A prospective study of complications from comprehensive abortion care services in Nepal

BMC Public Health

Kusum Thapa⁴  Yagya B Karki²  Indira Basnett¹  Sarah Stucke³  Bela Ganatra⁵  Kathryn Andersen⁵ 

[1] TCIC/Ipas Nepal, Family Health Division, 2nd Floor Teku, PO Box 11621, Kathmandu, Nepal;Population, Health and Development (PHD) Group, Ring Road, Kathmandu, Sanepa, Nepal;UNC-Chapel Hill School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA;Paropakar Mother and Women's Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal;Ipas, 300 Market St., Suite 200, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA

关键词: Nepal;    Post-abortion complications;    Induced abortion;   

Others  :  1163965
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-9

 received in 2011-08-19, accepted in 2012-01-05,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

In March 2002, Nepal's Parliament approved legislation to permit abortion on request up to 12 weeks of pregnancy. Between 2004 and 2007, 176 comprehensive abortion care (CAC) service sites were established in Nepal, leading to a rise in safe, legal abortions. Though monitoring systems have been developed, reporting of complications has not always been complete or accurate. The purpose of this study was to report the frequency and type of abortion complications arising from CAC procedures in different types of facilities in Nepal.

Methods

A total of 7,386 CAC clients from a sample of facilities across Nepal were enrolled over a three-month period in 2008. Data collection included an initial health questionnaire at the time of abortion care and a follow-up questionnaire assessing complications, administered two weeks after the abortion procedure. A total of 7,007 women (95%) were successfully followed up. Complication rates were assessed overall and by facility type. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between experiencing a complication and client demographic and facility characteristics.

Results

Among the 7,007 clients who were successfully followed, only 1.87% (n = 131) experienced signs and symptoms of complications at the two-week follow up, the most common being retained products of conception (1.37%), suspected sepsis (0.39%), offensive discharge (0.51%) and moderate bleeding (0.26%). Women receiving care at non-governmental organization (NGO) facilities were less likely to experience complications than women at government facilities, adjusting for individual and facility characteristics (AOR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.08-0.40). Compared to women receiving CAC at 4-5 weeks gestation, women at 10-12 weeks gestation were more likely to experience complications, adjusting for individual and facility characteristics (AOR = 4.21; 95% CI: 1.38-12.82).

Conclusions

The abortion complication rate in Nepali CAC facilities is low and similar to other settings; however, significant differences in complication rates were observed by facility type and gestational age. Interventions such as supportive supervision to improve providers' uterine evacuation skills and investment in equipment for infection control may lower complication rates in government facilities. In addition, there should be increased focus on early pregnancy detection and access to CAC services early in pregnancy in order to prevent complications.

【 授权许可】

   
2011 Andersen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Pradhan A, Aryal RH, Regmi G, Ban B, Govindasamy P: Nepal Family Health Survey 1996. Calverton, MD: Ministry of Health [Nepal], New ERA and Macro International Inc; 1997.
• [2]Ministry of Health and Population (MOHP) [Nepal], New ERA, Macro International Inc: Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2006. Kathmandu, Nepal; 2007.
• [3]Pant PD, Suvedi BK, Pradhan A, Hulton L, Matthews Z, Maskey M: Investigating Recent Improvements in Maternal Health in Nepal: Further Analysis of the 2006 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey. Calverton, MD: Macro International Inc; 2008.
• [4]Wee DW, Mullany LC, Katz J, Khartry SK, LeClerq SC, Tielsch JM: Pregnancy-related mortality in southern Nepal between 2001 and 2006: independent estimates from a prospective, population-based cohort and a direct sisterhood survey. Am J Epidemiol 2010, 172:855-860.
• [5]Ministry of Law and Justice: Muluki Ain, 2020 (Legal Code, 1963). Kathmandu, Nepal; 1963.
• [6]Thapa S, Padhye SM: Induced abortion in urban Nepal. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2001, 27(3):144-147, 151.
• [7]Thapa PJ, Thapa S, Shrestha N: Hospital-based study of abortion in Nepal. Stud Fam Plann 1992, 23(5):311-318.
• [8]Shakya G, Kishore S, Bird C, Barak J: Abortion law reform in Nepal: woman's right to life and health. Reprod Health Matters 2004, 12(24):75-84.
• [9]Sheriar N, Jaydeep T, Ganatra B: First trimester MTP using MVA: report of a FOGSI multicentre study across 27 clinics. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2007, 57(2):162-166.
• [10]Warriner IK, Meirik O, Hoffman M, Morroni C, Harries J, My Huong NT, Vy ND, Seuc AH: Rates of complication in first-trimester manual vacuum aspiration abortion done by doctors and mid-level providers in South Africa and Vietnam: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet 2006, 386(9551):1965-1972.
• [11]Gebreselassie H, Gallo MF, Monyo A, Johnson BR: The magnitude of abortion complications in Kenya. BJOG 2005, 112:1229-1235.
• [12]Westfall JM, Sophocles A, Burggraf H, Ellis S: Manual vacuum aspiration for first trimester abortion. Arch Fam Med 1998, 7:559-562.
• [13]Debby A, Malinger G, Harow E, Golan A, Glezerman M: Transvaginal ultrasound after first-trimester uterine evacuation reduces the incidence of retained products of conception. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006, 27:61-64.
• [14]Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG): Care of women requesting induced abortion. London; 2004.
• [15]Rowe AK, de Savigny D, Lanata CF, Victora CG: How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings? Lancet 2005, 366:1026-1035.
• [16]Hyman AG, Castleman L: Woman-centered abortion care: reference manual. Chapel Hill, NC: Ipas; 2005.
• [17]Sawaya GF, Grady D, Kerlikowske K, Grimes D: Antibiotics at the time of induced abortion: the case for universal prophylaxis based on a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1996, 87:884-890.