrushes as determined by static and dynamic tests using recommened brushing techniques. J Clin Dent 1993, 4:88-95.
  • [5]Volpenhein DW, Walsh MD, Dellermann PA, Burkett TA: A new method for in vitro evaluation of the interproximal penetration of manual toothbrushes. J Clin Dent 1994, 5:27-33.
  • [6]Ernst CP, Willershausen B, Driese G, Warren PR, Hilfinger P: A robot system for evaluating plaque removal efficiency of toothbrushes in vitro. Quintessence Int 1997, 28:441-445.
  • [7]Driesen GM, Warren PR, Hilfinger P, Ernst CP, Willershausen B: The development of the Braun Oral-B Ultra Plaque Remover: an in vitro robot study. Am J Dent 1996, 9:13-17.
  • [8]Driesen GM, Warren PR, Bielfeldt U, Helbig G: A laboratory comparison of the efficacy of battery-operated, non-rechargeable power toothbrushes. Am J Dent 2001, 14(Sec No):5B-8B.
  • [9]Kaiser E, Thurnay S, Markgraf D, Pack S, Grender J, Hengenhold D, Warren PR, Wehrbein H, Erbe C: Brush head wear, subject-perceived and laboratory cleaning performance of two oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush heads over 3 months. Am J Dent 2012, 25:84-90.
  • [10]Imfeld T, Sener B, Simonovic I: In-Vitro-Untersuchung der mechanischen Wirkung von handelsüblichen Handzahnbürsten. Acta Med Dent Helv 2000, 5:37-47.
  • [11]Schaetzle M, Imfeld T, Sener B, Schmidlin PR: In vitro tooth cleaning efficacy of manual toothbrushes around brackets. Eur J Orthod 2009, 31:103-107.
  • [12]Schaetzle M, Sener B, Schmidlin PR, Imfeld T, Attin T: In vitro tooth cleaning efficacy of electric toothbrushes around brackets. Eur J Orthod 2010, 32:481-489.
  • [13]Elliot JR, Bowers GM, Clemmer BA, Rovelstad GH: Evaluation of an oral physiotherapy center in the reduction of bacterial plaque and periodontal disease. J Periodontol 1972, 43:221-224.
  • [14]Rustogi KN, Curtis JP, Volpe AR, Kemp JH, McCool JJ, Korn LR: Refinement of the modified navy plaque index to increase plaque scoring efficiency in gumline and interproximal tooth areas. J Clin Dent 1992, 3:9-12.
  • [15]Claydon N, Addy M: The use of planimetry to record and score the modified Navy Index and other area-based plaque indices. A comparative toothbrush study. J Clin Periodontol 1995, 22:670-673.
  • [16]Stagge P, Krollmann FH, Veith F: Report A 07 1086. Germany: MPA Darmstadt; 2007.
  • [17]Sidney S, Castellan NJ: Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Second edition. New York: McGraw Hill; 1988.
  • [18]Gujarati DN: Basis Econometrics. Fourth edition. New York: McGraw Hill; 2003.
  • [19]Greene WH: Econometric Analysis. Second edition. New York: Macmillan; 1990.
  • [20]ADA American Dental Association: Acceptance Program Guidelines Toothbrushes. Council on Scientific Affairs; 2012. URL http://www.ada.org/sections/scienceAndResearch/pdfs/guide_toothbrushes.pdf webcite [accessed May 15, 2014]
  • [21]Ganss C, Hardt M, Blazek D, Klimek J, Schlueter N: Effects of toothbrushing force on the mineral content and demineralized organic matrix of eroded dentine. Eur J Oral Sci 2009, 117:255-260.
  • [22]Ganss C, Schlueter N, Preiss S, Klimek J: Tooth brushing habits in uninstructed adults - frequency, technique, duration and force. Clin Oral Invest 2009, 13:203-218.
  • [23]Claydon N, Addy M, Scratcher C, Ley F, Newcombe R: Comparative professional plaque removal study using 8 branded toothbrushes. J Clin Periodontol 2002, 29:310-316.
  • [24]Rosema M, Hennequin-Hoenderdos NL, Versteeg PA, Van der Weijden GA: Plaque removing efficacy of new and used manual toothbrushes - a professional brushing study. Int J Dent Hygiene 2013, 11:237-243.
  • [25]Gaengler P, Lang T, Jennes B: Computer-assisted planimetrical plaque assessment of robot tested toothbrushing. J Dent Res 2013., 92(Spec. Issue) Abstract No. 3326
  • [26]Lang T, Jennes B, Gaengler P: Clinical validation of robot tested toothbrushing of deciduous dentition. J Dent Res 2014., 93(Spec. Issue) Abstract No. 494
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:24次 浏览次数:10次