Industrial air pollution in rural Kenya: community awareness, risk perception and associations between risk variables

BMC Public Health

Michael Gatari¹  Zekarias Berhane³  Lisa Ulmer³  Eunice Omanga² 

[1] Institute of Nuclear Sciences and Technology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya;Impact Research and Development Organization, Kisumu, Kenya;School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA

关键词: Rural;    Risk;    Pollution;    Air;    Industrial;    Perception;    Environmental;   

Others  :  1131537
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-377

 received in 2012-10-19, accepted in 2014-03-20,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Developing countries have limited air quality management systems due to inadequate legislation and lack of political will, among other challenges. Maintaining a balance between economic development and sustainable environment is a challenge, hence investments in pollution prevention technologies get sidelined in favor of short-term benefits from increased production and job creation. This lack of air quality management capability translates into lack of air pollution data, hence the false belief that there is no problem. The objectives of the study were to: assess the population’s environmental awareness, explore their perception of pollution threat to their health; examine the association between specific health hazards.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was implemented by gathering quantitative information on demographic, health status, environmental perception and environmental knowledge of residents to understand their view of pollution in their neighborhood. Focus group discussions (FGDs) allowed for corroboration of the quantitative data.

Results

Over 80% of respondents perceived industrial pollution as posing a considerable risk to them despite the fact that the economy of the area largely depended on the factory. Respondents also argued that they had not been actively involved in identifying solutions to the environmental challenges. The study revealed a significant association between industrial pollution as a risk and, perception of risk from other familiar health hazards. The most important factors influencing the respondents’ pollution risk perception were environmental awareness and family health status.

Conclusion

This study avails information to policy makers and researchers concerning public awareness and attitudes towards environmental pollution pertinent to development and implementation of environmental policies for public health.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Omanga et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Mulaku GC, Kariuki LW: Mapping and Analysis of air Pollution in Nairobi, Kenya. In International Conference on Spatial Information for Sustainable Development. Nairobi, Kenya: Institution of Surveyors of Kenya; 2001.
• [2]Jones RE, Dunlap RE: The social bases of environmental concern: have they changed over time? Rural Sociol 1992, 57:28-47.
• [3]Adeola FO: Endangered community, enduring people: toxic contamination, health, and adaptive responses in a local context. Environ & Behav 2000, 32(2):207-247.
• [4]Kunzli N, Kaiser R, Medina S, Studnicka M, Chanel O, Filiger P, Herry M, Horak F Jr, Puybonnieux-Texier V, Quénel P, Schneider J, Seethaler R, Vergnaud JC, Sommer H: Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a European assessment. Lancet (North American Edition) 2000, 356(9232):795-801.
• [5]Kempton W, Boster JS, Hartley JA: Environmental Values in American Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995.
• [6]Carson R: Silent Spring. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1980.
• [7]WHO: Quantificating Environmental Health Impacts. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2007.
• [8]WHO: New Country-by-Country Data Show in Detail the Impact of Environmental Factors on Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World health Organization; 2007.
• [9]Byrd T, VanDerlslice J, Peterson S: Attitudes and beliefs about environmental hazards in three diverse communities in Texas on the border with Mexico. Panam Salud Publica 2001, 9(3):154-160.
• [10]Cohen AJ, Anderson HR, Ostro B, Pandey KD, Krzyzanowski M, Künzli N, Gutschmidt K, Pope CA III, Romieu I, Samet JM, Smith KR: Urban air Pollution. In Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors. Edited by Ezzati M. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004:1153-1433.
• [11]Boleij JSM, Ruigewaard P, Hoek F: Domestic air pollution from biomass burning in Kenya. Atmos Environ 1998, 23:1677-1681.
• [12]Gatebe CK, Kinyua AM, Mangala MJ, Kwach R, Njau LN, Mukolwe EA, Maina DM: Determination of suspended particulates matter of major significance to human health using nuclear techniques in kenya. J Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 1996, 203(1):125-134.
• [13]Gatari MJ, Boman J, Maina DM: Inorganic elemental concentrations in near surface aerosols sampled on the northwest slopes of Mount Kenya. Atmos Environ 2001, 35:6015-6019.
• [14]Gatari M, Wagner A, Boman J: Elemental composition of tropospheric aerosols in Hanoi, Vietnam and Nairobi, Kenya. Sci Total Environ 2004, 341:241-249.
• [15]Kenya Government: The environmental Management and Coordination Act (No. 8. of 1999). Nairobi: NEMA; 1999. [Judiciary]
• [16]UNEP/UNDP/DUTCH: Report on the development and harmonization of environmental standards in East Africa. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP; 1999.
• [17]Mwanthi MA, Kimani VN: Patterns of agrochemical handling and community response in central Kenya. J Environ Health 1993, 55(7):11-16.
• [18]Dunlap R, Van Liere K: The new environmental paradigm: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. J Environ Educ 1978, 9(4):10-19.
• [19]Dunlap R, Van Liere K, Merig A, Jones R: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J Social Issues 2000, 56(3):425-442.
• [20]Elliott SJ, Taylor SM, Walter S, Stieb D, Frank J, Eyles J: Modelling psychosocial effects of exposure to solid waste facilities. Soc Sci Med 1993, 37(6):791-804.
• [21]Freudenberg N: Action for environmental health: report of a survey of community organizations. Am J Public Health 1984, 74:444-448.
• [22]Greenberg MR: Concern about environmental pollution: How much difference Do race and ethnicity make? A New Jersey case study. Environ Health Perspect 2005, 113(4):369-373.
• [23]Gregory R, Mendelsohn R: Percieved risk, dread and benefits. Risk Anal 1993, 13:258-264.
• [24]Hallman W: Coping with an environmental stresor: perception of risk, attribution of responsibility and psychological distress in a community living near a harzadous waste facility. University of South Carolina: Columbia; 1989.
• [25]Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Layman M, Combs B: Judged frequency of lethal events. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn 1978, 4:551-578.
• [26]Riechard DE, Peterson SJ: Perception of environmental risk related to gender, community socioeconomic setting, age, and locus of control. J Environ Educ 1998, 30(1):11-19.
• [27]Schmidt FN, Gifford R: A dispositional approach to hazard perception: preliminary development of the environmental appraisal inventory. J Environ Psychol 1989, 9:57-67.
• [28]Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S: Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk. In Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough?. Edited by Schwing RC, Albers WA. New York: Plenum Press; 1980:p. 181-p. 216.
• [29]Taylor-Clark K, Koh H, Viswanath K: Perceptions of environmental health risks and communication barriers among Low-SEP and racial/ethnic minority communities. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2007, 18(4):165-183.
• [30]Torres EB, Subida RD, Gapas JL, Sarol JN, Villarin JT, Vinluan RJ, Ramos BM, Quirit LL: Public Health Monitoring of the Metro Manila Air Quality Improvement Sector Development Program. Manila, Philippines: World Health Organization (WHO), Asian Development Bank (ADB), Philippines Department of Health (DoH); 2004:156.
• [31]Vlek CJH, Stallen PJM: Rational and personal aspects of risk. Acta Psychologica 1980, 45:273-300.
• [32]Slovic P: Perception of Risk: Reflections on Psychometric Paradigm. In Social Theories of Risk. Edited by Krimsky S, Golding D. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers; 1992:117-152.
• [33]Westmoreland G: Perception of Risk from Environmental Hazards: A Comparative Study of Undergraduates in the United States and Costa Rica. Atlanta, GA: Emory University; 1994.
• [34]Hallman WK, Wandersman AH: Perception of Risk and Toxic Hazards. In Psychosocial Effects of Hazardous Waste Disposal on Communities. Edited by Peck D. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 1989.
• [35]Manor O, Matthews S, Power C: Dichotomous or categorical response? Analysing self-rated health and lifetime social class. Int J Epidemiol 2000, 29:149-157.
• [36]KNBS: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics 1999 Kenya population census report. Nairobi: Government Printer; 2000.
• [37]MacGregor DG, Slovic P, Morgan MG: Perception of risks from electromagnetic fields: a psychometric evaluation of a risk-communication approach. Risk Anal 1994, 14(5):815-828.
• [38]Sandman PM: Hazard versus Outrage in the Public Perception of Risk. In Effective Risk Communication: The role and responsibility of government and non-government organizations. Edited by Covello VT, McCallum DB, Pavlova MT. New York: Plenum Press; 1989:45-49.
• [39]Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK: Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Anal 1994, 14:1101-1108.
• [40]Miller M, Solomon G: Environmental risk communication for the clinician. Pediatrics 2003, 112(1):211-217.
• [41]Khayesi M: Liveable Streets for Pedestrians in Nairobi: The Challenge of Road Traffic Accidents. In The Earthscan Reader on World Transport Policy and Practice. Edited by Whitelegg J, Haq G. London: Earthscan; 2003:p. 35-p. 41.
• [42]Lamba D: The forgotten half; environmental health in Nairobi’s poverty areas. Environ Urban 1994, 6(1):164-173.
• [43]Dunlap RE, Mertig AG: Global environmental concer: an anomaly for pstmaterialism. Soc Sci Q 1997, 78(1):23-29.
• [44]Inglehart R: Public support for environmental protection: objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. Pol Soc Sci 1995, 28(1):57-72.
• [45]Adeola FO: Environmentalism and risk perception: empirical analysis of black and white differentials and convergence. Soc Nat Resour 2002, 17(10):911-939.
• [46]Satterfield TA, Mertz CK, Slovic P: Discrimination, vulnerability, and justice in the face of risk. Risk Anal 2004, 24(1):115-129.
• [47]Freudenberg WR: Rural–urban differences in environmental concern: a closer look. Sociol Inq 1991, 61:167-198.
• [48]WHO: World Health Report: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.
• [49]NASCOP: Ministry of Health, Kenya AIDS Indicator Survey (KAIS) 2007: Final Report. Nairobi, Kenya: NASCOP; 2008.
• [50]Bickerstaff K, Walker G: Public understandings of air pollution: the ‘localisation’ of environmental risk. Glob Environ Chang 2001, 11:133-145.
• [51]Walker G, Simmons P, Wynne B, Irwin A: Public Perception of Risks Associated with Major Accident Hazards. Associated with Major Accident Hazards. In Research Report Series 194/98. Sudbury: HSE Books; 1998.
• [52]Geller ES: Actively caring for the environment: an intergration of behaviorism and humanism. Environ & Behav 1995, 27(4):184-195.
• [53]Zeidner M, Schechter M: Psychological responses towards air pollutiion: some personality and demographic correlates. J Environ Psychol 1988, 8:191-208.
• [54]Cutter S: Living with Risk. New York: Routledge; 1993.
• [55]Elliott SJ, Cole DC, Krueger P, Voorberg N, Wakefield S: The power of perception: health risk attributed to Air pollution in an urban industrial neighborhood. Risk Anal 1999, 19(4):621-634.