期刊论文详细信息
BMC Health Services Research
Which need characteristics influence healthcare service utilization in home care arrangements in Germany?
Andreas Büscher1  Sabine Metzing3  Andreas Faatz2  Jörg große Schlarmann3  Lea Beckmann3  Suzi C Turner4  Lena Dorin3 
[1]Nursing Science, Faculty of Business Administration and Social Sciences, German Network for Quality Development in Nursing (DNQP), University of Applied Sciences Osnabrück, Caprivistraße 30a, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany
[2]Quantitative Methods, Faculty of Business Administration and Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Osnabrück, Caprivistraße 30a, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany
[3]Department of Nursing Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Stockumer Str. 10, 58453 Witten, Germany
[4]Master of Public Health in Epidemiology Student, Georgia Southern University, 1332 Southern Dr, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA
关键词: Long-term care services;    Family caregiving;    Family caregivers;    Elderly;    Needs;    Home care arrangements;    Long-term care;    Service utilization;   
Others  :  1130886
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-233
 received in 2013-10-22, accepted in 2014-05-16,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

We see a growing number of older adults receiving long-term care in industrialized countries. The Healthcare Utilization Model by Andersen suggests that individual need characteristics influence utilization. The purpose of this study is to analyze correlations between need characteristics and service utilization in home care arrangements.

Methods

1,152 respondents answered the questionnaire regarding their integration of services in their current and future care arrangements. Care recipients with high long-term care needs answered the questionnaire on their own, the family caregiver assisted the care recipient in answering the questions, or the family caregiver responded to the questionnaire on behalf of the care recipient. They were asked to rank specific needs according to their situation. We used descriptive statistics and regression analysis.

Results

Respondents are widely informed about services. Nursing services and counseling are the most used services. Short-term care and guidance and training have a high potential for future use. Day care, self-help groups, and mobile services were the most frequently rejected services in our survey. Women use more services than men and with rising age utilization increases. Long waiting times and bad health of the primary caregiver increases the chance of integrating services into the home care arrangements.

Conclusion

The primary family caregiver has a high impact on service utilization. This indicates that the whole family should be approached when offering services. Professionals should react upon the specific needs of care dependents and their families.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Dorin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150228094426636.pdf 291KB PDF download
Figure 1. 29KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]European Commission: The 2012 ageing report. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2012/pdf/ee-2012-2_en.pdf webcite
  • [2]European Commission: Ageing. 2013. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ageing/policy/index_en.htm webcite
  • [3]Rosenfeld P, Russell D: A review of factors influencing utilization of home and community-based long-term care: trends and implications to the nursing workforce. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 2012, 12(2):72-80.
  • [4]Wallace SP, Levy-Storms L, Kington RS, Andersen RM: The persistence of race and ethnicity in the use of long-term care. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1998, 53(2):104-112.
  • [5]Büscher A, Wingenfeld K, Schaeffer D: Determining eligibility for long-term care – lessons from Germany. Int J Integr Care 2011, 11:1-9.
  • [6]Federal Ministry for Health: Levels of care. 2013. http://www.bmg.bund.de/pflege/pflegebeduerftigkeit/pflegestufen.html webcite
  • [7]Schwarzkopf L, Menn P, Leidl R, Graessel E, Holle R: Are community-living and institutionalized dementia patients cared for differently? Evidence on service utilization and costs of care from German insurance claims data. BMC Health Serv Res 2013, 13(2):1-11.
  • [8]
  • [9]Hoover M, Rotermann M: Seniors’ use of and unmet needs for home care. Component of Statistics Canada Catalogue. Health Rep 2012, 23(4):3-8.
  • [10]Destatis: German Nursing statistics. 2013. http://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Gesundheit/Pflege/LaenderAmbulantePflegedienste5224101119004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile webcite
  • [11]Herrera A, Font J, Gori C, Maio A, Patxot C, Pickard L, Pozzi A, Rothgang H, Wittenberg R: European Study of Long-Term Care Expenditure. European Commission, Employment and Social Affairs; 2003. http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/soc-prot/healthcare/ltc_study_en.pdf webcite
  • [12]Chung MH, Hsu N, Wang YC, Lin HC, Huang YL, Amidon RL, Kao S: Factors affecting the long-term care preferences of the elderly in Taiwan. Geriatr Nurs 2008, 29(5):293-301.
  • [13]Kane R: Long-term care and a good quality of life: bringing them closer together. Gerontologist 2001, 41(3):293-304.
  • [14]Dorin L, Büscher A: Home care arrangements for people with severe care needs: preferences, expectations, and decision. Bertelsmann Foundation 2012. English abstract: http://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/cps/rde/xbcr/SID-DA197BF0-06A50C9E/bst/Abstract_Dorin_GeMo-HP.pdf webcite
  • [15]Babitsch B, Gohl D, von Lengerke T: Re-visiting Andersen’s behavioral model of health services Use: a systematic review of studies from 1998–2011. Psychosoc Med 2012, 9:1-15.
  • [16]Andersen R: Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995, 36:1-10.
  • [17]Schomerus G, Appel K, Meffert JP, Luppa M, Andersen MR, Grabe JH, Baumeister ES: Personality-related factors as predictors of help-seeking for depression: a population-based study applying the behavioral model of health services use. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2013, 48(11):1809-1817.
  • [18]Andersen R, Newman J: Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 1973, 51(1):1-28.
  • [19]Bradley EH, McGraw SA, Curry L, Buckser A, King KL, Kasl SV, Andersen R: Expanding the Andersen model: the role of psychosocial factors in long-term care Use. Health Serv Res 2002, 37(5):1221-1242.
  • [20]Condelius A, Edberg AK, Hallberg IR, Jakobsson U: Utilization of medical healthcare among people receiving long-term care at home or in special accommodation. Scand J Caring Sci 2010, 24:404-413.
  • [21]Chang HT, Lin MH, Hwang I, Lai HY, Ho MM, Lin CH, Chen CK, Hwang SJ: Utilization and patterns of community healthcare services for senior residents in long-term care facilities in Tawain: A nationwide study. J Chin Med Assoc 2013, 76:42-47.
  • [22]Genet N, GW Boerma W, Kringos D, Bouman A, Francke A, Fagerstrom C, Melchiorre M, Greco C, Deville W: Home care in Europe: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 2011, 11:207-214. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [23]Scharlach EA, Giunta N, Chow J, Lehning A: Racial and ethnic variations in caregiver service use. J Aging Health 2008, 20(3):326-346.
  • [24]Rose E, Mallinson K, Gerson L: Mastery, burden, and areas of concern among family caregivers of mentally ill persons. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2006, 20(1):41-51.
  • [25]Casado BL, van Vulpen KS, Davis SL: Unmet needs for home and community-based services among frail older americans and their caregivers. J Aging Health 2011, 23:529-553.
  • [26]Hong S: Understanding Patterns of Service Utilization among Informal Caregivers of Community Older Adults. Gerontologist 2010, 50(1):87-99.
  • [27]Corbin J, Strauss A: Making arrangements. The key to home care. In The Home Care Experience. Edited by Sage Publications, Gubrium JF, Sankar A. Newbury Park, London, New Dehli: Ethnography and Policy; 1990:59-74.
  • [28]Büscher A: Negotiating helpful action. A substantive theory on the relationship between formal and informal care. Tampere University Press; 2007. https://tampub.uta.fi/handle/10024/67689 webcite
  • [29]van Exel J, de Graaf G, Brouwer W: Give me a break! Informal caregiver attitudes towards respite care. Health Policy 2008, 88:73-87.
  • [30]Schneekloth U: Entwicklungstrends und Perspektiven in der häuslichen Pflege. Zentrale Ergebnisse der Studie Möglichkeiten und Grenzen selbständiger Lebensführung (MuG III). Z Gerontol Geriat 2006, 39:405-412.
  • [31]Lee T, Kovner CT, Mezey MD, Ko IS: Factors influencing long-term home care utilization by the older population: implications for targeting. Public Health Nurs 2001, 18(6):443-449.
  • [32]Rothgang H, Müller R, Unger R, Weiß C, Wolter A: BARMER GEK Pflegereport 2012. Schwerpunktthema: Kosten bei Pflegebedürftigkeit. Siegburg: BARMER GEK; 2012.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:13次 浏览次数:43次