Using PhenX toolkit measures and other tools to assess urban/rural differences in health behaviors: recruitment methods and outcomes

BMC Research Notes

Catherine A McCarty¹  Jeanette A Palcher¹  Pat G Conway¹  Michael M Hitz¹ 

[1] Essentia Institute of Rural Health, Maildrop: 6AV-2, 502 East Second Street, Duluth, MN 55805, USA

关键词: Vacation;    Occupational;    Health;    Depression;    Questionnaire design;    Epidemiologic research;    Design;   

Others  :  1118187
DOI  :  10.1186/1756-0500-7-847

 received in 2013-05-10, accepted in 2014-09-04,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The overall study was designed to examine how vacation behavior affects rural and urban Minnesotans and North Dakotans. The purpose of this substudy was to describe the method for sampling, follow-up and response rate by gender and urban/rural location to help inform future studies in this population.

Methods

Essentia health primary care patients (n = 1344) were sent a 21-page self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire included questions on demographics, work history, perceived stress, work productivity, depression and mania screeners, tobacco use, dietary information, vacation habits, and technology use. Participants were offered $10 to complete the questionnaire.

Results

The overall response to the three mailings to 1344 adults aged 25–64 was 38.8% for a final sample size of 522 completed surveys. Despite the oversampling of males, the total number of responses from males was lower than for females. The response rates between urban and rural locations were nearly identical for the males (33.3% and 33.0% respectively) but higher for rural females than urban females (47.2% and 42.6% respectively). Seventy-eight percent were currently employed. Sixty-nine percent of the participants reported being married, 5.4% were living with a partner, 14% were divorced widowed or separated and 11% were never married. Forty-seven percent of our population had an associate degree or some college, 29% had a Bachelor’s degree or higher, 17% had their diploma or equivalent and 2% had not completed high school.

Conclusions

The goal of the sampling frame and recruitment strategy for this study was to assemble a cohort of approximately 1000 working adults, represented equally by age, gender and rural location. We ended up with a smaller cohort than desired. The law of diminishing returns was observed, although the third mailing was more effective for men than women.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Hitz et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Chikani V, Reding D, Gunderson P, McCarty CA: Vacations improve mental health among rural women: the Wisconsin Rural Women’s Health Study. Wisc Med J 2005, 104:20-23.
• [2]Link MW, Battaglia MP, Frankel MR, Osborn L, Mokdad AH: Address-based versus random-digit-dial surveys: comparison of key health and risk indicators. Am J Epidemiol 2006, 164:1019-1025.
• [3]Leece P, Bhandari M, Sprague S, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH, Tornetta P III, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH: Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2). J Med Internet Res 2004, 6:e39.
• [4]Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I: Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 2002, 324:1193.
• [5]Eagan TML, Eide GE, Gulsvik A, Bakke PS: Nonresposne in a community cohort study. Predictors and consequences for exposure-disease associations. J Clin Epidemiol 2002, 55:775-781.
• [6]Perneger TV, Chamot E, Bovier PA: Nonresponse bias in a survey of patient perceptions of hospital care. Med Care 2005, 43:374-380.
• [7]McCarty CA, Wilke RA, Giampietro PF, Wesbrook S, Caldwell MD: Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project (PMRP): design, methods and recruitment for a large, population-based biobank. Personalized Med 2005, 2:49-79.
• [8]Hamilton CM, Strader LC, Pratt JG, Maiese D, Hendershot T, Kwok RK, Hammond JA, Huggins W, Jackman D, Pan H, Nettles DS, Beaty TH, Farrer LA, Kraft P, Marazita ML, Ordovas JM, Pato CN, Spitz MR, Wagener D, Williams M, Junkins HA, Harlan WR, Ramos EM, Haines J: The PhenX Toolkit: get the most from your measures. Am J Epidemiol 2011, 174:253-260.
• [9]Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM: The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. PharmacoEconomics 1993, 4:353-365.
• [10]Sonnentag S, Fritz C: The recovery experience questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. JOHP 2007, 12:204-221.
• [11]MacKay K, Vogt C: Information technology in everyday and vacation contexts. Ann Tourism 2012, 39:1380-1401.
• [12]McCarty CA, Berg R, Rottscheit CM, Waudby CJ, Kitchner T, Brilliant M, Ritchie MD: Validation of PhenX measures in the Personalized Medicine Research Project for use in gene/environment studies. BMC Med Genet 2014, 7:3.
• [13]Galea S, Tracy M: Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol 2007, 17:643-653.
• [14]Morton SMB, Bandara DK, Robinson EM, Carr PEA: In the 21st century, what is an acceptable response rate? Aust NZ J Public Health 2012, 36:106-108.
• [15]National Academy of Sciences: Nonreponse in Social Science Surveys: a research agenda. 2013.