Delivery and use of individualised feedback in large class medical teaching

BMC Medical Education

Simon Wilkinson¹  Elizabeth Brodier²  Steven A Burr³ 

[1] Information Services Research and Learning Resources Division, King’s Meadow Campus, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2NR, UK;School of Biomedical Sciences, Medical School, Queen’s Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK;Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine & Dentistry, Portland Square, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK

关键词: Blueprint;    Assessment;    Objective;    Feedback;   

Others  :  1138931
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6920-13-63

 received in 2012-03-19, accepted in 2013-04-29,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Formative feedback that encourages self-directed learning in large class medical teaching is difficult to deliver. This study describes a new method, blueprinted feedback, and explores learner’s responses to assess its appropriate use within medical science teaching.

Methods

Mapping summative assessment items to their relevant learning objectives creates a blueprint which can be used on completion of the assessment to automatically create a list of objectives ranked by the attainment of the individual student. Two surveys targeted medical students in years 1, 2 and 3. The behaviour-based survey was released online several times, with 215 and 22 responses from year 2, and 187, 180 and 21 responses from year 3. The attitude-based survey was interviewer-administered and released once, with 22 responses from year 2 and 3, and 20 responses from year 1.

Results

88-96% of learners viewed the blueprinted feedback report, whilst 39% used the learning objectives to guide further learning. Females were significantly more likely to revisit learning objectives than males (p = 0.012). The most common reason for not continuing learning was a ‘hurdle mentality’ of focusing learning elsewhere once a module had been assessed.

Conclusions

Blueprinted feedback contains the key characteristics required for effective feedback so that with further education and support concerning its use, it could become a highly useful tool for the individual and teacher.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Burr et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 5.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Howell WC, Fleishman EA: Human performance and productivity. Vol 2: Information processing and decision making. Erlbaum: Hillsdale New Jersey; 1982.
• [2]Kolb D, Fry R: Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. Edited by Cooper CL. London: John Wiley; 1972. [Theories of group processes]
• [3]Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P: The consultation: an approach to learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1984.
• [4]Silverman J, Draper J, Kurtz S: The Calgary-Cambridge approach to communication skills teaching. 1. Agenda-led outcome-based analysis of the consultation. Educ Gen Pract 1996, 7:288-299.
• [5]Brukner H, Altkorn D, Cook S, Quinn M, Mcnabb W: Giving effective feedback to medical students: a workshop for faculty and house staff. Med Teach 1999, 21:161-165.
• [6]Chowdhury R, Kalu G: Learning to give feedback in medical education. Obstet Gynaecol 2004, 6:243-247.
• [7]Standing Committee of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education (SCOPME): Appraising doctors and dentists in training. London: DoH; 1996.
• [8]Wall D: Giving feedback effectively. In Teaching made easy: a manual for health professionals. Edited by Mohanna K, Wall D, Cambers R. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2004.
• [9]Kluger A, van Dijk D: Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative. Med Educ 2010, 44:1166-1174.
• [10]Molloy E: The feedforward mechanism: a way forward in clinical learning? Med Educ 2010, 44:1157-1158.
• [11]Race P: Making learning happen. London: SAGE Publications; 2005.
• [12]Carter J: Instructional learner feedback: a literature review with implications for software development. Computer Teacher 1984, 12:53-55.
• [13]Van de Ridder M, Stokking K, Mcgaghie W, Cate O: What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ 2008, 42:189-197.
• [14]Hewson M, Little M: Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med 1998, 13:111-116.
• [15]Burr S, Brodier E: Integrating feedback into medical education. Br J Hosp Med 2010, 71:520-523.
• [16]McKimm J: Giving effective feedback. Br J Hosp Med 2009, 70:158-161.
• [17]General Medical Council (GMC): Assessment in undergraduate medical education. London: GMC; 2011. [Advice supplementary to Tomorrow’s Doctors 2009]
• [18]Brace I: Questionnaire design: How to plan, structure and write survey material for effective market research. London: Kogan Page Ltd; 2008.
• [19]Albaum G: The Likert scale revisited. JMRS 1997, 39:311-348.
• [20]Sinclair H, Cleland J: Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback? Med Educ 2007, 41:580-582.
• [21]Kruidering-Hall M, O’Sullivan P, Chou C: Teaching feedback to first-year medical students: Long-term skill retention and accuracy of student self-assessment. J Gen Intern Med 2009, 24:721-726.
• [22]Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, Dornan T: The self critical doctor: helping students become more reflective. BMJ 2008, 336:827-830.
• [23]Kluger A, Denisi A: The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996, 119:254-284.
• [24]White C, Fantone J: Pass-fail grading: laying the foundation for self-regulated learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2010, 15:469-477.