Metaproteomic analysis of ratoon sugarcane rhizospheric soil

BMC Microbiology

Ruiyu Lin¹  Zhixing Zhang¹  Jun Chen¹  Haibin Wang¹  Rui Lin²  Mingming Zhou¹  Aijia Zhang¹  Sheng Lin¹  Linkun Wu¹  Wenxiong Lin¹ 

[1]Agroecological Institute, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian, P. R. China

[2]College of Oceanography and Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, P. R. China

关键词: Sugarcane;    Soil protein extraction;    Soil metaproteomics;    Soil enzyme;    2D-electrophoresis;    CLPP;   

Others  :  1143622
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2180-13-135

 received in 2013-02-02, accepted in 2013-05-30,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

The current study was undertaken to elucidate the mechanism of yield decline in ratoon sugarcane using soil metaproteomics combined with community level physiological profiles (CLPP) analysis.

Results

The available stalk number, stalk diameter, single stalk weight and theoretical yield of ratoon cane (RS) were found to be significantly lower than those of plant cane (NS). The activities of several carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus processing enzymes, including invertase, peroxidase, urease and phosphomonoesterase were found to be significantly lower in RS soil than in NS soil. BIOLOG analysis indicated a significant decline in average well-color development (AWCD), Shannon’s diversity and evenness indices in RS soil as compared to NS soil. To profile the rhizospheric metaproteome, 109 soil protein spots with high resolution and repeatability were successfully identified. These proteins were found to be involved in carbohydrate/energy, amino acid, protein, nucleotide, auxin and secondary metabolisms, membrane transport, signal transduction and resistance, etc. Comparative metaproteomics analysis revealed that 38 proteins were differentially expressed in the RS soil as compared to the control soil or NS soil. Among these, most of the plant proteins related to carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism and stress response were up-regulated in RS soil. Furthermore, several microbial proteins related to membrane transport and signal transduction were up-regulated in RS soil. These proteins were speculated to function in root colonization by microbes.

Conclusions

Our experiments revealed that sugarcane ratooning practice induced significant changes in the soil enzyme activities, the catabolic diversity of microbial community, and the expression level of soil proteins. They influenced the biochemical processes in the rhizosphere ecosystem and mediated the interactions between plants and soil microbes.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Lin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Crane DR Jr, Spreen TH: A model of the stubble replacement decision for Florida sugarcane growers. South J Agr Econ 1980, 12:55-63.
• [2]Shukla SK, Yadav RL, Suman A, Singh PN: Improving rhizospheric environment and sugarcane ratoon yield through bioagents amended farm yard manure in udic ustochrept soil. Soil Till Res 2008, 99:158-168.
• [3]Lin WX, Chen T, Zhou MM: New dimensions in agroecology. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 2012, 20:253-264.
• [4]Garside AL, Smith MA, Chapman LS, Hurney AP, Magarey RC: The yield plateau in the Australian sugar industry: 1970–1990. In Intensive sugarcane production, meeting the challenges beyond 2000. Edited by Keating BA, Wilson JR. Wallingford: CAB International; 1997:103-124.
• [5]Gascho GJ, Ruelke OC, West SH: Residual effect of germination temperature in sugarcane. Crop Sci 1973, 13:274-276.
• [6]Magarey RC: Microbiological aspects of sugarcane yield decline. Aust J Agr Res 1996, 47:307-322.
• [7]Pankhurst CE, Magarey RC, Stirling GR, Blair BL, Bell MJ, Garside AL: Management practices to improve soil health and reduce the effects of detrimental soil biota associated with yield decline of sugarcane in Queensland. Soil Till Res 2003, 72:125-137.
• [8]Pankhurst CE, Blair BL, Magarey RC, Stirling GR, Bell MJ, Garside AL: Effect of rotation breaks and organic matter amendments on the capacity of soils to develop biological suppression towards soil organisms associated with yield decline of sugarcane. Appl Soil Ecol 2005, 28:271-282.
• [9]Stirling GR, Blair BL, Pattemore JA, Garside AL, Bell MJ: Changes in nematode populations on sugarcane following fallow, fumigation and crop rotation, and implications for the role of nematodes in yield decline. Australas Plant Path 2001, 30:323-335.
• [10]Marschner P: Plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere and nutrient cycling. In Nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Volume 10. Edited by Marschner P, Rengel Z. Berlin: Springer; 2007:159-182.
• [11]Pini F, Frascella A, Santopolo L, Bazzicalupo M, Biondi EG, Scotti C, Mengoni A: Exploring the plant-associated bacterial communities in Medicago sativa L. BMC Microbiol 2012, 12:78. BioMed Central Full Text
• [12]Mukerji KG, Manoharachary C: Rhizosphere biology- an overview. In Microbial activity in the rhizosphere. Volume 7. Edited by Mukerji KG, Manoharachary C, Singh J. Berlin: Springer; 2006:1-39.
• [13]Fernàndez-Guerra A, Buchan A, Mou X, Casamayor EO, González JM: T-RFPred: a nucleotide sequence size prediction tool for microbial community description based on terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism chromatograms. BMC Microbiol 2010, 10:262. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]Ying Y, Lv Z, Min H, Cheng J: Dynamic changes of microbial community diversity in a photohydrogen producing reactor monitored by PCR-DGGE. J Environ Sci 2008, 20:1118-1125.
• [15]Jacobsen C, Holben W: Quantification of mRNA in Salmonella sp. seeded soil and chicken manure using magnetic capture hybridization RT-PCR. J Microbiol Methods 2007, 69:315-321.
• [16]Griffin TJ, Gygi SP, Ideker T, Rist B, Eng J, Hood L, Aebersold R: Complementary profiling of gene expression at the transcriptome and proteome levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002, 1:323-333.
• [17]Wang HB, Zhang ZX, Li H, He HB, Fang CX, Zhang AJ, Li QS, Chen RS, Guo XK, Lin HF, Wu LK, Lin S, Chen T, Lin RY, Peng XX, Lin WX: Characterization of metaproteomics in crop rhizospheric soil. J Proteome Res 2011, 10:932-940.
• [18]Maron PA, Ranjard L, Mougel C, Lemanceau P: Metaproteomics: a new approach for studying functional microbial ecology. Microb Ecol 2007, 53:486-493.
• [19]Taylor E, Williams M: Microbial protein in soil: Influence of extraction method and C amendment on extraction and recovery. Microb Ecol 2010, 59:390-399.
• [20]Gomez E, Ferreras L, Toresani S: Soil bacterial functional diversity as influenced by organic amendment application. Bioresour Technol 2006, 97:1484-1489.
• [21]Palviainen M, Raekallio M, Vainionpää M, Kosonen S, Vainio O: Proteomic profiling of dog urine after European adder (Vipera berus berus) envenomation by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis. Toxicon 2012, 60:1228-1234.
• [22]Qi JJ, Yao HY, Ma XJ, Zhou LL, Li XN: Soil microbial community composition and diversity in the rhizosphere of a Chinese medicinal plant. Commun Soil Sci Plan 2009, 40:1462-1482.
• [23]Li CG, Li XM, Kong WD, Wu Y, Wang JG: Effect of monoculture soybean on soil microbial community in the Northeast China. Plant Soil 2010, 330:423-433.
• [24]Qu XH, Wang JG: Effect of amendments with different phenolic acids on soil microbial biomass, activity, and community diversity. Appl Soil Ecol 2008, 39:172-179.
• [25]Wu FZ, Wang XZ, Xue CY: Effect of cinnamic acid on soil microbial characteristics in the cucumber rhizosphere. Eur J Soil Biol 2009, 45:356-362.
• [26]Hunsigi G: Sugarcane in Agriculture and Industry. Bangalore: Prism Books Pvt Ltd; 2001.
• [27]Pankhurst CE, Magarey RC, Stirling GR, Holt JA, Brown JD: Rotation-induced changes in soil biological properties and their effect on yield decline in sugarcane. Proc Aust Soc Sugar Cane Technol 1999, 21:79-86.
• [28]Whipps JM: Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. J Exp Bot 2001, 52:487-511.
• [29]Gómez-Luna BE, De la Luz Ruiz-Aguilar GM, Vázquez-Marrufo G, Dendooven L, Olalde-Portugal V: Enzyme activities and metabolic profiles of soil microorganisms at KILN sites in Quercus spp. temperate forests of central Mexico. Appl Soil Ecol 2012, 52:48-55.
• [30]Puglisi E, Del Re AAM, Rao MA, Gianfreda L: Development and validation of numerical indexes integrating enzyme activities of soils. Soil Biol Biochem 2006, 38:1673-1681.
• [31]Gomez E, Garland J, Conti M: Reproducibility in the response of soil bacterial community-level physiological profiles from a land use intensification gradient. Appl Soil Ecol 2004, 26:21-30.
• [32]Papatheodorou EM, Efthimiadou E, Stamou GP: Functional diversity of soil bacteria as affected by management practices and phenological stage of Phaseolus vulgaris. Eur J Soil Biol 2008, 44:429-436.
• [33]Preston-Mafham J, Boddy L, Randerson PF: Analysis of microbial community functional diversity using sole-carbonsource utilization profiles – a critique. FEMS Microb Ecol 2002, 42:1-14.
• [34]Singh G, Mukerji KG: Root Exudates as determinant of rhizospheric microbial biodiversity. In Microbial activity in the rhizosphere. Volume 7. Edited by Mukerji KG, Manoharachary C, Singh J. Berlin: Springer; 2006:39-53.
• [35]Hadacek F, Gunther FF: Plant root carbohydrates affect growth behaviour of endophytic microfungi. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2002, 41:161-170.
• [36]Foyer CH, Mullineaux PM: Causes of photooxidative stres and amelioration of defense dystems in Plants. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1994.
• [37]Baker CJ, Orlandi EW: Active oxygen in plant pathogenesis. Annu Rev Phytopathol 1995, 33:299-321.
• [38]Härndahl U, Hall RB, Osteryoung KW, Vierling E, Bornman JF, Sundby C: The chloroplast small heat shock protein undergoes oxidation-dependent conformational changes and may protect plants from oxidative stress. Cell Stress Chaperon 1999, 4:129-138.
• [39]Groom QJ, Torres MA, Fordham-Skelton AP, Hammond-Kosack KE, Robinson NJ, Jones JD: rbohA, a rice homologue of the mammalian gp91phox respiratory burst oxidase gene. Plant J 1996, 10:515-522.
• [40]Jelenska J, van Hal JA, Greenberg JT: Pseudomonas syringae hijacks plant stress chaperone machinery for virulence. PNAS 2010, 107:13177-13182.
• [41]Walden AR, Walter C, Gardner RC: Genes expressed in pinus radiata male cones include homologs to anther-specific and pathogenesis response genes. Plant Physiol 1999, 121:1103-1116.
• [42]Pontier D, Godiard L, Marco Y, Roby D: hsr203J, a tobacco gene whose activation is rapid, highly localized and specific for incompatible plant/pathogen interactions. Plant J 1994, 5:507-521.
• [43]Zhou YL, Xu MR, Zhao MF, Xie XW, Zhu LH, Fu BY, Li ZK: Genome-wide gene responses in a transgenic rice line carrying the maize resistance geneRxo1to the rice bacterial streak pathogen, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzicola. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:78. BioMed Central Full Text
• [44]Magarey RC: Yield decline of sugarcane. In Current trends in sugarcane pathology. Edited by Rao GP, Gillaspie AGJr, Upadhyaya PP, Bergamin A, Agnihotri VP, Chen CT. Pitampura: International Books and Periodicals Supply Service; 1994:393-412.
• [45]Stirling GR, Blair BL, Whittle PJL: Nematode pests: their role in yield decline of sugarcane and opportunities for improved management practices. In Sugarcane: Research towards efficient and sustainable production. Edited by Wilson JR, Hogarth DM, Campbell JA, Garside AL. Brisbane: CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures; 1996:228-229.
• [46]Nataf Y, Yaron S, Stahl F, Lamed R, Bayer EA, Scheper TH, Sonenshein AL, Shoham Y: Cellodextrin and laminaribiose ABC transporters in Clostridium thermocellum. J Bacteriol 2009, 191:203-209.
• [47]Davidson AL, Chen J: ATP-binding cassette transporters in bacteria. Annu Rev Biochem 2004, 73:241-268.
• [48]Elferink MG, Albers SV, Konings WN, Driessen AJ: Sugar transport in Sulfolobus solfataricus is mediated by two families of binding protein-dependent ABC transporters. Mol Microbiol 2001, 39:1494-1503.
• [49]Barrett JF, Hoch JA: Two-component signal transduction as a target for microbial anti-infective therapy. Antimicrob Agents Ch 1998, 42:1529-1536.
• [50]Dekkers LC, Bloemendaal CJP, de Weger LA, Wijffelman CA, Spaink HP, Lugtenberg BJ: A two-component system plays an important role in the root-colonizing ability of Pseudomonas fluorescens strain WCS365. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 1998, 11:45-56.
• [51]Chaparro JM, Badri DV, Bakker MG, Sugiyama A, Manter DK, Vivanco JM: Root exudation of phytochemicals in Arabidopsis follows specific patterns that are developmentally programmed and correlate with soil microbial functions. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e55731.
• [52]Trivedi P, He Z, Van Nostrand JD, Albrigo G, Zhou J, Wang N: Huanglongbing alters the structure and functional diversity of microbial communities associated with citrus rhizosphere. The ISME Journal 2012, 6:363-383.
• [53]Schneider T, Keiblinger KM, Schmid E, Sterflinger-Gleixner K, Ellersdorfer G, Roschitzki B, Richter A, Eberl L, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Riedel K: Who is who in litter decomposition? Metaproteomics reveals major microbial players and their biogeochemical functions. ISME J 2012, 6:1749-1762.
• [54]Hettich RL, Sharma R, Chourey K, Giannone RJ: Microbial metaproteomics: identifying the repertoire of proteins that microorganisms use to compete and cooperate in complex environmental communities. Curr Opin Microbiol 2012, 15:373-380.
• [55]Hettich RL, Pan C, Chourey K, Giannone RJ: Metaproteomics: Harnessing the power of high performance mass spectrometry to identify the suite of proteins that control metabolic activities in microbial communities. Anal Chem 2013, 85:4203-4214.
• [56]Keiblinger KM, Wilhartitz IC, Schneider T, Roschitzki B, Schmid E, Eberl L, Riedel K, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S: Soil metaproteomics - Comparative evaluation of protein extraction protocols. Soil Biol Biochem 2012, 54:14-24.
• [57]Erickson AR, Cantarel BL, Lamendella R, Darzi Y, Mongodin EF, Pan C, Shah M, Halfvarson J, Tysk C, Henrissat B, Raes J, Verberkmoes NC, Fraser CM, Hettich RL, Jansson JK: Integrated metagenomics/metaproteomics reveals human host-microbiota signatures of Crohn's disease. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e49138.
• [58]Chen RK, Lin YQ, Zhang YB, Sun ZC: One hundred questions for sugarcane technique. Beijing: China Agriculture Press; 2009.
• [59]Wang QY, Zhou DM, Cang L: Microbial and enzyme properties of apple orchard soil as affected by long-term application of copper fungicide. Soil Biol Biochem 2009, 41:1504-1509.
• [60]Carine F, Capowiez Y, Stéven C: Enzyme activities in apple orchard agroecosystems: How are they affected by management strategy and soil properties. Soil Biol Biochem 2009, 41:61-68.
• [61]Yu XZ, Wu SC, Wu FY, Wong MH: Enhanced dissipation of PAHs from soil using mycorrhizal ryegrass and PAH-degrading bacteria. J Hazard Mater 2011, 186:1206-1217.
• [62]Lin RY, Rong H, Zhou JJ, Yu CP, Ye CY, Chen LS, Lin WX: Impact of allelopathic rice seedlings on rhizospheric microbial populations and their functional diversity. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2007, 27:3644-3654.
• [63]Choi KH, Dobbs FC: Comparison of two kinds of Biolog microplates (GN and ECO) in their ability to distinguish among aquatic microbial communities. J Microbiol Meth 1999, 36:203-213.
• [64]Blum H, Beiers H, Gross HJ: Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis 1987, 8:93-99.
• [65]Uniprot Database http://www.uniprot.org webcite
• [66]WEGO-Web Gene Ontology Annotation Plotting http://wego.genomics.org.cn/cgi-bin/wego/index.pl webcite
• [67]Ye J, Fang L, Zheng H, Zhang Y, Chen J, Zhang Z, Wang J, Li S, Li R, Bolund L, Wang J: WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:293-297.
• [68]KEGG-Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. http://www.genome.jp/kegg webcite