Peer support for stroke survivors: a case study

BMC Health Services Research

Lucy-Ann Kubina²  Mary Egan¹  Dorothy Kessler¹ 

[1]School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada

[2]Bruyère Research Institute, 43 Bruyère St, Ottawa, ON K1N 5C8, Canada

关键词: Caregivers;    Social participation;    Untrained workers;    Volunteers;    Stroke;   

Others  :  1130771
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-256

 received in 2013-08-21, accepted in 2014-06-10,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Innovative and sustainable programs are required to support the well-being of stroke survivors. Peer support is a potentially low cost way to enhance well-being of recent stroke survivors and the well-being and community reintegration of their peer supporters. This article describes the perceptions of stroke survivors, care partners, peer supporters, and professionals of an individual peer support program.

Methods

An instrumental case study design was used to examine a volunteer peer support program that provides acute care visits and telephone follow-up post-discharge. In particular, a) type of support provided, b) benefits for the stroke survivor and care partner, c) potential harms to the stroke survivor, d) impact of providing support on the peer supporter, and e) required processes were considered. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 16 new stroke survivors and 8 care partners immediately following hospital discharge and then 6 months later, and with 7 peer supporters, 3 program co-ordinators and 4 health professionals to gather feedback from multiple stakeholders.

Results

Emotional, affirmational and informational support were perceived as being offered by the peer supporters. Peer visits were perceived as providing encouragement, motivation, validation, and decreased feelings of being alone. However, the visits were not perceived as beneficial to all stroke survivors. The impact on the peer supporters included increased social connections, personal growth, enjoyment, and feelings of making a difference in the lives of others. Involvement of the healthcare team, peer supporter training and a skilled coordinator were crucial to the success this program.

Conclusions

Peer support can potentially enhance service to stroke survivors and promote community reintegration for peer volunteers. Further research is needed to determine the preferred format and timing of peer support, and the characteristics of stroke survivors most likely to benefit.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Kessler et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphine S, Cote R, Durcam L, Carleton J: Activity, participation and quality of life 6 months post stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83:1035-1042.
• [2]Robinson-Smith G: Self-efficacy and quality of life after stroke. J Neurosci Nursing 2002, 34:91-98.
• [3]Wyller TB, Kirkevold M: How does a cerebral stroke affect quality of life? Towards an adequate theoretical account. Disabil Rehabil 1999, 21:152-161.
• [4]Anderson S: Community living after stroke: An ecological model. In PhD Thesis. Centre for Health Promotion Studies. Edmonton: University of Alberta; 2010.
• [5]Kessler D, Dubouloz C, Urbanowski R, Egan M: Meaning perspective transformation following stroke: the process of change. Disabil Rehabil 2009, 31:1056-1065.
• [6]Dennis CL: Peer support within a health care context: A concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2003, 40:321-332.
• [7]Ketokivi K: Sharing the same fate: The social bond between the self and fellow sufferers in the context of peer support. Eur Soc 2009, 11:391-410.
• [8]Kyngas HA, Kroll T, Duffy ME: Compliance in adolescents with chronic diseases: a review. J Adol Health 2000, 26:379-388.
• [9]Morris R, Morris P: Participants' experiences of hospital-based peer support groups for stroke patients and carers. Disabil Rehabil 2012, 34:347-354.
• [10]Ch'ng AM, French D, McLean N: Coping with the challenges of recovery from stroke: Long term perspectives of stroke support group members. J Health Psychol 2008, 13:1136-1146.
• [11]Hancock E: Health Recovery Social Networks: Exploring the experiences of participants in stroke recovery peer support groups. Stroke Recovery Canada®; 2009. http://www.marchofdimes.ca/EN/programs/src/Documents/Strokepeersupport.pdf webcite]
• [12]National Stroke Foundation: National Stroke Foundation Hospital Peer Support Program: A report on the Hospital Peer Support Program Pilot. 2008. http://www.strokefoundation.com.au/index2.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=126&Itemid=39 webcite]
• [13]Stake RE: Case studies. In Handbook of qualitative research. Edited by Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1994:236-247.
• [14]Keen J, Packwood T: Case study evaluation. Br Med J 1995, 311:444-447.
• [15]MacPherson I, McKie L: Qualitative research in program evaluation. In Qualitative Methods in Health Research. Edited by Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, de Vries R. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE; 2010:454-477.
• [16]Muhr T, ATLAS.ti: The knowledge workbench: Visual qualitative data analysis. (Version 7). Berlin: Scientific Software Development GmbH; 2012.
• [17]Stewart MJ, Doble S, Hart G, Langille L, MacPherson K: Peer Visitor Support for Family Caregivers of Seniors with Stroke. Can J Nurs Res 1998, 30:87-117.
• [18]Egan M, Anderson S, McTaggart J: Community navigation for stroke survivors and their care partners: Description and evaluation. [References]. Top Stroke Rehabil 2010, 17(3):183-190.
• [19]Garrett D, Cowdell F: Information needs of patients and carers following stroke. Nurs Older People 2005, 17:14-16.
• [20]Rimmer JH, Wang E, Smith D: Barriers associated with exercise and community access for individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008, 45:315-322.
• [21]Schwartz CE, Sendor RM: Helping others helps oneself: Response shift effects in peer support. Soc Sci Med 1999, 48:1563-1575.
• [22]Salter K, Hellings C, Foley N, Teasell R: The experience of living with stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. J Rehabil Med 2008, 40:595-602.
• [23]Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, Gordon C, Higgins J, McEwen S, Salbach N: Disablement following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1999, 21:258-268.