A pilot study using low-dose Spectral CT and ASIR (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction) algorithm to diagnose solitary pulmonary nodules

BMC Medical Imaging

Jianbo Gao²  Suya Wang²  Lei Su²  Bo Wang²  Pan Liang²  Hongna Tan²  Yihe Liu¹  Huijuan Xiao² 

[1] The No.7 People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou, 17 Jingnan 5th Road, Zhengzhou Economic and Technological Development Zone, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan Province, China;The Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1, East Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan Province, China

关键词: Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction;    Solitary pulmonary nodules;    Spectral CT;    Computed tomography;   

Others  :  1233370
DOI  :  10.1186/s12880-015-0096-6

 received in 2015-06-19, accepted in 2015-10-25,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Lung cancer is the most common cancer which has the highest mortality rate. With the development of computed tomography (CT) techniques, the case detection rates of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) has constantly increased and the diagnosis accuracy of SPN has remained a hot topic in clinical and imaging diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the combination of low-dose spectral CT and ASIR (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction) algorithm in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN).

Methods

62 patients with SPN (42 cases of benign SPN and 20 cases of malignant SPN, pathology confirmed) were scanned by spectral CT with a dual-phase contrast-enhanced method. The iodine and water concentration (IC and WC) of the lesion and the artery in the image that had the same density were measured by the GSI (Gemstone Spectral Imaging) software. The normalized iodine and water concentration (NIC and NWC) of the lesion and the normalized iodine and water concentration difference (ICD and WCD) between the arterial and venous phases (AP and VP) were also calculated. The spectral HU (Hounsfield Unit ) curve was divided into 3 sections based on the energy (40–70, 70–100 and 100–140 keV) and the slopes (λHU) in both phases were calculated. The IC _AP , IC _VP , WC _APand WC _VP , NIC and NWC, and the λHU in benign and malignant SPN were compared by independent sample t-test.

Results

The iodine related parameters (IC _AP , IC _VP , NIC _AP , NIC _VP , and the ICD) of malignant SPN were significantly higher than that of benign SPN (t = 3.310, 1.330, 2.388, 1.669 and 3.251, respectively, P <0.05). The 3 λHU values of venous phase in malignant SPN were higher than that of benign SPN (t = 3.803, 2.846 and 3.205, P <0.05). The difference of water related parameters (WC _AP , WC _VP , NWC _AP , NWC _VPand WCD) between malignant and benign SPN were not significant (t = 0.666, 0.257, 0.104, 0.550 and 0.585, P >0.05).

Conclusions

The iodine related parameters and the slope of spectral curve are useful markers to distinguish the benign from the malignant lung diseases, and its application is extremely feasible in clinical applications.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Xiao et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]She J, Yang P, Hong Q, Bai C. Lung cancer in china: challenges and interventions. Chest. 2013;143(4):1117–26.
• [2]Rami-Porta R, Crowley JJ, Goldstraw P. The revised TNM staging system for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 15(1):4-9.
• [3]Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, Grasruck M, Bruder H, Morhard D et al.. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17(6):1510-1517.
• [4]Chae EJ, Song JW, Seo JB, Krauss B, Jang YM, Song KS. Clinical utility of dual-energy CT in the evaluation of solitary pulomonary nodules: initial experience. Radiology. 2008; 249(2):671-681.
• [5]Vorona GA, Ceschin RC, Clayton BL, Sutcavage T, Tadros SS, Panigrahy A. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique in children: a feasibility study. Pediatr Radiol. 2011; 41(9):1174-1182.
• [6]Rapalino O, Kamalian S, Kamalian S, Payabvash S, Souza LC, Zhang D et al.. Cranial CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: improved image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33(4):609-615.
• [7]Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, Sin D, Mayo JR. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction . AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(5):1095–9.
• [8]Qi L-P, Li Y, Tang L, Li YL, Li XT, Cui Y et al.. Evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction with the same group of patients. Br J Radiol. 2012; 85(1018):e906-e911.
• [9]Fontarensky M, Alfidja A, Perignon R, Schoenig A, Perrier C, Mulliez A et al.. Reduced Radiation Dose with Model-based Iterative Reconstruction versus Standard Dose with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Abdominal CT for Diagnosis of Acute Renal Colic. Radiology. 2015; 276(1):156-166.
• [10]Koc G, Courtier JL, Phelps A, Marcovici PA, MacKenzie JD. Computed tomography depiction of small pediatric vessels with model-based iterative reconstruction. Pediatr Radiol. 2014; 44(7):787-794.
• [11]Neroladaki A, Botsikas D, Boudabbous S, Becker CD, Montet X. Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: preliminary observations. Eur Radiol. 2013; 23(2):360-366.
• [12]Xu Y, He W, Chen H, Hu Z, Li J, Zhang T. Impact of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique on image quality in ultra-low-dose CT. Clin Radiol. 2013; 68(9):902-908.
• [13]Kim YK, Park BK, Kim CK, Park SY. Adenoma characterization: adrenal protocol with dual-energy CT. Radiology. 2013; 267(1):155-63.
• [14]Karçaaltıncaba M, Aktaş A. Dual-energy CT revisited with multidetector CT: review of principles and clinical applications. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011; 17(3):181-194.
• [15]Altenbernd J, Heusner TA, Ringelstein A, Ladd SC, Forsting M, Antoch G. Dual-energy-CT of hypervascular liver lesions in patients with HCC: investigation of image quality and sensitivity. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(4):738-43.
• [16]Graser A, Becker CR, Staehler M, Clevert DA, Macari M, Arndt N et al.. Single-phase dual-energy CT allows for characterization of renal masses as benign or malignant. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45(7):399-405.
• [17]Apfaltrer P, Meyer M, Meier C, Henzler T, Barraza JM, Dinter DJ et al.. Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Energy CT of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Is Iodine-Related Attenuation a Potential Indicator of Tumor Response? Invest Radiol. 2012; 47(1):65-70.
• [18]Goo HW, Yang DH, Kim N, Park SI, Kim DK, Kim EA. Collateral ventilation to congenital hyperlucent lung lesions assessed on xenon-enhanced dynamic dual-energy CT: an initial experience. Korean J Radiol. 2011; 12(1):25-33.
• [19]Hur S, Lee JM, Kim SJ, Park JH, Han JK, Choi BI. 80-kVp CT using Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space algorithm for the detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: phantom and initial clinical experience. Korean J Radiol. 2012; 13(2):152-164.
• [20]Ruoslahti E. Specialization of tumor vasculature. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012; 2:83-90.
• [21]Tateishi U, Kusumoto M, Nishihara H, Nagashima K, Morikawa T, Moriyama N. Contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography for the evaluation of tumor angiogenesis in patients with lung carcinoma. Cancer. 2002; 95(4):835-842.
• [22]Schmid-Bindert G, Henzler T, Chu TQ, Meyer M, Nance JW, Schoepf UJ et al.. Functional imaging of lung cancer using dual energy CT: how does iodine related attenuation correlate with standardized uptake value of 18FDG-PET-CT? Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(1):93-103.
• [23]Lee SH, Hur J, Kim YJ, Lee HJ, Hong YJ, Choi BW. Additional value of dual-energy CT to differentiate between benign and malignant mediastinal tumors: an initial experience. Eur J Radiol. 2013; 82(11):2043-2049.
• [24]Swensen SJ, Viggiano RW, Midthun DE, Müller NL, Sherrick A, Yamashita K, et al. Lung nodule enhancement at CT: multicenter study. Radiology. 2000;214(1):73–80.
• [25]Swensen SJ, Brown LR, Colby TV, Weaver AL. Pulmonary nodules: CT evaluation of enhancement with iodinated contrast material. Radiology. 1995; 194(2):393-398.
• [26]Yamashita K, Matsunobe S, Tsuda T, Nemoto T, Matsumoto K, Miki H et al.. Solitary pulmonary nodule: preliminary study of evaluation with incremental dynamic CT. Radiology. 1995; 194(2):399-405.
• [27]Swensen SJ, Morin RL, Aughenbaugh GL, Leimer DW. CT reconstruction algorithm selection in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995; 19(6):932-935.
• [28]Henzler T, Shi J, Jafarov H, Schoenberg SO, Manegold C, Fink C et al.. Functional CT imaging techniques for the assessment of angiogenesis in lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2012; 1(1):78-83.
• [29]Musturay K, Aykut A. Dual-energy CT revisited with multidetector CT: review of Pinciples and clinical applications. Dian Interv Radiol. 2010; 17(3):181-194.
• [30]Remy-Jardin M, Faivre JB, Pontana F, Hachulla AL, Tacelli N, Santangelo T, et al. Thoracic applications of dual energy . Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;48(1):193–205.
• [31]Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, Wu Q, Peter MB, Johnson CD. Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(1):126-131.