Getting more than they realized they needed: a qualitative study of women's experience of group prenatal care

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Suzanne C Tough¹  Sarah Horn⁴  Jodi Siever³  Siobhan M Dolan⁵  Monica Vekved⁴  Deborah A McNeil² 

[1] Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Aberta T2N 4Z6, Canada;Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Aberta T2N 1 N4, Canada;Public Health Innovation and Decision Support, Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Southport Atrium, 10101 Southport Road SW, Calgary, Alberta T2W 3N2, Canada;Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, 2888 Shaganappi Trail NW, Calgary, Aberta T3B 6A8, Canada;Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Mazer 634, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA

关键词: Social support;    Women's health;    Pregnant women;    Prenatal care;    Canada;   

Others  :  1153050
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2393-12-17

 received in 2011-12-09, accepted in 2012-03-21,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Pregnant women in Canada have traditionally received prenatal care individually from their physicians, with some women attending prenatal education classes. Group prenatal care is a departure from these practices providing a forum for women to experience medical care and child birth education simultaneously and in a group setting. Although other qualitative studies have described the experience of group prenatal care, this is the first which sought to understand the central meaning or core of the experience. The purpose of this study was to understand the central meaning of the experience of group prenatal care for women who participated in CenteringPregnancy through a maternity clinic in Calgary, Canada.

Methods

The study used a phenomenological approach. Twelve women participated postpartum in a one-on-one interview and/or a group validation session between June 2009 and July 2010.

Results

Six themes emerged: (1) "getting more in one place at one time"; (2) "feeling supported"; (3) "learning and gaining meaningful information"; (4) "not feeling alone in the experience"; (5) "connecting"; and (6) "actively participating and taking on ownership of care". These themes contributed to the core phenomenon of women "getting more than they realized they needed". The active sharing among those in the group allowed women to have both their known and subconscious needs met.

Conclusions

Women's experience of group prenatal care reflected strong elements of social support in that women had different types of needs met and felt supported. The findings also broadened the understanding of some aspects of social support beyond current theories. In a contemporary North American society, the results of this study indicate that women gain from group prenatal care in terms of empowerment, efficiency, social support and education in ways not routinely available through individual care. This model of care could play a key role in addressing women's needs and improving health outcomes.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 McNeil et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Schuurmans N, Gagne JP, Ezzat A, Colliton I, MacKinnon CJ, Dushinski B, Caddick R: Healthy Beginnings: Guidelines for Care During Pregnancy and Childbirth. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines No. 71. Toronto, Canada: Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada; 1995.
• [2]Canadian Association of Midwives: [http:/ / www.canadianmidwives.org/ DATA/ DOCUMENT/ CAM_FACT_SHEET_Regulation_ENG_April _2010.pdf] webciteMidwifery Regulation in Canada (2010). 2010.
• [3]Public Health Agency of Canada: What Mothers Say: The Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. Ottawa, ON: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2009.
• [4]Ehiri JE, Child IG: Maternal and child health in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. In Maternal and Child Health: Global Challenges, Programs and Policies. Edited by Ehiri JE. New York: Springer; 2009:53-81.
• [5]Ministry of Health - New Zealand Government: [http://www.health.govt.nz/publication/maternity-factsheet-2001-2010] webciteMaternity Factsheet 2001-2010 (provisional). 2011.
• [6]Hospital Episode Statistics Online: [http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/] webciteNHS Maternity Statistics, 2010-11. 2012.
• [7]Rising SS, Kennedy HP, Klima CS: Redesigning prenatal care through CenteringPregnancy. J Midwifery Womens Health 2004, 49:398-404.
• [8]Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, Magriples U, Massey Z, Reynolds H, Rising SS: Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007, 110:330-339.
• [9]Kennedy HP, Farrell T, Paden R, Hill S, Jolivet RR, Cooper BA, Rising SS: A randomized clinical trial of group prenatal care in two military settings. Mil Med 2011, 176:1169-1177.
• [10]Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, Rising SS, Klima C, Reynolds H, Magriples U: Group prenatal care and preterm birth weight: results from a matched cohort study at public clinics. Obstet Gynecol 2003, 102:1051-1057.
• [11]Baldwin KA: Comparison of selected outcomes of CenteringPregnancy versus traditional prenatal care. J Midwifery Womens Health 2006, 51:266-272.
• [12]Robertson B, Aycock DM, Darnell LA: Comparison of Centering Pregnancy to traditional care in Hispanic mothers. Matern Child Health J 2009, 13:407-414.
• [13]Shakespear K, Waite PJ, Gast J: A comparison of health behaviors of women in Centering Pregnancy and traditional prenatal care. Matern Child Health J 2010, 14:202-208.
• [14]Grady MA, Bloom KC: Pregnancy outcomes of adolescents enrolled in a CenteringPregnancy program. J Midwifery Womens Health 2004, 49:412-420.
• [15]Klima C, Norr K, Vonderheid S, Handler A: Introduction of CenteringPregnancy in a public health clinic. J Midwifery Womens Health 2009, 54:27-34.
• [16]Kennedy HP, Farrell T, Paden R, Hill S, Jolivet R, Willetts J, Rising SS: "I wasn't alone"-a study of group prenatal care in the military. J Midwifery Womens Health 2009, 54:176-183.
• [17]Novick G, Sadler LS, Kennedy HP, Cohen SS, Groce NE, Knafl KA: Women's experience of group prenatal care. Qual Health Res 2011, 21:97-116.
• [18]Heidegger M: Being and time. London: SCM Press; 1962.
• [19]Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001, 358:483-488.
• [20]Teate A, Leap N, Rising SS, Homer CSE: Women's experience of group antenatal care in Australia-the CenteringPregnancy Pilot Study. Midwifery 2011, 27:138-145.
• [21]Sherbourne C, Stewart A: MOS Social Support Survey. Soc Sci Med 1991, 32:705-714.
• [22]Brookings JB, Bolton B: Confirmatory factor analysis of the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List. Am J Community Psychol 1988, 16:137-147.
• [23]Bogossian FE: Social support: proposing a conceptual model for application to midwifery practice. Women & Birth: Journal of the Australian College of Midwives 2007, 20:169-173.
• [24]Hobfoll SE, Leiberman JR: Personality and social resources in immediate and continued stress resistance among women. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987, 52:18-26.
• [25]Coffman S, Ray MA: Mutual intentionality: a theory of support processes in pregnant African American women. Qual Health Res 1999, 9:479-492.
• [26]Coffman S, Ray MA: African American women describe support processes during high-risk pregnancy and postpartum. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002, 31:536-544.
• [27]Logsdon MC: Social support for pregnant and postpartum women. Not specified: Association for Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses; 2000.
• [28]Rising SS: Centering Pregnancy: an interdisciplinary model of empowerment. J Nurse Midwifery 1998, 43:46-54.
• [29]Hodnett ED, Fredericks S, Weston J: Support during pregnancy for women at increased risk of low birthweight babies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 6. 2010.
• [30]Logsdon MC, Gagne P, Hughes T, Patterson J, Rakestraw V: Social support during adolescent pregnancy: piecing together a quilt. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2005, 34:606-614.
• [31]Campos B, Schetter CD, Abdou CM, Hobel CJ, Glynn LM, Sandman CA: Familialism, social support, and stress: positive implications for pregnant Latinas. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 2008, 14:155-162.
• [32]Bolen JS: Goddesses in older women: Archetypes in women over fifty. New York: HarperCollins; 2001.
• [33]Sacred Moon: [http://www.sacredmoon.com.au/CirclesofWomen.htm] webciteCircles of women: Sacred space for feminine spirit - womanhood in a community of women. 2011.