The evolution of contact calls in isolated and overlapping populations of two white-eye congeners in East Africa (Aves, Zosterops)

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Jan Christian Habel²  Werner Ulrich¹  Martin Husemann³ 

[1] Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Chair of Ecology and Biogeography, Pl-87-100 Toruń, Poland;Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technische Universität München, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, D-85354 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany;Institute of Biology/Zoology, Department of General Zoology, University of Halle, D-06120 Halle, Germany

关键词: Zosterops poliogaster;    Zosterops abyssinicus;    Sympatry;    Reproductive character displacement;    Parapatry;    Contact calls;    Bioacoustics;    Allopatry;   

Others  :  855503
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2148-14-115

 received in 2013-11-15, accepted in 2014-05-14,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Closely related species often occur in geographic isolation, yet sometimes form contact zones with the potential to hybridize. Pre-zygotic barriers may prevent cross breeding in such contact zones. In East Africa, White-eye birds have evolved into various species, inhabiting different habitat types. Zosterops poliogaster is found in cool and moist cloud forests at higher elevations, whereas Z. abyssinicus is distributed across the dry and hot lowland savannahs. In most areas, these two species occur allopatrically, but in the contact zone where the mountain meets the savannah, the distributions of these species sometimes overlap (parapatry), and in a few areas the two taxa occur sympatrically. Acoustic communication is thought to be an important species recognition mechanism in birds and an effective prezygotic barrier for hybridisation. We recorded contact calls of both the lowland and highland species in (i) distinct populations (allopatry), (ii) along contact zones (parapatry), and (iii) in overlapping populations (sympatry) to test for species and population differentiation.

Results

We found significant differences in call characteristics between the highland and lowland species, in addition to call differentiation within species. The highland Z. poliogaster shows a strong call differentiation among local populations, accompanied by comparatively low variability in their contact calls within populations (i.e. a small acoustic space). In contrast, calls of the lowland Z. abyssinicus are not differentiated among local sites but show relatively high variability in calls within single populations. Call patterns in both species show geographic clines in relation to latitude and longitude. Calls from parapatric populations from both species showed greater similarity to the other taxon in comparison to heterospecific populations found in allopatry. However, where the two species occur sympatrically, contact calls of both species are more distinct from each other than in either allopatric or parapatric populations.

Conclusion

The contrasting patterns reflect divergent spatial distributions: the highland Z. poliogaster populations are highly disjunct, while Z. abyssinicus lowland populations are interconnected. Higher similarity in contact calls of heterospecific populations might be due to intermixing. In contrast, sympatric populations show reproductive character displacement which leads to strongly divergent call patterns.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Husemann et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 6.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Mallet J: Hybridization, ecological races and the nature of species: empirical evidence for the ease of speciation. Phil Trans Roy Soc 2008, 383:2971-2986.
• [2]Via S: Reproductive isolation between sympatric races of pea aphids. I. Gene flow restriction and habitat choice. Evol 1999, 53:1446-1457.
• [3]Coyne JA, Orr HA: Sinnauer Associates Sunderland. MA, USA: Sinnauer Associates Sunderland; 2004.
• [4]Nosil P, Vines TH, Funk DJ: Perspective: reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants from divergent habitats. Evolution 2005, 59:705-719.
• [5]Coyne JA, Orr HA: Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 1989, 43:362-381.
• [6]Coyne JA, Orr HA: Patterns of speciation in Drosophila revisited. Evolution 1997, 51:295-303.
• [7]Kirkpatrick M, Ravingne V: Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. The Am Nat 2002, 159:22-35.
• [8]Bernasconi G, Ashman T-L, Birkhead TR, Bishop JDD, Grossniklaus U, Kubli E, Marshall DL, Schmid B, Skogsmyr I, Snook RR, Taylor D, Till-Bottraud I, Ward PI, Zeh DW, Hellriegel B: Evolutionary ecology of the prezygotic stage. Science 2004, 303:971-975.
• [9]Rundle HD, Nagel L, Boughman JW, Schluter D: Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 2000, 287:306-308.
• [10]Schluter D: Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol Evol 2001, 16:372-380.
• [11]Gerhardt HC: Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim Behav 1994, 47:959-969.
• [12]Goldberg EE, Lande R: Ecological and reproductive character displacement on an environmental gradient. Evolution 2006, 60:1344-1357.
• [13]Wilkins MR, Seddon N, Safran RJ: Evolutionary divergence in acoustic signals: causes and consequences. Trend Ecol Evol 2013, 28:156-166.
• [14]Marshall DC, Cooley JR: Reproductive character displacement and speciation in periodical cicadas, with a description of a new species, 13-year Magicicada neotredecim. Evolution 2000, 54:1313-1325.
• [15]Tregenza T, Prichard VL, Butlin RK: The originas of premating reproductive isolation: testing hypotheses in the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus. Evolution 2000, 54:1687-1698.
• [16]Panhuis TM, Butlin R, Zuk M, Tregenza T: Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 2001, 16:364-371.
• [17]Höbel G, Gerhardt HC: Reproductive character displacement in the acoustic communication system of green tree frogs (Hyla cinerea). Evolution 2003, 57:894-904.
• [18]Lemmon EM: Diversification of conspecific signals in sympatry: geographic overlap drives multidimensional reproductive character displacement in frogs. Evolution 2009, 63:1155-1170.
• [19]Wallin L: Divergent character displacement in the song of two allospecies: the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca, and the Collared Flycatcher Ficedula albicollis. Ibis 1986, 128:251-259.
• [20]Haavie J, Borge T, Bures S, Garamszegi LZ, Lampe HM, Moreno J, Qvarnström A, Török J, Sætre G-P: Flycatcher song in allopatry and sympatry – convergence, divergence and reinforcement. J Evol Biol 2004, 17:227-237.
• [21]Kirschel ANG, Blumstein DT, Smith TB: Character displacement of song and morphology in African Tinkerbirds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:8256-8261.
• [22]Warren BH, Bermingham E, Prys-Jones R, Thebaud C: Immigration, species radiation and extinction in a highly diverse songbird lineage: White-eyes on Indian Ocean islands. Mol Ecol 2006, 15:3769-3786.
• [23]Moyle RG, Filardi CE, Smith CE, Diamond J: Explosive Pleistocene diversification and hemispheric expansion of a “great speciator”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:1863-1868.
• [24]Melo M, Warren BH, Jones PJ: Rapid parallel evolution of aberrant traits in the diversification of the Gulf of Guinea white-eyes (Aves, Zosteropidae). Mol Ecol 2011, 20:4953-4967.
• [25]Oatley G, Voelker G, Crowe TM, Bowie RCK: A multi-locus phylogeny reveals a complex pattern of diversification related to climate and habitat heterogeneity in southern African white-eyes. Mol Phyl Evol 2012, 64:633-644.
• [26]Diamond JM: Flightlessness and fear of flight in island species. Nature 1981, 293:507-508.
• [27]Bertrand JAM, Bourgeois YXC, Delahaie B, Duval T, Garcia-Jiminez R, Cornuault J, Heeb P, Mila B, Pujol B, Thebaud C: Extremely reduced dispersal and gene flow in an island bird. Heredity 2014, 112:190-196.
• [28]Clegg SM, Francesca D, Frentiu JK, Tavecchia KG, Owens IPF: 4000 years of phenotypic change in an island bird: heterogeneity of selection over three microevolutionary timescales. Evolution 2008, 62:2393-2410.
• [29]Gavrilets S: Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 2000, 403:886-889.
• [30]Redman N, Stevenson T, Fanshawe J: Birds of the Horn of Africa: Ethiopia, Eritrea, Djibouti, Somalia, and Socotra. 2009, 488. [Princeten Field Guide]
• [31]Gow JL, Peichel CL, Taylor EB: Ecological selection against hybrids in natural populations of sympatric threespine sticklebacks. J Evol Biol 2007, 20:2173-2180.
• [32]Naisbit RE, Jiggins CD, Mallet J: Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 2001, 268:1849-1854.
• [33]Robertson BC: Vocal mate recognition in a monogamous, flock-forming bird, the silvereye Zosterops lateralis. Anim Behav 1996, 1996:303-311.
• [34]Kondo N, Watanabe S: Contact calls: Information and social function. Jap Psyc Res 2009, 51:197-208.
• [35]Habel JC, Cox S, Gassert F, Meyer J, Lens L: Population genetics of four East African Mountain White-eye congeners. Conserv Genet 2013, 14:1019-1028.
• [36]Borghesio L, Ndanganga PK: Threatened birds of Kenya 11: Kulal White-eye. Kenya Birds 1999, 7:75-77.
• [37]Baker MC: Silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis) song differentiation in an island-mainland comparison: analyses of a complex cultural trait. Wilson J Ornithology 2012, 124:454-466.
• [38]Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W: Evolution ofintraspecific variation in the advertisement call of a cricket frog. Biol J Linn Soc 1991, 44:249-271.
• [39]Ryan MJ, Rand AS, Weigt LA: Allozyme and advertisement call variation in the Tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Evolution 1996, 50:2435-2453.
• [40]Irwin DE: Song variation in an avian ring species. Evolution 2000, 54:998-1010.
• [41]Cole JA: Clinal variation explainstaxonomic discepancy in the calling songs of shield-back katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Tettigoniinae: Aglaothorax). Biol J Linn Soc 2010, 101:910-921.
• [42]Weir JT, Wheatcroft D: A latitudinal gradient in rates of evolution of avian syllable diversity and song length. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 278:1713-1720.
• [43]Weir JT, Wheatcroft D, Price T: The role of ecological constraint in driving the evolution of avian song frequency across a latitudinal gradient. Evolution 2012, 66:2773-2783.
• [44]Beltman JB, Haccou P, Cate C: The impact of learning foster species’ song on the evolution of specialist avian brood parasitism. Behav Ecol 2003, 14:917-923.
• [45]Gee JM: No species barrier by call in an avian hybrid zone between California and Gambel’s quail (Callipepla californica and C. Gambelii). Biol J Linn Soc 2005, 86:253-264.
• [46]Tobias JA, Cornwallis CK, Derryberry EP, Claramunt S, Brumfield RT, Seeon N: Species coexistence and the dynamics of phenotypic evolution in adaptive radiation. Nature 2013, 506:359-363.
• [47]Chek AA, Bogart JP, Lougheed SC: Mating signal partitioning in multi-species assemblages: a null model test using frogs. Ecol Let 2003, 6:235-247.
• [48]Fouquette MJ Jr: Speciation in chorus frogs. I. Reproductive character displacement in the Pseudacris nigrita complex. Sys Biol 1975, 24:16-23.
• [49]Taylor SA, White TA, Hochachka WM, Ferretti V, Curry RL, Lovette I: Climate-mediated movement of an avian hybrid zone. Current Biol 2014, 24:671-676.
• [50]Milá B, Warren BH, Heeb P, Thébaud C: The geographic scale of diversification on islands: genetic and morphological divergence at a very small spatial scale in the Mascarene grey white-eye (Aves: Zosterops borbonicus). BMC Evol Biol 2010, 10:158. BioMed Central Full Text
• [51]Mulwa RK, Bennun LA, Ogol CKPO, Lens L: Population status and distribution of Taita White-eye Zosterops silvanus in the fragmented forests of Taita Hills and Mount Kasigau, Kenya. Bird Conserv Int 2007, 17:141-150.
• [52]Borghesio L, Laiolo P: Habitat use and feeding ecology of Kulal White-eye Zosterops kulalensis. Bird Conserv Int 2004, 14:11-24.
• [53]Boersma PPG: Praat - a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 2002, 5:341-345.
• [54]Jackson AL, Inger R, Parnell AC, Bearhop S: Comparing isotopic niche width among and within communities: SIBER – Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses in R. J Anim Ecol 2011, 80:595-602.
• [55]Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD: PAST 3.0: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeont Electr 2001, 4:1-9.