Population density and group size effects on reproductive behavior in a simultaneous hermaphrodite

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Nils Anthes¹  Rolanda Lange¹  Dennis Sprenger¹ 

[1] Animal Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Evolution and Ecology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

关键词: simultaneous hermaphrodite;    sexual conflict;    optimal mating rate;    mating group size;    population density;   

Others  :  1144590
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2148-11-107

 received in 2010-10-26, accepted in 2011-04-18,  发布年份 2011

【 摘 要 】

Background

Despite growing evidence that population dynamic processes can have substantial effects on mating system evolution, little is known about their effect on mating rates in simultaneous hermaphrodites. According to theory, mating rate is expected to increase with mate availability because mating activity is primarily controlled by the male sexual function. A different scenario appears plausible in the hermaphroditic opisthobranch Chelidonura sandrana. Here, field mating rates are close to the female fitness optimum, suggesting that mating activity remains unresponsive to variation in mate availability.

Results

Applying an experimental design that aims at independent experimental manipulation of density and social group size, we find substantial increases in mate encounter rate with both factors, but no statistically detectable effects on mating rate in C. sandrana. Instead, mating rate remained close to the earlier determined female fitness optimum.

Conclusions

We demonstrate that mating rate in C. sandrana is largely unresponsive to variation in mate availability and is maintained close to the female fitness optimum. These findings challenge the prevailing notion of male driven mating rates in simultaneous hermaphrodites and call for complementary investigations of mating rate effects on fitness through the male sexual function.

【 授权许可】

   
2011 Sprenger et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Kokko H, Rankin DJ: Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 2006, 361:319-334.
• [2]Gwynne DT: Sexual selection and sexual differences in Mormon crickets (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae, Anabrus simplex). Evolution 1984, 38:1011-1022.
• [3]Hubbell SP, Johnson LK: Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice, and sexual selection. Am Nat 1987, 130:91-112.
• [4]Crowley PH, Travers SE, Linton MC, Cohn SL, Sih A, Sargent RC: Mate density, predation risk, and the seasonal sequence of mate choices: a dynamic game. Am Nat 1991, 137:567-596.
• [5]Palokangas P, Alatalo RV, Korpimäki E: Female choice in the kestrel under different availability of mating options. Anim Behav 1992, 43:659-665.
• [6]Souroukis K, Murray AM: Female mating behvaior in the field cricket, Gryllus pennsylvanicus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae) at different operational sex ratios. J Insect Behav 1995, 8:269-279.
• [7]Kokko H, Monaghan P: Predicting the direction of sexual selection. Ecol Lett 2001, 4:159-165.
• [8]Kokko H, Mappes J: Sexual selection when fertilization is not guaranteed. Evolution 2005, 59:1876-1885.
• [9]Lauer MJ, Sih A, Krupa JJ: Male density, female density and inter-sexual conflict in a stream-dwelling insect. Anim Behav 1996, 52:929-939.
• [10]Martin OY, Hosken DJ: The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 2003, 423:979-982.
• [11]Härdling R, Kaitala A: The evolution of repeated mating under sexual conflict. J Evol Biol 2005, 18:106-115.
• [12]Michiels NK: Mating conflicts and sperm competition in simultaneous hermaphrodites. In Sperm competition and sexual selection. Edited by Birkhead TR, Møller AP. London: Academic Press; 1998:219-254.
• [13]Anthes N: Mate choice and reproductive conflict in simultaneous hermaphrodites. In Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms. Edited by Kappeler P. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010:329-358.
• [14]Bateman AJ: Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 1948, 2:349-368.
• [15]Charnov EL: Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1979, 76:2480-2484.
• [16]Anthes N, David P, Auld JR, Hoffer JNA, Jarne P, Koene JM, Kokko H, Lorenzi MC, Péllisié B, Sprenger D, Staikou A, Schärer L: Bateman Gradients in Hermaphrodites: An Extended Approach to Quantify Sexual Selection. Am Nat 2010, 176:249-263.
• [17]Leonard JL: Bateman's principle and simultaneous hermaphrodites: a paradox. Integr Compar Biol 2005., 45
• [18]Michiels NK, Koene JM: Sexual selection favors harmful mating in hermaphrodites more than in gonochorists. Integr Compar Biol 2006, 46:473-480.
• [19]Janicke T, Schärer L: Determinants of mating and sperm-transfer success in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. J Evol Biol 2009, 22:405-415.
• [20]Koene JM, Ter Maat A: Coolidge effect in pond snails: male motivation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2007, 7:212. BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Anthes N, Putz A, Michiels NK: Hermaphrodite sex role preferences: the role of partner body size, mating history and female fitness in the sea slug Chelidonura sandrana. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2006, 60:359-367.
• [22]Sprenger D, Anthes N, Michiels NK: Multiple mating affects offspring size in the opisthobranch Chelidonura sandrana. Mar Biol 2008, 153:891-897.
• [23]Sprenger D, Faber J, Michiels NK, Anthes N: Natural female mating rate maximizes hatchling size in a marine invertebrate. J Anim Ecol 2008, 77:696-701.
• [24]Sprenger D, Lange R, Michiels NK, Anthes N: Sources of phenotypic variation in offspring size and performance in an internally fertilizing marine hermaphrodite. Evol Ecol 2010, 24:185-194.
• [25]Greeff JM, Michiels NK: Sperm digestion and reciprocal sperm transfer can drive hermaphrodite sex allocation to equality. Am Nat 1999, 153:421-430.
• [26]Bedhomme S, Bernasconi G, Koene JM, Lankinen A, Arathi HS, Michiels NK, Anthes N: How does breeding system variation modulate sexual antagonism? Biol Lett 2009, 5:717-720.
• [27]Pongratz N, Michiels NK: High multiple paternity and low last-male sperm precedence in a hermaphroditic planarian flatworm: consequences for reciprocity patterns. Mol Ecol 2003, 12:1425-1433.
• [28]Anthes N, Michiels NK: Do "sperm trading" simultaneous hermaphrodites always trade sperm? Behav Ecol 2005, 16:188-195.
• [29]Schärer L: Tests of sex allocation theory in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 2009, 63:1377-1405.
• [30]Janicke T, Schärer L: Sex allocation predicts mating rate in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Proc R Soc Lond B 2009, 276:4247-4253.
• [31]Hoffer J, Ellers J, Koene J: Costs of receipt and donation of ejaculates in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:393. BioMed Central Full Text
• [32]Jordaens K, Dillen L, Backeljau T: Effects of mating, breeding system and parasites on reproduction in hermaphrodites: pulmonate gastropods (Mollusca). Anim Biol 2007, 57:137-195.
• [33]Anthes N, Michiels NK: Reproductive morphology, mating behavior, and spawning ecology of cephalaspid sea slugs (Aglajidae and Gastropteridae). Invert Biol 2007, 126:335-365.
• [34]Sprenger D, Lange R, Michiels NK, Anthes N: The role of body size in early mating behavior in a simultaneous hermaphrodite, Chelidonura sandrana. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2009, 63:953-958.
• [35]Engqvist L: The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim Behav 2005, 70:967-971.
• [36]Quinn GP, Keough MJ: Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.