From international health to global health: how to foster a better dialogue between empirical and normative disciplines

BMC International Health and Human Rights

Gorik Ooms¹ 

[1] Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium

关键词: Interdisciplinary research;    Is-ought problem;    Normative;    Empirical;    Ethics;    Human rights;    International health;    Global health;   

Others  :  1113308
DOI  :  10.1186/s12914-014-0036-5

 received in 2014-06-02, accepted in 2014-11-27,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Public health recommendations are usually based on a mixture of empirical evidence and normative arguments: to argue that authorities ought to implement an intervention that has proven effective in improving people’s health requires a normative position confirming that the authorities are responsible for improving people’s health. While public health (at the national level) is based on a widely accepted normative starting point – namely, that it is the responsibility of the state to improve people’s health – there is no widely accepted normative starting point for international health or global health. As global health recommendations may vary depending on the normative starting point one uses, global health research requires a better dialogue between researchers who are trained in empirical disciplines and researchers who are trained in normative disciplines.

Discussion

Global health researchers with a background in empirical disciplines seem reluctant to clarify the normative starting point they use, perhaps because normative statements cannot be derived directly from empirical evidence, or because there is a wide gap between present policies and the normative starting point they personally support. Global health researchers with a background in normative disciplines usually do not present their work in ways that help their colleagues with a background in empirical disciplines to distinguish between what is merely personal opinion and professional opinion based on rigorous normative research.

If global health researchers with a background in empirical disciplines clarified their normative starting point, their recommendations would become more useful for their colleagues with a background in normative disciplines. If global health researchers who focus on normative issues used adapted qualitative research guidelines to present their results, their findings would be more useful for their colleagues with a background in empirical disciplines.

Summary

Although a single common paradigm for all scientific disciplines that contribute to global health research may not be possible or desirable, global health researchers with a background in empirical disciplines and global health researchers with a background in normative disciplines could present their ‘truths’ in ways that would improve dialogue. This paper calls for an exchange of views between global health researchers and editors of medical journals.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Ooms; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Sabine GH: Descriptive and normative sciences. Philos Rev 1912, 21(4):433-450.
• [2]Friedrich J, Kierniesky N, Cardon L: Drawing moral inferences from descriptive science: the impact of attitudes on naturalistic fallacy errors. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1989, 15(3):414-425.
• [3]Nozick R: Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books, New York; 1974.
• [4]Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, Reddy KS, Rodriguez MH, Sewankambo NK, Wasserheit JN: for the Consortium of Universities for Global Health Executive Board: Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet 2009, 373(9679):1993-1995.
• [5]Steup M: Epistemology. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition), edited by Zalta EN. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/epistemology.
• [6]Rosen G: A History of Public Health (Expanded edition). The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore – London; 1993.
• [7]World Health Organization: World Report on Knowledge for Better Health: Strengthening Health Systems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. http://www.who.int/rpc/meetings/world_report_on_knowledge_for_better_health.pdf.
• [8]Whitehead M: The concepts and principles of equity and health. Health Promot Int 1991, 6(3):217-228.
• [9]Lencucha R: Cosmopolitanism and foreign policy for health: ethics for and beyond the state. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2013, 13:29. BioMed Central Full Text
• [10]Marseille E, Hofmann PB, Kahn JG: HIV prevention before HAART in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet 2002, 359(9320):1851-1856.
• [11]Costello A, Azad K, Barnett S: An alternative strategy to reduce maternal mortality. Lancet 2006, 368(9546):1477-1479.
• [12]Feldbaum H, Michaud J: Health diplomacy and the enduring relevance of foreign policy interests. PLoS Med 2010, 7(4):e1000226.
• [13]Ooms G, Hammonds R, Richard F, De Brouwere V: The global health financing revolution: why maternal health is missing the boat. Facts Views Vision ObGyn 2012, 4(1):11-17.
• [14]Ooms G, Hammonds R, Gonsalves G: The Struggle Against HIV/AIDS: Rights, Economics, and Global Responsibility. In The Millennium Development Goals and Human Rights: Past, Present and Future. Edited by Langford M, Sumner A, Yamin AE. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2013.
• [15]Frenk J, Gómez-Dantés O, Moon S: From sovereignty to solidarity: a renewed concept of global health for an era of complex interdependence. Lancet 2014, 383(9911):94-97.
• [16]Brown GW: Distributing who gets what and why: four normative approaches to global health. Glob Policy 2012, 3(3):292-302.
• [17]Stuckler D, McKee M: Five metaphors about global-health policy. Lancet 2008, 372(9633):95-97.
• [18]Choulagai B, Onta S, Subedi N, Mehata S, Bhandari GP, Poudyal A, Shrestha B, Mathai M, Petzold M, Krettek A: Barriers to using skilled birth attendants’ services in mid- and far-western Nepal: a cross-sectional study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2013, 13:49. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Ooms G, Hammonds R: Right to health and global public health research: from tensions to synergy? Trop Med Int Health 2014, 19(6):620-624.
• [20]Yamey G, Feachem R: Evidence-based policymaking in global health – the payoffs and pitfalls. Evid Based Med 2011, 16(4):97-99.
• [21]Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM: Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. Annu Rev Public Health 2009, 30:175-201.
• [22]Committee for the Study of the Future of Public Health: Division of Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine: The Future of Public Health. National Academies Press, Washington, DC; 1988.
• [23]Gostin LO: Global Health Law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA; 2014.
• [24]Tobin J: The Right to Health in International Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2012.
• [25]Murphy T: Health and Human Rights. Hart Publishing, Oxford; 2013.
• [26]Wolff J: The Human Right to Health. W.W. Norton, New York; 2012.
• [27]Vankatapuram S: Health Justice. Polity Press, Cambridge; 2011.
• [28]Sollaci LB, Pereira MG: The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey. J Med Libr Assoc 2004, 92(3):364-371.
• [29]Wu J: Improving the writing of research papers: IMRAD and beyond. Landsc Ecol 2011, 26(10):1345-1349.
• [30]Ooms G, Latif LA, Waris A, Brolan CE, Hammonds R, Friedman EA, Mulumba M, Forman L: Is universal health coverage the practical expression of the right to health care? BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2014, 14:3. BioMed Central Full Text
• [31]Bruen C, Brugha R: A ghost in the machine? Politics in global health policy. Int J Health Policy Manage 2014, 3(1):1-4.
• [32]McCoy D, Singh G: A spanner in the works? Anti-politics in global health policy. Int J Health Policy Manage 2014, 3(3):151-153.
• [33]Harmer A: Democracy – the real ‘ghost’ in the machine of global health policy. Int J Health Policy Manage 2014, 3(3):149-150.
• [34]Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights: Technical Guidance on the Application of a Human Rights-Based Approach to the Implementation of Policies and Programmes to Reduce Preventable Maternal Morbidity and Mortality. Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights; 2012. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/women/docs/A.HRC.21.22_en.pdf.
• [35]Rosenfield PL: The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med 1992, 35(11):1343-1357.
• [36]Clark JP: How to Peer Review a Qualitative Manuscript. In Peer Review in Health Sciences. 2nd edition. Edited by Godlee F, Jefferson T. BMJ books, London; 2003.
• [37]Hammonds R, Ooms G: The emergence of a global right to health norm – the unresolved case of universal access to quality emergency obstetric care. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2014, 14:4. BioMed Central Full Text
• [38]Amouzou A, Kozuki N, Gwatkin DR: Where is the gap?: the contribution of disparities within developing countries to global inequalities in under-five mortality. BMC Public Health 2014, 14:216. BioMed Central Full Text