Women’s perception of quality of maternity services: a longitudinal survey in Nepal

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Paras K Pokharel¹  Andy H Lee²  Rajendra Karkee¹ 

[1] School of Public Health and Community Medicine, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal;School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

关键词: Nepal;    Perceptions;    Maternity services;    Quality of care;   

Others  :  1131675
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2393-14-45

 received in 2013-10-30, accepted in 2014-01-23,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

In the context of maternity service, the mother’s assessment of quality is central because emotional, cultural and respectful supports are vital during labour and the delivery process. This study compared client-perceived quality of maternity services between birth centres, public and private hospitals in a central hills district of Nepal.

Methods

A cohort of 701 pregnant women of 5 months or more gestational age were recruited and interviewed, followed by another interview within 45 days of delivery. Perception of quality was measured by a 20-item scale with three sub-scales: health facility, health care delivery, and interpersonal aspects. Perceived quality scores were analysed by ANOVA with post-hoc comparisons and multiple linear regression.

Results

Within the health facility sub-scale, birth centre was rated lowest on items ‘adequacy of medical equipment’, ‘health staff suited to women’s health’ and ‘adequacy of health staff’, whereas public hospital was rated the lowest with respect to ‘adequacy of room’, ‘adequacy of water’, ‘environment clean’, ‘privacy’ and ‘adequacy of information’. Mean scores of total quality and sub-scales health facility and health care delivery for women attending private hospital were higher (p < 0.001) than those using birth centre or public hospital. Mean score of the sub-scale interpersonal aspects for public hospital users was lower (p < 0.001) than those delivered at private hospital and birth centre. However, perception on interpersonal aspects by women using public hospital improved significantly after delivery (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Overall, perception of quality differed significantly by types of health facility used for delivery. They rated lowest the supplies and equipment in birth centres and the amenities and interpersonal aspects in the public hospital. Accordingly, attention to these aspects is needed to improve the quality.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Karkee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]van den Broek NR, Graham WJ: Quality of care for maternal and newborn health: the neglected agenda. BJOG 2009, 116:18-21.
• [2]Baltussen R, Ye Y, Haddad S, Sauerborn R: Perceived quality of care of primary health care services in Burkina Faso. Health Policy Plan 2002, 17(1):42-48.
• [3]Hulton LA, Matthews Z, Stones RW: Applying a framework for assessing the quality of maternal health services in urban India. Soc Sci Med 2007, 64(10):2083-2095.
• [4]Haddad S, Fournier P: Quality, cost and utilization of health services in developing countries. A longitudinal study in Zaïre. Soc Sci Med 1995, 40(6):743-753.
• [5]Gilson L, Alilio M, Heggenhougen K: Community satisfaction with primary health-care services- an evaluation undertaken in the morogoro region of Tanzania. Soc Sci Med 1994, 39(6):767-780.
• [6]Akin JS, Hutchinson P: Health-care facility choice and the phenomenon of bypassing. Health Policy Plan 1999, 14(2):135-151.
• [7]Bronstein JM, Morrisey MA: Bypassing rural hospitals for obstetrics care. J Health Polit Policy Law 1991, 16(1):87-118.
• [8]Leonard KL, Mliga GR, Haile Mariam D: Bypassing health centres in Tanzania: revealed preferences for quality. J Afr Econ 2002, 11(4):441-471.
• [9]Hotchkiss DR, Piccinino L, Malaj A, Berruti AA, Bose S: Addressing the phenomenon of bypassing in Albania: the impact of a primary health care strengthening intervention. Int J Health Plann Manag 2007, 22(3):225-243.
• [10]Kahabuka C, Kvale G, Moland K, Hinderaker S: Why caretakers bypass primary health care facilities for child care - a case from rural Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res 2011, 11(1):315. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Andaleeb SS: Service quality perceptions and patient satisfaction: a study of hospitals in a developing country. Soc Sci Med 2001, 52(9):1359-1370.
• [12]Kruk ME, Paczkowski M, Mbaruku G, Pinho HD, Galea S: Women’s Preferences for place of delivery in rural Tanzania: a population-based discrete choice experiment. Am J Public Health 2009, 99(9):1666-1672.
• [13]Wagner M: Fish can’t see water: the need to humanize birth. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2001, 75, Supplement 1:S25-S37.
• [14]Behruzi R, Hatem M, Fraser W, Goulet L, Ii M, Misago C: Facilitators and barriers in the humanization of childbirth practice in Japan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010, 10(1):25. BioMed Central Full Text
• [15]Bailey P, de Bocaletti E, Barrios G, de Cross Y: Monitoring utilization and need for obstetric care in the highlands of Guatemala. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2005, 89(2):209-217.
• [16]Afsana K, Rashid SF: The challenges of meeting rural Bangladeshi women’s needs in delivery care. Reprod Health Matters 2001, 9(18):79-89.
• [17]Duong DV, Binns CW, Lee AH: Utilization of delivery services at the primary health care level in rural Vietnam. Soc Sci Med 2004, 59:2585-2595.
• [18]Kruk ME, Rockers PC, Mbaruku G, Paczkowski MM, Galea S: Community and health system factors associated with facility delivery in rural Tanzania: a multilevel analysis. Health Policy 2010, 97(2–3):209-216.
• [19]Khresheh R: Support in the first stage of labour from a female relative: the first step in improving the quality of maternity services. Midwifery 2010, 26(6):e21-e24.
• [20]Hulton L, Matthews Z, Stones RW: A framework for the evaluation of quality of care in maternity services. Southampton: University of Southampton; 2000.
• [21]Hadjigeorgiou E, Kouta C, Papastavrou E, Papadopoulos I, Mårtensson LB: Women’s perceptions of their right to choose the place of childbirth: an integrative review. Midwifery 2012, 28(3):380-390.
• [22]Kruk ME, Mbaruku G, McCord CW, Moran M, Rockers PC, Galea S: Bypassing primary care facilities for childbirth: a population-based study in rural Tanzania. Health Policy Plan 2009, 24(4):279-288.
• [23]Ith P, Dawson A, Homer CSE: Women’s perspective of maternity care in Cambodia. Women Birth 2013, 26(1):71-75.
• [24]Parkhurst JO, Ssengooba F: Assessing access barriers to maternal health care: measuring bypassing to identify health centre needs in rural Uganda. Health Policy Plan 2009, 24(5):377-384.
• [25]Jacobsen KH, Ansumana R, Abdirahman HA, Bockarie AS, Bangura U, Meehan KA, Jimmy DH, Malanoski AP, Sundufu AJ, Stenger DA: Considerations in the selection of healthcare providers for mothers and children in Bo, Sierra Leone: reputation, cost and location. Int Health 2012, 4(4):307-313.
• [26]Thaddeus S, Maine D: Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 1994, 38(8):1091-1110.
• [27]Abrahams N, Jewkes R, Mvo Z: Health care-seeking practices of pregnant women and the role of the midwife in Cape Town, South Africa. J Midwifery Womens Health 2001, 46(4):240-247.
• [28]D’Ambruoso L, Abbey M, Hussein J: Please understand when I cry out in pain: women’s accounts of maternity services during labour and delivery in Ghana. BMC Public Health 2005, 5:140. BioMed Central Full Text
• [29]Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, Hart J, Kimber A, Storey L, Thomas H: The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 2002, 6(32):1-244.
• [30]Sitzia J, Wood N: Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 1997, 45(12):1829-1843.
• [31]Haddad S, Fournier P, Potvin L: Measuring lay people’s perceptions of the quality of primary health care services in developing countries. Validation of a 20-item scale. Int J Qual Health Care 1998, 10(2):93-104.
• [32]Rao KD, Peters DH, Bandeen-Roche K: Towards patient-centered health services in India—a scale to measure patient perceptions of quality. Int J Qual Health Care 2006, 18(6):414-421.
• [33]Duong D, Binns CW, Lee AH, Hipgrave DB: Measuring client-perceived quality of maternity services in rural Vietnam. Int J Qual Health Care 2004, 16(6):447-452.
• [34]Su TT, Sax S: Key quality aspect: a fundamental step for quality improvement in a resource-poor setting. Asia Pac J Public Health 2009, 21(4):477-486.
• [35]Aitken JM: Voices from the inside: managing district health services in Nepal. Int J Health Plann Manag 1994, 9(4):309-340.
• [36]Clapham S, Basnet I, Pathak LR, McCall M: The evolution of a quality of care approach for improving emergency obstetric care in rural hospitals in Nepal. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004, 86(1):86-97.
• [37]Organisation Development Centre: Quality of care assessment study for Nepal safer motherhood project (NSMP) and family health division (FHD). Organisation Development Centre: Kathmandu; 2004.
• [38]District Public Health Office Kaski: Annual health report of kaski. Pokhara: Regional Health Directorate, Ministry of Health and Population, GoN; 2012.
• [39]Karkee R, Lee A, Binns C: Birth preparedness and skilled attendance at birth in Nepal: implications for achieving millennium development goal 5. Midwifery 2013, 29(10):1206-1210.
• [40]Karkee R, Binns C, Lee A: Determinants of facility delivery after implementation of safer mother programme in Nepal: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013, 13(1):193. BioMed Central Full Text
• [41]Pitchforth E, Lilford RJ, Kebede Y, Asres G, Stanford C, Frost J: Assessing and understanding quality of care in a labour ward: a pilot study combining clinical and social science perspectives in Gondar, Ethiopia. Soc Sci Med 2010, 71(10):1739-1748.
• [42]Filmer D, Pritchett LH: Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data-or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography 2001, 38(1):115-132.
• [43]IBM SPSS: PASW Statistics for window version18. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 2010.
• [44]Karkee R, Lee AH, Binns CW: Bypassing birth centres for childbirth: an analysis of data from a community-based prospective cohort study in Nepal. Health Policy Plan 2013. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt090
• [45]Baltussen R, Ye Y: Quality of care of modern health services as perceived by users and non-users in Burkina Faso. Int J Qual Health Care 2006, 18(1):30-34.
• [46]Berendes S, Heywood P, Oliver S, Garner P: Quality of private and public ambulatory health care in Low and middle income countries: systematic review of comparative studies. PLoS Med 2011, 8(4):e1000433.
• [47]Griffiths P, Stephenson R: Understanding users’ perspectives of barriers to maternal health care use in maharashtra, India. J Biosoc Sci 2001, 33(03):339-359.
• [48]Jallow IK, Chou Y-J, Liu T-L, Huang N: Women’s perception of antenatal care services in public and private clinics in the Gambia. Int J Qual Health Care 2012, 24(6):595-600.
• [49]Clapham S, Pokharel D, Bird C, Basnett I: Addressing the attitudes of service providers: increasing access to professional midwifery care in Nepal. Trop Doct 2008, 38(4):197.
• [50]Berry NS: Who’s Judging the quality of care? Indigenous Maya and the problem of “Not being attended”. Med Anthropol 2008, 27(2):164-189.
• [51]Foster J, Burgos R, Tejada C, Caceres R, Altamonte AT, Perez LJ, Noboa FRM, Urbaez MF, Heath A, Hilliard RC, et al.: A community-based participatory research approach to explore community perceptions of the quality of maternal-newborn health services in the Dominican Republic. Midwifery 2010, 26(5):504-511.
• [52]Family Health Division/ Nepal Health Sector Support Programme: Responding to increased demand for institutional childbirths at referral hospitals in Nepal: Situational analysis and emerging options. Kathmandu: Department of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Population [ Nepal ]; 2013.
• [53]Berman P, Laura R: The role of private providers in maternal and child health and family planning services in developing countries. Health Policy Plan 1996, 11(2):142-155.