Easier said than done!: methodological challenges with conducting maternal death review research in Malawi

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Address Malata²  Tarek Meguid¹  Johanne Sundby³  Viva Combs Thorsen³ 

[1] Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Namibia, School of Medicine, Private Bag 13301, Windhoek, Namibia;Department of Maternal and Child Health, Kamuzu College of Nursing, University of Malawi, Private Bag 1, Lilongwe, Malawi;Department of Community Medicine, University of Oslo, PO Box 1130, Blindern, N-0318 Oslo, Norway

关键词: Malawi;    Surveillance cycle;    Maternal mortality;    Maternal death audit;    Maternal death review;   

Others  :  866420
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2288-14-29

 received in 2012-11-21, accepted in 2014-02-10,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Maternal death auditing is widely used to ascertain in-depth information on the clinical, social, cultural, and other contributing factors that result in a maternal death. As the 2015 deadline for Millennium Development Goal 5 of reducing maternal mortality by three quarters between 1990 and 2015 draws near, this information becomes even more critical for informing intensified maternal mortality reduction strategies. Studies using maternal death audit methodologies are widely available, but few discuss the challenges in their implementation. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the methodological issues that arose while conducting maternal death review research in Lilongwe, Malawi.

Methods

Critical reflections were based on a recently conducted maternal mortality study in Lilongwe, Malawi in which a facility-based maternal death review approach was used. The five-step maternal mortality surveillance cycle provided the framework for discussion. The steps included: 1) identification of cases, 2) data collection, 3) data analysis, 4) recommendations, and 5) evaluation.

Results

Challenges experienced were related to the first three steps of the surveillance cycle. They included: 1) identification of cases: conflicting maternal death numbers, and missing medical charts, 2) data collection: poor record keeping, poor quality of documentation, difficulties in identifying and locating appropriate healthcare workers for interviews, the potential introduction of bias through the use of an interpreter, and difficulties with locating family and community members and recall bias; and 3) data analysis: determining the causes of death and clinical diagnoses.

Conclusion

Conducting facility-based maternal death reviews for the purpose of research has several challenges. This paper illustrated that performing such an activity, particularly the data collection phase, was not as easy as conveyed in international guidelines and in published studies. However, these challenges are not insurmountable. If they are anticipated and proper steps are taken in advance, they can be avoided or their effects minimized.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Combs Thorsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]WHO, UNICEF, The World Bank: Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 - 2010. Geneva: WHO; 2012.
• [2]Lewis G: Beyond the Numbers: reviewing maternal deaths and complications to make pregnancy safer. Br Med Bull 2003, 67:27-37.
• [3]Cham M, Sundby J, Vangen S: Maternal mortality in the rural Gambia, a qualitative study on access to emergency obstetric care. Reprod Health 2005, 2:3. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]Kongnyuy E, van den Broek N: The difficulties of conducting maternal death reviews in Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008, 8:42. BioMed Central Full Text
• [5]WHO: Beyond the Numbers: Reviewing Maternal Deaths and Complications to Make Pregnancy Safer. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004.
• [6]Lewis G: Reviewing maternal deaths to make pregnancy safer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2008, 22:447-463.
• [7]Barford D, Parkes J: Maternal mortality. A survey of 118 maternal deaths and the avoidable factors involved. S Afr Med J 1977, 51:101-105.
• [8]Bullough C: Analysis of maternal deaths in the Central Region of Malawi. East Afr Med J 1981, 58:25-36.
• [9]Chrichton D, Knobel J: The principles of prevention of avoidable maternal death. A study of 538 consecutive maternal deaths in the obstetric unit, King Edward 8th Hospital, Durban, 1953-1971. S Afr Med J 1973, 47:2005-2010.
• [10]Dumont A, Tourigny C, Fournier P: Improving obstetric care in low-resource settings: implementation of facility-based maternal death reviews in five pilot hospitals in Senegal. Hum Resour Health 2009, 7:61. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Nyamtema A, de Jong A, Urassa D, van Roosmalen J: Using audit to enhance quality of maternity care in resource limited countries: lessons learnt from rural Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011, 11:94. BioMed Central Full Text
• [12]Pearson L, de Bernis L, Shoo R: Maternal death review in Africa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009, 106:89-94.
• [13]Kongnyuy E, Mlava G, van den Broek N: Facility-based maternal death review in three districts in the Central Region of Malawi: an analysis of causes and characteristics of maternal deaths. Women’s Health Issues 2009, 19:14-20.
• [14]van Hamersveld K, den Bakker E, Nyamtema A, van den Akker T, Mfinanga E, van Elteren M, van Roosmalen J: Barriers to conducting effective obstetric audit in Ifakara: a qualitative assessment in an under-resourced setting in Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health 2012, 17:652-657.
• [15]Hsieh H, Shannon S: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005, 15:1277-1288.
• [16]Combs Thorsen V, Sundby J, Malata A: Piecing together the maternal death puzzle through narratives: the three delays model revisited. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e52090.
• [17]WHO: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision. 2010 edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
• [18]Halcomb E, Davidson P: Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary? Appl Nurs Res 2006, 19:38-42.
• [19]Thaddeus S, Maine D: Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 1994, 38:1091-1110.
• [20]Agarwal S, Sethi V, Srivastava K, Jha P, Baqui A: Birth preparedness and complication readiness among slum women in Indore City, India. J Health Popul Nutr 2010, 28:383-391.
• [21]JHPIEGO: Monitoring Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness: Indicators for Maternal and Newborn Health. Baltimore, MD: JHPIEGO; 2004.
• [22]Moran A, Sangli G, Dineen R, Rawlins B, Yaméogo M, Baya B: Birth-preparedness for maternal health: Findings from Koupéla District, Burkina Faso. J Health Popul Nutr 2006, 24:489-497.
• [23]Qomariyah S, Bell J, Pambudi E, Anggondowati T, Latief K, Achadi E, Graham WJ: A practical approach to identifying maternal deaths missed from routine hospital reports: lessons from Indonesia. Glob Health Action 2009., 2DOI: 10.3402/gha.v2i0.1905
• [24]Cross S, Bell J, Graham W: What you count is what you target: the implications of maternal death classification for tracking progress towards reducing maternal mortality in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 2010, 88:147-153.
• [25]Badcock D, Kelly A, Kerr D, Reade T: The quality of medical record review studies in the international emergency medicine literature. Ann Emerg Med 2005, 45:444-447.
• [26]Lowenstein S: Medical record reviews in emergency medicine: the blessing and the curse. Ann Emerg Med 2005, 45:452-455.
• [27]Siegler E: The evolving medical record. Ann Intern Med 2010, 153:671-677.
• [28]De Marinis M, Piredda M, Pascarella M, Vincenzi B, Spiga F, Tartaglini D, Alvaro R, Matarese M: ‘If it is not recorded, it has not been done!’? consistency between nursing records and observed nursing care in an Italian hospital. J Clin Nurs 2010, 19:1544-1552.
• [29]Engel L, Henderson C, Fergenbaum J, Colantonio A: Medical record review conduction model for improving interrater reliability of abstracting medical-related information. Eval Health Prof 2009, 32:281-298.
• [30]Osman H, Campbell O, Sinno D, Zarwi R, Nassar A: Facility-based audit of maternal mortality in Lebanon: A feasibility study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009, 88:1338-1344.
• [31]Pourasghar F, Malekafzali H, Kazemi A, Ellenius J, Fors U: What they fill in today, may not be useful tomorrow: lessons learned from studying Medical Records at the Women hospital in Tabriz. Iran. BMC Public Health 2008, 8:139. BioMed Central Full Text
• [32]Worster A, Bledsoe RD, Cleve P, Fernandes C, Upadhye S, Eva K: Reassessing the methods of medical record review studies in emergency medicine research. Ann Emerg Med 2005, 45:448-451.
• [33]Gregory K, Radovinsky L: Research strategies that result in optimal data collection from the patient medical record. Appl Nurs Res 2012, 25:108-116.
• [34]Gearing R, Mian I, Barber J, Ickowicz A: A methodology for conducting retrospective chart review research in child and adolescent psychiatry. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006, 15:126-134.
• [35]Bradley S, McAuliffe E: Mid-level providers in emergency obstetric and newborn health care: factors affecting their performance and retention within the Malawian health system. Hum Resour Health 2009, 7:14. BioMed Central Full Text
• [36]Diallo D, Doumbo O, Plowe C, Wellems T, Emanuel E, Hurst S: Community permission for medical research in developing countries. Clin Infect Dis 2005, 41:255-259.
• [37]Gikonyo C, Bejon P, Marsh V, Molyneux S: Taking social relationships seriously: Lessons learned from the informed consent practices of a vaccine trial on the Kenyan Coast. Soc Sci Med 2008, 67:708-720.
• [38]Tindana P, Kass N, Akweongo P: The informed consent process in rural African setting: a case study of the Kassena-Nankana District of Northern Ghana. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 2006, 28:1-6.
• [39]Mystakidou K, Panagiotou I, Katsaragakis S, Tsilika E, Parpa E: Ethical and practical challenges in implementing informed consent in HIV/AIDS clinical trials in developing or resource-limited countries. J Soc Asp HIV/AIDS 2009, 6:46-57.
• [40]Warren C, Barnes-Brus T, Burgess H, Wiebold-Lippisch L, Hackney J, Harkness G, Kennedy V, Dingwall R, Rosenblatt PC, Ryen A, Shuy R: After the interview. Qual Sociol 2003, 26:93-110.
• [41]King N, Horrocks C: Carrying Out Qualitative Interviews. In Interviews in Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2012:42-60.
• [42]Squires A: Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: a research review. Int J Nurs Stud 2009, 46:277-287.
• [43]Chamisa I, Zulu B: Setting the records straight–a prospective audit of the quality of case notes in a surgical department. S Afr J Surg 2007, 45:92-95.
• [44]Baerheim A: The diagnostic process in general practice: has it a two-phase structure? Fam Pract 2001, 18:243-245.
• [45]Marcum J: An integrated model of clinical reasoning: dual-process theory of cognition and metacognition. J Eval Clin Pract 2012, 18:954-961.
• [46]Hall K: Reviewing intuitive decision-making and uncertainty: the implications for medical education. Med Educ 2002, 36:216-224.
• [47]Jougla E, Rossolin F, Pavillon G: Cause of death statistics: production process, quality and international comparability. In Atlas of Cancer Mortality in the European Union and the European Economic Area 1993-1997. Edited by Boyle P, Smans M. Lyon Cedex: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2008:9-15.
• [48]Meguid T: Lack of political will is a clinical issue. BMJ 2009, 338:b1013.
• [49]Henry S: Recognizing racit knowledge in medical epistemology. Theor Med Bioeth 2006, 27:187-213.
• [50]Dumont A, Gaye A, de Bernis L, Chaillet N, Landry A, Delage J, Bouvier-Colle MH: Facility-based maternal death reviews: effects on maternal mortality in a district hospital in Senegal. Bull World Health Organ 2006, 84:218-224.
• [51]Kongnyuy E, Leigh B, van den Broek N: Effect of audit and feedback on the availability, utilisation and quality of emergency obstetric care in three districts in Malawi. Women and Birth 2008, 21:149-155.
• [52]van den Akker T, van Rhenen J, Mwagomba B, Lommerse K, Vinkhumbo S, van Roosmalen J: Reduction of severe acute maternal morbidity and maternal mortality in Thyolo District, Malawi: the impact of obstetric audit. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e20776.
• [53]van den Akker T, Mwagomba B, Irlam J, van Roosmalen J: Using audits to reduce the incidence of uterine rupture in a Malawian district hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009, 107:289-294.