| BMC Psychiatry | |
| Comparative psychometric analyses of the SCL-90-R and its short versions in patients with affective disorders | |
| Sylke Andreas5  Christoph Braukhaus2  Franz Petermann1  Holger Schulz3  Detlev O Nutzinger2  Ulrich Prinz4  | |
| [1] Center for Clinical Psychology and Rehabilitation, University of Bremen, Bremen, D-28359, Germany;Psychosomatic Clinic, Bad Bramstedt, Bad Bramstedt, D-24576, Germany;Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany;Center of Psychiatric Care Rickling, Rickling, D - 24635, Germany;Institute of Psychology, University of Klagenfurt, A-9020 Klagenfurt, Austria | |
| 关键词: Symptom severity; Affective disorder; Psychometric; Short versions; SCL-90-R; | |
| Others : 1124090 DOI : 10.1186/1471-244X-13-104 |
|
| received in 2012-07-27, accepted in 2013-03-16, 发布年份 2013 | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background
Despite the widespread application of Symptom Checklist 90-R (SCL-90-R), its psychometric weaknesses have repeatedly been noted. This study aimed to comparatively assess the psychometric properties of the SCL-90-R scales and the scales of its short versions Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Symptom Checklist-27 (SCL-27), Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18), Symptom Checklist-14 (SCL-14), and Symptom Checklist short version-9 (SCL-K-9) in patients with affective disorders.
Methods
The data of 2,727 patients within the main treatment group of affective disorders were assessed according to the DSM-IV. Patients completed the SCL-90-R and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).
Results
There were no significant differences regarding the internal consistency of the SCL-90-R scales and the scales of the short versions. The dimensional structure was only supported for the short versions BSI-18, SCL-14 and SCL-K-9. The assessment of convergent validity revealed high correlations. With regard to the discriminant validity, there were medium correlations. With regard to the sensitivity of change, no significant differences between the scales were found.
Conclusions
In summary, the scales of the short versions show mostly satisfactory psychometric properties in comparison to the scales of the SCL-90-R. The results support the application of the short versions as screening instruments, especially the BSI-18, and more economic variants of the SCL-90-R covering a wide range of psychopathological symptoms.
【 授权许可】
2013 Prinz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150216060619732.pdf | 207KB |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Derogatis LR: SCL-90-R, administration, scoring and procedures manual-II for the R(evised) version and other instruments of the Psychopathology Rating Scale Series. Townson: Clinical Psychometric Research; 1992.
- [2]Ruiperez MA, Ibanez MI, Lorente E, Moro M, Ortet G: Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the BSI: contributions to the relationship between personality and psychopathology. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 2001, 17:241-250.
- [3]Hessel A, Schumacher J, Geyer M, Brähler E: Symptom-Checkliste SCL-90-R: Testtheoretische Überprüfung und Normierung an einer bevölkerungsrepräsentativen Stichprobe [Symptom-Check-List-90-R: Psychometric evaluation and standardization within a population-based representative sample]. Diagnostica 2001, 47:27-39.
- [4]Derogatis LR (Ed): SCL-90-R: administration, scoring and procedures manual-I for the R(evised) version. Baltimore: John Hopkins University School Medicine; 1977.
- [5]Derogatis LR: The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis: National Computer Services; 1993. 3
- [6]Derogatis LR: The Brief-Symptom-Inventory-18 (BSI-18): administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis. National Computer Systems: MN; 2000.
- [7]Hardt J, Gerbershagen HU: Cross-validation of the SCL-27: a short psychometric screening instrument for chronic pain patients. Eur J Pain 2001, 5:187-197.
- [8]Harfst T, Koch U, Kurtz von Aschoff C, Nutzinger DO, Rüddel H, Schulz H: Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzform der Symptom Checklist-90-R [Development and validation of a short version of the Symptom-Check-List-90-R]. DRV-Schriften 2002, 33:71-73.
- [9]Rosen CS, Drescher KD, Moos RH, Finney JW, Murphy RT, Gusman F: Six- and ten-item indexes of psychological distress based on the Symptom Checklist-90. Psychol Assess 2000, 7:103-111.
- [10]Klaghofer R, Brähler E: Konstruktion und teststatistische Prüfung einer Kurzform der SCL-90-R [Development and psychometric evaluation of a short version of the Symptom-Check-List-90-R]. Z Klin Psychol Psychiatr Psychother 2001, 49:115-124.
- [11]Strand BH, Dalgard OS, Tambs K, Rognerud M: Measuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: a comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5 (SF-36). Nord J Psychiatr 2003, 57:113-118.
- [12]Prinz U, Nutzinger DO, Schulz H, Petermann F, Braukhaus C, Andreas S: Die Symptom-Checkliste-90-R und ihre Kurzversionen: Psychometrische Analysen bei Patienten mit psychischen Erkrankungen [The Symptom-Check-List-90-R and their short versions in patients with mental disorders]. Phys Med Rehab Kuror 2008, 18:337-343.
- [13]Andrews G, Henderson S: Prevalence, comorbidity, disability and service utilisation - overview of the Australian National Health Survey. Br J Psychiatry 2001, 178:145-153.
- [14]Jacobi F, Wittchen H-U, Hölting C, Höfler M, Pfister H, Müller N, Lieb R: Prevalence, comorbidity and correlates of mental disorders in the general population: results from the German Health Interview and Examination Survey (GHS). Psychol Med 2004, 34:597-611.
- [15]Schulz H, Barghaan D, Harfst T, Koch U: Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes - Psychotherapeutische Versorgung [Health related reporting in Germany - Mental health care]. Volume 41. Berlin: Robert-Koch-Institut; 2008.
- [16]Hautzinger M, Bailer M, Worrall H, Keller F: Das Beck Depressionsinventar (BDI). Bern: Huber; 1995.
- [17]American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DSM-IV. Washington: DC: APA; 1994.
- [18]Franke G: SCL-90-R. Die Symptom Checkliste von L.R. Derogatis - Manual zur Deutschen Version [SCL-90-R. The Symptom-Checklist by L.R. Derogatis - manual of the German version]. 2nd edition. : Beltz; 2002.
- [19]Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock JE, Erbaugh JT: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961, 4:561-571.
- [20]Nunnaly J: Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
- [21]Arbuckle JL: Amos 4.0 (Computer program). Chicago: SPSS; 1999.
- [22]Hu L, Bentler PM: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999, 6:1-55.
- [23]Little R, Rubin D: Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: John Wiley; 2002.
- [24]Cohen J: Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence; 1988.
- [25]Franke GH: Brief Symptom Inventory von L.R. Derogatis (Kurzform der SCL-90-R) - Deutsche Version - Manual. Beltz Test: Göttingen; 2002.
- [26]Hayes JA: What does the brief symptom inventory measure in college and university counseling center clients? J Couns Psychol 1997, 44:360-367.
- [27]Johnson LC, Murphy SA, Dimond M: Reliability, construct validity, and subscale norms of the brief symptom inventory when administered to bereaved parents. J Nurs Meas 1996, 4:117-127.
- [28]Benishek LA, Hayes CM, Bieschke KJ, Stoffelmayr BE: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the brief symptom inventory among substance abusers. J Subst Abuse 1998, 10(2):103-114.
- [29]Bonynge ER: Unidimensionality of SCL-90-R scales in adult and adolescent crisis samples. J Clin Psychol 1993, 49(2):212-215.
PDF