期刊论文详细信息
BMC Health Services Research
Provider cost analysis supports results-based contracting out of maternal and newborn health services: an evidence-based policy perspective
Atif Riaz2  Shehla Zaidi1  Hassan Fazli2  Shiraz Shaikh2  Peter Hatcher2 
[1] Women & Child Health Division, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan;Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
关键词: Maternal and newborn health;    Provider cost;    Contracting out;   
Others  :  1092096
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-459
 received in 2013-11-29, accepted in 2014-09-09,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

There is dearth of evidence on provider cost of contracted out services particularly for Maternal and Newborn Health (MNH). The evidence base is weak for policy makers to estimate resources required for scaling up contracting. This paper ascertains provider unit costs and expenditure distribution at contracted out government primary health centers to inform the development of optimal resource envelopes for contracting out MNH services.

Methods

This is a case study of provider costs of MNH services at two government Rural Health Centers (RHCs) contracted out to a non-governmental organization in Pakistan. It reports on four selected Basic Emergency Obstetrical and Newborn Care (BEmONC) services provided in one RHC and six Comprehensive Emergency Obstetrical and Newborn Care (CEmONC) services in the other. Data were collected using staff interviews and record review to compile resource inputs and service volumes, and analyzed using the CORE Plus tool. Unit costs are based on actual costs of MNH services and are calculated for actual volumes in 2011 and for volumes projected to meet need with optimal resource inputs.

Results

The unit costs per service for actual 2011 volumes at the BEmONC RHC were antenatal care (ANC) visit USD$ 18.78, normal delivery US$ 84.61, newborn care US$ 16.86 and a postnatal care (PNC) visit US$ 13.86; and at the CEmONC RHC were ANC visit US$ 45.50, Normal Delivery US$ 148.43, assisted delivery US$ 167.43, C-section US$ 183.34, Newborn Care US$ 41.07, and PNC visit US$ 27.34. The unit costs for the projected volumes needed were lower due to optimal utilization of resources. The percentage distribution of expenditures at both RHCs was largest for salaries of technical staff, followed by salaries of administrative staff, and then operating costs, medicines, medical and diagnostic supplies.

Conclusions

The unit costs of MNH services at the two contracted out government rural facilities remain higher than is optimal, primarily due to underutilization. Provider cost analysis using standard treatment guideline (STG) based service costing frameworks should be applied across a number of health facilities to calculate the cost of services and guide development of evidence based resource envelopes and performance based contracting.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Hatcher et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150128180330335.pdf 172KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Hausler HP, Sinanovic E, Kumaranayake L, Naidoo P, Schoeman H, Karpakis B, Godfrey-Faussett P: Costs of measures to control tuberculosis/HIV in public primary care facilities in Cape Town, South Africa. Bull World Health Organ 2006, 84(7):528-536.
  • [2]Castañeda-Orjuela C, Romero M, Arce P, Resch S, Janusz CB, Toscano CM, De la Hoz-Restrepo F: Using standardized tools to improve immunization costing data for program planning: the cost of the Colombian expanded program on immunization. Vaccine 2013, 31(Suppl 3):C72-C79.
  • [3]Khan A, Zaman S: Costs of vaginal delivery and Caesarean section at a tertiary level public hospital in Islamabad, Pakistan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010, 10(1):2. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [4]Levin A, Dmytraczenko T, McEuen M, Ssengooba F, Mangani R, Van Dyck G: Costs of maternal health care services in three anglophone African countries. Int J Health Plann Manage 2003, 18(1):3-22.
  • [5]Loevinsohn B, Harding A: Buying results? Contracting for health service delivery in developing countries. Lancet 2005, 366(9486):676-681.
  • [6]Liu X, Hotchkiss DR, Bose S: The effectiveness of contracting-out primary health care services in developing countries: a review of the evidence. Health Policy Plan 2008, 23(1):1-13.
  • [7]Loevinsohn B, Couffinhal A, Pande A: Contracting-in management to strengthen publicly financed primary health services: the experience of Punjab, Pakistan. Health Policy 2009, 91(1):17-23.
  • [8]Martinez J, Pearson M, England R, Donoghue M, Lucas H, Khan MS, Haq B, Hayat M, Moinuddin Qureshi H, Rehman A, Jogezai M: Third-Party Evaluation of the PPHI in Pakistan. Islamabad: DFId-HLSP, Technical Resource Facility and SOSEC; 2010.
  • [9]Zaidi S, Rabbani F, Riaz A, Pradhan N, Hatcher P: Improvement in Access and Equity for Maternal and Newborn Health Services: Comparative Advantages of Contracted out versus Non-Contracted Facilities. Islamabad: Research and Advocacy Fund, British Council; 2013.
  • [10]Baloch SK, Imdad MA, Aneela KS: Frequency of second stage intervention and its outcome in relation with instrumental vaginal delivery versus caesarean section. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008, 20(1):87-90.
  • [11]Bilal SN, Farhat Y, Shahnaz A: Frequency and indications of cesarean section in a tertiary care maternity unit. J Postgrad Med Inst (Peshawar - Pakistan) 2005, 19:4.
  • [12]Qazi GR, Akhtar S: Obstetrical correlates of the first time cesarean section, compared with the repeated cesarean section. JCPSP 2007, 17(10):611.
  • [13]Mogyorosy Z, Smith P: The Main Methodological Issues in Costing Health Care Services: a Literature Review. UK: Centre for Health Economics, University of York; 2005. [Working paper] Accessed: January 20, 2012: http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/researchpapers/rp7_Methodological_issues_in_costing_health_care_services.pdf webcite
  • [14]Collins D, Jarrah Z, Gupta P: Cost and Funding Projections for the Minimum Package of Activities for Health Centers: Ministry Of Health, Royal Government of Cambodia. Arlington, Va., USA: Basic Support for Institutionalizing Child Survival (USAID/BASICS) for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID); 2009. Accessed: February 10, 2012. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnadr452.pdf webcite
  • [15]Collins D, Jarrah Z, Gupta P: Cost and revenue comparisons for a Sample of Contracted and Non-contracted Health Centers, Ministry of Health, Royal Government of Cambodia . Arlington, Va, USA; 2009. Accessed: February 10, 2012. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnadr453.pdf webcite
  • [16]Collins D, Jarrah Z: Costing the basic package of health services at clinics and health centres in liberia: Rebuilding Basic Health Services Project (RBHS). USAID 2009. Accessed: February 10, 2012. http://www.mohsw.gov.lr/documents/Costing_Report_Liberia_BPHS_7Aug09.pdf webcite
  • [17]World Health Organization: Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth: Pregnancy, Childbirth, Postpartum and Newborn Care; a Guide for Essential Practice. Geneva: Who; 2003.
  • [18]Health Sector Reform Unit, Department of Health Government of Sindh: Karachi: Health Sector Strategy Sindh. 2012. Accessed: February 01, 2012. http://www.trfpakistan.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=M7wrtgDtju8%3d&tabid=2403 webcite
  • [19]Dalaba MA, Akweongo P, Savadogo G, Saronga H, Williams J, Sauerborn R, Dong H, Loukanova S: Cost of maternal health services in selected primary care centers in Ghana: a step down allocation approach. BMC Health Serv Res 2013, 13:287. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [20]Sarowar MG, Medin E, Gazi R, Koehlmoos TP, Rehnberg C, Saifi R, Bhuiya A, Khan J: Calculation of costs of pregnancy-and puerperium-related care: experience from a hospital in a low-income country. J Health Popul Nutr 2010, 28:264.
  • [21]Von Both C, Jahn A, Fleba S: Costing maternal health services in South Tanzania: a case study from Mtwara Urban District. Eur J Health Econ 2008, 9:103-115.
  • [22]Collins DH, Jarrah Z, Ndizeye C, Cros M: The cost of scaling up primary health-care services– comparisons from studies in six countries: economic research using systematic sampling. Lancet 2013, 381:S30.
  • [23]Leonard KH RK, Anabo A, Mongcopa CJ: Bangladesh: urban primary health care project. Asian Dev Bank 2008. Available from: http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/evaluation-document/35676/files/in212-08.pdf webcite
  • [24]Baqui AH, Rosecrans AM, Williams EK, Agrawal PK, Ahmed S, Darmstadt GL, Kumar V, Kiran U, Panwar D, Ahuja RC, Srivastava VK, Black RE, Santosham M: NGO facilitation of a government community-based maternal and neonatal health programme in rural India: improvements in equity. Health Policy Plan 2008, 23(4):234-243.
  • [25]Bhushan I, Bloom E, Clingingsmith D, Hong R, King E, Kremer M, Loevinsohn B, Schwartz JB: Contracting for health: evidence from Cambodia. Brookings Inst 2007. Available from: http://faculty.weatherhead.case.edu/clingingsmith/cambodia13JUN07.pdf webcite
  • [26]Danel I, La Forgia G: Contracting for basic health care in rural Guatemala: comparison of the performance of three delivery models. In Health Systems Innovations in Central America: Lessons and Impact of New Approaches. Washington, D.C: World Bank Working Paper No. 57, The World Bank; 2005:49-88.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:12次 浏览次数:23次