Patient advocacy and DSM-5

BMC Medicine

Katharine A Phillips¹  Dan J Stein² 

[1] Rhode Island Hospital and the Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Coro Center West, Suite 2.030, 1 Hoppin Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA;Department of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital J2, Anzio Rd, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa

关键词: Obsessive-compulsive and related disorders;    Consumer advocacy;    Patient advocacy;    Diagnosis;    Nosology;    Psychiatric classification;    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders;   

Others  :  857024
DOI  :  10.1186/1741-7015-11-133

 received in 2013-05-08, accepted in 2013-05-08,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

The revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) provides a useful opportunity to revisit debates about the nature of psychiatric classification. An important debate concerns the involvement of mental health consumers in revisions of the classification. One perspective argues that psychiatric classification is a scientific process undertaken by scientific experts and that including consumers in the revision process is merely pandering to political correctness. A contrasting perspective is that psychiatric classification is a process driven by a range of different values and that the involvement of patients and patient advocates would enhance this process. Here we draw on our experiences with input from the public during the deliberations of the Obsessive Compulsive-Spectrum Disorders subworkgroup of DSM-5, to help make the argument that psychiatric classification does require reasoned debate on a range of different facts and values, and that it is appropriate for scientist experts to review their nosological recommendations in the light of rigorous consideration of patient experience and feedback.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Stein and Phillips; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Hyman SE: Can neuroscience be integrated into the DSM-V? Nature Rev Neurosci 2007, 8:725-32.
• [2]Kupfer DJ, Regier DA: Neuroscience, clinical evidence, and the future of psychiatric classification in dsm-5. Am J Psychiatry 2011, 168:672-674.
• [3]Stein DJ, Lund C, Nesse RM: Classification systems in psychiatry: diagnosis and global mental health in the time of DSM-5 and ICD-11. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2013.
• [4]Regier DA, Narrow WE, Kuhl EA, Kupfer DJ: The conceptual development of DSM-V. Am J Psychiatry 2009, 166:645-650.
• [5]Regier DA, Kuhl EA, Kupfer DJ, McNulty JP: Patient involvement in the development of DSM-V. Psychiatry 2010, 73:308-310.
• [6]Stein DJ: Philosophy and the DSM-III. Compr Psychiatry 1991, 32:404-415.
• [7]Stein DJ: Philosophy of Psychopharmacology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
• [8]Phillips KA, Stein DJ, Rauch SL, Hollander E, Fallon BA, Barsky A, Fineberg N, Mataix-Cols D, Ferrão YA, Saxena S, Wilhelm S, Kelly MM, Clark LA, Pinto A, Bienvenu OJ, Farrow J, Leckman J: Should an obsessive-compulsive spectrum grouping of disorders be included in DSM-V? Depress Anxiety 2010, 27:528-555.
• [9]Stein DJ, Fineberg NA, Bienvenu OJ, Denys D, Lochner C, Nestadt G, Leckman JF, Rauch SL, Phillips KA: Should OCD be classified as an anxiety disorder in DSM-V? Depress Anxiety 2010, 27:495-506.
• [10]Stein DJ, Craske MG, Friedman MJ, Phillips KA: Meta-structure issues for the DSM-5: how do anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, post-traumatic disorders, and dissociative disorders fit together? Curr Psychiatry Rep 2011, 13:248-250.
• [11]Leckman JF, Denys D, Simpson HB, Mataix-Cols D, Hollander E, Saxena S, Miguel EC, Rauch SL, Goodman WK, Phillips KA, Stein DJ: Obsessive-compulsive disorder: a review of the diagnostic criteria and possible subtypes and dimensional specifiers for DSM-V. Depress Anxiety 2010, 27:507-527.
• [12]Mataix-Cols D, Frost RO, Pertusa A, Clark LA, Saxena S, Leckman JF, Stein DJ, Matsunaga H, Wilhelm S: Hoarding disorder: a new diagnosis for DSM-V? Depress Anxiety 2010, 27:556-572.
• [13]Stein DJ, Grant JE, Franklin ME, Keuthen N, Lochner C, Singer HS, Woods DW: Trichotillomania (hair pulling disorder), skin picking disorder, and stereotypic movement disorder: toward DSM-V. Depress Anxiety 2010, 27:611-626.
• [14]Lochner C, Grant JE, Odlaug BL, Woods DW, Keuthen NJ, Stein DJ: DSM-5 field survey: hair-pulling disorder (trichotillomania). Depress Anxiety 2012, 29:1025-1031.
• [15]Stein DJ, Phillips KA, Bolton D, Fulford KWM, Sadler JZ, Kendler KS: What is a mental/psychiatric disorder? From DSM-IV to DSM-V. Psychol Med 2010, 40:1759-1765.
• [16]Nesse RM, Stein DJ: Towards a genuinely medical model for psychiatric nosology. BMC Med 2012, 10:5. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Stein DJ: Is disorder X in category or spectrum Y? General considerations and application to the relationship between obsessive-compulsive disorder and anxiety disorders. Depress Anxiety 2008, 25:330-335.
• [18]Gureje O, Stein DJ: Classification of mental disorders: the importance of inclusive decision-making. Int Rev Psychiatry 2012, 24:606-612.
• [19]George B: What’s in a name? Client participation, diagnosis and the DSM-5. J Mental Health 2010, 19:479-482.
• [20]Sadler JZ, Fulford B: Should patients and their families contribute to the DSM-V process? Psychiatr Serv 2004, 55:133-138.
• [21]Spitzer RL: Good idea or politically correct nonsense? Psychiatr Serv 2004, 55:113.
• [22]Sadler JZ, Hulgus YF, Agich GJ: On values in recent American psychiatric classification. J Med Philos 1994, 19:261-277.
• [23]Spitzer RL: Values and assumptions in the development of DSM-III and DSM-III-R: an insider’s perspective and a belated response to Sadler, Hulgus, and Agich's “On values in recent American psychiatric classification”. J Nerv Ment Dis 2001, 189:351-359.
• [24]Jaspers K: General Psychopathology. Chicago: Chicago University Press; 1963.
• [25]Kleinman A: Rethinking Psychiatry: From Cultural Category to Personal Experience. New York: Free Press; 1988.
• [26]Kendler KS: Toward a philosophical structure for psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 2005, 162:433-440.
• [27]Cuthbert B, Insel T: The data of diagnosis: new approaches to psychiatric classification. Psychiatry 2010, 73:311-314.
• [28]Flanagan EH, Davidson L, Strauss JS: The need for patient-subjective data in the DSM and the ICD. Psychiatry 2010, 73:297-307.
• [29]Nilsen ES, Myrhaug HT, Johansen M, Oliver S, Oxman AD: Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006, CD004563.
• [30]Lovell AM: Commentary on “The need for patient-subjective data in the DSM and the ICD”. Psychiatry 2010, 73:318-24.
• [31]Silberman EK: Patients’ subjective experience as a component of psychiatric assessment: where does it fit? Psychiatry 2010, 73:315-317.
• [32]Ben-Zeev D, Young MA, Corrigan PW: DSM-V and the stigma of mental illness. J Mental Health 2010, 19:318-327.