Factors associated with institutional delivery in Ghana: the role of decision-making autonomy and community norms

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Kavita Singh¹  William T Story²  Ilene S Speizer¹ 

[1] Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA;Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

关键词: Social support;    Autonomy;    Maternal health;    Ghana;    Institutional delivery;   

Others  :  1091441
DOI  :  10.1186/s12884-014-0398-7

 received in 2014-07-30, accepted in 2014-11-19,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

In Ghana, the site of this study, the maternal mortality ratio and under-five mortality rate remain high indicating the need to focus on maternal and child health programming. Ghana has high use of antenatal care (95%) but sub-optimum levels of institutional delivery (about 57%). Numerous barriers to institutional delivery exist including financial, physical, cognitive, organizational, and psychological and social. This study examines the psychological and social barriers to institutional delivery, namely women’s decision-making autonomy and their perceptions about social support for institutional delivery in their community.

Methods

This study uses cross-sectional data collected for the evaluation of the Maternal and Newborn Referrals Project of Project Fives Alive in Northern and Central districts of Ghana. In 2012 and 2013, a total of 2,527 women aged 15 to 49 were surveyed at baseline and midterm (half in 2012 and half in 2013). The analysis sample of 1,606 includes all women who had a birth three years prior to the survey date and who had no missing data. To determine the relationship between institutional delivery and the two key social barriers—women’s decision-making autonomy and community perceptions of institutional delivery—we used multi-level logistic regression models, including cross-level interactions between community-level attitudes and individual-level autonomy. All analyses control for the clustered survey design by including robust standard errors in Stata 13 statistical software.

Results

The findings show that women who are more autonomous and who perceive positive attitudes toward facility delivery (among women, men and mothers-in-law) were more likely to deliver in a facility. Moreover, the interactions between autonomy and community-level perceptions of institutional delivery among men and mothers-in-law were significant, such that the effect of decision-making autonomy is more important for women who live in communities that are less supportive of institutional delivery compared to communities that are more supportive.

Conclusions

This study builds upon prior work by using indicators that provide a more direct assessment of perceived community norms and women’s decision-making autonomy. The findings lead to programmatic recommendations that go beyond individuals and engaging the broader network of people (husbands and mothers-in-law) that influence delivery behaviors.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Speizer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Accountability for Maternal, Newborn and Child Survival: The 2013 Update. WHO, Geneva; 2013.
• [2][http://www.unicef.org/ghana/Ghana_MICS_Final.pdf] webcite Ghana Statistical Service: Ghana Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey with an Enhanced Malaria Module and Biomarker, 2011, Final Report. Accra, Ghana: 2011. . Accessed July 23, 2014.
• [3]Moyer CA, Adongo PB, Aborigo RA, Hodgson A, Engmann CM, DeVries R: “It’s up to the woman’s people”: How social factors influence facility-based delivery in rural northern Ghana.Matern Child Health J 2013. doi:10.1007/s10995-013-1240-y
• [4]Making Pregnancy Safer: The Critical Role of the Skilled Attendant. WHO, ICM, FIGO, Geneva; 2004.
• [5][http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/EN_WHS09_Table4.pdf] webcite WHO: Health services coverage statistics. . Accessed July 23, 2014
• [6]Ghana Health Service (GHS), and ICF Macro. 2009. Ghana Demographic and Health Survey 2008. GSS, GHS, and ICF Macro, Accra, Ghana; 2009.
• [7]Doku D, Neupane S, Doku PN: Factors associated with reproductive health care utilization among Ghanaian women. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2012, 12:29. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-698X-12-29.pdf BioMed Central Full Text
• [8]Johnson FA, Padmadas SS, Brown JJ: On the spatial inequalities of institutional versus home births in Ghana: a multilevel analysis. J Community Health 2009, 34:64-72.
• [9]Penfold S, Harrison E, Bell J, Fitzmaurice A: Evaluation of the delivery fee exemption policy in Ghana: population estimates of changes in delivery service utilization in two regions. Ghana Med J 2007, 41:100-109.
• [10]Finlayson K, Downe S: Why do women not use antenatal services in low- and middle-income countries? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. PLoS Med 2013, 10(1):e1001373.
• [11]Pell C, Meñaca A, Were F, Afrah N, Chatio S, Manda-Taylor L, Hamel MJ, Hodgson A, Tagbor H, Kalilani L, Ouma P, Pool R: Factors affecting antenatal care attendance results from qualitative studies in Ghana, Kenya and Malawi. PLoS One 2013, 8(1):e53747.
• [12]Arthur E: Wealth and antenatal care use: Implications for maternal health care utilization in Ghana. Heal Econ Rev 2012, 2(14):14. doi: 10.1186/2191-1991-2-14 BioMed Central Full Text
• [13]Mwangome FK, Holding PA, Songola KM, Bomu GK: Barriers to hospital delivery in a rural setting in coast province. Kenya: community attitude and behaviours. Rural Remote Health 2012, 12:1852.
• [14]Ykong VN, Rush KL, Bassett-Smith J, Bottorff JL, Robinson C: Women’s experiences of seeking reproductive health care in rural Ghana: challenges for maternal health service utilization. J Adv Nurs 2010, 66(11):2431-2441.
• [15]Gething PW, Johnson FA, Frempong-Ainguah F, Nyarko P, Baschieri A, Aboagye P, Falkingham J, Matthews Z, Atkinson PM: Geographical access to care at birth in Ghana: a barrier to safe motherhood. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:991. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Kitui J, Lewis S, Davey G: Factors influencing place of delivery for women in Kenya: an analysis of the Kenya demographic and health survey, 2008/2009. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 2013, 13:40. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Matsuoka S, Aiga H, Rasmey LC, Rathavy T, Okitsu A: Perceived barriers to utilization of maternal health services in rural Cambodia. Health Policy 2010, 95:255-263.
• [18]Singh K, Osei-Akoto I, Otchere F, Sodzi-Tettey S, Barrington C, Huang C, Fordham C, Speizer I: Ghana’s national health insurance scheme and maternal and child health: a mixed methods study. 2014, Under review.
• [19]Dzakpasu S, Soremekun S, Manu A, ten Asbroek G, Tawiah C, Hurt L, Fenty J, Owusu-Agyei S, Hill Z, Campbell OMR, Kirkwood BR: Impact of free delivery care on health facility delivery and insurance coverage in Ghana’s Brong Ahafo Region. PLoS One 2012, 7(11):e49430.
• [20]Mensah J, Oppong J, Schmidt C: Ghana’s national health insurance scheme in the context of the health MDGs: an empirical evaluation using propensity score matching. Health Econ 2010, 19:95-106.
• [21]D’Ambruoso L, Abbey M, Hussein J: Please understand when I cry out in pain: Women’s accounts of maternity services during labour and delivery in Ghana. BMC Public Health 2005, 5:1-40. BioMed Central Full Text
• [22]Choudhury N, Ahmed SM: Maternal care practices among the ultra poor households in rural Bangladesh: a qualitative exploratory study. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 2011, 11:15. BioMed Central Full Text
• [23]Allendorf K: Couples’ reports of women’s autonomy and health-care use in Nepal. Stud Fam Plann 2007, 38(1):35-46.
• [24]Moyer CA, Mustafa A: Drivers and deterrents of facility delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reprod Health 2013, 10:40. BioMed Central Full Text
• [25]Stephenson R, Baschieri A, Clements S, Hennink M, Madise N: Contextual influences on the use of health facilities for childbirth in Africa. Am J Public Health 2006, 96(1):84-93.
• [26]Kruk ME, Rockers PC, Mbaruku G, Paczkowski MM, Galea S: Community and health system factors associated with facility delivery in rural Tanzania: a multilevel analysis. Health Policy 2010, 97(2–3):209-216.
• [27]Danforth EJ, Kruk ME, Rockers PC, Mbaruku G, Galea S: Household decision-making about delivery in health facilities: evidence from Tanzania. J Health Popul Nutr 2009, 27(5):696-703.
• [28]White D, Dynes M, Rubardt M, Sissoko K, Stephenson R: The influence of intra familial power on maternal health care in Mali: perspectives of women, men and mothers-in-law. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2013, 39(2):58-68.
• [29]Singh K, Bloom S, Haney E, Olorunsaiye C, Brodish P: Gender equality and childbirth in a health facility: Nigeria and MDG5. Afr J Reprod Health 2012, 16(3):123-129.
• [30]Story WT, Burgard SA: Couples’ reports of household decision-making and the utilization of maternal health services in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med 2012, 75:2403-2411.
• [31]Allendorf K: The quality of family relationships and use of maternal healthcare services in India. Stud Fam Plann 2010, 41(4):263-276.
• [32]Henderson R, Sundaresan T: Clustering sampling to assess immunization coverage: a review of experience with a simplified sampling method. Bull World Health Organ 1982, 60(2):253-260.
• [33]Adjiwanou V, LeGrand T: Does antenatal care matter in the use of skilled birth attendance in rural Africa: a multi-country analysis. Soc Sci Med 2013, 86:26-34.
• [34]Ai C, Norton EC: Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econ Lett 2003, 80(1):123-129.
• [35]Singh K, Bloom S, Brodish P: Gender equality as a means to improve maternal and child health in Africa. Health Care for Women International. 2013. doi:10.1080/07399332.2013.824971.
• [36]Becker S, Fonseca-Becker F, Schenck-Yglesias C: Husbands’ and wives’ reports of women’s decision-making power in Western Guatemala and their effects on preventive health behaviors. Soc Sci Med 2006, 62(9):2313-2326.
• [37]Fishbein M: A reasoned action approach to health promotion. Med Decis Making 2008, 28(6):834-844.
• [38]Speizer IS: Are husbands a barrier to women’s family planning use? The case of Morocco. Soc Biol 1999, 46(1–2):1-16.
• [39]Cofie LE, Barrington C, Singh K, Sodzi-Tetty S, Barker P, Akaligaung AJ: Birth location preferences of mothers and fathers in rural Ghana. Working paper. 2014.