Does clinical governance influence the appropriateness of hospital stay?

BMC Health Services Research

Antonio Giulio De Belvis²  Walter Ricciardi¹  Gianfranco Damiani¹  Andrea Cambieri²  Silvio Capizzi¹  Paolo Parente¹  Massimo Volpe²  Andrea Poscia²  Maria Lucia Specchia¹ 

[1] Department of Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Hearth, Largo F.Vito, 1, Rome, 00168, Italy;Clinical Directorate “A. Gemelli” Teaching Hospital, Largo Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy

关键词: Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol;    OPTIGOV©;    Appropriateness;    Quality;    Clinical governance;   

Others  :  1164293
DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-015-0795-2

 received in 2014-01-10, accepted in 2015-03-16,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Clinical Governance provides a framework for assessing and improving clinical quality through a single coherent program. Organizational appropriateness is aimed at achieving the best health outcomes and the most appropriate use of resources. The goal of the present study is to verify the likely relationship between Clinical Governance and appropriateness of hospital stay.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2012 in an Italian Teaching Hospital. The OPTIGOV^© (Optimizing Health Care Governance) methodology was used to quantify the level of implementation of Clinical Governance globally and in its main dimensions. Organizational appropriateness was measured retrospectively using the Italian version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol to analyze a random sample of medical records for each clinical unit.

Pearson-correlation and multiple linear regression were used to test the relationship between the percentage of inappropriate days of hospital stay and the Clinical Governance implementation levels.

Results

47 Units were assessed. The percentage of inappropriate days of hospital stay showed an inverse correlation with almost all the main Clinical Governance dimensions. Adjusted multiple regression analysis resulted in a significant association between the percentage of inappropriate days and the overall Clinical Governance score (β = −0.28; p < 0.001; R-squared = 0.8). EBM and Clinical Audit represented the Clinical Governance dimensions which had the strongest association with organizational appropriateness.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the evaluation of both Clinical Governance and organizational appropriateness through standardized and repeatable tools, such as OPTIGOV^© and AEP, is a key strategy for healthcare quality. The relationship between the two underlines the central role of Clinical Governance, and especially of EBM and Clinical Audit, in determining a rational improvement of appropriateness levels.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Specchia et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Scally G, Donaldson LJ: Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England. BMJ 1998, 317:61-5.
• [2]Allen P: Accountability for clinical governance: developing collective responsibility for quality in primary care. BMJ 2000, 321:608-11.
• [3]Dickinson A. Clinical Governance Strategy 2009–2012. NHS Leeds 2009. Available on http://www.leeds.nhs.uk
• [4]Specchia ML, La Torre G, Siliquini R, Capizzi S, Valerio L, Nardella P, et al.: OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10:174. BioMed Central Full Text
• [5]Specchia ML, Nardella P: Capizzi, Donno S, La Torre G, Siliquini R, Ibba N, Campana A, Rabacchi G, Bertetto O, Ricciardi W. [OPTIGOV: strumento per la misura della Clinical Governance. Risultati di una sperimentazione in Regione Piemonte]. Clin Governance 2008, 4:19-25.
• [6]Poppa P, La Torre G, Mannocci A, Specchia ML, Rabacchi G, Vaschetto C, et al.: Appropriateness of admission and stay in obstetric wards: a new tool assessing unnecessary days of hospital care. Ital J Public Health 2009, 4:341-51.
• [7]Anton P, Peiro S, Aranaz JM, Calpena R, Compan A, Leutscher E, et al.: Effectiveness of a physician-oriented feedback intervention on inappropriate hospital stays. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007, 61:128-34.
• [8]Gertman PM, Restuccia JD: The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care. Med Care 1981, 19:855-71.
• [9]Soria-Aledo V, Carrillo-Alcaraz A, Flores-Pastor B, Moreno-Egea A, Carrasco-Prats M, Aguayo-Albasini JL: Reduction in inappropriate hospital use based on analysis of the causes. BMC Health Serv Res 2012, 12:361. BioMed Central Full Text
• [10]Tagliaferri S, Ippolito A, Cuccaro P, Annunziata ML, Campanile M, Lieto AD: Governance of Innovation and Appropriateness of Hospitalization for High-Risk Pregnancy: The TOCOMAT System. Telemed J E Health 2013, 19:542-8.
• [11]Finocchiaro G, Paparo D, Gitto G, Caruso R, Parisi A: Clinical governance and continuous quality improvement in surgical organizations. G Chir 2009, 30(1–2):58-60.
• [12]Poscia A, Cambieri A, Tucceri C, Ricciardi W, Volpe M. Audit as a tool to assess and promote the quality of medical records and hospital appropriateness: methodology and preliminary results. Ig e San Pubbl. 2015;71(2). In press.
• [13]Fellin G, Apolone G, Tampieri A. Appropriateness of hospital use: an overview of Italian studies. Int J Quality Health Care. 1995;7:219–26.
• [14]D'Andrea G, Capalbo G, Volpe M, Marchetti M, Vicentini F, Capelli G, et al. Evaluation of the appropriateness of hospital admissions using the iso-gravity classification systems. APR-DRG and Disease Staging and the Italian version of Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP). Ann Ig. 2006;18(1):49–62.
• [15]Capalbo G, D’Andrea G, Volpe M, Cambieri A, Cicchetti A, Ricciardi G: Appropriateness evaluation of short hospital admissions using Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (Italian version): experience of a teaching hospital. Ann Ig 2004, 16(6):759-65.
• [16]Mannocci A, Specchia ML, Poppa G, Boccia G, Cavallo P, De Caro F, et al.: La Torre G; Collaborative Group. A multicenter study on the appropriateness of hospitalization in obstetric wards: application of Obstetric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (Obstetric AEP). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014, 29:1-7.
• [17]Lazio Region. DCA n 40 26/03/2012 and DCA n. 58/2009: Sistema dei controlli dell’attività sanitaria ospedaliera e specialistica - L. 133/08, art. 79, comma 1 septies. Available at: www.regione.lazio.it/binary/rl_main/tbl_delibere/223386.doc
• [18]Angelillo IF, Ricciardi G, Nante N, Boccia A, Bianco A, La Torre G, et al.: Appropriateness of hospital utilisation in Italy. Public Health 2000, 114(1):9-14.
• [19]Pérez-Rubio A, Santos S, Luquero FJ, Tamames S, Cantón B, Castrodeza JJ: [Evaluation of the appropriateness of stays in a third level hospital]. An Sist Sanit Navar 2007, 30(1):29-36.
• [20]Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Health and Public Policy Committee and Office of Health Policy. Position statement. The art and science of high-quality health care: Ten principles that fuel quality improvement. November 2, 2012. Avaliable online at: http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/common/documents/policy/quality_improvement_e.pdf.
• [21]Maxwell RJ: Dimensions of quality revisited: from thought to action. Qual Health Care 1992, 1(3):171-7.
• [22]de Belvis AG, Biasco A, Pelone F, Romaniello A, De Micco F, Volpe M, et al.: [Diffusion of clinical governance among the Italian Local Health Units (LHUs). Analysis of the Health Surveys, the Firm Acts and the Health Plans]. Ann Ig 2009, 21:117-26. Italian
• [23]Fontaine P, Jacques J, Gillain D, Sermeus W, Kolh P, Gillet P: Assessing the causes inducing lengthening of hospital stays by means of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. Health Policy 2011, 99:66-71.
• [24]Panis LJ, Verheggen FW, Pop P: To stay or not to stay. The assessment of appropriate hospital stay: a Dutch report. Int J Qual Health Care 2002, 14:55-67.
• [25]Sticca G, Filocamo A, Di Domenicantonio R, Prota F, Di Falco C, Materia E, et al.: Guasticchi G [Evaluation of the appropriateness of hospital admissions with the Italian version of the AEP in a university hospital]. Ann Ig 2006, 18:63-73.
• [26]Barisonzo R, Wiedermann W, Unterhuber M, Wiedermann CJ: Length of stay as risk factor for inappropriate hospital days: interaction with patient age and co-morbidity. J Eval Clin Pract 2013, 19:80-5.
• [27]Jepsen HK, Hendriksen C, Nielsen H, Nybo B, Perrild H: Every seventh acute medical admission is preventable. Dan Med J 2013, 60:A4595.
• [28]McDonagh MS, Smith DH, Goddard M: Measuring appropriate use of acute beds A systematic review of methods and results. Health Policy 2000, 53(3):157-84.
• [29]Lorenzo S, Lang T, Pastor R, Tampieri A, Santos-Eggimann B, Smith H, et al.: Reliability study of the European appropriateness evaluation protocol. Int J Qual Health Care 1999, 11(5):419-24.
• [30]West E: Management matters: the link between hospital organisation and quality of patient care. Qual Health Care 2001, 10:40-8.