Construct validity of functional capacity tests in healthy workers

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Michiel F Reneman³  Cees P van der Schans³  Rob KW Douma³  Harriët Wittink²  Jan HB Geertzen³  Remko Soer¹  Sandra E Lakke³ 

[1] Groningen Spine Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands;Research Group Lifestyle and Health, University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands;Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

关键词: Work;    Work capacity evaluation;    Validity;    Physical endurance;    Lifting;   

Others  :  1130559
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-14-180

 received in 2013-01-11, accepted in 2013-05-23,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Functional Capacity (FC) is a multidimensional construct within the activity domain of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework (ICF). Functional capacity evaluations (FCEs) are assessments of work-related FC. The extent to which these work-related FC tests are associated to bio-, psycho-, or social factors is unknown. The aims of this study were to test relationships between FC tests and other ICF factors in a sample of healthy workers, and to determine the amount of statistical variance in FC tests that can be explained by these factors.

Methods

A cross sectional study. The sample was comprised of 403 healthy workers who completed material handling FC tests (lifting low, overhead lifting, and carrying) and static work FC tests (overhead working and standing forward bend). The explainable variables were; six muscle strength tests; aerobic capacity test; and questionnaires regarding personal factors (age, gender, body height, body weight, and education), psychological factors (mental health, vitality, and general health perceptions), and social factors (perception of work, physical workloads, sport-, leisure time-, and work-index). A priori construct validity hypotheses were formulated and analyzed by means of correlation coefficients and regression analyses.

Results

Moderate correlations were detected between material handling FC tests and muscle strength, gender, body weight, and body height. As for static work FC tests; overhead working correlated fair with aerobic capacity and handgrip strength, and low with the sport-index and perception of work. For standing forward bend FC test, all hypotheses were rejected. The regression model revealed that 61% to 62% of material handling FC tests were explained by physical factors. Five to 15% of static work FC tests were explained by physical and social factors.

Conclusions

The current study revealed that, in a sample of healthy workers, material handling FC tests were related to physical factors but not to the psychosocial factors measured in this study. The construct of static work FC tests remained largely unexplained.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Lakke et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Soer R, van der Schans CP, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF: Towards consensus in operational definitions in functional capacity evaluation: a Delphi Survey. J Occup Rehabil 2008, 18:389-400.
• [2]World Health Organization: ICF: international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
• [3]Schenk P, Klipstein A, Spillmann S, Stroyer J, Laubli T: The role of back muscle endurance, maximum force, balance and trunk rotation control regarding lifting capacity. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006, 96:146-156.
• [4]Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Goeken LN: Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil 2002, 12:269-275.
• [5]Wittink H, Rogers W, Sukiennik A, Carr DB: Physical functioning: self-report and performance measures are related but distinct. Spine 2003, 28:2407-2413.
• [6]Oesch PR, Kool JP, Bachmann S, Devereux J: The influence of a Functional Capacity Evaluation on fitness for work certificates in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. Work 2006, 26:259-271.
• [7]van Abbema R, Lakke SE, Reneman MF, van der Schans CP, van Haastert CJ, Geertzen JH, Wittink H: Factors associated with functional capacity test results in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 2011, 21:455-473.
• [8]Lakke SE, Soer R, Takken T, Reneman MF: Risk and prognostic factors for non-specific musculoskeletal pain: a synthesis of evidence from systematic reviews classified into ICF dimensions. Pain 2009, 147:153-164.
• [9]Ariens GA, Bongers PM, Hoogendoorn WE, Houtman IL, van der Wal G, van Mechelen W: High quantitative job demands and low coworker support as risk factors for neck pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Spine 2001, 26:1896-1901.
• [10]Asante AK, Brintnell ES, Gross DP: Functional self-efficacy beliefs influence functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil 2007, 17:73-82.
• [11]Karasek R, Baker D, Marxer F: Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: A prospective study of Swedish men. Am J Public Health 1981, 71:694-705.
• [12]Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B: The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol 1998, 3:322-355.
• [13]Genovese E, Galper JS: American Medical Association: Guide to the evaluation of functional ability: how to request, interpret, and apply functional capacity evaluations . Chicago: Ill.: American Medical Association; 2009.
• [14]Portney LG, Watkins MP: Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice: 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2009.
• [15]Soer R, van der Schans CP, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Reneman MF: Normative values for a functional capacity evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009, 90:1785-1794.
• [16]Heerkens Y, Engels J, Kuiper C, Van der Gulden J, Oostendorp R: The use of the ICF to describe work related factors influencing the health of employees. Disabil Rehabil 2004, 26:1060-1066.
• [17]Reneman MF, Brouwer S, Meinema A, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW: Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in healthy adults. J Occup Rehabil 2004, 14:295-305.
• [18]Soer R, Gerrits EH, Reneman MF: Test-retest reliability of a WRULD functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults. Work 2006, 26:273-280.
• [19]Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Oberg B: Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for hand strength. J Rehabil Med 2001, 33:36-41.
• [20]Kuzala EA, Vargo MC: The relationship between elbow position and grip strength. Am J Occup Ther 1992, 46:509-512.
• [21]Bohannon RW: Make tests and break tests of elbow flexor muscle strength. Phys Ther 1988, 68:193-194.
• [22]Stratford PW, Balsor BE: A comparison of make and break tests using a hand-held dynamometer and the Kin-Com. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994, 19:28-32.
• [23]Vermeulen HM, de Bock GH, van Houwelingen HC, van der Meer RL, Mol MC, Plus BT, Rozing PM, Vliet Vlieland TPM: A comparison of two portable dynamometers in the assessment of shoulder and elbow strength. Physiotherapy 2005, 91:101-112.
• [24]Bohannon RW, Andrews AW: Interrater reliability of hand-held dynamometry. Phys Ther 1987, 67:931-933.
• [25]Soer R, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, van der Schans CP, Reesink DD, Reneman MF: Pain response of healthy workers following a functional capacity evaluation and implications for clinical interpretation. J Occup Rehabil 2008, 18(3):290-298.
• [26]Bruce RA, Kusumi F, Hosmer D: Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J 1973, 85:546-562.
• [27]Baecke JA, Burema J, Frijters JE: A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr 1982, 36:936-942.
• [28]Durnin JVGA, Passmore R: Energy, work and leisure. London: Heinemann Educational Books; 1967.
• [29]Philippaerts RM, Lefevre J: Reliability and validity of three physical activity questionnaires in Flemish males. Am J Epidemiol 1998, 147:982-990.
• [30]Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM, de Vet HC, Ariens GA, van Mechelen W, Bouter LM: High physical work load and low job satisfaction increase the risk of sickness absence due to low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 2002, 59:323-328.
• [31]Veldhoven Van M, Meijman TF, Broersen JPJ, Fortuin RJ: Handout questionnaire on perception and judgement of work. [Handleiding Vragenlijst Beleving en Beoordeling van de Arbeid (VBBA)]. Questionnaire services Amsterdam.[SKB Vragenlijst Services Amsterdam]. 2002.
• [32]Veldhoven VMJPM: Psychosociale Arbeidsbelasting en Werkstress [Pyschosocial workload and work stress]. PhD [dissertation]. Groningen, The Netherlands: University Medical Center Groningen; 1996.
• [33]Mokken RJ, Lewis C: A nonparameteric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses. Appl Psych Meas 1982, 6:417-430.
• [34]Kuijer W, Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Groothoff JW, Schellekens JM, Geertzen JH: Matching FCE activities and work demands: an explorative study. J Occup Rehabil 2006, 16:469-483.
• [35]United States Employment Service: Dictionary of occupational titles: 4th, rev 1991 ed . Washington D.C: The Administration: Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., distributor; 1991.
• [36]Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr: The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 1988, 26:724-735.
• [37]Van der Zee KI, Sanderman R, Heyink J: A comparison of two multidimensional measures of health status: the Nottingham Health Profile and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Qual Life Res 1996, 5:165-174.
• [38]Van der Zee KI, Sanderman R, Heyink JW, de Haes H: Psychometric qualities of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0: a multidimensional measure of general health status. Int J Behav Med 1996, 3:104-122.
• [39]Field AP: Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll): 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2005.
• [40]Pallant J: SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (Version 10). Buckingham: Open University Press; 2001.
• [41]Schwarz G: Estimating the Dimension of a Model. The Annals of Statistics 1978, 6:461-464.
• [42]Claeskens G, Hjort NL: Model selection and model averaging. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
• [43]Alschuler KN, Theisen-Goodvich ME, Haig AJ, Geisser ME: A comparison of the relationship between depression, perceived disability, and physical performance in persons with chronic pain. Eur J Pain 2008, 12:757-764.
• [44]Geisser ME, Haig AJ, Theisen ME: Activity avoidance and function in persons with chronic back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2000, 10:215-227.
• [45]Smeets RJ, van Geel AC, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA: Physical capacity tasks in chronic low back pain: what is the contributing role of cardiovascular capacity, pain and psychological factors? Disabil Rehabil 2007, 29:577-586.
• [46]Ruan CM, Haig AJ, Geisser ME, Yamakawa K, Buchholz RL: Functional capacity evaluations in persons with spinal disorders: predicting poor outcomes on the Functional Assessment Screening Test (FAST). J Occup Rehabil 2001, 11:119-132.
• [47]Lackner JM, Carosella AM, Feuerstein M: Pain expectancies, pain, and functional self-efficacy expectancies as determinants of disability in patients with chronic low back disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996, 64:212-220.
• [48]Reneman MF, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S: General and specific self-efficacy reports of patients with chronic low back pain: are they related to performances in a functional capacity evaluation? J Occup Rehabil 2008, 18:183-189.
• [49]Reneman MF, Kool J, Oesch P, Geertzen JH, Battie MC, Gross DP: Material handling performance of patients with chronic low back pain during functional capacity evaluation: a comparison between three countries. Disabil Rehabil 2006, 28:1143-1149.
• [50]Kenny GP, Yardley JE, Martineau L, Jay O: Physical work capacity in older adults: implications for the aging worker. Am J Ind Med 2008, 51:610-625.
• [51]Soer R, Brouwer S, Geertzen JH, van der Schans CP, Groothoff JW, Reneman MF: Decline of functional capacity in healthy aging workers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012, 93:2326-2332.
• [52]Ruiz-Ruiz J, Mesa JL, Gutierrez A, Castillo MJ: Hand size influences optimal grip span in women but not in men. J Hand Surg Am 2002, 27:897-901.
• [53]Jones T, Kumar S: Functional capacity evaluation of manual materials handlers: a review. Disabil Rehabil 2003, 25:179-191.
• [54]Wassermann K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Stringer WW, Whipp BJ: Principles of Exercise Testing and Interpretation. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
• [55]Yang MJ, Ho CK, Su YC, Yang MS: Job strain, social support and mental health: a study on the male heavy manufacturing workers. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 1997, 13:332-341.
• [56]Hall AM, Ferreira PH, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira ML: The influence of the therapist-patient relationship on treatment outcome in physical rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther 2010, 90:1099-1110.
• [57]Miciak M, Gross DP, Joyce A: A review of the psychotherapeutic 'common factors' model and its application in physical therapy: the need to consider general effects in physical therapy practice. Scand J Caring Sci 2012, 26:394-403.
• [58]Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Latimer J, Adams RD: The Therapeutic Alliance Between Clinicians and Patients Predicts Outcome in Chronic Low Back Pain. Phys Ther 2013, 93:470-478.
• [59]Crombez G, Vlaeyen JW, Heuts PH, Lysens R: Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain 1999, 80:329-339.
• [60]Schiphorst Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Boonstra AM, Dijkstra PU, Versteegen GJ, Geertzen JH, Brouwer S: Relationship between psychological factors and performance-based and self-reported disability in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2008, 17:1448-1456.
• [61]Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, van Eek H: Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain 1995, 62:363-372.
• [62]Vlaeyen JW, Crombez G: Fear of movement/(re)injury, avoidance and pain disability in chronic low back pain patients. Man Ther 1999, 4:187-195.
• [63]Moreau CE, Green BN, Johnson CD, Moreau SR: Isometric back extension endurance tests: A review of the literature. J Manip Physiol Ther 2001, 24:110-122.