BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | |
Fear for external cephalic version and depression: predictors of successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term? | |
Simone M Kuppens2  Victor J Pop1  Tom H Hasaart2  Sophie E Truijens1  Marieke van der Zalm2  Emily Ciliacus2  | |
[1] Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands;Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands | |
关键词: Psychological predictors; Depression; EDS; Breech presentation; External cephalic version; | |
Others : 1127507 DOI : 10.1186/1471-2393-14-101 |
|
received in 2013-06-03, accepted in 2013-12-24, 发布年份 2014 | |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Objective was to determine whether fear for external cephalic version (ECV) and depression are associated with the success rate of ECV in women with a breech presentation at term.
Methods
Prospective study conducted in the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven between October 2007 and May 2012. Participants fulfilled The Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) questionnaire and expressed their degree of fear on a visual analogue scale from one to ten before ECV. Obstetric factors were evaluated as well. Primary outcome was the relation between psychological factors (fear for ECV and depression EDS scores) and ECV success rate. Secondary outcome was a possible relation between fear for ECV and increased abdominal muscle tension.
Results
The overall success rate was 55% and was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in nulliparous women (44.3%) compared with parous women (78.0%). Fear for ECV and depression EDS-scores were not related with ECV success rate. Parity, placental location, BMI and engagement of the fetal breech were obstetric factors associated with ECV outcome. There was no relation between fear for ECV and abdominal muscle tone.
Conclusion
Fear for ECV and depression were not related with ECV success rate in this study. Engagement of the fetal breech was the most important factor associated with a successful ECV.
Trial registration
EBIS: The Eindhoven Breech Intervention Study,NCT00516555.
【 授权许可】
2014 Ciliacus et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20150220204921834.pdf | 131KB | download |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists: ACOG Committee opinion no. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006, 108:235-237.
- [2]RCOG Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: RCOG guideline. London (UK): External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of breech presentation (green-top 20a); 2006.
- [3]Keriakos R, Abdelmalek B, Campbell L: Sheffield modified technique for external cephalic version. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009, 29(5):384-387.
- [4]Ben-Meir A, Erez Y, Sela HY, Shveiky D, Tsafrir A, Ezra Y: Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008, 21(9):660-662.
- [5]Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, Van Der Post JA, Mol BW: Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009, 33(1):76-84.
- [6]Opmeer B, Mol BW, Van Der Post JA, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, Kok M: Clinical factors to predict outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008, 630(6):e1-e7. 199
- [7]Haas DM, Magann EF: External cephalic version with an amniotic fluid index < or = 10: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005, 18(4):249-252.
- [8]Rijnders M, Herschderfer K, Prins M, van Baaren R, van Veelen AJ, Schönbeck Y, Buitendijk S: A retrospective study of the success, safety and effectiveness of external cephalic version without tocolysis in a specialised midwifery centre in the Netherlands. Midwifery 2008, 24(1):38-45. Epub 2006 Dec 29
- [9]Smaga D, Cheseaux N, Forster A, Colombo S, Rentsch D, de Tonnac N: Hypnosis and anxiety problems. Rev Med Suisse 2010, 6:330-333.
- [10]Chung TK, Lau TK, Yip AS, Chiu HF, Lee DT: Antepartum depressive symptomatology is associated with adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Psychosom Med 2001, 63(5):830-834.
- [11]Kuppens SM, Kooistra L, Hasaart TH, van der Donk RW, Vader HL, Oei GS, Pop VJ: Maternal thyroid function and the outcome of external cephalic version: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011, 11:10.
- [12]Wijnen H, Bunevicius R, van Baar A, Pop V, Bergink V, Kooistra L, den Berg MP L-v: Validation of the Edinburgh depression scale during pregnancy. J Psychosom Res 2011, 70(4):385-389.
- [13]Hutton EK, Hannah ME, Ross SJ, Delisle MF, Carson GD, Windrim R, Ohlsson A, Willan AR, Gafni A, Sylvestre G, Natale R, Barrett Y, Pollard JK, Dunn MS, Turtle P, Early ECV2 Trial Collaborative Group: The early external cephalic version (ECV) 2 trial: an international multicenter randomized controlled trial of timing of ECV for breech pregnancies. BJOG 2011, 118(5):564-577.
- [14]Reinhard J, Heinrich TM, Reitter A, Herrmann E, Smart W, Louwen F: Clinical hypnosis before external cephalic version. Am J Clin Hypn 2012, 55(2):184-192.
- [15]Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, Mol BW, van der Post JA: External cephalic version–related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2008, 112(5):1143-1151.