期刊论文详细信息
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Head-Eye movement control tests in patients with chronic neck pain; Inter-observer reliability and discriminative validity
Jan Kool2  Hannu Luomajoki2  André Meichtry2  Jutta Affolter Helbling1  Eveline Della Casa2 
[1] Provital Physiotherapy& GRAVITYtraining, Büelstrasse 29, 8132, Egg, Switzerland;Zurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland
关键词: Assessment;    Discriminative validity;    Reliability;    Whiplash associated disorders;    Chronic neck pain;    Head-eye movement control;   
Others  :  1128914
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-15-16
 received in 2013-06-12, accepted in 2014-01-07,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Head-eye movement control deficit is an identified problem in patients with chronic neck pain, particularly in cases of whiplash associated disorders (WAD). To date, there is no evidence concerning the reliability and validity of visually assessed active head-eye movement control tests. Therefore, the objectives of the present cross-sectional study were, a) to develop a test battery; and b) to investigate inter-observer reliability and discriminative validity in patients with chronic neck pain compared to healthy controls.

Methods

The study was conducted at two physiotherapy clinics in Switzerland. Ethics Committee approval was obtained. Ten active head-eye coordination tests, on 23 patients with chronic neck pain and associated symptoms and 19 healthy controls, were videotaped. The tests included eye movements in the neutral head position and 45° relative neck rotation, gaze stability and sequential head-eye movements. All tests were performed in the sitting and standing positions. Two blinded physiotherapists independently rated the randomized videos. Performance was rated as "negative", "moderately positive" or "clearly positive". Weighted kappa (wK) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to investigate inter-observer reliability. Good reliability was defined as wK >0.5 with a lower boundary of 95% CI >0.2. Odds ratios (to define cut-off points) and the distribution of the classificator, numbers of positive tests, were calculated.

Results

Three out of ten tests showed "excellent" (wK 0.82 to 0.86), five out of ten tests showed "substantial" (wK 0.69 to 0.79) and two out of ten tests showed "moderate" (wK 0.54 to 0.59) reliability. Results were comparable in the sitting and standing positions. On average, three out of five tests were rated positive in patients and one out of five tests was rated positive in healthy controls. An odds ratio of 13.3 to 18.6 was obtained using ≥2/5 tests as a cut-off point.

Conclusion

Visual assessment by physiotherapists of head-eye movement control tests is reliable. The test battery is able to discriminate between patients with chronic neck pain and healthy controls. There were no differences in performance between the sitting and standing positions. The test battery can therefore be reduced to five tests. Further research is needed to identify the test-retest stability and responsiveness.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Della Casa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150225131524719.pdf 1653KB PDF download
Figure 10. 81KB Image download
Figure 9. 80KB Image download
Figure 8. 71KB Image download
Figure 7. 72KB Image download
Figure 6. 68KB Image download
Figure 5. 71KB Image download
Figure 4. 69KB Image download
Figure 3. 67KB Image download
Figure 2. 92KB Image download
Figure 1. 88KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J: The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2006, 15(6):834-848.
  • [2]Haldeman S, Carroll L, Cassidy JD, Schubert J, Nygren A: The bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders: executive summary. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009, 32(2 Suppl):S7-S9.
  • [3]Treleaven J, Jull G, Grip H: Head eye co-ordination and gaze stability in subjects with persistent whiplash associated disorders. Man Ther 2011, 16(3):252-257.
  • [4]Gimse R, Bjørgen IA, Straume A: Driving skills after whiplash. Scand J Psychol 1997, 38(3):165-170.
  • [5]Gimse R, Tjell C, Bjørgen IA, Saunte C: Disturbed eye movements after whiplash due to injuries to the posture control system. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1996, 18(2):178-186.
  • [6]Hildingsson C, Wenngren BI, Bring G, Toolanen G: Oculomotor problems after cervical spine injury. Acta Orthop Scand 1989, 60(5):513-516.
  • [7]Hildingsson C, Wenngren BI, Toolanen G: Eye motility dysfunction after soft-tissue injury of the cervical spine. A controlled, prospective study of 38 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1993, 64(2):129-132.
  • [8]Wenngren BI, Pettersson K, Lowenhielm G, Hildingsson C: Eye motility and auditory brainstem response dysfunction after whiplash injury. Acta Otolaryngol 2002, 122(3):276-283.
  • [9]Yahia A: Chronic neck pain and vertigo: is a true balance disorder present? Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2009, 52(7–8):556-567.
  • [10]Humphreys K, Irgens P: The effect of a rehabilitation exercise program on head repositioning accuracy and reported levels of pain in chronic neck pain subjects. J Whiplash Relat Disord 2002, 1:99-112.
  • [11]Heikkila H, Wenngren B: Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility, active range of cervical motion, and oculomotor function in patients with whiplash injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998, 79(9):1089-1094.
  • [12]Revel M, Andre-Deshays C, Minguet M: Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with cervical pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991, 72(5):288-291.
  • [13]Peterson BW: Current approaches and future directions to understanding control of head movement. Prog Brain Res 2004, 143:369-381.
  • [14]Armstrong B, McNair P, Taylor D: Head and neck position sense. Sports Med 2008, 38(2):101-117.
  • [15]Kristjansson E, Oddsdottir GL: "The Fly": a new clinical assessment and treatment method for deficits of movement control in the cervical spine: reliability and validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010, 35(23):E1298-E1305.
  • [16]Tjell C, Rosenhall U: Smooth pursuit neck torsion test: a specific test for cervical dizziness. Am J Otol 1998, 19(1):76-81.
  • [17]Grip H, Jull G, Treleaven J: Head eye co-ordination using simultaneous measurement of eye in head and head in space movements: potential for use in subjects with a whiplash injury. J Clin Monit Comput 2009, 23(1):31-40.
  • [18]Boyling JD, Jull G: Grieve’s Modern Manual Therapy, The Vertebral Column. Third edition. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2004.
  • [19]Jull G, Sterling M, Falla D, Treleaven J, O’Leary S: Whiplash, Headache, and Neckpain. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingston; 2008.
  • [20]Treleaven J: Sensorimotor disturbances in neck disorders affecting postural stability, head and eye movement control. Man Ther 2008, 13(1):2-11.
  • [21]Luomajoki H, Kool J, de Bruin ED, Airaksinen O: Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007, 8:90. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [22]Vernon H, Mior S: The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991, 14(7):409-415.
  • [23]Vernon H: The neck disability index: state-of-the-art, 1991–2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008, 31(7):491-502.
  • [24]Swanenburg J, Humphreys K, Langenfeld A, Brunner F, Wirth B: Validity and reliability of a German version of the neck disability index (NDI-G). Man Ther 2013. in press
  • [25]Teng CC, Chai H, Lai DM, Wang SF: Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in young and middle-aged adults with or without a history of mild neck pain. Man Ther 2007, 12(1):22-28.
  • [26]Cinelli M, Patla A, Stuart B: Age-related differences during a gaze reorientation task while standing or walking on a treadmill. Exp Brain Res 2008, 185(1):157-164.
  • [27]Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33(1):159-174.
  • [28]Sjölander P, Michaelson P, Jaric S, Djupsjöbacka M: Sensorimotor disturbances in chronic neck pain–range of motion, peak velocity, smoothness of movement, and repositioning acuity. Man Ther 2008, 13(2):122-131.
  • [29]Humphreys BK: Cervical outcome measures: testing for postural stability and balance. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008, 31(7):540-546.
  • [30]Treleaven J, Clamaron-Cheers C, Jull G: Does the region of pain influence the presence of sensorimotor disturbances in neck pain disorders? Man Ther 2011, 16(6):636-640.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:48次 浏览次数:5次