The concerned significant others of people with gambling problems in a national representative sample in Sweden – a 1 year follow-up study

BMC Public Health

Emma Shepherdson²  Ulla Romild²  Jessika Svensson¹ 

[1] Department of Health Science, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden;Swedish National Institute of Public Health, Östersund, Sweden

关键词: Longitudinal;    Concerned significant others;    Relatives;    Family;    Problem gambling;   

Others  :  1161540
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-1087

 received in 2012-12-20, accepted in 2013-11-20,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Research into the impact of problem gambling on close social networks is scarce with the majority of studies only including help-seeking populations. To date only one study has examined concerned significant others (CSOs) from an epidemiological perspective and it did not consider gender. The aim of this study is to examine the health, social support, and financial situations of CSOs in a Swedish representative sample and to examine gender differences.

Methods

A population study was conducted in Sweden in 2008/09 (n = 15,000, response rate 63%). Respondents were defined as CSOs if they reported that someone close to them currently or previously had problems with gambling. The group of CSOs was further examined in a 1-year follow up (weighted response rate 74% from the 8,165 respondents in the original sample). Comparisons were also made between those defined as CSOs only at baseline (47.7%, n = 554) and those defined as CSOs at both time points.

Results

In total, 18.2% of the population were considered CSOs, with no difference between women and men. Male and female CSOs experienced, to a large extent, similar problems including poor mental health, risky alcohol consumption, economic hardship, and arguments with those closest to them. Female CSOs reported less social support than other women and male CSOs had more legal problems and were more afraid of losing their jobs than other men. One year on, several problems remained even if some improvements were found. Both male and female CSOs reported more negative life events in the 1 year follow-up.

Conclusions

Although some relationships are unknown, including between the CSOs and the individuals with gambling problems and the causal relationships between being a CSO and the range of associated problems, the results of this study indicate that gambling problems not only affect the gambling individual and their immediate close family but also the wider social network. A large proportion of the population can be defined as a CSO, half of whom are men. While male and female CSOs share many common problems, there are gender differences which need to be considered in prevention and treatment.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Svensson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Korn D: Examining gambling issues from a public health perspective. Electron J Gambl Issues 2001, 4:18.
• [2]Dickson-Gillespie L, Rugle L, Rosenthal R, Fong T: Preventing the incidence and harm of gambling problems. J Prim Prev 2008, 29(1):37-55.
• [3]Marshall D: Gambling as a public health issue: the critical role of the local environment. J Gambl Issues 2009, 23:66-80.
• [4]Wynne H, Ferris J: The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse (CCSA); 2001.
• [5]Morasco BJ, Pietrzak RH, Blanco C, Grant BF, Hasin D, Petry NM: Health problems and medical utilization associated with gambling disorders: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Psychosom Med 2006, 68(6):976-984.
• [6]Mason K, Arnold R: Problem risk gambling risk factors and associated behaviours and health status: results from the 2002/03 New Zealand Health Survey. N Z Med J 2007, 120(1257):U2604.
• [7]Wardle H, Moody A, Spence S, Orford J, Volberg R, Jotangia D, Griffiths M, Hussey D, Dobbie F: British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. Norwich: National Centre for Social Research; 2011:189.
• [8]el-Guebaly N, Patten SB, Currie S, Williams JVA, Beck CA, Maxwell CJ, Li Wang J: Epidemiological associations between gambling behavior, substance use & mood and anxiety disorders. J Gambl Stud 2006, 22(3):275-287.
• [9]Potenza M, Maciejewski P, Mazure C: A gender-based examination of past-year recreational gamblers. J Gambl Stud 2006, 22(1):41-64.
• [10]Kessler RC, Hwang I, LaBrie R, Petukhova M, Sampson KC, Winters KC, Shaffer HJ: DSM-IV pathological gambling in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychol Med 2008, 38(9):10.
• [11]Park S, Cho MJ, Jeon HJ, Lee HW, Bae JN, Park JI: Prevalence, clinical correlations, comorbidities, and suicidal tendencies in pathological Korean gamblers: results from the Korean epidemiologic catchment area study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2010, 45(6):621-629.
• [12]Barry DT, Stefanovics EA, Desai RA, Potenza MN: Gambling problem severity and psychiatric disorders among Hispanic and white adults: findings from a nationally representative sample. J Psychiatr Res 2011, 45(3):404-411.
• [13]Carragher N, McWilliams LA: A latent class analysis of DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Psychiatry Res 2011, 187(1–2):185-192.
• [14]Meltzer H, Bebbington P, Brugha T, Jenkins R, McManus S, Dennis MS: Personal debt and suicidal ideation. Psychol Med 2011, 41(4):771-778.
• [15]Hodgins DC, Shead NW, Makarchuk K: Minimal treatment approaches for concerned significant others of problem gamblers: a randomized controlled trial. J Gambl Stud 2007, 23(2):215-230.
• [16]Wenzel HG, Øren A, Bakken IJ: Gambling problems in the family. A stratified probability sample study of prevalence and reported consequences. BMC Public Health 2009, 8:412-416.
• [17]Ingle PJ, Marotta J, McMillen G, Wisdom JP: Significant others and gambling treatment outcomes. J Gambl Stud 2008, 24:381-392.
• [18]Ladouceur R: Jeu pathologique [Pathological gambling]. In Therapie cognitive et comportementale. Edited by Ladouceur R, Fontaine O, Cottraux J. Paris: Masson; 1993:123-128.
• [19]Lobsinger C, Beckett L: Odds on the Break Even: A Practical Approach to Gambling Awareness. Canberra: Relationships Australia, Inc.; 1996.
• [20]Australian Productivity Commission: Australia’s Gambling Industries: Inquiry Report. Canberra: Australian Productivity Commission; 1999.
• [21]Wardle H, Moody A, Spence S, Orford J, Volberg R, Jotangia D: British Prevalence Survey 2010. London: The Stationary Office; 2010.
• [22]Black DW, Monahan PO, Temkit MH, Shaw M: A family study of pathological gambling. Psychiatry Res 2006, 141:295-303.
• [23]Dowling N, Smith D, Thomas T: The family function of female pathological gamblers. Int J Ment Heal Addict 2009, 7:29-44.
• [24]Castellani B: Pathological Gambling. The Making of a Medical Problem. Albany: State University of New York Press; 2000.
• [25]Petry NM: Pathological Gambling: Etiology, Comorbidity, and Treatment. Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association; 2005.
• [26]Orford J, Wardle H, Griffiths M, Sproston K, Erens B: The Role of Social Factors in Gambling: Evidence from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey. Birmingham: Gambling Commission; 2009.
• [27]Shaw M, Forbush K, Schlinder J, Rosenman E, Black DW: The effect of pathological gambling on families, marriage, and children. CNC Spectr 2007, 12(8):615-622.
• [28]Kalischuk RG, Nowatzki N, Cadwell K, Klein K, Solowoniuk K: Problem gambling and its impact on families: a literature review. J Gambl Stud 2006, 6(1):31-60.
• [29]McComb JL, Lee BL, Sprenkle DH: Conceptualizing and treating problem gambling as a family issue. J Marital Fam Ther 2009, 35(4):415-431.
• [30]Krishnan M, Orford J: Gambling and the family. From the stress-coping-support perspective. Int Gambl Stud 2002, 2(1):61-83.
• [31]Heineman M: A comparison: The treatment of wives of alcoholics with the treatment of wives of pathological gamblers. J Gambl Behav 1987, 3(1):27-40.
• [32]Lorenz VC, Shuttlesworth D: The impact of pathological gambling on the spouse of the gambler. J Community Psychol 1983, 11:67-76.
• [33]Patford J: For worse, for poorer and in ill health: how women experience, understand and respond to a partner's gambling problem. Int J Ment Heal Addict 2009, 7:177-189.
• [34]Gaudia R: Effects of compulsive gambling on the family. Soc Work 1987, 32(3):254-256.
• [35]Lorenz VC, Yaffee RA: Pathological gambling, psychosomatic, emotional and mental differences as reported by the spouse of the gambler. J Gambl Behav 1988, 4(1):13-26.
• [36]National Opinion Research Center - NORC: Gambling Impact and Behavior Study. Chicago: University of Chicago; 1999. [Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission]
• [37]Korman LM, Collins J, Dutton D, Dhayananthan B, Littman-Sharp N, Skinner W: Problem gambling and intimate partner violence. J Gambl Stud 2008, 24(1):13-23.
• [38]Bland RC, Newman SC, Orn H, Stebelsky G: Epidemiology of pathologal gambling in Edmonton. Can J Psychiatry 1993, 38:108-112.
• [39]Muelleman RL, Denotter T, Wadman M, Tran pT, Andersson J: Problem gambling in the partner of the emergency department as a risk factor for intimate partner violence. J Emerg Med 2002, 23(3):307-312.
• [40]Brasfield H, Febres J, Shorey R, Strong D, Ninnemann A, Elmquist J, Andersen S, Bucossi M, Schonbrun Y, Temple J, et al.: Male batterer's alcohol use and gambling behavior. J Gambl Stud 2012, 28(1):77-88.
• [41]Darbyshire P, Oster C, Carrig H: Children of parent(s) who have a gambling problem: a review of the literature and commentary on research approaches. Health Soc Care Community 2001, 9(4):185-193.
• [42]Lesieur HR, Rothshields J: Children of Gamblers Anonymous members. J Gambl Behav 1989, 5:269-281.
• [43]Schluter P, Abbott M, Bellringer M: Problem gambling related to intimate partner violence: findings from the pacific islands families study. Int Gambl Stud 2008, 8(1):49-61.
• [44]Hansen MB: Game over? Adolescent Gambling Behaviour after Interventions in the Gambling Market. University of Oslo, Oslo: A public health perspective; 2012.
• [45]Statens folkhälsoinstitut: Swedish Longitudinal Gambling Study: En studie om spel och hälsa. Östersund: Statens folkhälsoinstitut; 2010.
• [46]Boström G, Nyqvist K: Hälsa på lika villkor: Syfte och bakgrund till frågorna i den nationella folkhälsoenkäten. Östersund: Statens folkhälsoinstitut; 2008.
• [47]Babor T, Higgins-Biddle J, et al.: AUDIT. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Guidelines for Use in Primary Care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. [Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence]
• [48]Undén AL, Orth-Gomer K: Development of a social support instrument for use in population surveys. Soc Sci Med 1989, 29(12):1387-1392.
• [49]Statens folkhälsoinstitut: Spel om pengar och spelproblem i Sverige 2009/10: Resultat från Swelogs ettårsuppföljning. Östersund: Statens folkhälsoinstitut; 2012.
• [50]Currie SR, Casey DM, et al.: Improving the psychometric properties of the Problem Gambling Severity Index, Interprovincial Problem Gambling Research Consortium. 2010.
• [51]Statens folkhälsoinstitut: Årsrapport Stödlinjen 2010. Östersund: Statens folkhälsoinstitut; 2011.
• [52]Crisp BR, Thomas SA, Jackson AC, Thomason N, Smith S, Borrell J, Ho W, Holt TA: Sex differences in the treatment needs and outcomes of problem gamblers. Res Soc Work Pract 2000, 10:229-242.
• [53]Tepperman JH: The effectiveness of short-term group therapy upon the pathological gambler and wife. J Gambl Stud 1985, 1(2):119-130.
• [54]Potenza M, Steinberg MA, Wu R: Characteristics of gambling helpline callers with self-reported gambling and alcohol use problems. J Gambl Stud 2005, 21(3):233-254.
• [55]Lemaire J, MacKay T-L, Patton D: Manitoba Gambling and Problem Gambling 2008. Winnipeg: Addictions Foundation of Manitoba; 2008.