期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Green space, social inequalities and neonatal mortality in France
Severine Deguen2  Denis Zmirou-Navier3  Marcello Gelormini1  Benoît Lalloué3  Cindy M Padilla2  Wahida Kihal-Talantikite1 
[1] EHESP School of Public Health–Rennes, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France;INSERM U1085-IRSET – Research Institute of Environmental and Occupational Health, Rennes, France;Lorraine University Medical School–Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy-France, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France
关键词: Spatial analysis;    Infant mortality;    Neighborhood deprivation;    Greenness level;   
Others  :  1137843
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2393-13-191
 received in 2013-03-27, accepted in 2013-10-07,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Few studies have considered using environmental amenities to explain social health inequalities.

Nevertheless, Green spaces that promote good health may have an effect on socioeconomic health inequalities. In developed countries, there is considerable evidence that green spaces have a beneficial effect on the health of urban populations and recent studies suggest they can have a positive effect on pregnancy outcomes. To investigate the relationship between green spaces and the spatial distribution of infant mortality taking account neighborhood deprivation levels.

Methods

The study took place in Lyon metropolitan area, France. All infant deaths that occurred between 2000 and 2009 were geocoded at census block level. Each census block was assigned greenness and socioeconomic deprivation levels. The spatial–scan statistic was used to identify high risk cluster of infant mortality according to these neighborhood characteristics.

Results

The spatial distribution of infant mortality was not random with a high risk cluster in the south east of the Lyon metropolitan area (p<0.003). This cluster disappeared (p=0.12) after adjustment for greenness level and socioeconomic deprivation, suggesting that these factors explain part of the spatial distribution of infant mortality. These results are discussed using a conceptual framework with 3 hypothetical pathways by which green spaces may have a beneficial effect on adverse pregnancy outcomes: (i) a psychological pathway, (ii) a physiological disruption process and (iii) an environmental pathway.

Conclusions

These results add some evidence to the hypothesis that there is a relationship between access to green spaces and pregnancy outcomes but further research is required to confirm this.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Kihal-Talantikite et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150318032623434.pdf 1503KB PDF download
Figure 3. 66KB Image download
Figure 2. 58KB Image download
Figure 1. 49KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Mathews TJ, MacDorman MF: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2008 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2010, 60:5.
  • [2]Kurinczuk JJ, Hollowell J, Boyd PA, Oakley L, Brocklehurst P, Gray R: Inequalities in infant mortality project briefing paper 4. The contribution of congenital anomalies to infant mortality. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit; 2010.
  • [3]Kramer MS: Intrauterine growth and gestational duration determinants. Pediatrics 1987, 80:502-511.
  • [4]Borrell C, Cirera E, Ricart M, Pasarín MI, Salvador J: Social inequalities in perinatal mortality in a Southern European city. Eur J Epidemiol 2003, 18:5-13.
  • [5]Singh GK, Kogan MD: Persistent socioeconomic disparities in infant, neonatal, and postneonatal mortality rates in the United States, 1969–2001. Pediatrics 2007, 119:e928-e939.
  • [6]Calling S, Li X, Sundquist J, Sundquist K: Socioeconomic inequalities and infant mortality of 46,470 preterm infants born in Sweden between 1992 and 2006. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2011, 25:357-365.
  • [7]Janevic T, Stein CR, Savitz DA, Kaufman JS, Mason SM, Herring AH: Neighborhood deprivation and adverse birth outcomes among diverse ethnic groups. Ann Epidemiol 2010, 20:445-451.
  • [8]O’Campo P, Burke JG, Culhane J, Elo IT, Eyster J, Holzman C, Messer LC, Kaufman JS, Laraia BA: Neighborhood deprivation and preterm birth among non-Hispanic Black and White women in eight geographic areas in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 2008, 167:155-163.
  • [9]Auger N, Giraud J, Daniel M: The joint influence of area income, income inequality, and immigrant density on adverse birth outcomes: a population-based study. BMC Public Health 2009, 9:237. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [10]Pickett KE, Ahern JE, Selvin S, Abrams B: Neighborhood socioeconomic status, maternal race and preterm delivery: a case–control study. Ann Epidemiol 2002, 12:410-418.
  • [11]Luo Z-C, Wilkins R, Kramer MS: Effect of neighbourhood income and maternal education on birth outcomes: a population-based study. CMAJ 2006, 174:1415-1420.
  • [12]Roberts EM: Neighborhood social environments and the distribution of low birthweight in Chicago. Am J Public Health 1997, 87(4):597-603.
  • [13]Agyemang C, Vrijkotte TGM, Droomers M, Van der Wal MF, Bonsel GJ, Stronks K: The effect of neighbourhood income and deprivation on pregnancy outcomes in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009, 63:755-760.
  • [14]Kaufman JS, Dole N, Savitz DA, Herring AH: Modeling community-level effects on preterm birth. Ann Epidemiol 2003, 13:377-384.
  • [15]Carbajal-Arroyo L, Miranda-Soberanis V, Medina-Ramón M, Rojas-Bracho L, Tzintzun G, Solís-Gutiérrez P, Méndez-Ramírez I, Hurtado-Díaz M, Schwartz J, Romieu I: Effect of PM(10) and O(3) on infant mortality among residents in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area: a case-crossover analysis, 1997–2005. J Epidemiol Community Health 2011, 65:715-721.
  • [16]Genereux M, Auger N, Goneau M, Daniel M: Neighbourhood socioeconomic status, maternal education and adverse birth outcomes among mothers living near highways. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008, 62:695-700.
  • [17]Woodruff TJ, Parker JD, Kyle AD, Schoendorf KC: Disparities in exposure to air pollution during pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect 2003, 111:942-946.
  • [18]Passchier-Vermeer W, Passchier WF: Noise exposure and public health. 2000, 123-131.
  • [19]Guidelines for Community Noise. Geneva: WHO; 1999. Available at: http://www.who.int/docstore/peh/noise/guidelines2.html webcite
  • [20]Mitchell R, Popham F: Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet 2008, 372:1655-1660.
  • [21]Lee ACK, Maheswaran R: The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. J Public Health (Oxf) 2011, 33:212-222.
  • [22]Bowler DE, Buyung-Ali LM, Knight TM, Pullin AS: A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:456. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [23]Maas J, Verheij RA, Vriesde S, Spreeuwenberg P, Schellevis FG, Groenewegen PP: Morbidity is related to a green living environment. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009, 63:967-973.
  • [24]Bedimo-Rung AL, Mowen AJ, Cohen DA: The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: a conceptual model. Am J Prev Med 2005, 28:159-168.
  • [25]Vinikoor-Imler LC, Messer LC, Evenson KR, Laraia BA: Neighborhood conditions are associated with maternal health behaviors and pregnancy outcomes. Soc Sci Med 2011, 73:1302-1311.
  • [26]Pretty J, Griffin M, Sellens M, Pretty C: Green exercise: complementary roles of nature, exercise and diet in physical and emotional well-being and implications for public health policy. Colchester: University of Essex, CES Occasional paper; 2003.
  • [27]Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC: Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 2006, 4:115-123.
  • [28]Paoletti E, Bardelli T, Giovannini G, Pecchioli L: Air quality impact of an urban park over time. Procedia Environmental Sciences 2011, 4:10-16.
  • [29]Greater London Authority: Health Issues in Planning: Best Practice Guidance. London: Greater London Authority; 2007.
  • [30]Maas J, Van Dillen SME, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP: Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health Place 2009, 15:586-595.
  • [31]Ward Thompson C, Roe J, Aspinall P, Mitchell R, Clow A, Miller D: More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: Evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landscape and Urban Planning 2012, 105:221-229.
  • [32]Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, de Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P: Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Community Health 2006, 60:587-592.
  • [33]Sugiyama T, Leslie E, Giles-Corti B, Owen N: Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships? J Epidemiol Community Health 2008, 62:e9.
  • [34]Hu Z, Liebens J, Rao KR: Linking stroke mortality with air pollution, income, and greenness in northwest Florida: an ecological geographical study. Int J Health Geogr 2008, 7:20. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [35]Lachowycz K, Jones AP: Greenspace and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence. Obes Rev 2011, 12:e183-e189.
  • [36]Dadvand P, De Nazelle A, Figueras F, Basagaña X, Su J, Amoly E, Jerrett M, Vrijheid M, Sunyer J, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ: Green space, health inequality and pregnancy. Environ Int 2012, 40:110-115.
  • [37]Dadvand P, De Nazelle A, Triguero-Mas M, Schembari A, Cirach M, Amoly E, Figueras F, Basagaña X, Ostro B, Nieuwenhuijsen M: Surrounding greenness and exposure to air pollution during pregnancy: an analysis of personal monitoring data. Environ Health Perspect 2012, 120:1286-1290.
  • [38]Dadvand P, Sunyer J, Basagaña X, Ballester F, Lertxundi A, Fernández-Somoano A, Estarlich M, García-Esteban R, Mendez MA, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ: Surrounding greenness and pregnancy outcomes in four spanish birth cohorts. Environ Health Perspect 2012, 120:1481-1487.
  • [39]Donovan GH, Michael YL, Butry DT, Sullivan AD, Chase JM: Urban trees and the risk of poor birth outcomes. Health Place 2011, 17:390-393.
  • [40]Crawford D, Timperio A, Giles-Corti B, Ball K, Hume C, Roberts R, Andrianopoulos N, Salmon J: Do features of public open spaces vary according to neighbourhood socio-economic status? Health Place 2008, 14:889-893.
  • [41]Koohsari M: Access to public open space: is distribution equitable across different socio-economic areas. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering 2011, 5:67.
  • [42]Bambhroliya AB, Burau KD, Sexton K: Spatial analysis of county-level breast cancer mortality in Texas, Volume 2012. 2012, 959343.
  • [43]Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics. Available at: http://www.irdes.fr/EcoSante/RegionsEtDepartements.htm webcite
  • [44]Lalloué B, Monnez JM, Padilla C, Kihal W, Le Meur N, Zmirou-Navier D, Deguen S: A statistical procedure to create a neighborhood socioeconomic index for health inequalities analysis. International Journal for Equity in Health 2013, 12:21. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [45]Information Management Services, Inc: SaTScan: software for the spatial, temporal, and space-time scan statistics, version 6.0. 2005.
  • [46]Kulldorff M, Feuer EJ, Miller BA, Freedma LS: Breast Cancer Clusters in the Northeast United States: A Geographic Analysis. Am J Epidemiol 1997, 146:161-170.
  • [47]Kulldorff M: A spatial scan statistic. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 1997, 26:1481-1496.
  • [48]Dwass M: Modified Randomization Tests for Nonparametric Hypotheses. Ann. Math. Statist. 1957, 28:181-187.
  • [49]Melzer K, Schutz Y, Boulvain M, Kayser B: Physical activity and pregnancy: cardiovascular adaptations, recommendations and pregnancy outcomes. Sports Med 2010, 40:493-507.
  • [50]Kaplan R, Kaplan S: The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
  • [51]Hartig T, Evans GW, Jamner LD, Davis DS, Gärling T: Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of environmental psychology 2003, 23:109-123.
  • [52]Ulrich RS: Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. Human Behavior & Environment: Advances in Theory & Research 1983, 6:85-125.
  • [53]Ulrich R, Simons R, Losito B, Fiorito E, Miles M, Zelson M: Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1991, 11:201-230.
  • [54]Barton J, Pretty J: What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44:3947-3955.
  • [55]Roe J, Aspinall P: The restorative benefits of walking in urban and rural settings in adults with good and poor mental health. Health Place 2011, 17:103-113.
  • [56]Heinrichs M, Baumgartner T, Kirschbaum C, Ehlert U: Social support and oxytocin interact to suppress cortisol and subjective responses to psychosocial stress. Biol Psychiatry 2003, 54:1389-1398.
  • [57]Hartig T, Mang M, Evans GW: Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior 1991, 23:3-26.
  • [58]Ottosson J, Grahn P: A comparison of leisure time spent in a garden with leisure time spent indoors: on measures of restoration in residents in geriatric care. Landscape Research 2005, 30:23-55.
  • [59]Morishima HO, Yeh MN, James LS: Reduced uterine blood flow and fetal hypoxemia with acute maternal stress: experimental observation in the pregnant baboon. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979, 134:270-275.
  • [60]Schell LM, Gallo MV, Denham M, Ravenscroft J: Effects of pollution on human growth and development: an introduction. J Physiol Anthropol 2006, 25:103-112.
  • [61]Myers RE: Maternal psychological stress and fetal asphyxia: a study in the monkey. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975, 122:47-59.
  • [62]Myers RE: Production of fetal asphyxia by maternal psychological stress. Pavlov J Biol Sci 1977, 12:51-62.
  • [63]Hobel CJ: Stress and preterm birth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004, 47:856-880. discussion 881–882
  • [64]Pivarnik J, Chambliss H, Clapp J, Dugan S, Hatch M, Lovelady C, Mottola M, Williams M: Impact of physical activity during pregnancy and postpartum on chronic disease risk. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006, 38:989-1006.
  • [65]Yeo S, Steele NM, Chang MC, Leclaire SM, Ronis DL, Hayashi R: Effect of exercise on blood pressure in pregnant women with a high risk of gestational hypertensive disorders. J Reprod Med 2000, 45:293-298.
  • [66]Sorensen TK, Williams MA, Lee I-M, Dashow EE, Thompson ML, Luthy DA: Recreational physical activity during pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia. Hypertension 2003, 41:1273-1280.
  • [67]Xiong X, Mayes D, Demianczuk N, Olson DM, Davidge ST, Newburn-Cook C, Saunders LD: Impact of pregnancy-induced hypertension on fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999, 180:207-213.
  • [68]Xiong X, Demianczuk NN, Buekens P, Saunders LD: Association of preeclampsia with high birth weight for age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000, 183:148-155.
  • [69]Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M: Pre-eclampsia. The Lancet 2005, 365:785-799.
  • [70]Roberts JM, Redman CW: Pre-eclampsia: more than pregnancy-induced hypertension. Lancet 1993, 341:1447-1451.
  • [71]Tobias DK, Zhang C, Van Dam RM, Bowers K, Hu FB: Physical activity before and during pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2011, 34:223-229.
  • [72]Stothard KJ, Tennant PWG, Bell R, Rankin J: Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2009, 301:636-650.
  • [73]Evenson KR, Siega-Riz AM, Savitz DA, Leiferman JA, Thorp JM Jr: Vigorous leisure activity and pregnancy outcome. Epidemiology 2002, 13:653-659.
  • [74]Hedderson MM, Ferrara A, Sacks DA: Gestational diabetes mellitus and lesser degrees of pregnancy hyperglycemia: association with increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2003, 102:850-856.
  • [75]DaCosta D, Rippen N, Dritsa M, Ring A: Self-reported leisure-time physical activity during pregnancy and relationship to psychological well-being. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2003, 24:111-119.
  • [76]Poudevigne MS, O’Connor PJ: Physical activity and mood during pregnancy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005, 37:1374-1380.
  • [77]Seguin L, Potvin L, St-Denis M, Loiselle J: Chronic stressors, social support, and depression during pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1995, 85:583-589.
  • [78]Faisal-Cury A, Araya R, Zugaib M, Menezes PR: Common mental disorders during pregnancy and adverse obstetric outcomes. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2010, 31:229-235.
  • [79]Pien GW, Schwab RJ: Sleep disorders during pregnancy. Sleep 2004, 27:1405-1417.
  • [80]Lavin T, Higgins C, Metcalfe O, Jordan A: Health Effects of the Built Environment: A Review. The Institute of Public Health in Ireland 2006.
  • [81]LUC (Land and Use Consultants): Making the Links: Greenspace and Quality of Life. 2004, 91.
  • [82]Cardelino CA, Chameides W: Natural hydrocarbons, urbanization, and urban ozone. J Geophys Res 1990, 95(D9):13,971-13,979.
  • [83]Taha H: Modeling impacts of increased urban vegetation on ozone air quality in the South Coast Air Basin. Atmos Environ 1996, 20:3423-3430.
  • [84]Nowak D: The interactions between urban forests and global climate change. In Global climate change and the urban forest.  : GCRCC and Franklin Press. Appeaning, A; 2000:31-44.
  • [85]Nowark D: The effects of urban trees on air quality. Syracuse, NY: USDA Forest Service; 2002.
  • [86]Akbari H: Shade trees reduce building energy use and CO2 emissions from power plants. Environ Pollut 2002, 116(Suppl 1):S119-S126.
  • [87]Sram RJ, Binková B, Dejmek J, Bobak M: Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature. Environ Health Perspect 2005, 113:375-382.
  • [88]Hartikainen-Sorri AL, Sorri M, Anttonen HP, Tuimala R, Läärä E: Occupational noise exposure during pregnancy: a case control study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1988, 60:279-283.
  • [89]Mamelle N, Laumon B, Lazar P: Prematurity and occupational activity during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 1984, 119:309-322.
  • [90]Hartikainen AL, Sorri M, Anttonen H, Tuimala R, Läärä E: Effect of occupational noise on the course and outcome of pregnancy. Scand J Work Environ Health 1994, 20:444-450.
  • [91]Knipschild P, Meijer H, Sallé H: Aircraft noise and birth weight. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1981, 48:131-136.
  • [92]Greenspace Scotland: Health Impact Assessment of Greenspace: A guide. 2008.
  • [93]RCEP: The Urban Environment, Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. London: The Stationery Office; 2007.
  • [94]Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A, Öhrström E: Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 83:115-126.
  • [95]Richardson E, Pearce J, Mitchell R, Day P, Kingham S: The association between green space and cause-specific mortality in urban New Zealand: an ecological analysis of green space utility. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:240. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [96]Estabrooks PA, Lee RE, Gyurcsik NC: Resources for physical activity participation: does availability and accessibility differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status? Ann Behav Med 2003, 25:100-104.
  • [97]Talen E: The social equity of urban service distribution: an exploration of park access in Pueblo, Colorado and Macon, Georgia. Urban Geog 1997, 18:521-541.
  • [98]Timperio A, Ball K, Salmon J, Roberts R, Crawford D: Is availability of public open space equitable across areas? Health Place 2007, 13:335-340.
  • [99]Jones A, Hillsdon M, Coombes E: Greenspace access, use, and physical activity: understanding the effects of area deprivation. Prev Med 2009, 49:500-505.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:13次