Peering through the mist: systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigarettes tells us about health risks

BMC Public Health

Igor Burstyn¹ 

[1] Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Drexel University, Nesbitt Hall, 3215 Market St. Floor 6, Office 614, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

关键词: Occupational exposure limit;    Aerosol;    Risk assessment;    Tobacco harm reduction;    e-cigarettes;    Vaping;   

Others  :  1161365
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-18

 received in 2013-08-26, accepted in 2014-01-02,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are generally recognized as a safer alternative to combusted tobacco products, but there are conflicting claims about the degree to which these products warrant concern for the health of the vapers (e-cigarette users). This paper reviews available data on chemistry of aerosols and liquids of electronic cigarettes and compares modeled exposure of vapers with occupational safety standards.

Methods

Both peer-reviewed and “grey” literature were accessed and more than 9,000 observations of highly variable quality were extracted. Comparisons to the most universally recognized workplace exposure standards, Threshold Limit Values (TLVs), were conducted under “worst case” assumptions about both chemical content of aerosol and liquids as well as behavior of vapers.

Results

There was no evidence of potential for exposures of e-cigarette users to contaminants that are associated with risk to health at a level that would warrant attention if it were an involuntary workplace exposures. The vast majority of predicted exposures are < <1% of TLV. Predicted exposures to acrolein and formaldehyde are typically <5% TLV. Considering exposure to the aerosol as a mixture of contaminants did not indicate that exceeding half of TLV for mixtures was plausible. Only exposures to the declared major ingredients -- propylene glycol and glycerin -- warrant attention because of precautionary nature of TLVs for exposures to hydrocarbons with no established toxicity.

Conclusions

Current state of knowledge about chemistry of liquids and aerosols associated with electronic cigarettes indicates that there is no evidence that vaping produces inhalable exposures to contaminants of the aerosol that would warrant health concerns by the standards that are used to ensure safety of workplaces. However, the aerosol generated during vaping as a whole (contaminants plus declared ingredients) creates personal exposures that would justify surveillance of health among exposed persons in conjunction with investigation of means to keep any adverse health effects as low as reasonably achievable. Exposures of bystanders are likely to be orders of magnitude less, and thus pose no apparent concern.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Burstyn; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Etter JF: The electronic cigarette: an alternative to tobacco? Jean-François Etter. 2012.
• [2]Pellegrino RM, Tinghino B, Mangiaracina G, Marani A, Vitali M, Protano C, et al.: Electronic cigarettes: an evaluation of exposure to chemicals and fine particulate matter (PM). Ann Ig 2012, 24:279-288.
• [3]eSmoking Institute: Assessment of e-cigarette safety by comparing the chemical composition of e-cigarette aerosol and cigarette smoke from reference traditional cigarette. http://www.esmokinginstitute.com/en/node/31 webcite. 2013. Ref Type: Electronic Citation
• [4]Schripp T, Markewitz D, Uhde E, Salthammer T: Does e-cigarette consumption cause passive vaping? Indoor Air 2013, 23:25-31.
• [5]Lauterbach JH, Laugesen M: Comparison of toxicant levels in mainstream aerosols generated by Ruyan® electronic nicotine delivery systems(ENDS) and conventional cigarette products. 2012.
• [6]Romagna G, Zabarini L, Barbiero L, Boccietto E, Todeschi S, Caravati E, et al.: Characterization of chemicals released to the environment by electronic cigarettes use (ClearStream-AIR project): is passive vaping a reality?. Helsinki, Finland: XIV Annual Meeting of the SRNT Europe 2012; 2012. Ref Type: Report
• [7]Laugesen M: In Safety report on the Ruyan® e-cigarette cartridge and inhaled aerosol. Edited by Health New Zealand Ltd. 2008. Ref Type: Report
• [8]Goniewicz ML, Knysak J, Gawron M, Kosmider L, Sobczak A, Kurek J, et al.: Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob Control 2013. [Epub ahead of print]
• [9]Benowitz NL, Jacob P III: Daily intake of nicotine during cigarette smoking. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1984, 35:499-504.
• [10]The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: 2013 threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents & biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH; 2013.
• [11]Scherer G: Smoking behaviour and compensation: a review of the literature. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 1999, 145:1-20.
• [12]Ganong WF: Review of medical physiology. 15th edition. London: Prentice Hall; 1995.
• [13]Holmes JR: How much air do we breathe? Research note 94–11. California: California Environmental Protection Agency; 1994. Ref Type: Report
• [14]Farsalinos KE, Romagna G, Tsiapras D, Kyrzopoulos S, Voudris V: Evaluation of electronic cigarette use (vaping) topography and estimation of liquid consumption: implications for research protocol standards definition and for public health authorities’ regulation. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013, 10:2500-2514.
• [15]Alliance Technologies L: Chemical composition of “Instead” electronic cigarette smoke juice and vapor. 2009. Ref Type: Report
• [16]Alliance Technologies L: Characterization of liquid “Smoke Juice” for electronic cigarettes. 2009. Ref Type: Report
• [17]Alliance Technologies L: Characterization of Regal cartridges for electronic cigarettes. 2009. Ref Type: Report
• [18]Alliance Technologies L: Characterization of regal cartridges for electronic cigarettes - Phase II. 2009. Ref Type: Report
• [19]eSmoking Institute: Identifying the concentration of chemical compounds and heavy metals in liquids. http://www.esmokinginstitute.com/en/node/32 webcite. 2013. Ref Type: Electronic Citation
• [20]Evans Analytical Group: Gas chromatography mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) analysis report; JOB NUMBER C09Y8961. 2009. Ref Type: Report
• [21]Coulson H: In Analysis of components from Gamucci electronic cigarette cartridges, tobacco flavour regular smoking liquid; Report number: E98D. Edited by LPD Laboratory Services, Blackburn MicroTech Solutions Ltd. 2009. Ref Type: Report
• [22]Ellicott M: In Analysis of components from “e-Juice XX HIGH 36mg/ml rated Nicotine Solution” ref S 55434; Report Number: E249A. Edited by LPD Laboratory Services, Blackburn MicroTech Solutions Ltd. 2009. Ref Type: Report
• [23]Westenberger BJ: In Evaluation of e-cigarettes; DPATR-FY-09-23. Edited by US Food and Drug Administration. 2009. Ref Type: Report
• [24]McAuley TR, Hopke PK, Zhao J, Babaian S: Comparison of the effects of e-cigarette vapor and cigarette smoke on indoor air quality. Inhal Toxicol 2012, 24:850-857.
• [25]Goniewicz ML, Kuma T, Gawron M, Knysak J, Kosmider L: Nicotine levels in electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res 2013, 15:158-166.
• [26]Williams M, Villarreal A, Bozhilov K, Lin S, Talbot P: Metal and silicate particles including nanoparticles are present in electronic cigarette cartomizer fluid and aerosol. PLoS One 2013, 8:e57987.
• [27]Laugesen M: Ruyan® E-cigarette bench-top tests. Dublin: Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco; 2009. Ref Type: Abstract
• [28]Tytgat J: In “Super Smoker” expert report. Edited by Catholic University L. 2007. Ref Type: Report
• [29]Valance C, Ellicott M: In Analysis of chemical components from high, med & low nicotine cartridges; Report Number: D318. Edited by LPD Laboratory Services, Blackburn MicroTech Solutions Ltd. 2008. Ref Type: Report
• [30]Kubica P, Kot-Wasik A, Wasik A, Namiesnik J: “Dilute & shoot” approach for rapid determination of trace amounts of nicotine in zero-level e-liquids by reversed phase liquid chromatography and hydrophilic interactions liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry-electrospray ionization. J Chromatogr A 2013, 1289:13-18.
• [31]Trehy ML, Ye W, Hadwiger ME, Moore TW, Allgire JF, Woodruff JT, et al.: Analysis of electronic cigarette cartridges, refill solutions, and smoke for nicotine and nicotine related impurities. J Liquid Chromatogr Relat Technol 2011, 34:1442-1458.
• [32]Graves I: Report no. 468304. 60 ml sample of mist from 11 mg nicotine e-cigarette cartridge. Thermal desorption tubes. 468304. Hamilton, New Zealand: Hill Laboratories; 2008. Ref Type: Report
• [33]Pattison J, Valenty SJ: Material characterization report. 0910.14. Analyze Inc; 2009. Ref Type: Report
• [34]Sodoma A, Caggiano CM: Material characterization report. 0706.04. Analyze Inc; 2007. Ref Type: Report
• [35]Anspach T: Determination of tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNA) in aroma fluid for e-cigarettes. 11–57021. Eurofins Dr.Specht Laboratorien; 2011. Ref Type: Report
• [36]Kim HJ, Shin HS: Determination of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in replacement liquids of electronic cigarettes by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2013, 1291:48-55.
• [37]Hadwiger ME, Trehy ML, Ye W, Moore T, Allgire J, Westenberger B: Identification of amino-tadalafil and rimonabant in electronic cigarette products using high pressure liquid chromatography with diode array and tandem mass spectrometric detection. J Chromatogr A 2010, 1217:7547-7555.
• [38]Uchiyama S, Inaba Y, Kunugita N: Determination of acrolein and other carbonyls in cigarette smoke using coupled silica cartridges impregnated with hydroquinone and 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine. J Chromatogr A 2010, 1217:4383-4388.
• [39]Uchiyama S: Determination of acrolein and other carbonyls in cigarette smoke using coupled silica cartridges impregnated with hydroquinone and 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine. 2013. Ref Type: Personal Communication
• [40]Uchiyama S 2013. unpublished concentrations from experiments presented in https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bunsekikagaku/60/10/60_10_791/_pdf webcite; through personal communications; Ref Type: Unpublished Work
• [41]Ohta K, Uchiyama S, Inaba Y, Nakagome H, Kunugita N: Determination of carbonyl compounds generated from the electronic cigarette using coupled silica cartridges impregnated with hydroquinone and 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine. BUNSEKI KAGAKU 2011, 60:791-797.
• [42]eSmoke: Analytical reports on batches of e-liquids. 2009. http://www.esmoke.net/pages.php?pageid=20 webcite Ref Type: Electronic Citation
• [43]Murphy J, Wong E, Lawton M: Chemical and operational assessment of the Ruyan classic e-cigarette. Report P.474. British American Tobacco; 2010. Ref Type: Report
• [44]Trtchounian A, Talbot P: Electronic nicotine delivery systems: is there a need for regulation? Tob Control 2011, 20:47-52.
• [45]Etter JF, Bullen C, Flouris AD, Laugesen M, Eissenberg T: Electronic nicotine delivery systems: a research agenda. Tob Control 2011, 20:243-248.
• [46]Varughese S, Teschke K, Brauer M, Chow Y, van NC, Kennedy SM: Effects of theatrical smokes and fogs on respiratory health in the entertainment industry. Am J Ind Med 2005, 47:411-418.
• [47]Teschke K, Chow Y, Van NC, Varughese S, Kennedy SM, Brauer M: Exposures to atmospheric effects in the entertainment industry. J Occup Environ Hyg 2005, 2:277-284.
• [48]Hecht SS, Hoffmann D: Tobacco-specific nitrosamines, an important group of carcinogens in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Carcinogenesis 1988, 9:875-884.
• [49]Digard H, Errington G, Richter A, McAdam K: Patterns and behaviors of snus consumption in Sweden. Nicotine Tob Res 2009, 11:1175-1181.
• [50]Phillips CV, Sargent C, Rabiu D, Rodu B: Calculating the comparative mortality risk from smokeless tobacco vs. smoking. Am J Epidemiol 2006, 163(11):S189. Ref Type: Abstract
• [51]Liedel NA, Busch KA, Crouse WE: Exposure measurement action level and occupational environmental variability. HEW Publication No. (NIOSH) 76–131. Cincinnati, OH: US Departement of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Laboatories and Criteria Development; 1975. Ref Type: Report
• [52]Trtchounian A, Williams M, Talbot P: Conventional and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have different smoking characteristics. Nicotine Tob Res 2010, 12:905-912.
• [53]Tischer M, Bredendiek-Kamper S, Poppek U, Packroff R: How safe is control banding? Integrated evaluation by comparing OELs with measurement data and using monte carlo simulation. Ann Occup Hyg 2009, 53:449-462.
• [54]British Occupational Hygiene Society, Nederlandse Vereniging voor Arbeidshygiëne: Testing compliance with occupational exposure limits for airborne substances. 2011. Ref Type: Report