Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy use among obstetricians and midwives in Viet Nam

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Amanda J Ampt²  Christine L Roberts²  Anh T Trinh¹ 

[1] Hung Vuong Hospital, 128 Hong Bang Street, Ward 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;Clinical and Population Perinatal Health Research, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney at Royal North Shore Hospital, Building 52, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards 2065, NSW, Australia

关键词: Viet Nam;    Survey;    Experience;    Attitudes;    Knowledge;    Episiotomy;   

Others  :  1178866
DOI  :  10.1186/s12884-015-0531-2

 received in 2014-08-21, accepted in 2015-04-16,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Episiotomy remains a routine procedure at childbirth in many South-East Asian countries but the reasons for this are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the knowledge of, attitudes towards and experience of episiotomy use among clinicians in Viet Nam.

Methods

All obstetricians and midwives who provide delivery care at Hung Vuong Hospital were surveyed about their practice, knowledge and attitudes towards episiotomy use. Data were analysed using frequency tabulations and contingency table analysis.

Results

148 (88%) clinicians completed the questionnaire. Fewer obstetricians (52.2%) than midwives (79.7%) thought the current episiotomy rate of 86% was about right (P < 0.01). Most obstetricians (82.6%) and midwives (98.7%) reported performing episiotomies on nulliparous women over 90% of the time. Among multipara, 24.6% of obstetricians reported performing episiotomy less than 60% of the time compared with only 3 (3.8%) midwives (P < 0.01). Aiming to reduce 3rd-4th degree perineal tears was the most commonly reported reason for performing an episiotomy by both obstetricians (76.8%) and midwives (82.3%), and lack of training in how to minimize tears and keep the perineum intact was the mostly commonly reported obstacle (obstetricians 56.5%, midwives 36.7% P = 0.02) to reducing the episiotomy rate.

Conclusion

Although several factors that may impede or facilitate episiotomy practice change were identified by our survey, training and confidence in normal vaginal birth without episiotomy is a priority.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Trinh et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Lai CY, Cheung HW, Hsi Lao TT, Lau TK, Leung TY: Is the policy of restrictive episiotomy generalisable? A prospective observational study. J Mat-Fetal Neonatal Med 2009, 22(12):1116-21.
• [2]Lam KW, Wong HS, Pun TC: The practice of episiotomy in public hospitals in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2006, 12(2):94-8.
• [3]The SEA-ORCHID Study Group: Use of Evidence-Based Practices in Pregnancy and Childbirth: South East Asia Optimising Reproductive and Child Health in Developing Countries Project PLoS One 2008, 3(7):e2646.
• [4]Frankman EA, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL: Episiotomy in the United States: has anything changed? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009, 200(5):573.
• [5]Trinh AT, Khambalia A, Ampt A, Morris JM, Roberts CL: Episiotomy rate in Vietnamese-born women in Australia: support for a change in obstetric practice in Viet Nam. Bull World Health Organ 2013, 91(5):350-6.
• [6]Carroli G, Mignini L: Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1. Art. No.::CD000081. doi:000010.001002/14651858.CD14000081.pub14651852.
• [7]Wheeler J, Davis D, Fry M, Brodie P, Homer CS: Is Asian ethnicity an independent risk factor for severe perineal trauma in childbirth? A systematic review of the literature. Women Birth 2012, 25(3):107-13.
• [8]Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I: Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG 2013, 120(2):152-60.
• [9]Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Jones PW: Evaluation of postpartum perineal pain and dyspareunia–a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008, 137(2):152-6.
• [10]Handa VL, Blomquist JL, McDermott KC, Friedman S, Munoz A: Pelvic floor disorders after vaginal birth: effect of episiotomy, perineal laceration, and operative birth. Obstet Gynecol 2012, 119(2 Pt 1):233-9.
• [11]Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R, Howarth L, Goyder K, Van de Venne M, et al.: A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. BJOG 2008, 115(13):1688-94.
• [12]Sartore A, De Seta F, Maso G, Pregazzi R, Grimaldi E, Guaschino S: The effects of mediolateral episiotomy on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 103(4):669-73.
• [13]Klein MC, Gauthier RJ, Robbins JM, Kaczorowski J, Jorgensen SH, Franco ED, et al.: Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994, 171(3):591-8.
• [14]Klein MC, Liston R, Fraser WD, Baradaran N, Hearps SJ, Tomkinson J, et al.: Attitudes of the new generation of Canadian obstetricians: how do they differ from their predecessors? Birth 2011, 38(2):129-39.
• [15]Ampt AJ, Ford JB, Roberts CL, Morris JM: Trends in obstetric anal sphincter injuries and associated risk factors for vaginal singleton term births in New South Wales 2001–2009. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2013, 53(1):9-16.
• [16]Goldberg J, Hyslop T, Tolosa JE, Sultana C: Racial differences in severe perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003, 188:1063-7.
• [17]Hopkins LM, Caughey AB, Glidden DV, Laros RK Jr: Racial/ethnic differences in perineal, vaginal and cervical lacerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 193(2):455-9.
• [18]Laine K, Rotvold W, Staff AC: Are obstetric anal sphincter ruptures preventable?– large and consistent rupture rate variations between the Nordic countries and between delivery units in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013, 92(1):94-100.
• [19]Raisanen S, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, Heinonen S: Up to seven-fold inter-hospital differences in obstetric anal sphincter injury rates- A birth register-based study in Finland. BMC Res Notes 2010, 3:345. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Agency for Healthcare Research and Qualiy: Patient Safety Indicators Technical Specifications (Obstetric Trauma rate)- Version 4.5. 2013, http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Modules/PSI_TechSpec.aspx (Accessed May 2014).
• [21]Australian Institute of Health & Welfare: Towards national indicators of safety and quality in health care. Cat. no. HSE 75. In. Canberra: AIHW; 2009.
• [22]Sultan AH: Obstetrical perineal injury and incontinence. Clinical Risk 1999, 5:193-6.
• [23]Klein MC, Kaczorowski J, Robbins JM, Gauthier RJ, Jorgensen SH, Joshi AK: Physicians’ beliefs and behaviour during a randomized controlled trial of episiotomy: consequences for women in their care. CMAJ 1995, 153(6):769-79.
• [24]Graham ID, Carroli G, Davies C, Medves JM: Episiotomy rates around the world: an update. Birth 2005, 32(3):219-23.
• [25]Hals E, Oian P, Pirhonen T, Gissler M, Hjelle S, Nilsen EB, et al.: A multicenter interventional program to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears. Obstet Gynecol 2010, 116(4):901-8.
• [26]Malqvist M, Lincetto O, Du NH, Burgess C, Hoa DT: Maternal health care utilization in Viet Nam: increasing ethnic inequity. Bull World Health Organ 2013, 91(4):254-61.