Validation of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) 21 as a screening instrument for depression and anxiety in a rural community-based cohort of northern Vietnamese women

BMC Psychiatry

Jane Fisher¹  Tuan Tran²  Thach Duc Tran¹ 

[1] Melbourne School of Population Health, Australia, Monash University, Parkville, Australia;Research and Training Centre for Community Development, Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi, Viet Nam

关键词: Vietnam;    Women;    Validation;    Anxiety;    Depression;    Screening;   

Others  :  1124169
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-244X-13-24

 received in 2012-10-17, accepted in 2013-01-11,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Depression and anxiety are recognised increasingly as serious public health problems among women in low- and lower-middle income countries. The aim of this study was to validate the 21-item Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS21) for use in screening for these common mental disorders among rural women with young children in the North of Vietnam.

Methods

The DASS-21 was translated from English to Vietnamese, culturally verified, back-translated and administered to women who also completed, separately, a psychiatrist-administered Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Axis 1 diagnoses of depressive and anxiety disorders. The sample was a community-based representative cohort of adult women with young children living in Ha Nam Province in northern Viet Nam. Cronbach’s alpha, Exploratory Factor Analyses (EFA) and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to identify the psychometric properties of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress subscales and the overall scale.

Results

Complete data were available for 221 women. The internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) of each sub-scale and the overall scale were high, ranging from 0.70 for the Stress subscale to 0.88 for the overall scale, but EFA indicated that the 21 items all loaded on one factor. Scores on each of the three sub-scales, and the combinations of two or three of them were able to detect the common mental disorders of depression and anxiety in women with a sensitivity of 79.1% and a specificity of 77.0% at the optimal cut off of >33. However, they did not distinguish between those experiencing only depression or only anxiety.

Conclusions

The total score of the 21 items of the DASS21-Vietnamese validation appears to be comprehensible and sensitive to detecting common mental disorders in women with young children in primary health care in rural northern Vietnam and therefore might also be useful to screen for these conditions in other resource-constrained settings.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Tran et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Goldberg D, Huxley P: Common Mental Disorders: A Biosocial Model. London: Tavistock / Routledge; 1992.
• [2]Fisher J, Mello MC, Patel V, Rahman A, Tran T, Holton S, Holmes W: Prevalence and determinants of common perinatal mental disorders in women in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 2012, 90(2):139-149G.
• [3]WHO: World Health Report 2001. Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
• [4]Clark LA, Watson D: Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. J Abnorm Psychol 1991, 100(3):316-336.
• [5]Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF: Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. 2nd edition. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia; 1995.
• [6]Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH: The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther 1995, 33(3):335-343.
• [7]Ng F, Trauer T, Dodd S, Callaly T, Campbell S, Berk M: The validity of the 21‐item version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales as a routine clinical outcome measure. Acta Neuropsychiatrica 2007, 19(5):304-310.
• [8]Brown TA, Chorpita BF, Korotitsch W, Barlow DH: Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behav Res Ther 1997, 35(1):79-89.
• [9]Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP: Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychol Assess 1998, 10(2):176-181.
• [10]Henry JD, Crawford JR: The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2005, 44:227-239.
• [11]Chan RC, Xu T, Huang J, Wang Y, Zhao Q, Shum DH, O’Gorman J, Potangaroa R: Extending the utility of the Depression Anxiety Stress scale by examining its psychometric properties in Chinese settings. Psychiatry Res 2012. in press
• [12]Musa R, Fadzil MA ZZ: Translation, validation and psychometric properties of Bahasa Malaysia version of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS). ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry 2007, 82(2):82-89.
• [13]Severino GA, Haynes WDG: Development of an Italian version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. Psychol Health Med 2010, 15(5):607-621.
• [14]Bados A, Solanas A, Andres R: Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of depression, anxiety and stress scales (DASS). Psicothema 2005, 17(4):679-683.
• [15]Tran TD, Tran T, La B, Lee D, Rosenthal D, Fisher J: Screening for perinatal common mental disorders in women in the north of Vietnam: a comparison of three psychometric instruments. J Affect Disord 2011, 133(1–2):281-293.
• [16]Tuan T, Harpham T, Huonh N: Validity and reliability of the self-reporting questionnnaire 20 items in Vietnam. Hong Kong J 2004, 14(3):7-10.
• [17]Fisher J, Tran T, La BT, Kriitmaa K, Rosenthal D, Tuan T: Common perinatal mental disorders in northern Viet Nam: community prevalence and health care use. Bull World Health Organ 2010, 88(10):737-745.
• [18]First M, Gibbon M, Spitzer R, Williams J: User’s Guide for the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Axis 1 Disorders - Research Version. New York: Biometrics Research; 1996.
• [19]Maruyama G: Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1997.
• [20]Kline P: An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge; 2002.
• [21]Warner J: Clinicians’ guide to evaluating diagnostic and screening tests in psychiatry. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2004, 10:446-454.
• [22]GSO: Viet Nam Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2006, Final Report. Ha Noi, Viet Nam: General Statistics Office; 2007.
• [23]Tran TD, Tran T, Fisher J: Validation of three psychometric instruments for screening for perinatal common mental disorders in men in the north of Vietnam. J Affect Disord 2012, 136:104-109.