MRI signal distribution within the intervertebral disc as a biomarker of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolisthesis

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Carl-Eric Aubin¹  Hubert Labelle¹  Stefan Parent¹  Delphine Périé¹  Julien Gervais¹ 

[1] Research Center Sainte-Justine University Hospital, Montreal, Canada

关键词: Descriptive statistics;    Histograms;    Spondylolisthesis;    Scoliosis;    MRI;    Intervertebral disc degeneration;   

Others  :  1134405
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-13-239

 received in 2012-05-24, accepted in 2012-11-19,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Early stages of scoliosis and spondylolisthesis entail changes in the intervertebral disc (IVD) structure and biochemistry. The current clinical use of MR T2-weighted images is limited to visual inspection. Our hypothesis is that the distribution of the MRI signal intensity within the IVD in T2-weighted images depends on the spinal pathology and on its severity. Therefore, this study aims to develop the AMRSID (analysis of MR signal intensity distribution) method to analyze the 3D distribution of the MR signal intensity within the IVD and to evaluate their sensitivity to scoliosis and spondylolisthesis and their severities.

Methods

This study was realized on 79 adolescents who underwent a MRI acquisition (sagittal T2-weighted images) before their orthopedic or surgical treatment. Five groups were considered: low severity scoliosis (Cobb angle ≤50°), high severity scoliosis (Cobb angles >50°), low severity spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grades I and II), high severity spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grades III, IV and V) and control. The distribution of the MRI signal intensity within the IVD was analyzed using the descriptive statistics of histograms normalized by either cerebrospinal fluid or bone signal intensity, weighted centers and volume ratios. Differences between pathology and severity groups were assessed using one- and two-way ANOVAs.

Results

There were significant (p < 0.05) variations of indices between scoliosis, spondylolithesis and control groups and between low and high severity groups. The cerebrospinal fluid normalization was able to detect differences between healthy and pathologic IVDs whereas the bone normalization, which reflects both bone and IVD health, detected more differences between the severities of these pathologies.

Conclusions

This study proves for the first time that changes in the intervertebral disc, non visible to the naked eye on sagittal T2-weighted MR images of the spine, can be detected from specific indices describing the distribution of the MR signal intensity. Moreover, these indices are able to discriminate between scoliosis and spondylolisthesis and their severities, and provide essential information on the composition and structure of the discs whatever the pathology considered. The AMRSID method may have the potential to complement the current diagnostic tools available in clinics to improve the diagnostic with earlier biomarkers, the prognosis of evolution and the treatment options of scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Gervais et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Bushell GR, Ghosh P, Taylor TK, Sutherland JM: The collagen of the intervertebral disc in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1979, 61-B:501-508.
• [2]Antoniou J, Arlet V, Goswami T, Aebi M, Alini M: Elevated synthetic activity in the convex side of scoliotic intervertebral discs and endplates compared with normal tissues. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001, 26:E198-206.
• [3]Urban MR, Fairbank JCT, Bibby SRS, Urban JPG: Intervertebral disc composition in neuromuscular scoliosis - changes in cell density and glycosaminoglycan concentration at the curve apex. Spine 2001, 26:610-617.
• [4]Schlenzka D, Poussa M, Seitsalo S, Osterman K: Intervertebral disc changes in adolescents with isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 1991, 4:344-352.
• [5]Kouwenhoven JWM, Castelein RM: The pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis review of the literature. Spine 2008, 33:2898-2908.
• [6]Perie D, Sales de Gauzy J, Curnier D, Hobatho MC: Intervertebral disc modeling using a MRI method: migration of the nucleus zone within scoliotic intervertebral discs. Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 19:1245-1248.
• [7]Chen IR, Wei TS: Disc height and lumbar index as independent predictors of degenerative spondylolisthesis in middle-aged women with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009, 34:1402-1409.
• [8]Dai LY: Disc degeneration in patients with lumbar spondylolysis. J Spinal Disord 2000, 13:478-486.
• [9]Horton WC, Daftari TK: Which disc as visualized by magnetic resonance imaging is actually a source of pain? A correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992, 17:S164-S171.
• [10]Kornberg M: Discography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lumbar disc disruption. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989, 14:1368-1372.
• [11]Linson MA, Crowe CH: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and lumbar discography in the diagnosis of disc degeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990, 250:160-163.
• [12]Osti OL, Fraser RD: MRI and discography of annular tears and intervertebral disc degeneration. A prospective clinical comparison. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992, 74:431-435.
• [13]Schneiderman G, Flannigan B, Kingston S, Thomas J, Dillin WH, Watkins RG: Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of disc degeneration: correlation with discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987, 12:276-281.
• [14]Aprill C, Bogduk N: High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 1992, 65:361-369.
• [15]Ross JS, Modic MT, Masaryk TJ: Tears of the anulus fibrosus: assessment with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989, 10:1251-1254.
• [16]Sether LA, Yu S, Haughton VM, Fischer ME: Intervertebral disk: normal age-related changes in MR signal intensity. Radiology 1990, 177:385-388.
• [17]Yu SW, Haughton VM, Sether LA, Wagner M: Anulus fibrosus in bulging intervertebral disks. Radiology 1988, 169:761-763.
• [18]Schmidt TA, An HS, Lim TH, Nowicki BH, Haughton VM: The stiffness of lumbar spinal motion segments with a high-intensity zone in the anulus fibrosus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998, 23:2167-2173.
• [19]Boos N, Wallin A, Gbedegbegnon T, Aebi M, Boesch C: Quantitative MR imaging of lumbar intervertebral disks and vertebral bodies: influence of diurnal water content variations. Radiology 1993, 188:351-354.
• [20]Malko JA, Hutton WC, Fajman WA: An in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in the volume (and fluid content) of the lumbar intervertebral discs during a simulated diurnal load cycle. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999, 24:1015-1022.
• [21]LeBlanc AD, Evans HJ, Schneider VS, Wendt RE 3rd, Hedrick TD: Changes in intervertebral disc cross-sectional area with bed rest and space flight. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994, 19:812-817.
• [22]Hedman TP, Fernie GR: In vivo measurement of lumbar spinal creep in two seated postures using magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995, 20:178-183.
• [23]Beattie PF, Brooks WM, Rothstein JM, Sibbitt WL Jr, Robergs RA, MacLean T, Hart BL: Effect of lordosis on the position of the nucleus pulposus in supine subjects. A study using magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994, 19:2096-2102.
• [24]Fennell AJ, Jones AP, Hukins DW: Migration of the nucleus pulposus within the intervertebral disc during flexion and extension of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996, 21:2753-2757.
• [25]Brault JS, Driscoll DM, Laakso LL, Kappler RE, Allin EF, Glonek T: Quantification of lumbar intradiscal deformation during flexion and extension, by mathematical analysis of magnetic resonance imaging pixel intensity profiles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997, 22:2066-2072.
• [26]Perie D, Curnier D, de Gauzy JS: Correlation between nucleus zone migration within scoliotic intervertebral discs and mechanical properties distribution within scoliotic vertebrae. Magn Reson Imaging 2003, 21:949-953.
• [27]Majumdar S: Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of the intervertebral disc. NMR Biomed 2006, 19:894-904.
• [28]Endean A, Palmer KT, Coggon D: Potential of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings to Refine Case Definition for Mechanical Low Back Pain in Epidemiological Studies: A Systematic Review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011, 36:160-169.
• [29]Mwale F, Iatridis JC, Antoniou J: Quantitative MRI as a diagnostic tool of intervertebral disc matrix composition and integrity. Eur Spine J 2008, 17(Suppl 4):432-440.
• [30]Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N: Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001, 26:1873-1878.
• [31]Antoniou J, Pike GB, Steffen T, Baramki H, Poole AR, Aebi M, Alini M: Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of degenerative disc disease. Magn Reson Med 1998, 40:900-907.
• [32]Wang C, Auerbach JD, Witschey WR, Balderston RA, Reddy R, Borthakur A: Advances in magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. Semin Spine Surg 2007, 19:65-71.
• [33]Alomari RS, Corso JJ, Chaudhary V, Dhillon G: Automatic Diagnosis of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Shape and Appearance Features from MRI. In Medical Imaging 2010: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 16–18 Feb 2010. SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, USA; 2010:76249. 76241A
• [34]Koh J, Chaudhary V, Dhillon G: Diagnosis of Disc Herniation Based on Classifiers and Features Generated from Spine MR Images. In Medical Imaging 2010: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 16–18 Feb 2010. SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, USA; 2010:76248. 76243O
• [35]Positano V, Brotini L, Aquaro G, Pingitore A, Lombardi M, Landini L, Santarelli MF: Automatic assessment of myocardial fibrosis by delayed enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Piscataway, NJ, USA. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Macro to Nano 2008, 1497-1500.
• [36]Freiman M, Edrei Y, Gross E, Joskowicz L, Abramovitch R: Liver metastasis early detection using fMRI based statistical model. IEEE, Piscataway; 2008:584-587.
• [37]Patriarche J, Erickson B: Part 2. Automated change detection and characterization applied to serial MR of brain tumors may detect progression earlier than human experts. J Digit Imaging 2007, 20:321-328.
• [38]Kerttula L, Kurunlahti M, Jauhiainen J, Koivula A, Oikarinen J, Tervonen O: Apparent diffusion coefficients and T2 relaxation time measurements to evaluate disc degeneration. A quantitative MR study of young patients with previous vertebral fracture. Acta Radiol 2001, 42:585-591.
• [39]Kerttula LI, Serlo WS, Tervonen OA, Paakko EL, Vanharanta HV: Post-traumatic findings of the spine after earlier vertebral fracture in young patients: clinical and MRI study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000, 25:1104-1108.
• [40]Luoma K, Vehmas T, Grönblad M, Kerttula L, Kääpä E: MRI follow-up of subchondral signal abnormalities in a selected group of chronic low back pain patients. Eur Spine J 2008, 17:1300-1308.
• [41]Violas P, Estivalezes E, Briot J, Sales de Gauzy J, Swider P: Quantification of intervertebral disc volume properties below spine fusion, using magnetic resonance imaging, in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine 2007, 32:E405-412.
• [42]Perie D, Curnier D: Effect of pathology type and severity on the distribution of MRI signal intensities within the degenerated nucleus pulposus: application to idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolisthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010, 11:189. BioMed Central Full Text
• [43]Perie D, Sales De Gauzy J, Baunin C, Hobatho MC: Tomodensitometry measurements for in vivo quantification of mechanical properties of scoliotic vertebrae. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2001, 16:373-379.
• [44]Perie D, Hobatho MC, Baunin C, Sales De Gauzy J: Personalised mechanical properties of scoliotic vertebrae determined in vivo using tomodensitometry. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2002, 5:161-165.
• [45]Ludescher B, Effelsberg J, Martirosian P, Steidle G, Markert B, Claussen C, Schick F: T2- and diffusion-maps reveal diurnal changes of intervertebral disc composition: an in vivo MRI study at 1.5 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 28:252-257.
• [46]Gervais J, Perie D, Aubin C: Sensitivity of MRI signal distribution within the intervertebral disc to image segmentation and data normalization. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2012. In press
• [47]Chevrefils C, Cheriet F, Aubin CE, Grimard G: Texture analysis for automatic segmentation of intervertebral disks of scoliotic spines from MR images. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2009, 13:608-620.
• [48]Michopoulou SK, Costaridou L, Panagiotopoulos E, Speller R, Panayiotakis G, Todd-Pokropek A: Atlas-based segmentation of degenerated lumbar intervertebral discs from MR images of the spine. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009, 56:2225-2231.
• [49]Manac’h YG, Perie D, Gilbert G, Beaudoin G: Sensitivity of multi-parametric MRI to the compressive state of the isolated intervertebral discs. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. In press
• [50]Boos N, Boesch C: Quantitative magnetic-resonance-imaging of the lumbar spine - potential for investigations of water-content and biochemical-composition. Spine 1995, 20:2358-2365.
• [51]Benneker LM, Heini PF, Anderson SE, Alini M, Ito K: Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 2005, 14:27-35.
• [52]O’Connell GD, Johannessen W, Vresilovic EJ, Elliott DM: Human internal disc strains in axial compression measured noninvasively using magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 2007, 32:2860-2868.
• [53]Nguyen AM, Johannessen W, Yoder JH, Wheaton AJ, Vresilovic EJ, Borthakur A, Elliott DM: Noninvasive quantification of human nucleus pulposus pressure with use of T1rho-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:796-802.
• [54]Zuo J, Saadat E, Romero A, Loo K, Li X, Link TM, Kurhanewicz J, Majumdar S: Assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration with magnetic resonance single-voxel spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 2009, 62:1140-1146.
• [55]Zuo J, Joseph GB, Li X, Link TM, Hu SS, Berven SH, Kurhanewitz J, Majumdar S: In vivo intervertebral disc characterization using magnetic resonance spectroscopy and T1rho imaging: association with discography and Oswestry Disability Index and Short Form-36 Health Survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012, 37:214-221.