期刊论文详细信息
BMC Infectious Diseases
Rubella immunity among prenatal women in Ontario, 2006–2010
Shelley L Deeks6  Tina Kozlowski3  Tony Mazzulli1  Natasha S Crowcroft2  Shalini Desai5  Tara Harris4  Gillian H Lim4 
[1]Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Suite RFE 3-805, Toronto M5G 2C4, Canada
[2]Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, 1 King’s College Circle, 6th Floor, Toronto M5S 1A8, Canada
[3]Public Health Ontario Laboratory, 81 Resources Road, Etobicoke M9P 3T1, Canada
[4]Immunization and Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Public Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue, Suite 300, Toronto M5G 1V2, Canada
[5]Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, 180 Queen Street West, 11th floor, Toronto M5V 3L7, Ontario, Canada
[6]Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto M5T 3M7, Canada
关键词: Canada;    Ontario;    Rubella elimination goals;    Prenatal screening;    Seroprevalence study;    Rubella;   
Others  :  1146504
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2334-13-362
 received in 2012-11-09, accepted in 2013-07-30,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Countries of the Americas have been working towards rubella elimination since 2003 and endemic rubella virus transmission appears to have been interrupted since 2009. To contribute towards monitoring of rubella elimination, we assessed rubella seroprevalence among prenatal screening tests performed in Ontario.

Methods

Specimens received for prenatal rubella serologic testing at the Public Health Ontario Laboratory, the provincial reference laboratory, between 2006 and 2010 were analyzed. A patient-based dataset was created using all tests occurring among 15–49 year-old females, where prenatal screening was indicated. Multiple tests were assigned to the same patient on the basis of health card number, name and date of birth. Only unique tests performed at least nine months apart were included. SAS version 9.2 was used for analysis.

Results

Between 2006 and 2010, we identified 459,963 women who underwent 551,160 unique prenatal screening tests for rubella. Of these, 81.6%, 17.1% and 1.4% had one, two and three or more tests respectively.

Rubella immunity remained stable at approximately 90% overall; the proportion of susceptible women was 4.4%. Additionally, 0.6% of women were initially susceptible and subsequently developed immunity. Across the province, susceptibility was highest in the north and declined with increasing age (p < 0.0001). Among women with multiple tests, the proportion who remained susceptible declined as the number of years between tests increased (p < .0001). Based on age at first test, younger women had the highest susceptibility (4.2% among 15–19 year-olds) and were significantly more likely to develop immunity if previously susceptible (p < .0001).

Conclusion

Rubella susceptibility among prenatal women in Ontario supports elimination goals as population immunity in this group is relatively high. Higher susceptibility among young women and women living in the north highlights an opportunity for greater focus on identification and immunization of susceptible women in these groups.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Lim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150403123540528.pdf 656KB PDF download
Figure 5. 38KB Image download
Figure 4. 35KB Image download
Figure 3. 26KB Image download
Figure 2. 32KB Image download
Figure 1. 81KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Pan American Health Organization: Plan of Action Documentation and Verification of Measles, Rubella, and Congenital Rubella Syndrome Elimination in the Region of the Americas. http://new.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=16739&Itemid webcite
  • [2]Castillo-Solorzano C, Reef SE, Morice A, et al.: Guidelines for the documentation and verification of measles, rubella, and congenital rubella syndrome elimination in the region of the Americas. J Infect Dis 2011, 204(Suppl 2):S683-S689.
  • [3]Public Health Agency of Canada: Final report of outcomes from the national consensus conference for vaccine-preventable diseases in Canada, June 12–14, 2005 - Quebec City, Quebec. Can Commun Dis Rep 2008, 34(Suppl 2):1-56.
  • [4]Lim GH, Deeks S, Williams D, Gubbay J, Mazzulli T, Crowcroft N: Measles and rubella elimination in a federal country: acting provincially; thinking locally, regionally, nationally, internationally and globally. Proceedings of the 2012 European Scientific Conference on Applied Infectious Disease Epidemiology: 24-26 October 2012; Edinburgh 2012, 139.
  • [5]Public Health Ontario: Monthly infectious diseases surveillance report: November 2012. http://www.publichealthontario.ca/en/DataAndAnalytics/Documents/2012_November_PHO_Monthly_Report.pdf webcite
  • [6]McIntyre MA, Lim GH, Wormsbecker AE, Scott T, Fediurek JK: Immunization coverage in Ontario: Estimates and reported challenges. Proceedings of the 10th Canadian Immunization Conference: 3-5 December 2012; Vancouver 2012, 63.
  • [7]Laroche J, Frescura A, Belzak L: Results from the 2008 adult national immunization coverage survey. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2010, 21:204.
  • [8]Canadian Paediatric Society: Prevention of congenital rubella syndrome. Paediatr Child Health 2007, 12:795-801.
  • [9]Dontigny L, Arsenault MY, Martel MJ, et al.: Rubella in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008, 30:152-168.
  • [10]Greenaway C, Dongier P, Boivin JF, Tapiero B, Miller M, Schwartzman K: Susceptibility to measles, mumps, and rubella in newly arrived adult immigrants and refugees. Ann Intern Med 2007, 146:20-24.
  • [11]Duclos P, Tepper ML, Weber J, Marusyk RG: Seroprevalence of measles- and rubella-specific antibodies among military recruits, Canada, 1991. Can J Public Health 1994, 85:278-281.
  • [12]Gyorkos TW, Beliveau C, Rahme E, Muecke C, Joseph S, Soto JC: High rubella seronegativity in daycare educators. Clin Invest Med 2005, 28:105-111.
  • [13]Gyorkos TW, Tannenbaum TN, Abrahamowicz M, Delage G, Carsley J, Marchand S: Evaluation of rubella screening in pregnant women. CMAJ 1998, 159:1091-1097.
  • [14]Kearns MJ, Plitt SS, Lee BE, Robinson JL: Rubella immunity among pregnant women in a Canadian provincial screening program. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2009, 20:73-77.
  • [15]McElroy R, Laskin M, Jiang D, Shah R, Ray JG: Rates of rubella immunity among immigrant and non-immigrant pregnant women. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009, 31:409-413.
  • [16]Hyde TB, Kruszon-Moran D, McQuillan GM, Cossen C, Forghani B, Reef SE: Rubella immunity levels in the United States population: has the threshold of viral elimination been reached? Clinical Infectious Diseases 2006, 43(Supplement 3):S146-S150.
  • [17]Eason E, Naus M, Sciberras J, Oppenheimer L: Evaluation of an institution-based protocol for postpartum rubella vaccination. CMAJ 2001, 165:1321-1323.
  • [18]Johnson CE, Kumar ML, Whitwell JK, Staehle BO, Rome LP, Dinakar C, Hurni W, Nalin DR: Antibody persistence after primary measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and response to a second dose given at four to six vs. eleven to thirteen years. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996, 15:687-692.
  • [19]Pebody RG, Gay NJ, Hesketh LM, Vyse A, Morgan-Capner P, Brown DW, Litton P, Miller E: Immunogenicity of second dose measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and implications for serosurveillance. Vaccine 2002, 20:1134-1140.
  • [20]Feijen-de JE, Jansen DE, Baarveld F, van der Schans CP, Schellevis FG, Reijneveld SA: Determinants of late and/or inadequate use of prenatal healthcare in high-income countries: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health 2012, 22:904-913.
  • [21]Delissaint D, McKyer ELJ: A systematic review of factors utilized in preconception health behavior research. Health Educ Behav 2011, 38:603-616.
  • [22]Sibley LM, Weiner JP: An evaluation of access to health care services along the rural–urban continuum in Canada. BMC Health Serv Res 2011, 11:20. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [23]Tarrant M, Gregory D: Mothers’ perceptions of childhood immunizations in first nations communities of the Sioux lookout zone. Can J Public Health 2001, 92:42-45.
  • [24]Health Canada: First Nations comparable health indicators. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fniah-spnia/diseases-maladies/2005-01_health-sante_indicat-eng.php#prop_pop webcite
  • [25]Statistics Canada: Births 2009. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/84f0210x/84f0210x2009000-eng.pdf webcite
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:37次 浏览次数:32次