Vaginal microbiome in women from Greenland assessed by microscopy and quantitative PCR

BMC Infectious Diseases

Jørgen Skov Jensen⁶  Peter Ahrens⁶  Anders Koch¹  Elisabeth Rink⁵  Ruth Montgomery-Andersen³  Gert Mulvad⁴  Dionne Gesink²  Raluca Datcu⁶ 

[1] Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark;Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;University of Greenland, Nuuk, Greenland;Centre for Primary Care, Nuuk, Greenland;Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA;Microbiology and Infection Control, STI, Research and Development, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, DK 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark

关键词: Clusters;    ROC curve analysis;    Specificity;    Sensitivity;    Nugent criteria;    Bacterial vaginosis;   

Others  :  1145693
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2334-13-480

 received in 2013-07-02, accepted in 2013-10-10,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common condition, although its aetiology remains unexplained. The aim of this study was to analyse the composition of vaginal microbiota in women from Greenland to provide a quantitative description and improve the understanding of BV.

Methods

Self-collected vaginal smears and swabs were obtained from 177 women. The vaginal smears were graded for BV according to Nugent’s criteria. The vaginal swab samples were analysed by 19 quantitative PCRs (qPCRs) for selected vaginal bacteria and by PCR for four sexually transmitted infections (STIs).

Results

STIs were common: Mycoplasma genitalium 12%, Chlamydia trachomatis 7%, Neisseria gonorrhoeae 1%, and Trichomonas vaginalis 0.5%. BV was found in 45% of women, but was not associated with individual STIs. Seven of the 19 vaginal bacteria (Atopobium vaginae, Prevotella spp., Gardnerella vaginalis, BVAB2, Eggerthella-like bacterium, Leptotrichia amnionii, and Megasphaera type 1) had areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve > 85%, suggesting they are good predictors of BV according to Nugent. Prevotella spp. had the highest odds ratio for BV (OR 437; 95% CI 82–2779) in univariate analysis considering only specimens with a bacterial load above the threshold determined by ROC curve analysis as positive, as well as the highest adjusted odds ratio in multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.4-13.5). BV could be subdivided into clusters dominated by a single or a few species together.

Conclusions

BV by Nugent score was highly prevalent. Two of seven key species (Prevotella spp. and A. vaginae) remained significantly associated with BV in a multivariate model after adjusting for other bacterial species. G. vaginalis and Prevotella spp. defined the majority of BV clusters.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Datcu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Donders G: Diagnosis and management of bacterial vaginosis and other types of abnormal vaginal bacterial flora: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2010, 65:462-473.
• [2]Lamont RF, Morgan DJ, Wilden SD, Taylor-Robinson D: Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in women attending one of three general practices for routine cervical cytology. Int J STD AIDS 2000, 11:495-498.
• [3]Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KC, Eschenbach D, Holmes KK: Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 1983, 74:14-22.
• [4]Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL: Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991, 29:297-301.
• [5]Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Claeys G, Verschraegen G, Van Simaey L, De Ganck C, et al.: Comparison between gram stain and culture for the characterization of vaginal microflora: definition of a distinct grade that resembles grade I microflora and revised categorization of grade I microflora. BMC Microbiol 2005, 5:5-61. BioMed Central Full Text
• [6]Ison CA, Hay PE: Validation of a simplified grading of gram stained vaginal smears for use in genitourinary medicine clinics. Sex Transm Infect 2002, 78:413-415.
• [7]Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, Roelens K, Claeys G, Weyers S, De Backer E, et al.: Modified classification of Gram-stained vaginal smears to predict spontaneous preterm birth: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007, 196:528-529.
• [8]Josey WE, Schwebke JR: The polymicrobial hypothesis of bacterial vaginosis causation: a reassessment. Int J STD AIDS 2008, 19:152-154.
• [9]Allsworth JE, Peipert JF: Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis: 2001–2004 national health and nutrition examination survey data. Obstet Gynecol 2007, 109:114-120.
• [10]Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, McCulle SL, et al.: Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108(Suppl 1):4680-4687.
• [11]Catlin BW: Gardnerella vaginalis: characteristics, clinical considerations, and controversies. Clin Microbiol Rev 1992, 5:213-237.
• [12]Dawson SG, Ison CA, Csonka G, Easmon CS: Male carriage of Gardnerella vaginalis. Br J Vener Dis 1982, 58:243-245.
• [13]Fethers KA, Fairley CK, Morton A, Hocking JS, Hopkins C, Kennedy LJ, et al.: Early sexual experiences and risk factors for bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Dis 2009, 200:1662-1670.
• [14]Fethers KA, Fairley CK, Hocking JS, Gurrin LC, Bradshaw CS: Sexual risk factors and bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2008, 47:1426-1435.
• [15]Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, Vaneechoutte M, Temmerman M: The epidemiology of bacterial vaginosis in relation to sexual behaviour. BMC Infect Dis 2010, 10:81. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Gesink D, Rink E, Mulvad G, Koch A: Sexual health and sexually transmitted infections in the North American Arctic. Emerg Infect Dis 2008, 14:4-9.
• [17]Gesink DC, Mulvad G, Montgomery-Andersen R, Poppel U, Montgomery-Andersen S, Binzer A, et al.: Mycoplasma genitalium presence, resistance and epidemiology in Greenland. Int J Circumpolar Health 2012, 71:1-8.
• [18]Moller BR, From E, Christensen RB, Heilmann B, Jensen KE, Thorsen P: The venereological profile in Godthab district venereal clinic, Nuuk, Gronland. A 3-month study in 1991. Ugeskr Laeger 1992, 154:1505-1508.
• [19]Gesink D, Rink E, Montgomery-Andersen R, Mulvad G, Koch A: Developing a culturally competent and socially relevant sexual health survey with an urban Arctic community. Int J Circumpolar Health 2010, 69:25-37.
• [20]Rink E, Gesink LD, Montgomery-Andersen R, Mulvad G, Koch A: The practical application of community-based participatory research in Greenland: initial experiences of the Greenland sexual health study. Int J Circumpolar Health 2009, 68:405-413.
• [21]Jensen JS, Bjornelius E, Dohn B, Lidbrink P: Use of TaqMan 5′ nuclease real-time PCR for quantitative detection of Mycoplasma genitalium DNA in males with and without urethritis who were attendees at a sexually transmitted disease clinic. J Clin Microbiol 2004, 42:683-692.
• [22]De Backer E, Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Alqumber MA, Burton JP, Tagg JR: Quantitative determination by real-time PCR of four vaginal Lactobacillus species, Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae indicates an inverse relationship between L. gasseri and L. iners. BMC Microbiol 2007, 7:115. BioMed Central Full Text
• [23]Jensen JS, Borre MB, Dohn B: Detection of Mycoplasma genitalium by PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol 2003, 41:261-266.
• [24]Westh H, Jensen JS: Low prevalence of the new variant of Chlamydia trachomatis in Denmark. Sex Transm Infect 2008, 84:546-547.
• [25]Hjelmevoll SO, Olsen ME, Sollid JU, Haaheim H, Unemo M, Skogen V: A fast real-time polymerase chain reaction method for sensitive and specific detection of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae porA pseudogene. J Mol Diagn 2006, 8:574-581.
• [26]Kengne P, Veas F, Vidal N, Rey JL, Cuny G: Trichomonas vaginalis: repeated DNA target for highly sensitive and specific polymerase chain reaction diagnosis. Cell Mol Biol 1994, 40:819-831.
• [27]Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Thomas KK, Oakley BB, Marrazzo JM: Targeted PCR for detection of vaginal bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 2007, 45:3270-3276.
• [28]Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Thomas KK, Mitchell CM, Marrazzo JM: Changes in vaginal bacterial concentrations with intravaginal metronidazole therapy for bacterial vaginosis as assessed by quantitative PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2009, 47:721-726.
• [29]Zozaya-Hinchliffe M, Lillis R, Martin DH, Ferris MJ: Quantitative PCR assessments of bacterial species in women with and without bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 2010, 48:1812-1819.
• [30]Prince AM, Andrus L: PCR - How to kill unwanted DNA. Biotechniques 1992, 12:358.
• [31]Bukusi EA, Cohen CR, Meier AS, Waiyaki PG, Nguti R, Njeri JN, et al.: Bacterial vaginosis: risk factors among Kenyan women and their male partners. Sex Transm Dis 2006, 33:361-367.
• [32]Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Klebanoff SJ, Eschenbach DA: The relationship of hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli to bacterial vaginosis and genital microflora in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 1992, 79:369-373.
• [33]Das S, Allan S: Higher vaginal pH is associated with Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a predominantly white population. Sex Transm Dis 2006, 33:527-528.
• [34]Das S, Sabin C, Allan S: Higher vaginal pH is associated with Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a prospective case-controlled study. Int J STD AIDS 2005, 16:290-293.
• [35]Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Landers DV, Sweet RL: Bacterial vaginosis is a strong predictor of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Clin Infect Dis 2003, 36:663-668.
• [36]Moi H: Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and its association with genital infections, inflammation, and contraceptive methods in women attending sexually transmitted disease and primary health clinics. Int J STD AIDS 1990, 1:86-94.
• [37]Desseauve D, Chantrel J, Fruchart A, Khoshnood B, Brabant G, Ancel PY, et al.: Prevalence and risk factors of bacterial vaginosis during the first trimester of pregnancy in a large French population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012, 163:30-34.
• [38]Johnson AM, Mercer CH, Erens B, Copas AJ, McManus S, Wellings K, et al.: Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours. Lancet 2001, 358:1835-1842.
• [39]Menard JP, Fenollar F, Henry M, Bretelle F, Raoult D: Molecular quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae loads to predict bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis 2008, 47:33-43.
• [40]Cartwright CP, Lembke BD, Ramachandran K, Body BA, Nye MB, Rivers CA, et al.: Development and validation of a semiquantitative, multitarget PCR assay for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 2012, 50:2321-2329.
• [41]Shipitsyna E, Roos A, Datcu R, Hallen A, Fredlund H, Jensen JS, et al.: Composition of the vaginal microbiota in women of reproductive age - sensitive and specific molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis is possible? PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e60670.
• [42]Fethers K, Twin J, Fairley CK, Fowkes FJ, Garland SM, Fehler G, et al.: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) candidate bacteria: associations with BV and behavioural practices in sexually-experienced and inexperienced women. PLoS One 2012, 7:e30633.
• [43]Srinivasan S, Hoffman NG, Morgan MT, Matsen FA, Fiedler TL, Hall RW, et al.: Bacterial communities in women with bacterial vaginosis: high resolution phylogenetic analyses reveal relationships of microbiota to clinical criteria. PLoS One 2012, 7:e37818.
• [44]Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Rabe LK, Klebanoff SJ, Eschenbach DA: The normal vaginal flora, H2O2-producing lactobacilli, and bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women. Clin Infect Dis 1993, 16(Suppl 4):S273-S281.
• [45]Spear GT, Sikaroodi M, Zariffard MR, Landay AL, French AL, Gillevet PM: Comparison of the diversity of the vaginal microbiota in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women with or without bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Dis 2008, 198:1131-1140.
• [46]Pybus V, Onderdonk AB: Evidence for a commensal, symbiotic relationship between Gardnerella vaginalis and Prevotella bivia involving ammonia: potential significance for bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Dis 1997, 175:406-413.