期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
Research, evidence and policymaking: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda
Bart Criel1  Jean Macq5  Freddie Ssengooba3  Bruno Marchal1  David Kaawa Mafigiri4  Juliet Nabyonga Orem2 
[1] Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp-Belgium, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium;WHO Uganda office, Health systems and services cluster, P. O. Box 24578, Kampala, Uganda;School of Public Health, Makerere University, P.O. Box. 7072, Kampala, Uganda;Makerere University School of Social Sciences, P.O Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda;Université Catholique de Louvain, Boite 3058; Clos Chapelle aux champs, 30, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium
关键词: Low income countries;    Uganda;    Implementation gap;    Practice;    Policy;    Research;   
Others  :  1163866
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-109
 received in 2011-08-04, accepted in 2012-02-09,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Use of evidence in health policymaking plays an important role, especially in resource-constrained settings where informed decisions on resource allocation are paramount. Several knowledge translation (KT) models have been developed, but few have been applied to health policymaking in low income countries. If KT models are expected to explain evidence uptake and implementation, or lack of it, they must be contextualized and take into account the specificity of low income countries for example, the strong influence of donors. The main objective of this research is to elaborate a Middle Range Theory (MRT) of KT in Uganda that can also serve as a reference for other low- and middle income countries.

Methods

This two-step study employed qualitative approaches to examine the principal barriers and facilitating factors to KT. Step 1 involved a literature review and identification of common themes. The results informed the development of the initial MRT, which details the facilitating factors and barriers to KT at the different stages of research and policy development. In Step 2, these were further refined through key informant interviews with policymakers and researchers in Uganda. Deductive content and thematic analysis was carried out to assess the degree of convergence with the elements of the initial MRT and to identify other emerging issues.

Results

Review of the literature revealed that the most common emerging facilitating factors could be grouped under institutional strengthening for KT, research characteristics, dissemination, partnerships and political context. The analysis of interviews, however, showed that policymakers and researchers ranked institutional strengthening for KT, research characteristics and partnerships as the most important. New factors emphasized by respondents were the use of mainstreamed structures within MoH to coordinate and disseminate research, the separation of roles between researchers and policymakers, and the role of the community and civil society in KT.

Conclusions

This study refined an initial MRT on KT in policymaking in the health sector in Uganda that was based on a literature review. It provides a framework that can be used in empirical research of the process of KT on specific policy issues.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Nabyonga Orem et al; BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150413120939507.pdf 697KB PDF download
Figure 3. 55KB Image download
Figure 2. 36KB Image download
Figure 1. 48KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Cordero C, Delino R, Jeyaseelan L, Lansang MA, Lozano JM, Kumar S, Moreno S, Pietersen M, Quirino J, Thamlikitkul V, et al.: Funding agencies in low- and middle-income countries: support for knowledge translation. Bull World Health Organ 2008, 86(7):524-534.
  • [2]Syed SB, Hyder AA, Bloom G, Sundaram S, Bhuiya A, Zhenzhong Z, Kanjilal B, Oladepo O, Pariyo G, Peters DH: Exploring evidence-policy linkages in health research plans: a case study from six countries. Health Res Policy Syst 2008, 6:4.
  • [3]Graham ID, Tetroe JM: Getting evidence into policy and practice: perspective of a health research funder. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2009, 18(1):46-50.
  • [4]Armstrong R, Waters E, Roberts H, Oliver S, Popay J: The role and theoretical evolution of knowledge translation and exchange in public health. J Public Health 2006, 28(4):384-389.
  • [5]Aaserud M, Lewin S, Innvaer S, Paulsen EJ, Dahlgren AT, Trommald M, Duley L, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD: Translating research into policy and practice in developing countries: a case study of magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia. BMC Health Serv Res 2005, 5:68.
  • [6]Sauerborn R, Nitayarumphong S, Gerhardus A: Strategies to enhance the use of health systems research for health sector reform. Trop Med Int Health 1999, 4(12):827-835.
  • [7]Elliott H, Popay J: How are policy makers using evidence? Models of research utilisation and local NHS policy making. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000, 54(6):461-468.
  • [8]McDonald PW, Viehbeck S: From evidence-based practice making to practice-based evidence making: creating communities of (research) and practice. Health Promot Pract 2007, 8(2):140-144.
  • [9]Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB: Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. Jama 1995, 274(9):700-705.
  • [10]Young J: Research, policy and practice: why developing countries are different. J Int Dev 2005, 17:727-734.
  • [11]Bowen S, Zwi AB: Pathways to "evidence-informed" policy and practice: a framework for action. PLoS Med 2005, 2(7):e166.
  • [12]Dobbins M, Ciliska D, Cockerill R, Barnsley J, DiCenso A: A framework for the dissemination and utilization of research for health-care policy and practice. Online J Knowl Synth Nurs 2002, 9:7.
  • [13]Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N: Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006, 26(1):13-24.
  • [14]Jacobson N, Butterill D, Goering P: Development of a framework for knowledge translation: understanding user context. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003, 8(2):94-99.
  • [15]Lavis JN, Robertson D, Woodside JM, McLeod CB, Abelson J: How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Q 2003, 81(2):221-248.
  • [16]Nutley S, Walter I, Davies H: From knowing to doing: a framework for understanding the evidence-into-practice agenda. Evaluation 2003, 9:125-148.
  • [17]Lavis JN, Lomas J, Hamid M, Sewankambo NK: Assessing country-level efforts to link research to action. Bull World Health Organ 2006, 84(8):620-628.
  • [18]Lomas J: Connecting research and policy. Isuma: Can J Policy Res 2000, 1(1):140-144.
  • [19]Oxman AD, Vandvik PO, Lavis JN, Fretheim A, Lewin S: SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 2: Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst 2009, 7:(Suppl 1):S2.
  • [20]Dobrow MJ, Goel V, Lemieux-Charles L, Black NA: The impact of context on evidence utilization: a framework for expert groups developing health policy recommendations. Soc Sci Med 2006, 63(7):1811-1824.
  • [21]COHRED: Lessons in Research to Action and Policy - Case studies from seven countries. Geneva: The Council of Health Research and Development working group on Research to Action and Policy (COHRED). 2000.
  • [22]Kingdon J: Agendas, alternatives and public policie. 2nd edition. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers; 1995.
  • [23]Lavis JN, Ross SE, Hurley JE, Hohenadel JM, Stoddart GL, Woodward CA, Abelson J: Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. Milbank Q 2002, 80(1):125-154.
  • [24]Shampa N: Case Studies: Getting Research into Policy and Practice (GRIPP). London: John Snow International, Europe; 2007.
  • [25]Estabrooks CA, Thompson DS, Lovely JJ, Hofmeyer A: A guide to knowledge translation theory. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006, 26(1):25-36.
  • [26]Daniels K, Lewin S: Translating research into maternal health care policy: a qualitative case study of the use of evidence in policies for the treatment of eclampsia and pre-eclampsia in South Africa. Health Res Policy Syst 2008, 6:12.
  • [27]Merton RK: Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press; 1968.
  • [28]Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, Hsu R, Katbamna S, Olsen R, Smith L, et al.: Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006, 6:35.
  • [29]Delisle H, Roberts JH, Munro M, Jones L, Gyorkos TW: The role of NGOs in global health research for development. Health Res Policy Syst 2005, 3(1):3.
  • [30]Sanders D, Labonte R, Baum F, Chopra M: Making research matter: a civil society perspective on health research. Bull World Health Organ 2004, 82(10):757-763.
  • [31]WHO: WHO's role and responsibilities in health research. In WHA6321. Volume 63.21. Edited by WHO. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
  • [32]Varkevisser CM, Mwaluko GM, Le Grand A: Research in action: the training approach of the Joint Health Systems Research Project for the Southern African Region. Health Policy Plan 2001, 16(3):281-291.
  • [33]Lavis JN, Paulsen EJ, Oxman AD, Moynihan R: Evidence-informed health policy 2 - survey of organizations that support the use of research evidence. Implement Sci 2008, 3:54.
  • [34]Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Moynihan R, Paulsen EJ: Evidence-informed health policy 1 - synthesis of findings from a multi-method study of organizations that support the use of research evidence. Implement Sci 2008, 3:53.
  • [35]Lavis JN, Guindon GE, Cameron D, Boupha B, Dejman M, Osei EJ, Sadana R: Bridging the gaps between research, policy and practice in low- and middle-income countries: a survey of researchers. Can Med Assoc J 2010, 182(9):E350-E361.
  • [36]Sevene E, Lewin S, Mariano A, Woelk G, Oxman AD, Matinhure S, Cliff J, Fernandes B, Daniels K: System and market failures: the unavailability of magnesium sulphate for the treatment of eclampsia and pre-eclampsia in Mozambique and Zimbabwe. BMJ 2005, 331(7519):765-769.
  • [37]Mubyazi GM, Gonzalez-Block MA: Research influence on antimalarial drug policy change in Tanzania: case study of replacing chloroquine with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine as the first-line drug. Malar J 2005, 4:51.
  • [38]Hennink M, Stephenson R: Using research to inform health policy: barriers and strategies in developing countries. J Health Commun 2005, 10(2):163-180.
  • [39]Santesso N, Tugwell P: Knowledge translation in developing countries. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006, 26(1):87-96.
  • [40]Ssengooba F, Atuyambe L, Kiwanuka SN, Puvanachandra P, Glass N, Hyder AA: Research translation to inform national health policies: learning from multiple perspectives in Uganda. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2011, 11(Suppl 1):S13.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:20次 浏览次数:25次