期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Comparison of human lung tissue mass measurements from Ex Vivo lungs and high resolution CT software analysis
Steven Kesten1  Norma Lowe1  Joseph C Anderson1  Erik Henne1 
[1]Uptake Medical®, 1173 Warner Ave, Tustin, CA, 92780, USA
关键词: Measurement lung volume reduction;    Mass;    Volume;    Computed tomography;    Software;    Emphysema;   
Others  :  1172476
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2466-12-18
 received in 2011-07-18, accepted in 2012-05-02,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Quantification of lung tissue via analysis of computed tomography (CT) scans is increasingly common for monitoring disease progression and for planning of therapeutic interventions. The current study evaluates the quantification of human lung tissue mass by software analysis of a CT to physical tissue mass measurements.

Methods

Twenty-two ex vivo lungs were scanned by CT and analyzed by commercially available software. The lungs were then dissected into lobes and sublobar segments and weighed. Because sublobar boundaries are not visually apparent, a novel technique of defining sublobar segments in ex vivo tissue was developed. The tissue masses were then compared to measurements by the software analysis.

Results

Both emphysematous (n = 14) and non-emphysematous (n = 8) bilateral lungs were evaluated. Masses (Mean ± SD) as measured by dissection were 651 ± 171 g for en bloc lungs, 126 ± 60 g for lobar segments, and 46 ± 23 g for sublobar segments. Masses as measured by software analysis were 598 ± 159 g for en bloc lungs, 120 ± 58 g for lobar segments, and 45 ± 23 g for sublobar segments. Correlations between measurement methods was above 0.9 for each segmentation level. The Bland-Altman analysis found limits of agreement at the lung, lobe and sublobar levels to be −13.11% to −4.22%, –13.59% to 4.24%, and –45.85% to 44.56%.

Conclusion

The degree of concordance between the software mass quantification to physical mass measurements provides substantial evidence that the software method represents an appropriate non-invasive means to determine lung tissue mass.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Henne et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150422022505188.pdf 842KB PDF download
Figure 4 . 112KB Image download
Figure 3 . 44KB Image download
Figure 2 . 60KB Image download
20150204013344668.pdf 238KB PDF download
【 图 表 】

Figure 2 .

Figure 3 .

Figure 4 .

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Dirksen A, Dijkman JH, Madsen F, et al.: A randomized clinical trial of α1-antitrypsin augmentation therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999, 160:1468-1472.
  • [2]Prasad M, Sowmya A, Wilson P: Multi-level classification of emphysema in HRCT lung images. Pattern Anal Appl 2009, 12(1):9-20.
  • [3]Snell GI, Hopkins P, Westall G, et al.: A feasibility and safety study of bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation: a novel emphysema therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2009, 88:1993-1998.
  • [4]Zhang L, Hoffman EA, Reinhardt JM: Atlas driven lung lobe segmentation in volumetric x-ray CT images. IEEE Med Imaging 2006, 25(1):1-16.
  • [5]van Rikxoort EM, de Hoop B, van de Vorst S, Prokop M, van Ginneken B: Automatic segmentation of pulmonary segments from volumetric chest CT scans. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009, 28:621-630.
  • [6]Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Zidowitz S, et al.: Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): new tools for computer assistance in thoracic CT. Part 1. Functional analysis of lungs, lung lobes, and bronchopulmonary segments. Radiographics 2005, 25:525-536.
  • [7]Tschirren J, Yavarna T, Reinhardt JM: Airway segmentation framework for clinical environments. EXACT 2009, 227-238.
  • [8]Tschirren J, Hoffman EA, McLennan G, Sonka M: Segmentation and quantitative analysis of intrathoracic airway trees from computed tomography images. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2005, 2(6):484-487.
  • [9]Tschirren J, Hoffman EA, McLennan G, Sonka M: Intrathoracic airway trees: segmentation and airway morphology analysis from low-dose CT scans. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005, 24(12):1529-1539.
  • [10]Hogg JC, Nepszy S: Regional lung volume and pleural pressure gradient estimated from lung density in dogs. J Appl Physiol 1969, 27(2):198-203.
  • [11]Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 327(8476):307-310.
  • [12]Lin SC, Whipple DM, Ho CS: Evaluation of statistical equivalence using limits of agreement and associated sample size calculation. Comm Stat Theor Meth 1998, 27(6):1419-1432.
  • [13]Sciurba FC, Ernst A, Herth FJ, et al.: A randomized study of endobronchial valves for advanced emphysema. N Engl J Med 2010, 363(13):1233-1244.
  • [14]Herth FJ, Eberhardt R, Gompelmann D, Slebos D, Ernst A: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with a dedicated coil: a clinical pilot study. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2010, 4(4):225-231.
  • [15]Herth FJ, Gompelmann D, Stanzel F, et al.: Treatment of advanced emphysema with emphysematous lung sealant (AeriSeal). Respiration 2011.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:35次 浏览次数:17次