期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medical Genetics
Diagnostic laboratory testing for Charcot Marie Tooth disease (CMT): the spectrum of gene defects in Norwegian patients with CMT and its implications for future genetic test strategies
Øivind Nilssen3  Svein I Mellgren2  Bjørn Nygård1  Helene Hjellnes1  Toril Fagerheim1  Rune Østern3 
[1]Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of North-Norway, Tromsø NO9038, Norway
[2]Department of Neurology, University Hospital of North-Norway, Tromsø NO9038, Norway
[3]Department of Clinical Medicine, Neuromuscular Research Group, University of Tromsø, Tromsø NO9037, Norway
关键词: Guidelines;    Clinical neurophysiology;    Mutation analysis;    Neuromuscular diseases;    Genetic and inherited disorders;    Charcot-Marie-Tooth;   
Others  :  1122635
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2350-14-94
 received in 2013-04-27, accepted in 2013-09-17,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Current genetic test algorithms for Charcot Marie Tooth (CMT) disease are based on family details and comprehensive clinical and neurophysiological data gathered under ideal conditions for clinical assessment. However, in a diagnostic laboratory setting relying on external test requisitions and patient samples, such conditions are not always met. Our objective was therefore to perform a retrospective evaluation of the data given in laboratory request forms and to assess their quality and applicability with regard to the recommended algorithms for CMT diagnostics. As we are the main test centre for CMT in Norway our results also provide an overview of the spectrum of gene defects in the Norwegian CMT population.

Methods

Genetic testing was performed according to polyneuropathy type; demyelinating/mixed: PMP22 duplication, MPZ, EGR2, LITAF, NEFL, PMP22, GJB1, axonal: MFN2, MPZ, NEFL, and GJB1.

Results

Diagnostic testing of index patients was requested in 435 of the 549 cases. Seventy-two (16.6%) positive molecular genetic findings were made. The majority (94.6%) of mutation positive cases showed disease onset before 50 years of age. PMP22 (duplication), MPZ, GJB1 and MFN2 mutations constituted 95.8% of the positive findings. Within the nerve conduction study groups, mutation detection rates were; demyelinating 33.8%; mixed 29.0%; axonal 8.8%; unspecified 16.5%.

Conclusion

We suggest a simplified algorithm intended for referral centres, dealing with DNA/blood samples, which involves the assessment of age at onset and neurophysiological data followed by testing of four genes; PMP22 (duplication), MPZ, GJB1 and MFN2. Patients negative for mutations in those four genes should be subjected to evaluation at an interdisciplinary inherited neuropathy clinic with the capacity for extended molecular genetic analysis by next generation sequencing.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Østern et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150214024200728.pdf 1175KB PDF download
Figure 2. 106KB Image download
Figure 1. 100KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Dyck PJ, Oviatt KF, Lambert EH: Intensive evaluation of referred unclassified neuropathies yields improved diagnosis. Ann Neurol 1981, 10:222-226.
  • [2]Skre H: Genetic and clinical aspects of Charcot-Marie-Tooth's disease. Clin Genet 1974, 6:98-118.
  • [3]Harding AE, Thomas PK: The clinical features of hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy types I and II. Brain 1980, 103:259-280.
  • [4]Nicholson G, Myers S: Intermediate forms of Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy: a review. Neuromolecular Med 2006, 8:123-130.
  • [5]Bird TD: Charcot-Marie-Tooth Hereditary Neuropathy Overview. Gene Reviews (accessed June 02, 2012); 2012. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1358/ webcite]
  • [6]Boerkoel CF, Takashima H, Garcia CA, Olney RK, Johnson J, Berry K, Russo P, Kennedy S, Teebi AS, Scavina M, Williams LL, Mancias P, Butler IJ, Krajewski K, Shy M, Lupski JR: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and related neuropathies: mutation distribution and genotype-phenotype correlation. Ann Neurol 2002, 51:190-201.
  • [7]Nelis E, Van Broeckhoven C, De Jonghe P, Löfgren A, Vandenberghe A, Latour P, Le Guern E, Brice A, Mostacciuolo ML, Schiavon F, Palau F, Bort S, Upadhyaya M, Rocchi M, Archidiacono N, Mandich P, Bellone E, Silander K, Savontaus ML, Navon R, Goldberg-Stern H, Estivill X, Volpini V, Friedl W, Gal A, et al.: Estimation of the mutation frequencies in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 and heriditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies: a European collaborative study. Eur J Hum Genet 1996, 4:25-33.
  • [8]Lawson VH, Graham BV, Flanigan KM: Clinical and electrophysiologic features of CMT2A with mutations in the mitofusin 2 gene. Neurology 2005, 65:197-204.
  • [9]Verhoeven K, Claeys KG, Züchner S, Schröder JM, Weis J, Ceuterick C, Jordanova A, Nelis E, De Vriendt E, Van Hul M, Seeman P, Mazanec R, Saifi GM, Szigeti K, Mancias P, Butler IJ, Kochanski A, Ryniewicz B, De Bleecker J, Van den Bergh P, Verellen C, Van Coster R, Goemans N, Auer-Grumbach M, Robberecht W, Milic Rasic V, Nevo Y, Tournev I, Guergueltcheva V, Roelens F, et al.: MFN2 mutation distribution and genotype/phenotype correlation in Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2. Brain 2006, 129:2093-2102.
  • [10]Bienfait HM, Baas F, Koelman JH, de Haan RJ, van Engelen BG, Gabreëls-Festen AA, de Visser BW O, Meggouh F, Weterman MA, De Jonghe P, Timmerman V, de Visser M: Phenotype of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Type 2. Neurology 2007, 68:1658-1667.
  • [11]England JD, Gronseth GS, Franklin G, Carter GT, Kinsella LJ, Cohen JA, Asbury AK, Szigeti K, Lupski JR, Latov N, Lewis RA, Low PA, Fisher MA, Herrmann D, Howard JF, Lauria G, Miller RG, Polydefkis M, Sumner AJ: American Academy of Neurology; American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine; American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of laboratory and genetic testing (an evidence-based review). Muscle Nerve 2009, 39:116-125.
  • [12]Saporta AS, Sottile SL, Miller LJ, Feely SM, Siskind CE, Shy ME: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease subtypes and genetic testing strategies. Ann Neurol 2011, 69:22-33.
  • [13]Murphy SM, Laura M, Fawcett K, Pandraud A, Liu YT, Davidson GL, Rossor AM, Polke JM, Castleman V, Manji H, Lunn MP, Bull K, Ramdharry G, Davis M, Blake JC, Houlden H, Reilly MM: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: frequency of genetic subtypes and guidelines for genetic testing. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012, 83:706-710.
  • [14]Plon SE, Eccles DM, Easton D, Foulkes WD, Genuardi M, Greenblatt MS, Hogervorst FB, Hoogerbrugge N, Spurdle AB, Tavtigian SV: IARC Unclassified Genetic Variants Working Group: Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results. Hum Mutat 2008, 29:1282-1291.
  • [15]Bort S, Nelis E, Timmerman V, Sevilla T, Cruz-Martínez A, Martínez F, Millán JM, Arpa J, Vílchez JJ, Prieto F, Van Broeckhoven C, Palau F: Mutational analysis of the MPZ, PMP22 and Cx32 genes in patients of Spanish ancestry with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Hum Genet 1997, 99:746-754.
  • [16]Choi BO, Lee MS, Shin SH, Hwang JH, Choi KG, Kim WK, Sunwoo IN, Kim NK, Chung KW: Mutational analysis of PMP22, MPZ, GJB1, EGR2 and NEFL in Korean Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy patients. Hum Mutat 2004, 24:185-186.
  • [17]Mostacciuolo ML, Righetti E, Zortea M, Bosello V, Schiavon F, Vallo L, Merlini L, Siciliano G, Fabrizi GM, Rizzuto N, Milani M, Baratta S, Taroni F: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type I and related demyelinating neuropathies: Mutation analysis in a large cohort of Italian families. Hum Mutat 2001, 18:32-41.
  • [18]Nicholson GA: Mutation testing in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999, 883:383-388.
  • [19]Silander K, Meretoja P, Juvonen V, Ignatius J, Pihko H, Saarinen A, Wallden T, Herrgård E, Aula P, Savontaus ML: Spectrum of mutations in Finnish patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and related neuropathies. Hum Mutat 1998, 12:59-68.
  • [20]Abe A, Numakura C, Kijima K, Hayashi M, Hashimoto T, Hayasaka K: Molecular diagnosis and clinical onset of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in Japan. J Hum Genet 2011, 56:364-368.
  • [21]Antonidi T, Majumdar A, Burton-Jones S, Williams M: Inherited peripheral neuropathies: Genetic testing in the diagnostic laboratory [abstract]. Neuromuscul Disord 2011, 21:687-688.
  • [22]Mersiyanova IV, Ismailov SM, Polyakov AV, Dadali EL, Fedotov VP, Nelis E, Löfgren A, Timmerman V, van Broeckhoven C, Evgrafov OV: Screening for mutations in the peripheral myelin genes PMP22, MPZ and Cx32 (GJB1) in Russian Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy patients. Hum Mutat 2000, 15:340-347.
  • [23]McCorquodale DS 3rd, Montenegro G, Peguero A, Carlson N, Speziani F, Price J, Taylor SW, Melanson M, Vance JM, Züchner S: Mutation screening of mitofusin 2 in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2. J Neurol 2011, 258:1234-1239.
  • [24]Braathen GJ: Genetic epidemiology of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Acta Neurol Scand 2012, 193:IV-22.
  • [25]Laššuthová P, Mazanec R, Vondráček P, Sišková D, Haberlová J, Sabová J, Seeman P: High frequency of SH3TC2 mutations in Czech HMSN I patients. Clin Genet 2011, 80:334-345.
  • [26]Montenegro G, Powell E, Huang J, Speziani F, Edwards YJ, Beecham G, Hulme W, Siskind C, Vance J, Shy M, Züchner S: Exome sequencing allows for rapid gene identification in a Charcot-Marie-Tooth family. Ann Neurol 2011, 69:464-470.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:30次 浏览次数:23次