期刊论文详细信息
BMC Health Services Research
Lack of access to chemotherapy for colon cancer: multiplicative disadvantage of being extremely poor, inadequately insured and African American
Sindu M Kanjeekal4  Frances C Wright3  Isaac N Luginaah1  Emma Bartfay5  Sundus Haji-Jama2  Kevin M Gorey2 
[1] Department of Geography, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada;School of Social Work, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario N9B, 3P4, Canada;Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center and cross appointed to the Departments of Surgery and Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;Windsor Regional Cancer Center, Windsor, Ontario, Canada;Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
关键词: United States;    California;    Health care reform;    Ethnicity;    African American;    Chemotherapy;    Colon cancer;    Poverty;    Underinsured;    Uninsured;    Health insurance;   
Others  :  1133228
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-133
 received in 2013-08-17, accepted in 2014-03-05,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Despite evidence of chemotherapy’s ability to cure or comfort those with colon cancer, nearly half of such Americans do not receive it. African Americans (AA) seem particularly disadvantaged. An ethnicity by poverty by health insurance interaction was hypothesized such that the multiplicative disadvantage of being extremely poor and inadequately insured is worse for AAs than for non-Hispanic white Americans (NHWA).

Methods

California registry data were analyzed for 459 AAs and 3,001 NHWAs diagnosed with stage II to IV colon cancer between 1996 and 2000 and followed until 2011. Socioeconomic data from the 2000 census categorized neighborhoods: extremely poor (≥ 30% of households poor), middle (5-29% poor) and low poverty (< 5% poor). Participants were randomly selected from these poverty strata. Primary health insurers were Medicaid, Medicare, private or none. Chemotherapy rates were age and stage-adjusted and comparisons used standardized rate ratios (RR). Logistic and Cox regressions, respectively, modeled chemotherapy receipt and long term survival.

Results

A significant 3-way ethnicity by poverty by health insurance interaction effect on chemotherapy receipt was observed. Among those who did not live in extremely poor neighborhoods and were adequately insured privately or by Medicare, chemotherapy rates did not differ significantly between AAs (37.7%) and NHWAs (39.5%). Among those who lived in extremely poor neighborhoods and were inadequately insured by Medicaid or uninsured, AAs (14.6%) were nearly 60% less likely to receive chemotherapy than were NHWAs (25.5%, RR = 0.41). When the 3-way interaction effect as well as the main effects of poverty, health insurance and chemotherapy was accounted for, survival rates of AAs and NHWAs were the same.

Conclusions

The multiplicative barrier to colon cancer care that results from being extremely poor and inadequately insured is worse for AAs than it is for NHWAs. AAs are more prevalently poor, inadequately insured, and have fewer assets so they are probably less able to absorb the indirect and direct, but uncovered, costs of colon cancer care. Policy makers ought to be cognizant of these factors as they implement the Affordable Care Act and consider future health care reforms.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Gorey et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150304122604940.pdf 211KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Gill S, Loprinzi CL, Sargent DJ, Thomé SD, Alberts SR, Haller DG, Benedetti J, Francini G, Shepherd LE, Francois Seitz J, Labianca R, Chen W, Cha SS, Heldebrant MP, Goldberg RM: Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much? J Clin Oncol 2004, 22:1797-1806.
  • [2]Sargent DJ, Goldberg RM, Jacobson SD, Macdonald JS, Labianca R, Haller DG, Shepherd LE, Seitz JF, Francini G: A pooled analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer in elderly patients. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:1091-1097.
  • [3]Figueredo A, Coombes ME, Mukherjee S: Adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage II colon cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, 4.
  • [4]Ahmed N, Ahmedzai S, Vora V, Hillam S, Paz S: Supportive care for patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, 4.
  • [5]Etzioni DA, El-Khoueiry AB, Beart RW Jr: Rates and predictors of chemotherapy use for stage III colon cancer: a systematic review. Cancer 2008, 113:3279-3289.
  • [6]DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith JC, US Census Bureau, Current Population Reports (P60-245): Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2011. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2012.
  • [7]Conley D: Being Black, Living in the red: Race, Wealth, and Social Policy in America. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 1999.
  • [8]Dimou A, Syrigos KN, Saif MW: Disparities in colorectal cancer in African-Americans vs whites: before and after diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol 2009, 15:3734-3743.
  • [9]Yothers G, Sargent DJ, Wolmark N, Goldberg RM, O’Connell MJ, Benedetti JK, Saltz LB, Dignam JJ, Blackstock AW, ACCENT Collaborative Group: Outcomes among black patients with stage II and III colon cancer receiving chemotherapy: an analysis of ACCENT adjuvant trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011, 103:1498-1506.
  • [10]Du XL, Meyer TE, Franzini L: Meta-analysis of racial disparities in survival in association with socioeconomic status among men and women with colon cancer. Cancer 2007, 109:2161-2170.
  • [11]Mack CD, Carpenter W, Meyer A, Sanoff H, Stürmer T: Racial disparities in receipt and comparative effectiveness of oxaliplatin for stage III colon cancer in older adults. Cancer 2012, 118:2925-2934.
  • [12]Berry J, Caplan L, Davis S, Minor P, Counts-Spriggs M, Glover R, Ogunlade V, Bumpers K, Kauh J, Brawley OW, Flowers C: A black-white comparison of the quality of stage-specific colon cancer treatment. Cancer 2010, 116:713-722.
  • [13]Sabounchi S, Keihanian S, Anand BS: Impact of race on colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2012, 11:66-70.
  • [14]Albain KS, Unger JM, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA Jr, Hershman DL: Racial disparities in cancer survival among randomized clinical trials patients of the Southwest Oncology Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009, 101:984-992.
  • [15]Wirtzfeld DA, Mikula L, Gryfe R, Ravani P, Dicks EL, Parfrey P, Gallinger S, Pollett WG: Concordance with clinical practice guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I–III colon cancer: experience in 2 Canadian provinces. Can J Surg 2009, 52:92-97.
  • [16]Gorey KM, Holowaty EJ, Fehringer G, Laukkanen E, Moskowitz A, Webster DJ, Richter NL: An international comparison of cancer survival: Toronto, Ontario, and Detroit, Michigan, metropolitan areas. Am J Public Health 1997, 87:1156-1163.
  • [17]Gorey KM, Luginaah IN, Bartfay E, Zou GY, Haji-Jama S, Holowaty EJ, Hamm C, Kanjeekal SM, Wright FC, Balagurusamy MK, Richter NL: Better colon cancer care for extremely poor Canadian women compared with American women. Health Soc Work 2013, 38:240-248.
  • [18]Gorey KM, Luginaah IN, Holowaty EJ, Zou G, Hamm C, Bartfay E, Kanjeekal SM, Balagurusamy MK, Haji-Jama S, Wright FC: Effects of being uninsured or underinsured and living in high poverty neighborhoods on colon cancer care and survival in California: Historical cohort analysis, 1996—2011. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:897. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [19]Wilson WJ: The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. 2nd edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2012.
  • [20]Jargowsky PA: Stunning progress, hidden problems: the dramatic decline of concentrated poverty in the 1990s. In Redefining Urban and Suburban America: Evidence from Census 2000, Vol 2. Edited by Berube A, Katz B, Lang RE. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2005:137-171.
  • [21]Jargowsky PA: Poverty and Place: Ghettos, Barrios, and the American City. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1997.
  • [22]Iceland J: Poverty in America: A Handbook. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 2003.
  • [23]Dalaker J, US Census Bureau, Current Population Reports (P60-214): Poverty in the United States: 2000. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2001.
  • [24]Gorey KM, Luginaah IN, Holowaty EJ, Zou GY, Hamm C, Balagurusamy MK: Mediation of the effects of living in extremely poor neighborhoods by health insurance: breast cancer care and survival in California, 1996 to 2011. Int J Equity Health 2013, 12:6. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [25]Haji-Jama S, Gorey KM, Luginaah IN, Balagurusamy MK, Hamm C: Health insurance mediation of the Mexican American non-Hispanic white disparity on early breast cancer diagnosis. SpringerPlus 2013, 2:285. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [26]Richter NL, Gorey KM, Haji-Jama S, Luginaah IN: Care and survival of Mexican American women with node negative breast cancer: Historical cohort evidence of health insurance and barrio advantages. J Immigr Minor Healthin press
  • [27]Gorey KM, Luginaah IN, Bartfay E, Fung KY, Holowaty EJ, Wright FC, Hamm C, Kanjeekal SM: Effects of socioeconomic status on colon cancer treatment accessibility and survival in Toronto, Ontario, and San Francisco, California, 1996—2006. Am J Public Health 2011, 101:112-119.
  • [28]Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz A, Balch CM, Haller DG, Morrow M: American Joint Committee on Cancer: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th edition. New York: Springer- Verlag; 2002.
  • [29]Brant MK, Ziegler KL: California Cancer Reporting System Standards: Abstracting and Coding Procedures for Hospitals (Vol 1. 13th edition. Sacramento, CA: California Cancer Registry; 2013.
  • [30]Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
  • [31]Vittinghoff E, Glidden DV, Shiboski SC, McCulloch CE: Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models. 2nd edition. New York: Springer; 2012.
  • [32]Brown GW, Mood AM: On median tests for linear hypotheses. In Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 159–66. Edited by Neyman J. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 1951.
  • [33]Shapiro T, Meschede T, Osoro S: The roots of the widening racial wealth gap: Explaining the black-white economic divide. Waltham, MA: Institute on Assets and Social Policy, Brandeis University; 2013.
  • [34]Shapiro TM: The hidden cost of being African American: How wealth perpetuates inequality. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
  • [35]US Cancer Statistics Working Group: United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2007 Incidence and Mortality. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2010.
  • [36]US Census Bureau: Current Population Survey. Annual Social and Economic Supplement: 2011. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2012.
  • [37]Greenland S: Applications of stratified analysis methods. In Modern Epidemiology, 283–302. Edited by Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2008.
  • [38]Michaud CM, McKenna MT, Begg S, Tomijima N, Majmudar M, Bulzacchelli MT, Ebrahim S, Ezzati M, Salomon JA, Kreiser JG, Hogan M, Murray CJL: The burden of disease and injury in the United States 1996. Popul Health Metr 2006, 4:11. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [39]Shankaran V, Jolly S, Blough D, Ramsey SD: Risk factors for financial hardship patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer: a population-based exploratory analysis. J Clin Oncol 2012, 30:1608-1614.
  • [40]Cress RD, Zaslavsky AM, West DW, Wolf RE, Felter MC, Ayanian AZ: Completeness of information on adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer in population-based cancer registries. Med Care 2003, 41:1006-1012.
  • [41]Mallin K, Palis BE, Watroba N, Stewart AK, Walczak D, Singer J, Barron J, Blumenthal W, Haydu G, Edge SB: Completeness of American cancer registry treatment data: implications for quality of care research. J Am Coll Surg 2013, 216:428-437.
  • [42]Chan JK, Gomez SL, O’Malley CD, Perkins CI, Clarke CA: Validity of cancer registry Medicaid status against enrollment files: implications for population-based studies of cancer outcomes. Med Care 2006, 44:952-955.
  • [43]Hall S, Schulze K, Groome P, Mackillop W, Holowaty E: Using cancer registry data for survival studies: the example of the Ontario cancer registry. J Clin Epidemiol 2006, 59:67-76.
  • [44]Verrill C: Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Primary Payer Information in Central Cancer Registry Data. Quebec City: Annual meeting of the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries; 2010.
  • [45]Copeland KT, Checkoway H, McMichael AJ, Holbrook RH: Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. Am J Epidemiol 1977, 105:488-495.
  • [46]Jurek AM, Greenland S, Maldonado G: How far from non-differential does exposure or disease misclassification have to be to bias measures of association away from the null? Int J Epidemiol 2008, 37:382-385.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:26次