Measuring engagement in deliberate self-harm behaviours: psychometric evaluation of six scales

BMC Psychiatry

Alan Tennant²  Tanya Meade¹  Shane Latimer¹ 

[1] School of Social Sciences and Psychology, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia;Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Gt. George Street, Leeds, LS13EX, UK

关键词: Rasch measurement;    Self-injurious behaviour;    Self-mutilation;    Deliberate self-harm;   

Others  :  1124189
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-244X-13-4

 received in 2012-06-12, accepted in 2012-12-28,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Engagement in Deliberate Self-Harm (DSH) is commonly measured by behavioural scales comprised of specific methods of self-harm. However, there is a scarcity of information about the degree to which the methods relate to the same DSH construct although such scales are routinely used to provide a DSH total score. This study addresses the shortfall by evaluating the dimensionality of six commonly used behavioural measures of DSH.

Methods

The DSH measures were Self-Injury Questionnaire Treatment Related (SIQTR), Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI), Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory (DSHI), Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury (ISAS), Self-Harm Information Form (SHIF) and Self-Harm Inventory (SHI). The behavioural scales contained in each measure were administered to 568 young Australians aged 18 to 30 years (62% university students, 21% mental health patients, and 17% community members). Scale quality was examined against the stringent standards for unidimensional measurement provided by the Rasch model.

Results

According to the stringent post-hoc tests provided by the Rasch measurement model, there is support for the unidimensionality of the items contained within each of the scales. All six scales contained items with differential item functioning, four scales contained items with local response dependency, and one item was grossly misfitting (due to a lack of discrimination).

Conclusions

This study supports the use of behavioural scales to measure a DSH construct, justifies the summing of items to form a total DSH score, informs the hierarchy of DSH methods in each scale, and extends the previous evidence for reliability and external validity (as provided by test developers) to a more complete account of scale quality. Given the overall adequacy of all six scales, clinicians and researchers are recommended to select the scale that best matches their adopted definition of DSH.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Latimer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Lundh LG, Karim J, Quilisch E: Deliberate self-harm in 15-year-old adolescents: a pilot study with a modified version of the deliberate self-harm inventory. Scand J Psychol 2007, 48:33-41.
• [2]Kreitman N: Parasuicide. England: Wiley; 1977.
• [3]Babiker G, Arnold L: The Language of Injury: Comprehending Self-Mutilation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 1997.
• [4]Morgan HG: Death wishes? The understanding and management of deliberate self-harm. Chichester: Wiley; 1979.
• [5]Hawton K, James A: Suicide and deliberate self harm in young people. Br Med J 2005, 330:891-894.
• [6]Klonsky ED, Glenn CR: Assessing the functions of non-suicidal self-injury: Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Statements About Self-injury (ISAS). J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2009, 31:215-219.
• [7]Ougrin D, Zundel T: Defining self-harm. In Self-Harm in Young People: A Therapeutic Assessment manual. Edited by Ougrin D, Zundel T, Ng AV. London: Hodder Arnold; 2009:1-17.
• [8]Klonsky ED, Oltmanns TF, Turkheimer E: Deliberate self-harm in a nonclinical population: prevalence and psychological correlates. Am J Psychiatry 2003, 160:1501-1508.
• [9]Nock MK: Self-Injury. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2010, 6:339-363.
• [10]Skegg K: Self-harm. Lancet 2005, 366:1471-1483.
• [11]Hooley JM: Self-harming behavior: introduction to the special series on non-suicidal self-injury and suicide. Appl Prev Psychol 2008, 12:155-158.
• [12]Nada-Raja S, Skegg K, Langley J, Morrison D, Sowerby P: Self-harmful behaviors in a population-based sample of young adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2004, 34:177-186.
• [13]Nock MK, Joiner TE, Gordon KH, Lloyd-Richardson E, Prinstein MJ: Non-suicidal self-injury among adolescents: diagnostic correlates and relation to suicide attempts. Psychiatr Res 2006, 144:65-72.
• [14]Wilkinson P, Goodyer I: Non-suicidal self-injury. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatr 2011, 20:103-108.
• [15]Whitlock J, Muehlenkamp J, Eckenrode J: Variation in nonsuicidal self-injury: identification and features of latent classes in a college population of emerging adults. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2008, 37:725-735.
• [16]Gratz KL: Measurement of deliberate self-harm: preliminary data on the deliberate self-harm inventory. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2001, 23:253-263.
• [17]Nock MK, Wedig MM, Janis IB, Deliberto TL: Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors. In A Guide to Assessments That Work. Edited by Hunsley J, Mash EJ. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008:158-177.
• [18]Whitlock J, Eckenrode J, Silverman D: Self-injurious behaviors in a college population. Pediatrics 2006, 117:1939-1948.
• [19]Glenn CR, Klonsky ED: Prospective prediction of nonsuicidal self-injury: a 1-year longitudinal study in young adults. Behav Ther 2011, 42:751-762.
• [20]Klonsky ED, Olino TM: Identifying clinically distinct subgroups of self-injurers among young adults: a latent class analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008, 76:22-27.
• [21]Sansone RA, Wiederman MW, Sansone LA: The Self-Harm Inventory (SHI): development of a scale for identifying self-destructive behaviors and borderline personality disorder. J Clin Psychol 1998, 54:973-983.
• [22]Lumsden J: The construction of unidimensional tests. Psychol Bull 1961, 58:122-131.
• [23]Walsh BW: Treating self-injury: A practical guide. New York: The Guilford Press; 2008.
• [24]Borschmann R, Hogg J, Phillips R, Moran P: Measuring self-harm in adults: a systematic review. Eur Psychiatr 2012, 27:176-180.
• [25]Hunsley J, Mash EJ: Evidence-based assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2007, 3:29-51.
• [26]Nock MK, Holmberg EB, Photos VI, Michel BD: Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors interview: development, reliability, and validity in an adolescent sample. Psychol Assess 2007, 19:309-317.
• [27]Fliege H, Kocalevent RD, Walter OB, Beck S, Gratz KL, Gutierrez PM, Klapp BF: Three assessment tools for deliberate self-harm and suicide behavior: evaluation and psychopathological correlates. J Psychosom Res 2006, 61:113-121.
• [28]Cortina JM: What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol 1993, 78:98-104.
• [29]Rasch G: Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1960.
• [30]Pallant JF, Tennant A: An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol 2007, 46:1-18.
• [31]Barkham M, Hardy GE, Mogg K, Bradley B, Morley S, Brewin CR, Hodgson R, Shapiro DA: The British Journal of (Social and) Clinical Psychology–a brief citation review. Br J Clin Psychol 2011, 50:1-6.
• [32]Wilson M: On choosing a model for measuring. Meth Psychol Res 2003, 8:1-22.
• [33]Andrich D: Rasch models for measurement series: quantitative applications in the social sciences no. 68. London: Sage Publications; 1988.
• [34]Claes L, Muehlenkamp J, Vandereycken W, Hamelinck L, Martens H, Claes S: Comparison of non-suicidal self-injurious behavior and suicide attempts in patients admitted to a psychiatric crisis unit. Personal Individ Differ 2010, 48:83-87.
• [35]Croyle KL, Waltz J: Subclinical self-harm: range of behaviors, extent, and associated characteristics. Am J Orthopsychiatr 2007, 77:332-342.
• [36]Zanarini MC, Vujanovic AA, Parachini EA, Boulanger JL, Frankenburg FR, Hennen J: A screening measure for BPD: The McLean screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (MSI-BPD). J Pers Disord 2003, 17:568-573.
• [37]Kann L: The youth risk behavior surveillance system: measuring health-risk behaviors. Am J Health Behav 2001, 25:272-277.
• [38]Kolb JE, Gunderson JG: Diagnosing borderline personality with a semi-structured interview. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980, 37:37-41.
• [39]Hyler SE, Rieder RO, Williams JBW, Spitzer RL, Hendler J, Lyons M: The personality diagnostic questionnaire: development and preliminary results. J Pers Disord 1988, 2:229-237.
• [40]Guertin T, Lloyd-Richardson E, Spirito A, Donaldson D, Boergers J: Self-mutilative behavior in adolescents who attempt suicide by overdose. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatr 2001, 40:1062-1069.
• [41]Oldham J, Clarkin J, Appelbaum A, Carr A, Kernberg P, Lotterman A, Haas G: A self-report instrument for borderline personality organization. In The borderline: Current empirical research. Edited by McGlashan TH. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1985:21-28.
• [42]Sansone RA, Songer DA, Sellbom M: The relationship between suicide attempts and low lethal self-harm behavior among psychiatric inpatients. J Psychiatr Pract 2006, 12:148-152.
• [43]Gutierrez PM, Osman A, Barrios FX, Kopper BA: Development and initial validation of the self-harm behavior questionnaire. J Pers Assess 2001, 77:475-490.
• [44]Lloyd E, Kelley ML, Hope T: Self-mutilation in a community sample of adolescents: Descriptive characteristics and provisional prevalence rates. New Orleans: Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Behavioural Medicine; 1997.
• [45]Linehan MM, Comtois KA, Brown MZ, Heard HL, Wagner A: Suicide Attempt Self-Injury Interview (SASII): development, reliability, and validity of a scale to assess suicide attempts and intentional self-injury. Psychol Assess 2006, 18:303-312.
• [46]Madge N, Hewitt A, Hawton K, Wilde EJ, Corcoran P, Fekete S, Heeringen K, Leo DD, Ystgaard M: Deliberate self harm within an international community sample of young people: comparative findings from the Child & Adolescent Self harm in Europe (CASE) Study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008, 49:667-677.
• [47]Skegg K, Nada-Raja S, Moffit TE: Minor self-harm and psychiatric disorder: a population-based study. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2004, 34:187-196.
• [48]Patton GC, Harris R, Carlin JB, Hibbert ME, Coffey C, Schwartz M, Bowes G: Adolescent suicidal behaviours: a population-based study of risk. Psychol Med 1997, 27:715-724.
• [49]King RA, Ruchkin VV, Schwab-Stone ME: Suicide and the continuum of adolescent self-destructiveness: Is there a connection? In Suicide in children and adolescents. Edited by King RA, Apter A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003:41-62.
• [50]Nock MK: Actions speak louder than words: an elaborated theoretical model of the social functions of self-injury and other harmful behaviors. Appl Prev Psychol 2008, 12:159-168.
• [51]De Ayala RJ: The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: Guilford Press; 2008.
• [52]Luce RD, Tukey JW: Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement. J Math Psychol 1964, 1:1-27.
• [53]Newby VA, Conner GR, Grant CP, Bunderson CV: The Rasch model and additive conjoint measurement. J Appl Meas 2009, 10:348-354.
• [54]Andrich D, Sheridan BED, Luo G: RUMM2030: Rasch unidimensional models for measurement. Perth, Western Australia: RUMM Laboratory; 2009.
• [55]Marais I, Andrich D: Formalizing dimension and response violations of local independence in the unidimensional Rasch model. J Appl Meas 2008, 9:200-215.
• [56]Feise RJ: Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment? BMC Med Res Methodol 2002, 2:8. BioMed Central Full Text
• [57]Hagquist C, Andrich D: Is the sense of coherence-instrument applicable on adolescents? A latent trait analysis using Rasch-modelling. Personal Individ Differ 2004, 36:955-968.
• [58]Ponterotto JG, Ruckdeschel DE: An overview of coefficient alpha and a reliability matrix for estimating adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with psychological research measures. Percept Mot Skills 2007, 105:997-1014.
• [59]Smith EV Jr: Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas 2002, 3:205-231.
• [60]Wainer H, Kiely GL: Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: a case for testlets. J Educ Meas 1987, 24:185-201.
• [61]Muehlenkamp JJ, Claes L, Havertape L, Plener PL: International prevalence of adolescent non-suicidal self-injury and deliberate self-harm. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Mental Health 2012, 6:10. BioMed Central Full Text
• [62]Connors R: Self-injury in trauma survivors: 1. Functions and meanings. Am J Orthopsychiatr 1996, 66:197-206.
• [63]Perroud N, Dieben K, Nicastro R, Muscionico M, Huguelet P: Functions and timescale of self-cutting in participants suffering from borderline personality disorder. J Pers Disord 2012, 26:267-279.