The validity of the non-exercise activity thermogenesis questionnaire evaluated by objectively measured daily physical activity by the triaxial accelerometer

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation

Osamu Ezaki⁴  Mitsuhiko Noda²  Masafumi Kakei¹  Hidekatsu Yanai³  Hidetaka Hamasaki¹ 

[1] Division of Complementary Medicine, First Department of General Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Saitama, Japan;Department of Diabetes Research, Diabetes Research Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan;Department of Internal Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine Kohnodai Hospital, Chiba, Japan;Department of Human Health and Design, Faculty of Human Life and Environmental Sciences, Showa Women’s University, Tokyo, Japan

关键词: Type 2 diabetes;    Accelerometer;    Non exercise activity thermogenesis;    Physical activity;   

Others  :  869775
DOI  :  10.1186/2052-1847-6-27

 received in 2014-03-11, accepted in 2014-07-01,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Physical inactivity is a major cardiovascular risk factor. Recently, we showed that non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) assessed by the self-reported questionnaire is favorably associated with metabolic risks in patients with type 2 diabetes. The purpose of the present study was to examine the validity of the questionnaire by comparing with objectively measured daily physical activity (PA) by using the triaxial accelerometer.

Methods

Daily physical activity level (PAL) of 51 participants (24 men and 27 women) with type 2 diabetes was measured by the triaxial accelerometer. At the same time, we evaluated their NEAT score using our original questionnaire modified from a compendium of physical activities.

Results

The NEAT score was significantly and positively correlated with PAL measured by the triaxial accelerometer (r = 0.604, P < 0.001). PAL was also significantly and positively correlated with both the locomotive NEAT score and the non-locomotive NEAT score (r = 0.444, P = 0.001 and r = 0.526, P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

The NEAT score measured by the self-reported questionnaire was highly correlated with PAL measured by the triaxial accelerometer. Our original NEAT questionnaire may be useful for evaluation of daily PAL in clinical practices.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Hamasaki et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Thompson PD, Buchner D, Pina IL, Balady GJ, Williams MA, Marcus BH, Berra K, Blair SN, Costa F, Franklin B, Fletcher GF, Gordon NF, Pate RR, Rodriguez BL, Yancey AK, Wenger NK, American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology Subcommittee on Exercise, Rehabilitaion, and Prevention: Exercise and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Rehabilitaion, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity). Circulation 2003, 107:3109-3116.
• [2]Kodama S, Tanaka S, Heianza Y, Fujihara K, Horikawa C, Shimano H, Saito K, Yamada N, Ohashi Y, Sone H: Association between physical activity and risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2013, 36:471-479.
• [3]Shibata A, Oka K, Harada K, Nakamura Y, Muraoka I: Psychological, social, and environmental factors to meeting physical activity recommendations among Japanese adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009, 6:60. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]Levine JA: Non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT). Nutr Rev 2004, 5:S82-S97.
• [5]Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Owen N: Objectively measured light-intensity physical activity is independently associated with 2-h plasma glucose. Diabetes Care 2007, 30:1384-1389.
• [6]Healy GN, Wijndaele K, Dunstan DW, Shaw JE, Salmon J, Zimmet PZ, Owen N: Objectively measured sedentary time, physical activity, and metabolic risk: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Diabetes Care 2008, 31:369-371.
• [7]Hamasaki H, Yanai H, Mishima S, Mineyama T, Yamamoto-Honda R, Kakei M, Ezaki O, Noda M: Correlations of non-exercise activity thermogenesis to metabolic parameters in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2013, 5:26. BioMed Central Full Text
• [8]Oshima Y, Kawaguchi K, Tanaka S, Ohkawara K, Hikihara Y, Ishikawa-Takata K, Tabata I: Classifying household and locomotive activities using a triaxial accelerometer. Gait Posture 2010, 31:370-374.
• [9]Ohkawara K, Oshima Y, Hikihara Y, Ishikawa-Takata K, Tabata I, Tanaka S: Real-time estimation of daily physical activity intensity by a triaxial accelerometer and a gravity-removal classification algorithm. Br J Nutr 2011, 105:1681-1691.
• [10]Ganpule AA, Tanaka S, Ishikawa-Takata K, Tabata I: Interindividual variability in sleeping metabolic rate in Japanese subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr 2007, 61:1256-1261.
• [11]Energy and protein requirements: Report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1985, 724:1-206.
• [12]Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR Jr, Tudor-Locke C, Greer JL, Vezina J, Whitt-Glover MC, Leon AS: Compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011, 43:1575-1581.
• [13]Colbert LH, Matthews CE, Havighurst TC, Kim K, Schoeller DA: Comparative validity of physical activity measures in older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011, 43:867-876.
• [14]Colbert LH, Schoeller DA: Expending our physical activity (measurement) budget wisely. J Appl Physiol 2011, 111:606-607.
• [15]Welk GJ, Corbin CB, Dale D: Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000, 71:S59-S73.
• [16]Midorikawa T, Tanaka S, Kaneko K, Koizumi K, Ishikawa-Takata K, Futami J, Tabata I: Evaluation of low-intensity physical activity by triaxial accelerometry. Obesity 2007, 15:3031-3038.
• [17]Plasqui G, Bonomi AG, Westerterp KR: Daily physical activity assessment with accelerometers: new insights and validation studies. Obes Rev 2013, 14:451-462.
• [18]Ekelund U, Sjöström M, Yngve A, Poortvliet E, Nilsson A, Froberg K, Wedderkopp N, Westerterp K: Physical activity assessed by activity monitor and doubly labeled water in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001, 33:275-281.
• [19]Cooper AR, Sebire S, Montgomery AA, Peters TJ, Sharp DJ, Jackson N, Fitzsimons K, Dayan CM, Andrews RC: Sedentary time, breaks in sedentary time and metabolic variables in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2012, 55:589-599.
• [20]Rennie KL, McCarthy N, Yazdgerdi S, Marmot M, Brunner E: Association of the metabolic syndrome with both vigorous and moderate physical activity. Int J Epidemiol 2003, 32:600-606.
• [21]Jakicic JM, Gregg E, Knowler W, Kelley DE, Lang W, Miller GD, Pi-Sunyer FX, Regensteiner JG, Rejeski WJ, Ridisl P, Walkup MP, Wolf DL: Activity patterns of obese adults with type 2 diabetes in the look AHEAD study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010, 42:1995-2005.
• [22]Morrato EH, Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Ghushchyan V, Sullivan PW: Physical activity in U.S. adults with diabetes and at risk for developing diabetes, 2003. Diabetes Care 2007, 30:203-209.
• [23]Leenders NY, Sherman WM, Nagaraja HN: Energy expenditure estimated by accelerometry and doubly labeled water: do they agree? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006, 38:2165-2172.
• [24]Kumahara H, Tanaka H, Schutz Y: Daily physical activity assessment: what is the importance of upper limb movements vs whole body movements? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004, 28:1105-1110.